Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 4:43 am
LOL.In post 521, singletonking wrote:Actually I can explain my TW read now
TW was signal hunting, something inapplicable in this game because of this.
LOL.In post 521, singletonking wrote:Actually I can explain my TW read now
TW was signal hunting, something inapplicable in this game because of this.
BNS also stands for Big Naked Scarecrows
nvm this veto was goodIn post 501, Baked Nips wrote:Take a chill pill peeps. We never said you were lock scum. We think there is one scum between Chara and Insomnia, but not both of them. We’re tryna find out which, best way to do that is make em fail a mission. Theres also other Resistance style strategies I’m implementing here, but I don’t wanna let my secrets loose and let scum know what I’m trying to do so you’ll just have to trust me on this, I know the game.In post 422, Chito and Yuuri wrote:Baked Nips literally had not even said my name in this game before deciding I was so lock scum they would include not one but BOTH of the other people from the first failed mission in their team? What even is this game
-Dil Lebbie
When you google shtick, the first two words in the definition are “a” and “gimmick” broooooIn post 523, the worst wrote:a shtick is a characteristic kind of gimmick fam
read the rest of the definition duuuuudeIn post 529, Baked Nips wrote:When you google shtick, the first two words in the definition are “a” and “gimmick” broooooIn post 523, the worst wrote:a shtick is a characteristic kind of gimmick fam
The day one.In post 532, insomnia wrote:Town should seriously analyse how the team was formed and who advocated for it, interactions and determine who the scum was on the mission because that's information. Solid. Information.
Yes.. But after two vetoes and one pass I'm not sure this really stacks up..? Your slot is under pressure. If you're town could you please try this in practice rather than blasting us with theory?In post 532, insomnia wrote:Town should seriously analyse how the team was formed and who advocated for it, interactions and determine who the scum was on the mission because that's information. Solid. Information.
Looks that way.In post 2, Morality wrote:• You are separate from the Kira thread, you do not know them, but they know you. During either the Third or Fourth Task Force Mission Success/Fail phase, you may find out how many Succeed and Fails there are.Once per game, you may choose to switch a single one of them.You may do this by PM’ing the mod. You cannot change your own Success/Fail card.
I only see what I want to see maaaaaaaanIn post 530, the worst wrote:read the rest of the definition duuuuudeIn post 529, Baked Nips wrote:When you google shtick, the first two words in the definition are “a” and “gimmick” broooooIn post 523, the worst wrote:a shtick is a characteristic kind of gimmick fam
Well TLK and Chito are town. I’m town as well but I know no one likes to believe that so I won’t propose me for the solid townblock. Worst, if you’re town then we have our four but you’ll have to convince the thread because I think a lot of them aren’t buying itIn post 469, the worst wrote:4p towncore wins the game we just need a solid ass towncore
FWIW It’s really fast readingIn post 505, singletonking wrote:Had stuff to do, I'll be catching up tomorrow.
I'd appreciate having the activity toned down, I can't read a lot of pages and I won't be able to catch up at this rate
So this is guaranteed to contain scum from Chito's perspective, but not from a spectator's perspectiveIn post 414, Chito and Yuuri wrote:OK so why the fuck are you proposing a team that is guaranteed to have scum on it?In post 387, Baked Nips wrote:Uhh I believe we are proposing proposing it. Not proposing to propose. That’s a waste of time.
We would like to see
TLK
Insomnia
Chara
BNS
VOTE: VETO
Why did no one shut this down earlier? So bad
Even so from a spec pov that has a 2/3 chance of containing the scum from the previous mission. If you allow that Chito is playing his towngame: is has a >2/3 chance of containing the scum from the previous missionIn post 548, singletonking wrote:So this is guaranteed to contain scum from Chito's perspective, but not from a spectator's perspectiveIn post 414, Chito and Yuuri wrote:OK so why the fuck are you proposing a team that is guaranteed to have scum on it?In post 387, Baked Nips wrote:Uhh I believe we are proposing proposing it. Not proposing to propose. That’s a waste of time.
We would like to see
TLK
Insomnia
Chara
BNS
VOTE: VETO
Why did no one shut this down earlier? So bad