Right, with the lack of names, I assumed that when vettrock said "he", he was talking about Teapot. But "he" must have meant Albert, who we already know was town. So that probably doesn't say anything about Teapot.
On the one hand I agree that it feels a little unfair and somewhat unreliable to look at log in times. But the one rule that is bolded tells me to play to my win condition, and gaining information is critical to that goal, even if the information isn't perfect. And it's not cheating; this is public information, not much different from the times when someone says "(Player) has posted in other games but is lurking here." There's a discussion to be had about this, but it belongs in Mafia Discussion after this game is over.
No one's vote should be based solely on someone having been logged in during that time, if only because there were multiple people whose times were between the previous vote count and the kill and multiple people whose times were hidden. Also, I've made mistakes based on things like that before. But as long as the Mod doesn't say it's not allowed, it's fair to mention it, and because of the way vettrock reacted, I think it may help in the long term.
I think the most relevant considerations for Sup-Zero's alignment would be his end of day discussion with Albert, which I apologize for cutting short. There's also what Albert said:
↑ Albert B. Rampage wrote:It looks like you voted for archaebob, realized he looked too townie, and then hammered him to get rid of a loose end and frame me with the same stone. Your reads and suspicions are all wrong. Your interactions with texcat and vet look like you're buddies.
I want to look into that at some point, but I won't be assuming it's correct solely on the basis that it came from Albert.
Sup, when you said that Astinus would be a good person to look at, can you explain in what way you looked at them? A random-looking vote doesn't mean a lot.
