Mafiascum.net

In post 598, insomnia wrote:Take notes of the current leading wagons if wilky flips scum at some point

He’s defending someone by deflecting or he wants to be town read himself for the lack of content.

In post 595, BrightEyedFish wrote:

In post 590, wilky wrote:

In post 589, BrightEyedFish wrote:This whole case on insomnia started after his mass claim thing. Mass claiming is stupid for town. I don't think scum!insomnia pushes that.
However, what I got out of his massclaim push is the reactions from wilky and Sheldon.
Suggesting massclaim especially on D1 gives scum a perfect out to put pressure on insomnia.

So that leads me to believe scum is in wilky andor Sheldon.

I feel fine about finally placing a vote.

VOTE: Wilky

My case doesn't include the mass claim though lol

I said that's where the case started.

In post 603, wilky wrote:

In post 595, BrightEyedFish wrote:

In post 590, wilky wrote:

In post 589, BrightEyedFish wrote:This whole case on insomnia started after his mass claim thing. Mass claiming is stupid for town. I don't think scum!insomnia pushes that.
However, what I got out of his massclaim push is the reactions from wilky and Sheldon.
Suggesting massclaim especially on D1 gives scum a perfect out to put pressure on insomnia.

So that leads me to believe scum is in wilky andor Sheldon.

I feel fine about finally placing a vote.

VOTE: Wilky

My case doesn't include the mass claim though lol

I said that's where the case started.

U got Sheldons views on the mass claim thing, I tried to discuss things with insomnia who has been wholly stand offish from the start. It's unfortunate timing that this is when both me and Insomnia are available but it's definitely not my case on him at all

In post 609, insomnia wrote:I wouldn’t have this conversation with you if I weren’t willing to cooperate

You are the one accusing me and that started with “Work with me” when in reality you want me to get lynched

So..?

In post 611, insomnia wrote:Can you define cooperation for me, I don’t remeber it being : Vote the person that you want to cooperate with, make a scum case against them and when they are taking a 1v1 because you accused them, accuse them further by saying THEY don’t want to cooperate

In post 612, wilky wrote:

In post 611, insomnia wrote:Can you define cooperation for me, I don’t remeber it being : Vote the person that you want to cooperate with, make a scum case against them and when they are taking a 1v1 because you accused them, accuse them further by saying THEY don’t want to cooperate

Right at the start you said to come back to you at L-1. You then told me your mind hasnt changed on BEF but your reasons for stating you townread him are contradictory.

I think cooperation is being honest with one another and putting all cards on the table which you haven't done.

In post 614, insomnia wrote:

In post 612, wilky wrote:

In post 611, insomnia wrote:Can you define cooperation for me, I don’t remeber it being : Vote the person that you want to cooperate with, make a scum case against them and when they are taking a 1v1 because you accused them, accuse them further by saying THEY don’t want to cooperate

Right at the start you said to come back to you at L-1. You then told me your mind hasnt changed on BEF but your reasons for stating you townread him are contradictory.

I think cooperation is being honest with one another and putting all cards on the table which you haven't done.

I admitted I scum read BEF after saying I town read him

I did put everything on the table

And now you’re using that “everything” to accuse me

In post 554, wilky wrote:

In post 553, insomnia wrote:

In post 550, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:

In post 530, insomnia wrote:Hol’ up two newbies leading the game isn’t good I’ll wait for thoughts

I am serious about mass claim though to be completely honest

This is going to be one of the games where town lynches town if we don’t give roles

Golly gosh this is concerning

What’s so concerning about it?

I think the fact you cant see what's concerning about it is even more concerning. If you're town you gotta think about what would happen in the situation of a d1 mass claim

In post 556, wilky wrote:@Insomnia can you provide any benefits on a d1 mass claim? I can think of 1 but the 1 benefit is far beaten by the many flaws.

In post 559, wilky wrote:That's a good spot actually. Insomnia where did that U-turn stem from?

In post 560, wilky wrote:Insomnias vote is still on a town read aswell why is that?

VOTE: Insomnia

In post 564, wilky wrote:

In post 562, insomnia wrote:I told you. Everyone was saying my push was garbage, nobody backed me up on it.

If townies don’t see what I see then me tunneling BEF is unproductive and it lets scum slip under the radar. It would be an anti-town thing for me to keep tunneling BEF because I am the most active person in here. Imagine having a 1v1 with someone that has 40 posts per day on average. People can grab some popcorn and scum can chill in PT scum hunting prs

That doesn't = Town!BEF though does it? It just means you would be scum reading someone that others are reading as town.

By all means a tunnel could be avoided but scum are more likely to fall in line than town.

In post 565, wilky wrote:BEF was also lead wagon at one point

In post 566, wilky wrote:

In post 563, insomnia wrote:Pm me when I get at L-1

Is this you saying that you aren't willing to discuss?

In post 618, Creature wrote:This is going too fast...

In post 620, Creature wrote:Dunno still Shiidaji is scum