Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 2:51 am
I meant only ABR is in group 2/3 who is voting group 1.
I feel presentIn post 490, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:youre hardly present
I only remember like one of your posts off the top of my head
The difference is that they seemed to be trying to analyze the incorrect set-up and you only mentioned that it wasn't what you thought it was.In post 497, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Why is adorable town for not being aware of the setup but not me?In post 459, Raya36 wrote:Adorable seems like obvious lynchbait to me and their first post suggests they aren't aware of the set-up which scum would be. That could be a fake "slip" of course but based on the rest of their play I just don't think they would do that.
This feels like a very contrived reason to townread Adorable.
In short: you do not understand my texts and the tone I am using seems to emphasize quantity instead of quality in your point of view, which seems to conveys the message in a confused/insubstantial way. Correct ?In post 594, Mohab500 wrote:Clidd, I don't really think I am getting much from what you write. I'll admit it could very well just be the meta, and I only looked at your meta briefly, but it seems a little excessive this game. 153 for example, this post means nothing and gets across nothing, you write way too much and 'analyze' way too much for it to have this much holes. 182 is another one where it seems deliberately made to be confusing, meaningless, full of contradictions or otherwise just full of random assumptions meant to mislead us. So yeah, another hunch.In post 452, clidd wrote:Mohab, could you explain what you found scummy about my slot ? I feel like my eyes will end up ignoring your posts if I don’t understand how you’re interpreting group 2 individually.In post 428, Mohab500 wrote:
who do you think is the 3rd scum if there is only 2 scum in group 1.In post 605, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Trust me, voting group 1 offers our easiest chance to win this and go home.
I think it is mohab.In post 607, enomis wrote:who do you think is the 3rd scum if there is only 2 scum in group 1.In post 605, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Trust me, voting group 1 offers our easiest chance to win this and go home.
I think he is town though. Well, we can leave this to day 2 if we are still alive then and we manage to lynch group 1.In post 609, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think it is mohab.In post 607, enomis wrote:who do you think is the 3rd scum if there is only 2 scum in group 1.In post 605, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Trust me, voting group 1 offers our easiest chance to win this and go home.
I think it depends on the flips, I might completely change my mind after we have more info.In post 610, enomis wrote:I think he is town though. Well, we can leave this to day 2 if we are still alive then and we manage to lynch group 1.In post 609, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think it is mohab.In post 607, enomis wrote:who do you think is the 3rd scum if there is only 2 scum in group 1.In post 605, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Trust me, voting group 1 offers our easiest chance to win this and go home.
I hope we win straight away though.
what does this even meanIn post 613, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Group 3 is for in-betweeners afraid of taking risks but still want to hit at least 1 scum maybe.
Isn't that kinda a good thing?In post 613, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Group 3 is for in-betweeners afraid of taking risks but still want to hit at least 1 scum maybe.
This is a good point. Because of this I'll consider group 1 but first I need to actually find 2 or 3 people on it I actually think are scum and so far I'm mostly only seeing scummy players in group 3.In post 617, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The fact that no one from group 2 or 3 has hammered group 1 pretty much confirms my theory of minimal scum in groups 2-3.