Fixed list:
Budja (Niel Perry, Miller)
DDD (Rita Bennet, Vanilla)
chamber (James Doakes, cop)
Sociopath (Tony Tucci, Vanilla)
Sotty7 (Dexter, Restricted Vigilante)
Jebus (Angel Batista, doublevoter)
My next bit is based on these tidbits:
-I know myself to be town aligned. (Fact)
-Dexter (Sotty) is town aligned. (Assumption)
-chamber is town aligned. (Assumption)
-chamber is telling the truth about his actions. (Assumption)
-We had two people killed N1. (Fact)
-We had two people killed N2. (Fact)
-Sotty couldn't kill N1. (Assumption)
-Sotty did kill N2. (Assumption)
-Jorge and Dr. Emmeret are part of one scumteam. (Assumption)
-The rule DEX-3 exists.
DEX-3) Vote counts will list the names of players voting for a particular player. A pre-determined condition for "arrest" has been decided upon. Because of this, votes should be placed with care. You have been warned.
(Fact)
-The rule DEX-3 is a real rule. (Assumption)
First, on the killing discrepancy:
-Everyone is telling the truth, there is an SK (Ice Truck Killer)
-Either the mafia (human traffikers) or the ITK did not kill N2.
-The mafia (human traffikers) could not kill N2 because LL was their last player.
-Sotty is not telling the truth about her actions.
I'm leaning towards the first two being correct - which would imply a third human traffiker (maybe Valerie?). At the same time, the third is also plausible. As for the last, while the possibility exists, I see no reason for Sotty not to tell the truth.
Second is on the chamber's results discrepancy.
-chamber is telling the truth - this means there's a Framer or something.
-chamber is telling the truth, but has sanity issues - naivety is most likely.
-chamber is not telling the truth, but is still town.
-chamber is not telling the truth and is scum.
I lean towards option one or two - three seems somewhat unlikely, and four seems very unlikely at this point.
Third is the number of votes to lynch. I'm believing that Dex-3 doesn't have much to do with voting roles, and more towards the idea that each person has a set of conditions on how they get lynched, as the rule suggests. Eg, this person is lynched if person A and B are on their wagon, or this person automatically takes one more/less vote to lynch. Something like that.
Budja wrote:I agree with DDD.
We have at least two scum, almost certainly SK and mafia, left.
If we mis-lynch today, we could reach a prisoners dilemma at worst (baring special mechanics).
vote Jebus
Best target IMO.
I disagree that this is a good move. I have a voting ability. So does Sotty. If we do have 2 scum left in 6 players (which I don't find unlikely), I think it'd be best if we kept the number of votes in the town higher - what causes people to be endgamed isn't the number of people, it's the number of votes.
On that note, I think it'd be a good idea to rule out Sotty, chamber, and myself for today's lynch. In addition, I find budja to be town, and as a D1-claimed miller, he fits the bill well. That leaves our Vanilla townies, DDD and Socio. I'm cool with lynching either of them.
Bastard ModGod. Mislynch fodder. Suave savior.