Page 26 of 27
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:19 am
by ShadowLurker
Day is almost go, all but 1 choices received and talked to stark today.
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 5:18 pm
by MeMe
Is this dead? Someone please fill me in on why this has been in night for so long.
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:53 pm
by ShadowLurker
I am unable to resolve night choices. stark has them and stark has been inactive.
If you want I can try to resolve Night Choices although I may mess something up.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:19 am
by MeMe
Let's call it.
Time of death: 12:19 p.m. EST.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:22 am
by mith
So, were you scum, Yos?
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:33 am
by Save The Dragons
My scum group:
Cos Tangent
Sin Tangent
That's me and VisMaior.
That's it.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:36 am
by Thok
Just for clarification; the protown tell I found on stikey was in his very first post, when he claimed that his role didn't really depend on any higher math. That seemed like something scum wouldn't know, and would be likely to guess wrong about/wouldn't reveal day 1 given the theme.
(Also, my role had a weird component to it also; I could only block people who posted on a multiple of 10, or a number whose digits summed to 10. I found this to be inconsistent with armlx's claim, since how would random player X know to do that if they were just given a power?)
I blocked Yos2 Night 1.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:51 am
by Glork
I also had Yos pegged as my other scumbag at this point in the game.
Glad to know I was right about Vis-StD, though.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:59 am
by Glork
My other thought was still that BA/Timmy were tying to dupe us with a huge gambit.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:01 am
by mith
Yeah, that would've had to get some serious consideration if the one of them didn't die.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:07 am
by Brutal Assassin
No, but if we were scum that would have been one hell of a bandit. lmao
For the record, no-one should EVER, EVER make a post where a player can only post on multiples of 3 or 4 :/
We had a good deal of backstory we could have shared to prove too.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:32 am
by Smashy
Ok, I'll admit that my role was super-complicated too. If we're allowed to quote our role PM's, I'll do just that. In shorthand, I was
Subtraction
. Picked an A and B, and B got the opposite of A's powers, but would be told they had A's original power (aka if A was vig, B would be told they had vig but they'd protect instead). Seeing as I could find no confirmation of any effects happening (and I've forgotten my night choices.
So... dahen or Yos for last scum?
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:35 am
by Smashy
Also, slap a big 'I think' on that role.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:02 am
by dahen
Smashy, you were pretty obvious with those hints of subtraction.
I was cop, the Equalizer himself. Guilty on Vis, pro-town on Glork. Last night I investigated Stikey without any results.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:02 am
by mith
Wow.
I mean, if that role was actually used as I think it's intended, what's the point of it? The only good that could come of it is if you picked a scum as A and a doc as B, and A used the "protection" on his partner. Otherwise, it's pretty much a crapshoot.
But the gaping hole is that you could have just claimed it, and then you're as broken as I was.
(Also, our roles state that B would get an "either or" on abilities, but at least for me on night 1, I used my normal ability to get a doc power off Glork, and then used that protection. So it wasn't consistent with what was stated. And if it *had* been consistent, they were paradoxical.)
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:04 am
by mith
Sorry, that was at Smashy.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:47 am
by Smashy
That's what I was actually trying for. Not sure if anyone got any PMs when you or I used our abilities, so I have no clue how this would have resolved. Then again, I could have possibly been roleblocked by Glork's ability for all I know.
I just want to stop thinking about this game's mechanics already.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:08 am
by Yosarian2
Hah...I knew you were scum, STD.
I was the SK. With a minor extra ability I never got to use.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:31 am
by Smashy
Wait there was a SK after all? o.o
Vote: Yos
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:54 am
by mith
Well, I know the game was horribly broken, but it looks like we nailed the scum without actually having to make use of the broken-ness. I call it a win.
(I still haven't got the slightest idea why I found Yos so scummy. I'll have to remember to look at this game again next time I play with him, see if I can figure it out.)
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:56 am
by Yosarian2
mith wrote:Well, I know the game was horribly broken, but it looks like we nailed the scum without actually having to make use of the broken-ness. I call it a win.
You neva would have manged to get me lynched.
At least not after I lynched STD.
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:35 am
by mith
STD was at -1 for about a decade. You finishing him off after all that time wouldn't have bought you much.
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:41 am
by Glork
mith wrote:I still haven't got the slightest idea why I found Yos so scummy.
Welcome to my scumhunting world... seriously.
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:30 am
by mith
Yeah, some people hunt like this. Just not me, usually, and it frustrates me when I can't explain my suspicions.
Well done on VM/StD, btw. I'd
like
to say I was too busy focusing on Yos-scum to bother with StD, but really I just had no read on him at all.
(If nothing else, I'm glad VM finally turned up scum when I went after him. I think I always find him scummy.
Of course, he was toast anyway, between Glork and dahen's investigation.)
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 5:36 am
by Yosarian2
mith wrote:STD was at -1 for about a decade. You finishing him off after all that time wouldn't have bought you much.
Actually, I've been voting for him for most of that time.