Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 8:51 pm
I'll reconsider if the mod confirms it's a mistake.In post 622, implosion wrote:I was assuming the "day two" thing was just a mistake and I don't understand why anyone thinks it isn't?
I'll reconsider if the mod confirms it's a mistake.In post 622, implosion wrote:I was assuming the "day two" thing was just a mistake and I don't understand why anyone thinks it isn't?
They both died during the night. As a member of the NRG I know that there is no such thing as dying at the start of the day.In post 621, Almost50 wrote:N_M died at night, PP died at the start of the day. The two did not die "simultaneously". I thought YOU should explain that as a member of the NRG.
based on...?In post 621, Almost50 wrote:and the way PP plays Weak Hider is NOT to try and survive, but rather as a one-shot Cop.
Hiding behind N_M without crumbing it would be much much worse play, don't you think? Like, you're a WEAK role and you don't crumb your target??In post 626, implosion wrote:N_M makes sense as a target; open 806 just ended where Penguin incorrectly townread N_M but his play this game IMO was a bit starkly different from that one (hence me saying I lightly townread him).
Gonna have to call BS on this. I've been mis-exed because people thought that a hider visited me, the person they had been pushing all day.In post 621, Almost50 wrote:ISO PP. He voted implo in RVS, was focused on him all day, and revoted him to reassert his crumb.
PP character. He even OUTED he was the Weak Hider when he promptly responded to Artimiana's fake claim with one word: Liar (tell me you didn't notice that too)In post 630, implosion wrote:based on...?In post 621, Almost50 wrote:and the way PP plays Weak Hider is NOT to try and survive, but rather as a one-shot Cop.
So to sum this up.In post 621, Almost50 wrote:ISO PP. He voted implo in RVS, was focused on him all day, and revoted him to reassert his crumb. He voted STD afterwards for a short period (which I don't think is the true crumb, but can't rule it out) and then he switched to Artimiana.
You don't think PP would go into the night without crumbing his target, would you? Now unless you think "Pooky is town" was the actual crumb (in which case shame on PP) or the "Lying clodpole" was a reference to him targeting N_M, I can't seem to find anything more telling than PP SRing implo and spending the whole day arguing he was Scum.
ALSO, Pooky -if Town- is/was a prime NK target himself, so PP would not have hid behind him regardless. N_M was early on the wagon so is unlikely to be suspected by PP too, and the way PP plays Weak Hider is NOT to try and survive, but rather as a one-shot Cop.
Didn't you just point out the "lying clodpole" thing as a potential N_M crumb?In post 631, Almost50 wrote:Hiding behind N_M without crumbing it would be much much worse play, don't you think?
In a game with only 2 members for the main Scum team, AND a flipped Scum on D1???In post 632, Something_Smart wrote:News flash, hiders want to not visit scum. You do not hide behind a person you're scumreading. That's terrible play.
coolIn post 637, Almost50 wrote:You all know what? This is my solve and I'm going to let you all decide whom to eliminate. I am no longer going to argue, and I am not moving my vote. Good Luck
OK, so I am wrong, but I'm also stubborn. You solve the game, and I will keep my vote where I want it to be.In post 635, Something_Smart wrote:Didn't you just point out the "lying clodpole" thing as a potential N_M crumb?In post 631, Almost50 wrote:Hiding behind N_M without crumbing it would be much much worse play, don't you think?
I also disagree to that. This monkey is a shit player. Don't listen to him EVER.In post 636, Dunnstral wrote:I disagree that penguin crumbed that he was going to hide behind implosion
In post 625, Almost50 wrote:I'll reconsider if the mod confirms it's a mistake.In post 622, implosion wrote:I was assuming the "day two" thing was just a mistake and I don't understand why anyone thinks it isn't?
Are we distancing already?
Okie dokie. Now, one more question: Did he die hiding behind N_M??In post 645, Rockhopper wrote:In post 625, Almost50 wrote:I'll reconsider if the mod confirms it's a mistake.In post 622, implosion wrote:I was assuming the "day two" thing was just a mistake and I don't understand why anyone thinks it isn't?My bad for phrasing it like that. PP died on N1 and was found dead at the start of D2.