just in case we are both town and just having trouble understanding each other, I'm going to take this very slow and make it detailed.
Please reply in kind so we can find out if we can understand each other or not.
don_johnson wrote:
what is your interest in protecting ddd?
his is the only claim I can believe without hesitation. The other three are all hella scummy to me. Your's especially.
What evidence do you have on ddd? He hasn't been active? When I ran the numbers about a week ago:
Code: Select all
player words posts words/posts
jvw 3753 47 79.8510638297872
DDD 5523 48 115.0625
d_j 4760 46 103.478260869565
muh 4716 59 79.9322033898305
Adel 7924 68 116.529411764706
he was the second most active player after myself. Better yet, when I read through the game using my vote record diagram, each of his posts make sense to me coming from the POV of a vanilla townie. IMHO he is the player most likely to be town.
Everyone was inactive in this game, mostly. All of the town players are at fault for that. You pointing a finger at DDD for a lack of activity is totally hypocritical in my eyes. Only recently have you been active. If a lack of activity = scummy, then your suspicion of me doesn't make sense, and you should be suspicious of muh and jvw over DDD for lack of activity. Your application of your logic is inconsistent.
Even worse, your explanations just don't make sense. For instance this one
don_johnson in 634 wrote:adel wrote:which posts did Liam express fear of you in?
his late switch to a town wagon and his "sideways" comment about me. he seemed to be setting up his run for the next day while knowingly lynching a townie.
doesn't answer the question. So I asked you for specific post numbers so I could look at the evidence that led you to that conclusion.
Adel in 635 wrote:don_johnson wrote:adel wrote:which posts did Liam express fear of you in?
his late switch to a town wagon and his "sideways" comment about me. he seemed to be setting up his run for the next day while knowingly lynching a townie.
post numbers, please.
to which you replied
don_johnson in 637 wrote:very easy to find, bro. his last few iso posts before i shot him. 496 is entirely hypocritical.
which still doesn't answer the question regarding which of Liam's posts he expressed fear of you in. But it at least points me in the direction of 496.
Liam totally doesn't express fear of you in 496.
Adel in 638 wrote:don_johnson wrote:very easy to find, bro. his last few iso posts before i shot him. 496 is entirely hypocritical.
I call that scumfail:
CallMeLiam in 496 wrote:don_johnson wrote:^^ this is terrible. Adel's next.
someone hammer this home.
What do you mean by these two things? You seem to think Adel's vote is scummy, but you also want someone to hammer?
don_johnson in 497 wrote:CallMeLiam wrote:don_johnson wrote:^^ this is terrible. Adel's next.
someone hammer this home.
What do you mean by these two things? You seem to think Adel's vote is scummy, but you also want someone to hammer?
the logic is terrible. using a mod post to determine your vote is heinous.
also: Adel is scummy regardless of the flip. ABR wants out, a replacement is more work for the mod regardless of alignment. grant the wish. if he's scum, great, if he's not then Adel is 100%.
if he thought that 496 was so scummy, he wouldn't have made 497.
so when I reread your claim
don_johnson in 534 wrote:bulletproof vigilante
1. kill (1-shot)
2. bullet proof vest, bullet proof vest
3. none
4. town
5. call me liam for vig kill
6. same reason as suspicion of josh. fear of nk immune player. only scum fear 'em.
7. ddd
the reason for your night move totally doesn't make sense to me.
Muh's reasons for protecting you don't make sense either, but he wasn't sitting on an unclaimed kill.