best bit of sass EVER! .....This maybe the best bit of FU I have seen in mafia...VIS( your points are perfect) I think Coolbot did not give this game the attension it deservedVisMaior wrote:Oh, yes, right. Well, here is your first 9 posts, all your posts until I called you a nonissueposter.
Well, not much to say about this one.Phoebus, why are you so concerned about an early vote? Most initial votes are meaningless. Is it really that big a deal Pooky didn't include "OMGUS" or "random" with his vote?
Phoebus is acting pretty touchy, to both Pookie and VisMaior. I don't ever remember him acting in this way, so I suspect something amiss.
vote: Phoebus
Ok, 180 degrees turn, bt I guess thats not much either so early.
No point, really. Well, a bit of a reasoning behind of your vote, almost nothing. Your vote was not very well grounded. I told you that Phoebus took his temper from friendsandenemies over here, so we should not take these as scumsign.Phoebus, you're reactions have been overboard in this game. Noting that fact is not metagaming. If you had a history of this sort of thing, I may've let it go. But you don't, so I won't.
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
Why haven't we lynched the Phoebie yet?
Having read the thread again, the discussion regarding Phoebus stopped with david's bizarre attack on MeMe. I would not be suprised if he was trying to deflect the attenion off of Phoebus.
This I found as fairly strange at the time. You attack DAS on the assumption that Phoebus is scum. It seems to me like a try to smear some on DAS. Also, a try to push the Phoebus wagon further.This has no point either. Post for the sake of posting.Pooky, my vote is already on Phoebus. I can't really do more.
I dont find much analysys in this one either.I'm not sure lurker hunting is the way to go now. Aureal's right; mikeburn's reactions have been over the top.
vote: mikeburnfireThis struck me as odd back then. You call out DAS again...david, why are you focusing on MeMe? She didn't lynch Phoebus alone.
Backing off?david, I am not attacking you or your style. I am asking you a question for clarification. Why are you interested in MeMe over Pooky, CA, or me? On the face, it doesn't seem consistent. All I want to know is if I missed something.
Sinking back to the image of a noninteresting person. Joining the calls for a lurkerprod/replacement.I'd like swinkee replaced, too. His abcence is starting to hold up the game.This post is also devoid of content.davidangelsummer wrote:
Coolbot, I do think it is in hand...Im happy to find you posting ,but I responded to your post. Would it be ok I f you responded to mine.
This post is devoid of content. How am I supposed to respond to it?
All in all, you always had some reason to post, yet never really got anywhere. You did not really took part in the discussion, never analyzed. I had the impression you are not motivated in finding scum, so I called you out on that. And you reacted too, ever since then, your style changed. I find these scummy.
Mini 238: Destroy All Humans Mafia - Game Over!
Forum rules
- davidangelsummers
- davidangelsummers
-
davidangelsummers
- It's a Norwegian thing
- It's a Norwegian thing
- Posts: 899
- Joined: January 30, 2005
- CoolBot
- CoolBot
-
CoolBot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: February 24, 2003
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
No point? That wsa a direct response to Phoebus. You may have disagreed with me, but that's a far cry from "nonissue" posting.VisMaior wrote:No point, really. Well, a bit of a reasoning behind of your vote, almost nothing. Your vote was not very well grounded. I told you that Phoebus took his temper from friendsandenemies over here, so we should not take these as scumsign.Phoebus, you're reactions have been overboard in this game. Noting that fact is not metagaming. If you had a history of this sort of thing, I may've let it go. But you don't, so I won't.
So again, I'm addressing an issue in the game.VisMaior wrote:PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
Why haven't we lynched the Phoebie yet?
Having read the thread again, the discussion regarding Phoebus stopped with david's bizarre attack on MeMe. I would not be suprised if he was trying to deflect the attenion off of Phoebus.
This I found as fairly strange at the time. You attack DAS on the assumption that Phoebus is scum. It seems to me like a try to smear some on DAS. Also, a try to push the Phoebus wagon further.
Direct response to something Pooky asked me. Again, not nonissue posting.VisMaior wrote:This has no point either. Post for the sake of posting.Pooky, my vote is already on Phoebus. I can't really do more.
So what? I'm addressing lurker hunts, which was an issue at time, and backing Aureal's logic.VisMaior wrote:I dont find much analysys in this one either.I'm not sure lurker hunting is the way to go now. Aureal's right; mikeburn's reactions have been over the top.
vote: mikeburnfire
Backing off? I asked him a question; I didn't attack him. Though again, not nonissue postingVisMaior wrote:This struck me as odd back then. You call out DAS again...david, why are you focusing on MeMe? She didn't lynch Phoebus alone.
Backing off?david, I am not attacking you or your style. I am asking you a question for clarification. Why are you interested in MeMe over Pooky, CA, or me? On the face, it doesn't seem consistent. All I want to know is if I missed something.
Why is this a bad thing? Swinkee needed to be replaced.VisMaior wrote:Sinking back to the image of a noninteresting person. Joining the calls for a lurkerprod/replacement.I'd like swinkee replaced, too. His abcence is starting to hold up the game.
What more could I say. DAS didn't give any indication what he was talking about. This is the closet I came to nonissue posting, and the only reason was DAS asked me a question and I need more info to respond.VisMaior wrote:This post is also devoid of content.davidangelsummer wrote:
Coolbot, I do think it is in hand...Im happy to find you posting ,but I responded to your post. Would it be ok I f you responded to mine.
This post is devoid of content. How am I supposed to respond to it?
My style changed? How? I wasn't defending myself earlier; I am now. That's tands to reason, though, since I'm being attacked now.VisMaior wrote:All in all, you always had some reason to post, yet never really got anywhere. You did not really took part in the discussion, never analyzed. I had the impression you are not motivated in finding scum, so I called you out on that. And you reacted too, ever since then, your style changed. I find these scummy.
I don't see how all this adds up to nonissue posting. Perhaps I didn't analyse as much as you like, but I generally play things close to the chest.
- CoolBot
- CoolBot
-
CoolBot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: February 24, 2003
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Oh, and DAS, if you're so suspicous of me, why aren't you voting me? You and Vis have both been working together to paint me as nonparticipatory, though there's nothing further from the truth. Yet neither of you seem comfortable in actually voting me. Vis had to be goaded into it, and you still haven't done so. All this waiting around to see if someone else will vote someone first is wasting our time. And scum would surely be doing just that.
vote: Davidangelsumers
though I could easily change that to Vis.- mikeburnfire
- mikeburnfire
-
mikeburnfire
- Flashy
- Flashy
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: September 11, 2005
- Location: confirmed. Sending supplies.
DAS seems very naive. First he says that I have a good case against Vis, then he says Vis has a good case against you (which he really doesn't). Lest we forget that DAS, if telling the truth, is Vigilante, and therefore most important to our survival.
FOS:
Coolbot, as I don't think DAS's commentary was worth a vote."It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill with rope and a slim majority."
Flash Guide to Mafia and Flash Mafia Roles
Yes, as the light fell on you, you immediately jumped out to defend yourself. Participation increased, etc. And nonissueposting, well, while your posts did have connections with discussion points, they did not bring the discussion any further, thus, nonissueposts. I feel your posts lack the analytical parts, and thus, are posts just for the sake of posting. This is a major scumtell in my book.My style changed? How? I wasn't defending myself earlier; I am now. That's tands to reason, though, since I'm being attacked now.
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
- Fishbulb
- Fishbulb
-
Fishbulb
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: West Virginia, US
- Contact:
Sorry, I meant to comment on this before. While my role doesn't say that there is definitely a mind controller out there, it does hint at the possibility in a pretty direct way. So, I would assume that there is one, and that VisMaior is either telling the truth, or he is the mind controller, since he was first to mention it.CoolBot wrote:It occurs to me the only reason to believe we have a mind controller is VisMaior's word. No one claimed to be controlled Day 2, and we can't know about anyone cotrolled this day.
As for the rest of the discussion... I hear what everyone is saying, and agree with both sides of the arguments. I really hope other town are thinking about this situation and can come up with a good lynch. At this point, if it were up to me, I'd have to flip a coin.
[url=http://fishbulb515.blogspot.com/][b]Fishblog![/b][/url]
Uhh. Ok. Im a protown roleblocker. d8p confirms me and I confirm d8p. How could I be scum with DAS, if d8p confirms me?
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
Coolbot
mikeburnfire
davidangelsummers
Fishbulb
d8P
MeMe
VisMaior
Who is voting?
mike votes me
Coolbot votes DAS
I voted Coolbot
Scum could have jumped on those, if there are , in fact, 3 scums left. MeMe is the only one confirmed. It seems we have 2 teams of suspects, me, DAS and d8p in one group, mike and Coolbot in the other. Fishbulb seems like a protown role. Well, what can I say? I claimed to have blocked you Meme, before I knew that you had no nightaction. Were I scum, I could have screwed up horribly, but given that Im not, I did not. What else? Give me your reasons, so I can defend against them, please!
mikeburnfire
davidangelsummers
Fishbulb
d8P
MeMe
VisMaior
Who is voting?
mike votes me
Coolbot votes DAS
I voted Coolbot
Scum could have jumped on those, if there are , in fact, 3 scums left. MeMe is the only one confirmed. It seems we have 2 teams of suspects, me, DAS and d8p in one group, mike and Coolbot in the other. Fishbulb seems like a protown role. Well, what can I say? I claimed to have blocked you Meme, before I knew that you had no nightaction. Were I scum, I could have screwed up horribly, but given that Im not, I did not. What else? Give me your reasons, so I can defend against them, please!
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
- MeMe
- MeMe
-
MeMe
- Post or Perish
- Post or Perish
- Posts: 10710
- Joined: October 6, 2002
- Location: Missouri
- Contact:
One thing you did that really stuck out to me as suspicious was when you said "sleepy wutsisname" in reference to mike's claim. It seemed affected to me -- as though you were going out of your way to make it sound as dumb as possible.
And regarding Fishbulb -- though he's not incredibly
I've also been thinking about the fact that, if you and d8P are both pro-town, the offbeat naming of your roles (cops who are actually blockers) basically forms a second mason-group when claims occur.
And regarding Fishbulb -- though he's not incredibly
high
on my suspicious list at the moment -- I think he's an odd person to pick out as seeming like a "protown role." With a mason group, I think that backups for both doc and blocker seems excessive. Since you have no choice but to claim to believe d8P's claim, I'd think you'd be even more skeptical about Fishbulb. And even if you don't
think it'd be unbalanced to have two back-ups, there's the fact that Fishbulb's claiming backup to a revealed role, making it rather easy for him to match the wording to Aureal's name. So why single him out as protown?I've also been thinking about the fact that, if you and d8P are both pro-town, the offbeat naming of your roles (cops who are actually blockers) basically forms a second mason-group when claims occur.
Remember...It's not a lie if you believe it. -- G. Costanza
the names on the beginning of my previous post are in order of scummyness, and who I believe over the other. I picked fishbulb because I was trying to see the situation from an independent point of view. It seems that i am connected with d8p and DAS while Coolbot is connected with mike. You are confirmed mason, that leaves Fishbulb, who has not made himself connected to any of us.
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
- mikeburnfire
- mikeburnfire
-
mikeburnfire
- Flashy
- Flashy
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: September 11, 2005
- Location: confirmed. Sending supplies.
Stop trying to isolate me into a group with Coolbot. I don't see any connection between us, and mixing your possible scum buddy in with innocents is unnerving.
And I'm not inclined to believe you're connected with DAS. I'm leaning more towards him being innocent.
And I'm not inclined to believe you're connected with DAS. I'm leaning more towards him being innocent.
Wasn't there already a discussion about this? How one shouldn't approach a situation from an independent viewpoint because one alreasy has the knowledge bestowed upon them in their role? Something like that....Vis wrote:I picked fishbulb because I was trying to see the situation from an independent point of view.
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill with rope and a slim majority."
Flash Guide to Mafia and Flash Mafia Roles
What? Did I not answer all your questions?no one seems much to care -- not even the person I'm planning to vote.
O RLY?And I'm not inclined to believe you're connected with DAS.
DAS claimed to have been blocked. IF HE IS INNOCENT, I MUST BE INNOCENT! BECAUSE NOONE COUNTERCLAIMED ME!
Ok, Im the roleblocker, d8p supports me as well. As he claims to be backup roleblocker. Im one of the most confirmeds, except for MEME. To think that I am scum you must also assume D8p is scum, and DAS too. Also, If we dont lynch me, I can prove that I am who I am.
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
- mikeburnfire
- mikeburnfire
-
mikeburnfire
- Flashy
- Flashy
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: September 11, 2005
- Location: confirmed. Sending supplies.
YA RLY
I don't doubt you can 'prove' your role. Just forfeit your scumkill during the Night. Viola'! You've blocked the scum! Automatic tenure!
I am still not convinced that the intentions of your meddlings in others' night abilities is geared toward the benefit of the town. AKA MAFIASCUM-BLOCKER.DAS claimed to have been blocked. IF HE IS INNOCENT, I MUST BE INNOCENT! BECAUSE NOONE COUNTERCLAIMED ME!
I don't doubt you can 'prove' your role. Just forfeit your scumkill during the Night. Viola'! You've blocked the scum! Automatic tenure!
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill with rope and a slim majority."
Flash Guide to Mafia and Flash Mafia Roles
- davidangelsummers
- davidangelsummers
-
davidangelsummers
- It's a Norwegian thing
- It's a Norwegian thing
- Posts: 899
- Joined: January 30, 2005
Im going to go with the flow...Coolbot, if Vis and I are scum then so is D8p.Meme, just finger the person you think does not care.When you post I try and think of a way that a mason could be scum. Cuz you have played a lot of games, and are you are still as sure Mr Naive about who scum is. .. Vis ...I want you to be scum because I then know D8p is scum.
Mike...If you turn out to be scum....fair play. Fish....I had my attension on you, as did many others. With your calim, I cant really understand why your not lynched already. D8p...I cant wait for your post game post....
Now..do you still think im scum........??????????.......
Mike...If you turn out to be scum....fair play. Fish....I had my attension on you, as did many others. With your calim, I cant really understand why your not lynched already. D8p...I cant wait for your post game post....
Now..do you still think im scum........??????????.......
- d8P
- d8P
-
d8P
- The "I told you so" guy
- The "I told you so" guy
- Posts: 833
- Joined: February 16, 2003
- Location: Galway, Ireland
- Contact:
I don't understand the scenario you are proposing - where if DAS is scum you are scum... Where is the logic there? If you are both town, you are not directly associated, merely mutually confirming claims the other made.
But if one of you is scum, you're saying the other is scum? That doesn't follow at all that I can see. I can see that if Vis turned out to be other than a cop blocker that I'd have to be scum too, but I don't see the connection that implies if DAS = scum => Vis = scum or vice versa.
But if one of you is scum, you're saying the other is scum? That doesn't follow at all that I can see. I can see that if Vis turned out to be other than a cop blocker that I'd have to be scum too, but I don't see the connection that implies if DAS = scum => Vis = scum or vice versa.
[size=75]-POST NO BULLS-[/size]
- mikeburnfire
- mikeburnfire
-
mikeburnfire
- Flashy
- Flashy
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: September 11, 2005
- Location: confirmed. Sending supplies.
^ Is that directed at me?
"It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill with rope and a slim majority."
Flash Guide to Mafia and Flash Mafia Roles
Hm, true, DAS is not as strongly connected to me as you. But he did claimed to have been blockes, so its either he is innocent, or he is the hypnotizer. That is exactly why I put him higher on my list than you.
"logic is in the eye of the beholder" -LyingBrian in Eyewitness 1
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia
"correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't the CHANCE of something happening always 50% (either it will or it won't)?" -LyingBrian in BJs Wild West mafia