Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:29 am**

Bahaha we are geniuses.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:30 am**

Interesting.

I think we should end the day

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:30 am**

phew................

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:31 am**

Unless anyone seriously think it’s 1-0-2?

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:32 am**

I am now confirmed town or the only scum in groups 2 and 3 and I just put both my scumbuddies at L-1 twice

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:35 am**

I think there’s virtually no risk in lynching group 1 because I doubt scum made the partitions 1-0-2

I don’t think there’s value in discussing who scum might be in groups 2/3 in case there’s 2 scum in group 1 bc I have no idea who it is

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:35 am**

Let's wait for consensus.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:40 am**

I am still wondering though, who is the scum in Group #1?

Spoiler:

my guess would be D&D and raya but it's pretty baseless.

As for outside of group #1, I'd guess clidd..? I still townlean on group #3 and think it's generally a bad move for scum to put people in there. Easily could just be wrong on group #3 and there is in fact 1 scum in there though

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:42 am**

What even was that experiment lol

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:44 am**

UNVOTE: Groupe 1

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:44 am**

oh woops I was too slow. Glad it worked out.

VOTE: Group 1

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:44 am**

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:50 am**

I think we're ready to nuke pretty much. If there's 2 scum in here, no one's confirmed town for tomorrow, just keep that in mind.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 7:51 am**

If theres 3 scum we are all confirmed town

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 8:11 am**

Adorable

- Avatar is highly manipulative. Underhanded tactics.

Ame

- Jokes are very on point... almost suspiciously so. Probably buddying the thread.

Cat Scratch Fever

- She has cat-GiF!indicative tells. The reduced frequency this game is scum-indicative.

Daenerys and Dragons

- Outdated show. Trying to rekindle past nostalgia to keep us from lynching them.

Hoctac

- He

did

misread his role PM. He just checked, and he's scum... whoops.

Kanna

- Newbscum. Facing away from us in her avatar; a sign of guilt.

Raya36

- Scumslipped by making herself blue in this post. For people unaware: Raya comes from a site where they use blue for scum.

It's time.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:10 am**

Raya reminds me of scum fencesitting a little bit on the group #1 lynch issue. i also dont like her insistence on group #3 bring scum

So if it's gonna be 2-3 scum in group #1, i think thats scum #1

D&D could be scum by PoE, nothing especially scum indictative but if scum does in fact not want group #1 lynched, they're another decent bet

It's possible that there's a group #1 doomsayer scum in group #1 as well. I'm leaning Kanna if so, although not very strongly.

i think its most likely that the final scum is outside group #1 somewhere and i gotta find which townread i had wrong. My main guess is clidd at the moment

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:22 am**

I'm back, reading soon.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:35 am**

In post 374, Mohab500 wrote:
In post 350, Adorable wrote:I also think whoever are scum in this game are trying way too hard to look towny and it is Group 1 who is getting town read alot.
This feels like scum acting like they're scumhunting tbh, this statement adds little to nothing here: we know scum is trying to act like townt so can you please tell us something more discreet? What do you mean by trying too hard to be towny? And was that last part a jab against Group 1 or are you actually defending Group 1?

In post 427, Mohab500 wrote:
In post 238, dsjstr wrote:Part of that has to do with the slip I saw,
In post 13, Morning Tweet wrote:First impressions: i feel that it is unlikely scum placed 2 of themselves in group 2, or 2 of themselves in group 3

That seems like a lot of risk, because at a glance you'd expect us to probably pick group 2 or 3 for the lynch, and it'd be hard to stop it if one of those groups gained traction. all it would take is one scummy member in the group and you'd lose that group and 2/3rds of the scumteam

Whereas if you placed 2+ scum inside group one, it'd likely be easier to steer the lynch away from one to one of the smaller groups.
after all, there's at least 5 town in group one and im sure at least some of them would not want to die

I just realized while writing this that if we lynch group one, and there's zero scum in there, we lose the game immediately. ack!
I just noticed that MT referred to the town as "them" when saying that there are at least 5 town in group 1 and they should not vote for their own group. This seems weird to me and looks like MT could have slipped. If they are town then they

would have included them self as part of the town. Instead he talks about town being other people, now what does this have to do with group 3? If you look at MT's first read list you will notice that Mohab is the only strong town read. I personally

don't see the reasoning to be strong Mohab could have just faked that he wanted to lynch his own group and then he actually does change his vote. MT continues to town read him as they both switch over to group 2 which had gained some traction.

Just realized that group 2 is also at L-3, but basically I am scum reading Mahob because I scum read MT but that's just one person from group 1 so it would be better to go for group 3.
I don't get this post at all, you make several paragraphs about how some guy referred to a hypothetical group with 'them' instead of 'us'. The rest of your posts give me a similar vibe, too: seems like you're writing for the sake of writing, and reading for the sake of reading, not actually trying to do anything useful or help us find scum at all. I am starting to get an Albert + dsj scum feel.

If two scum are in Group 1, I think Mohab is the last scum. These two posts above look like scum throwing shade and this doesn't look like something a towny would say.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:38 am**

In post 617, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The fact that no one from group 2 or 3 has hammered group 1 pretty much confirms my theory of minimal scum in groups 2-3.

In post 618, Albert B. Rampage wrote:if there was 2 scum in groups 2-3, they hammer, they NK, its 2v2 town is endgamed.

In post 619, Albert B. Rampage wrote:this confirms 2 or 3 scum in group 1.

In post 620, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Theres at least 2 scum in Hoctac, Cat, MT, or Raya. They would never self-vote group 1.

In post 621, Albert B. Rampage wrote:From perspectives other than mine its possible im scum with enomis trying for autowin but I can confirm I'm town.

I agree about the game state indicating 2 scums on group 1, but I highly doubt that they are 3 because of the reads that I have on group 3. It would be an insult to my analysis ability to say that group 3 is entirely town, so my solve at the moment is 2-0-1.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:41 am**

In post 624, Raya36 wrote:
In post 617, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The fact that no one from group 2 or 3 has hammered group 1 pretty much confirms my theory of minimal scum in groups 2-3.
This is a good point. Because of this I'll consider group 1 but first I need to actually find 2 or 3 people on it I actually think are scum and so far I'm mostly only seeing scummy players in group 3.

Good reads ^

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:53 am**

In post 625, Ame wrote:
In post 622, Albert B. Rampage wrote:UNVOTE:
Scum backing down

You are deliberately trolling or are scum, I am still waiting for the explanation of my push and the sudden change of posture on post 542.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 9:55 am**

In post 626, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I think only clidd is confirmed to not be scum with 1 scum in group 1 by virtue of not hammering

I need to think

Did you have any evolution in your read about group 3 ?

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 10:06 am**

In post 647, Morning Tweet wrote:VOTE: Group One

In post 648, Albert B. Rampage wrote:i am not hammering

In post 649, Morning Tweet wrote:UNVOTE:

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 10:09 am**

In post 653, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Unless anyone seriously think it’s 1-0-2?

I think I was the only one who considered this hypothesis so far.

Posted: **Thu May 14, 2020 10:10 am**

I only looked briefly but considering Group 1 is at L-1 now and nobody has hammered, it's safe to say either scum is already on the wagon (unlikely?) or Group 1 is actually the 2 or 3 scum group.

Mafiascum.net

mini 2140: partition (this is over)