Mafiascum.net

In post 689, Almost50 wrote:

In post 594, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Will I pass?

I can't guarantee it, but you can definitely pass the salt, if you please.

In post 698, Almost50 wrote:

In post 615, nomnomnom wrote:Babysitters wouldn't give a guilty in any situation because it's not an active kill.

It did in that setup. Trust me. It was an open-setup and the rules said it would.

In post 692, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 691, cyrus62 wrote:i just dont see scum making this post .

you've said that but i want to understand why you think so

In post 704, humaneatingmonkey wrote:claim?

In post 615, nomnomnom wrote:it would only take a scum aware that their team (or themselves) is a roaming "something" to come up with a roaming "something".

In post 709, Almost50 wrote:

In post 615, nomnomnom wrote:it would only take a scum aware that their team (or themselves) is a roaming "something" to come up with a roaming "something".

Why would Scum be given ROAMING anything? What purpose would it serve to get scum to target one player only once??

In post 619, nomnomnom wrote:Like think about it too. From a setup perspective, in what situation do you decide to add a roaming modifier to a detective? Detective is already somewhat on the weaker side of role (I estimate it less useful than a tracker, taking into account the same scum makes all the same kills, which is likely in a setup where mafia isn't multitasking by default), why would you nerf it on top of that with a roaming modifier? Like now that the role is claimed you can see it has now become a role that is 90% useless unless you somehow hit the scum committing the nightkill. That is it. You are getting at most one guilty. How is that a role a moderator includes in a setup?
Normally I am wary of outguessing the mod situations but here it just strikes me as a claim that scums can easily make because it does not clear anything, and you can go the whole game without claiming a single guilty and still manage to explain how you will not die on every night by (correctly) saying your role is justifiably weak so it does not warrant a nightkill from the scums.

In post 695, Almost50 wrote:

In post 613, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 612, Almost50 wrote:^This doesn't even have anything to do with boxxy's content. The ROLE itself is 100% Town, and is hard for Scum to fake.

Why can't you fake that?

Because >I< didn't know what ROAMING was. I don't think Scum tend to search for unknown/uncommon modifiers when tailoring their fake claims.

In post 626, Kerset wrote:Box is kind of player with old account, empty hole and claims to be playing offside.

In post 710, cyrus62 wrote:so now that thats done as i said boxy isnt lieing. so check monkey to see why he wanted to lynch a pr.

In post 715, Almost50 wrote:

In post 626, Kerset wrote:Box is kind of player with old account, empty hole and claims to be playing offside.

His play may need to be checked by the VAR system

In post 712, Almost50 wrote:making a bad push

In post 697, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 687, Kerset wrote:

In post 681, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 678, Kerset wrote:

In post 667, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 660, Kerset wrote:Salsabil do you ever make nonquestion posts? You keep asking asking but there are no conclusions out of it.

Read all the posts and then count and let me know how many 'asking' posts I made with no conclusion.

Without deep reading it would be 17

Spoiler:

In post 29, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 22, Seanzie wrote:

In post 20, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 18, Seanzie wrote:

In post 16, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 14, Seanzie wrote:Sixth!

No vote?
Hmmm suspicious.
pedit:
he knows what he did

Nope, I'm too scared to vote because then you'll see my TMI.

I want to see your TMI

Too bad.

Hmm....
Tood bad in a town way or a scum way??

In post 40, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 34, Seanzie wrote:

In post 30, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 26, Seanzie wrote:Non fluff though, current reads:

Cyrus - wolf

Everyone else who has posted thus far - Town

Aahahaha.....
You rolled scum, aren't you?

Does someone on a new forum that knows no one who rolls scum usually stick their neck out to push the game out of fluff?

I guess I can see the TMI of yours now....

VOTE: Seanzie

Btw, did you play forum mafia or any sort of mafia game anywhere else before?

In post 53, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 46, Dwlee99 wrote:
Wagon on Seanzie seems way overblown? What am I missing?

He seems (newb) scum to me.... what do you think?

In post 58, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 49, cyrus62 wrote:

In post 44, Kerset wrote:

In post 42, cyrus62 wrote:rvs votes dont mean nothing for one for two im a wild card . so i tend to make games wild . you seem to be trying to hard relax and have fun gee. we just started . you will see me casting votes every where when i think people are scum . even when i said they were town. plus no two games of mine are the same.

cyrus got scared, pressure worked well

scared no . angry yes i was trying to have fun and he went that rout .

Are you short-tempered?

In post 106, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 104, Kerset wrote:

In post 86, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i feel so good rolling town i hope i catch scum !

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i don't want to vote so early but the scum could be anyone!

In post 88, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i guess i'm just gonna vote for the Mod for making me town! i wanted so bad to be scum

why do you act out of meta?

What is his meta? Can you share 1/2 game links?

In post 113, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 112, Seanzie wrote:Still waiting to hear townreads from people.

Who do you think is town atm?

In post 128, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 119, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Sup nerds.

VOTE: salsabil

Is it RVS or serious?

In post 162, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 122, cyrus62 wrote:right now i have mostly nulls.

In post 127, cyrus62 wrote:town i think i get town vibe from nom. but wont know for sure till we get going.

In post 135, cyrus62 wrote:i see kerset as more lay back town to be honest i wont vote them yet.

In post 136, cyrus62 wrote:sean to me is feeling town like the way hes pushing feels like hes trying to short maybe a bit fast for my taste but still.

In post 147, cyrus62 wrote:salsabil gets a scum lean from me.

Your reason to scumread me?

In post 163, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 150, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 128, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 119, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Sup nerds.

VOTE: salsabil

Is it RVS or serious?

It's serious,

Reason?

In post 173, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 166, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 165, OutWorldER wrote:cyrus62 (3): Seanzie, nomnomnom, boxxy

Ah yes, E-1

In post 160, cyrus62 wrote:opps they changed it to e-2 and e-1 ok im at e-1 and seans at e-2

@cyrus62

, how serious it was?

In post 180, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 169, cyrus62 wrote:my bad i thought it was 5 . not 7

Did you play mini normal ar any normal set-up game(s) before?

In post 229, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 222, boxxy wrote:
This feels like a reach, and possibly dishonest. Cause I didn't even vote monkey, i just said I support a policy lim at end of day if they don't contribute more.

VOTE: nomnomnom

In other news monkey moves to slight townlean.

What changes your mind?

In post 587, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 418, Seanzie wrote:

In post 417, Seanzie wrote:

In post 414, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Seanzie, he townleaned me out of nowhere from #222. My posts before #222 were horseshit.

Give me a second to look to see if I agree with your assessment of your own posts.

Okay, yes #222 was before you actually started posting game-related content. I agree that him switching to a townread there is bad.

But not scummy enough to you? See my 256.

In post 588, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 344, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:While I am confident most of this wagon is comprised of town I feel strongly that at least one of Cyrus and Salsa are scum

Fot the argument's sake, assuming

cyrus62

is the town between us, how it makes me scum to you?

In post 597, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 589, Almost50 wrote:

In post 236, Dwlee99 wrote:I think that Cyrus not knowing we weren't in a newbie with 9 players (hence that whole "I'm at e-1!!" drama) is a town slip? Unless it was ultra planned to give off that impression, but he doesn't strike me as that kind of player at all.

In post 1, OutWorldER wrote:Daytalk enabled for all PT's.

Also, he was only @3 votes, so not even in a 9-players setup would he have been @E-1

So you're scumreading him or not?

In post 609, Salsabil Faria wrote:

@Dwlee99

, how often you are playing here? Your joining year is 2015 but didn't see you much before.

In post 639, Salsabil Faria wrote:

If

cyrus62

flips town, will

boxxy

be cleared?

Cool! Now how many of the questions aren't answered yet?

5 speaking from memory
and now we got another question of yours, which leads towards no conlusion

From these 5 questions, 1 is kept ignoring by

cyrus62

while he is online.... rest of the 4 I think towards other people who aren't online yet or not game related.
So, you can't be exaggerated that I'm having no conclusion.

In post 717, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 710, cyrus62 wrote:so now that thats done as i said boxy isnt lieing. so check monkey to see why he wanted to lynch a pr.

why though

In post 699, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 696, Kerset wrote:hem, why (for first time?) you are agitating people towards an elimination? I think about your cheering towards box death. Did you hope to early pressure him or what?

I don't understand this question. Don't you want to pressure your scumreads to see what happens?

In post 646, Salsabil Faria wrote:Don't understand..... can you explain your thought process?