QFTNabakov wrote:In terms of actually playing the game, I propose that we treat L-2 as we would L-1. Who knows what unpredictable punishments/modkills could change the # to lynch?
Says youGorrad wrote:the time for random votes is over.
As always, Yosarian2 is right. But really, Kabenon's last post was just far too ambiguous for us to be able to conclude anything. Also I need a clarification here, is random Voting over yet? Getting scowled for Unvoting my random Vote woke me up from something.Yosarian2 wrote:No reason we can't do both.Draux wrote:Guys, I suggest we start looking for Scum instead of trying to figure out these Rules.
Why is this scum not dead yet?Draux wrote:As always, Yosarian2 is right. But really, Kabenon's last post was just far too ambiguous for us to be able to conclude anything. Also I need a clarification here, is random Voting over yet? Getting scowled for Unvoting my random Vote woke me up from something.Yosarian2 wrote:No reason we can't do both.Draux wrote:Guys, I suggest we start looking for Scum instead of trying to figure out these Rules.
QFT/B(ump)The Fonz wrote:Why is this scum not dead yet?Draux wrote:As always, Yosarian2 is right. But really, Kabenon's last post was just far too ambiguous for us to be able to conclude anything. Also I need a clarification here, is random Voting over yet? Getting scowled for Unvoting my random Vote woke me up from something.Yosarian2 wrote:No reason we can't do both.Draux wrote:Guys, I suggest we start looking for Scum instead of trying to figure out these Rules.
Why are you asking for clarification on whether random voting is over? When do you think a random phase ends?Draux wrote: As always, Yosarian2 is right. But really, Kabenon's last post was just far too ambiguous for us to be able to conclude anything. Also I need a clarification here, is random Voting over yet? Getting scowled for Unvoting my random Vote woke me up from something.
Actually, there was another question regarding random voting phase IIRC, and the rule which Qman broke was related to random voting. So, we might find something in the questionaire, but I don't see how knowing the rules could help us catch scum.Yosarian2 wrote:One random speculation; since rule 5 deals with a subject covered in the mod's "survey" before this game started, I wonder if other hidden rules (either now or in future days) might also be related to things discussed in that survey.
A random Voting phase ends when people want it to end.Sir Tornado wrote:Why are you asking for clarification on whether random voting is over? When do you think a random phase ends?Draux wrote: As always, Yosarian2 is right. But really, Kabenon's last post was just far too ambiguous for us to be able to conclude anything. Also I need a clarification here, is random Voting over yet? Getting scowled for Unvoting my random Vote woke me up from something.
My guess is that they're related to mafia conventions. I assume making a list of those I suspect would just get me slammed. (Though I noticed that "QFT" is apparently clean)Sir T wrote: Actually, there was another question regarding random voting phase IIRC, and the rule which Qman broke was related to random voting. So, we might find something in the questionaire, but I don't see how knowing the rules could help us catch scum.
On another note, do you think (you = everyone) if the extra rules are determinal to the town? If they are, we might have fewer scumbags than your normal 12 player game.
(shrug) That kind of thing can be a sign of a cautious scum, trying to look active but hoping someone else takes the lead in starting bandwagons.Draux wrote:Yes, I know The Fonz Voted me because I suggested that we start Scum-hunting without actually doing anything to contribute. I don't have an actual defense to that, although I fail to see how that is a 'reasonably large tell'.
Also shows a lack of scumhunting. With 2.5 pages of content, there has to beNocmen wrote:The problem with asking when random voting ends is that it seems that it would be opportunistic scum saying that so they know when to start BSing their reasons why someone else is scum so they dont get called out for voting with out reason.
Well, so far they have been, but I don't see why the rules would necessarily hurt scum less than town (unless they get told some of the rules). I also think that there's probably more to the game than the rules in terms of "unpredictability", but that's just personal speculation.Sir Tornado wrote:On another note, do you think (you = everyone) if the extra rules are determinal to the town? If they are, we might have fewer scumbags than your normal 12 player game.
There's been several other players who have just unvoted (eg. Gorrad, Nocmen come to mind), so it's not just Draux.Nabakov wrote:Also shows a lack of scumhunting. With 2.5 pages of content, there has to be something to go on that would make a vote less than random.
Firstly, Draux is not the only player to say "I agree with Yos2". The second sentence regarding kabenon had already been discussed, so this could be an attempt to appear to be contributing. Post 67 is similar in that respect; not really helpful at all.Draux wrote:As always, Yosarian2 is right. But really, Kabenon's last post was just far too ambiguous for us to be able to conclude anything.
Well then, why don't you start contributing and tell us who you find suspicious.Draux wrote:Yes, I know The Fonz Voted me because I suggested that we start Scum-hunting without actually doing anything to contribute. I don't have an actual defense to that, although I fail to see how that is a 'reasonably large tell'.
See basically communist mafia. (Admittedly, that one bit me in the ass, since it was my scumbuddy i pointed it out in, and she went down without a fight. Grrr.) It's attempting to appear active and keen on scumhunting, withoutDraux wrote:Yes, I know The Fonz Voted me because I suggested that we start Scum-hunting without actually doing anything to contribute.
I don't have an actual defense to that, although I fail to see how that is a 'reasonably large tell'.