Mafiascum.net

If it had gone to L-1 I would have unvoted

Why would you put your vote on him at all if this is the case?

In post 75, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

If it had gone to L-1 I would have unvoted

Why would you put your vote on him at all if this is the case?

There was no specific reason

It was never a vote to lynch

?? Then what was it?
Please explain.

In post 77, NorwegianboyEE wrote:?? Then what was it?
Please explain.

It was an RVS vote

In post 78, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 77, NorwegianboyEE wrote:?? Then what was it?
Please explain.

It was an RVS vote

You might claim your vote was meaningless, but that's not the way i saw it. In my mind you were trying to achieve a lynch with little to no discussion, then when the people reacted to your push and retracted their own votes you changed your story.

In post 79, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 78, Chemist1422 wrote:

In post 77, NorwegianboyEE wrote:?? Then what was it?
Please explain.

It was an RVS vote

You might claim your vote was meaningless, but that's not the way i saw it. In my mind you were trying to achieve a lynch with little to no discussion, then when the people reacted to your push and retracted their own votes you changed your story.

But that’s not true

You have this assumption locked in your head when it’s actually not what happened, and you have no proof for it

Either way i see nobody else that is suspicious right now.
I'll chime back in if someone else posts anything that makes me change my mind.

Wallaby joey

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Chemist1422

(3): Micc, skitter30, NorwegianboyEE

Mr Oobsy

(1): Leucosticte

Jamelia

(1): Dyrenz

Leucosticte

(1): Chemist1422

NorwegianboyEE

(1): Farren

Not Voting

(2): Mr Oobsy, Jamelia

Deadline:

(expired on 2019-09-04 23:00:00).

NorwegianBoyEE is the new mmiscrazy12.[/area]

In post 74, Chemist1422 wrote:I have not no

And I still don’t see how that’s what you got from it? If it had gone to L-1 I would have unvoted

How do you know that you would have been able to unvote in between L-1 and the hammer?

Yesterday this thread was empty. Today it's 4 pages long and someone's already accused me of being too quiet. HA.

Anyway, I am a , and I've been keeping track of votes and less formal accusations. I've not been able to meaningfully separate the other players into teams of 6 and 2 based on this evidence. However, I have concluded the following:

If is , and are both .

But if either or are , is .

My reasoning for this is the fact that votes alone, as well as accusations alone, both independently suggest it. I hope to be vindicated by future developments.

Mr Oobsy: any comparisons between Micc, Skitter, Chemist, and Leucosticte?

In post 84, Mr Oobsy wrote: If

Farren

is

Mafia

,

skitter30

and

NorwegianBoyEE

are both

Town

.

But if either

skitter30

or

NorwegianBoyEE

are

Mafia

,

Farren

is

Town

.

My reasoning for this is the fact that votes alone, as well as accusations alone, both independently suggest it.

If it's not too much work for you. Can you go into more detail as to why you came to these conclusions? I'm not sure i follow the logic behind it.

Regarding my thoughts on those 4 people listed, all I am confident adding at this point is that I strongly believe to be . His wordy posts sound quite sincere, as opposed to rambling. If it were all an act, something would have stuck out by now.

Regarding how I came to the conclusion in my previous post, I simply separated players into 2 teams based on whether one voted against the other. I also did this based on informal accusations. The teams indicated by votes contradicted those indicated by mere accusations. But the aspects where they did both agree, is what I based my conclusion on. It felt like taking the intersection of a Venn diagram, you know? Well technically, more like taking the overlapping portion of a pair of circles.

I want to address the fact he used his first post to unironically vote for being quiet.

You're one of the few people not voting yet Mr Oobsy. Who do you find the most suspicious so far?

Also, the mafia games i've played usually last 72 hours. I've never played a mafia game which lasts a whooping 10 day-hours before deadline. Is it normal for each day to last that long before the town decides who to lynch?

The days usually last 72 hours in the mafia games i've played.

Also i just learnt that this forum doesn't have a way to isolate each user's posts. Sad... （；へ：）

I want to wait for ' response before I actually call someone suspicious. In the meantime I am happy to wait 10 IRL days to gather as much information as possible.

Lazy entrance I know (>-_-)>

Didn't want to add to the Chemist train so early despite getting a scum vibe from him. L-1 can be dangerous this early on if someone just hammers on a whim. Not really used to how to open in RVS, also not sure I even like RVS, but I threw down a vote for the sheer sake of doing so.

Also
UNVOTE:

Because it seems pointless atm

So I read through everything and tried analyzing as much as possible. My brain actually hurts from trying to form opinion's of scuminess so, yeah. LOL

I agree with the opinion that Leucostictie is pretty neutral, but I wouldn't agree that he is auto-town or whatever. I appreciate the indepth analysis but I found at times the wording of how townspeople should act to be almost a: "I think this is the way Town in this game should play!" versus "I am town, but I wouldn't be surprised if other Town played this way".

I personally don't blame anyone for voting for someone based on inactivity, including Dyrenz' back on Page 2. He hasn't been on since I've started talking and stuff. I think that voting for someone based on inactivity when I personally haven't seen any overt scuminess makes sense?

That's all I really have right now. This is fun! LOL

Damn, i'm going to grow old by the time day 1 is finished.
Nah just kidding.
@Dyrenz If someone hammers on a whim and the person lynched flips town then the person that hammered will obviously be seen as very suspicious. So i don't think we need to worry about a mafia doing this. I would be more worried that a clueless townie accidentally hammered too early or something.

In post 90, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

Also, the mafia games i've played usually last 72 hours.

The days usually last 72 hours in the mafia games i've played.

Also i just learnt that this forum doesn't have a way to isolate each user's posts. Sad... （；へ：）

If you look just to the right of the post number, there's an ISO link for the poster.

Oh, there is. Thanks Farren, i found it now.

In post 83, Farren wrote:

In post 74, Chemist1422 wrote:I have not no

And I still don’t see how that’s what you got from it? If it had gone to L-1 I would have unvoted

How do you know that you would have been able to unvote in between L-1 and the hammer?

I don’t, but that’s less of my issue and more of the hammerer’s

Not really. I don’t think we should put any voters away from the equation just because they didn’t hammer.