Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 1:41 am
VOTE: reaper
How do you like being on L-1?
And don't get me fucking started on this vote. You have the audacity to cruise through this game providing no reads or insight after THAT start? And then you go and drop a vote on NotMySpamAccount of all people. Terrible, just terrible.
STOP with this tomfoolery, or you're gonna have to pay me a lot more than you already FUCKING have. Look AROUND and tell me, does this really look like a place where you can joke around AND somehow stumble into a win? The scum-catching BUS is gonna leave with, or without you. I don't care if that means other people voting for ME. We just need to leave on it ALREADY before it's too late.In post 78, Elements wrote:Hectic, you have a day chat. You don't need to signal to you scum buddies via capitalised words in your posts.
Yes.In post 80, Elements wrote:Hectic, will you marry me?
FathomlessIn post 81, Hectic wrote:Elements has DEEP pockets.
You’re attacking me.In post 69, skitter30 wrote:Y am i townie?In post 64, rosterfoster wrote:Tchill is town.
Skitter is probably town also tbh.
47 is exactly why I voted reaper fyi
Have you read the thread? I said I am use to playing in an environment where there are no majority lynches on Day 1. Thus you don't have to fret about those things in RVS. When skitter posted it, I pulled my vote as it was strictly a RVS vote based on the less than optimal play of self voting.In post 63, Tchill13 wrote:Means you didn't really mean it when you put him at L-1. Had someone LOL lynched you would have been fine with it but now that you have an opportunity to show you care about the lynch you're making sure other people notice.
Seeing as how you have already rescinded your bonafided 'he's scum case' on Elements. And now he comes with this word salad. Tl;drIn post 74, Hectic wrote:But now this, THIS is the type of shit which can establish you as a pretty fucking solid scumread on PAGE 1. The unannounced L-1 is bad enough, but something I can reluctantly forgive, but the second post? Now that is scum through and through.In post 19, ReaperOfSouls wrote:In post 13, skitter30 wrote:oh dear
is that like .... a serious post ? are you usually so over the top ... ?
pedit @hecticUNVOTE:In post 14, skitter30 wrote:also that's l-1
So let me explain: From my vast experience playing in the forum pro leagues, back when I was in my prime during the 2010-2012 era, I noticed there were two types of players that would unvote to avoid a quickhammer.
The ones that were town. And the ones that were scum.
The ones that were town were concerned. They're concerned someone's gonna lolhammer the fool on L-1 and cut the day short. They're concerned some village idiot or opportunistic scum is gonna swoop in and bring that hammer down. So what do they do? They unvote. They don't need to provide any reasoning, they don't need to prove to anyone WHY they're unvoting, they just fucking unvote as quickly as possible.
And then there's the scum unvoters. Now THEY, they have something to prove, they feel the need to justify their actions. They don't want any suspicion from a naked unvote, do they? So what do they do? They justify, they lie, they quote, and they explain. They're not actually in a rush to unvote, they don't actually care if the fool on L-1 is actually hammered; they just want their action to LOOK good.
That's what Reaper has done here. He's felt the need to quote not one, but TWO posts before he unvotes. Scum scum scum scum scum.
And that brings me to my second point: The self-voter Elements wasn't even on L-1 when Reaper actually unvoted. You telling me you missed that, Reaper? We all know that there's a pretty nifty function on mafiascum, it allows one to see any new posts in the time that you've last refreshed the thread to the time where you press 'submit' on your post. It's pretty goddamn handy in avoiding accidental hammers, and allows a more natural conversation to flow through the beauty of "Pedits", or "Post-edits". Reaper is provided this functionality just like the rest of us. However, he fails to notice that the self-voter Elements has ALREADY unvoted himself, and is therefore not on L-1 anymore. So why does Reaper unvote anyway? Reaper wants to look like a cautious and concerned townie, that's why. He wants to look like he doesn't want a quicklynch, and for the day to end early. He's just a rightminded honest townie, right? FUCK NO. Really, he's just a scheming manipulative scum, who saw Elements unvote, but proceeded to do so ANYWAY, because hey, it might win him some townie points.
VOTE: Reaper
Doesn't phase me one way or the other. How is it I am supposed to feel?
So my vote yo put you on L-1 hasn't changed your opinion or view on anything at all?In post 88, ReaperOfSouls wrote:Doesn't phase me one way or the other. How is it I am supposed to feel?
It makes me wonder if you are just looking for quick end to the day phase so that the full use of the time isn't maximized.In post 89, Elements wrote:So my vote yo put you on L-1 hasn't changed your opinion or view on anything at all?In post 88, ReaperOfSouls wrote:Doesn't phase me one way or the other. How is it I am supposed to feel?
OH, but this case is no joke. Not even gonna bother defending yourself and just gonna causally OMGUS are you? You could've at least TRIED to make your case look better. I was at the very least expecting a "Oh, I'm on mobile, I didn't see the other unvote when I posted".In post 87, ReaperOfSouls wrote: Seeing as how you have already rescinded your bonafided 'he's scum case' on Elements. And now he comes with this word salad. Tl;dr
VOTE: Hectic
The only player I can imagine hammering at this point is DEB and he's not in this game. If someone was to hammer and end the day now I think it would be all but a scum claim. So in that sense it would be very good to end the day so quickly. I'm guessing is 2v7 so that would instantly give us half the scum team day 2.In post 90, ReaperOfSouls wrote:It makes me wonder if you are just looking for quick end to the day phase so that the full use of the time isn't maximized.
In post 92, Elements wrote: The only player I can imagine hammering at this point is DEB and he's not in this game.
D1 is by plurality. Person with most votes at EoD is lynched. Tie votes are randomized. Majority disabled.In post 91, Hectic wrote:OH, but this case is no joke. Not even gonna bother defending yourself and just gonna causally OMGUS are you? You could've at least TRIED to make your case look better. I was at the very least expecting a "Oh, I'm on mobile, I didn't see the other unvote when I posted".In post 87, ReaperOfSouls wrote: Seeing as how you have already rescinded your bonafided 'he's scum case' on Elements. And now he comes with this word salad. Tl;dr
VOTE: Hectic
But nope, you think this is just gonna blow over if you decide to not confront it with any real explanation. Well, you should've known better than to pick a fight with someone with58confirmed scummies.
But seriously, your disregard for my points makes you more scummy, because you want to avoid a proper argument about what I'm addressing here. And your vote is HELLA suspicious given you've just said my words don't make me scummy in of itself.
Okay, let's all fucking calm down here and talk this out with no emotions involved, ALRIGHT? How does plurality voting on your old site work? And did you not see the self-voter Elements unvote when you did?
That would constitute site meta which I don't have. I played a few games here late last year early this.In post 92, Elements wrote:The only player I can imagine hammering at this point is DEB and he's not in this game. If someone was to hammer and end the day now I think it would be all but a scum claim. So in that sense it would be very good to end the day so quickly. I'm guessing is 2v7 so that would instantly give us half the scum team day 2.In post 90, ReaperOfSouls wrote:It makes me wonder if you are just looking for quick end to the day phase so that the full use of the time isn't maximized.
Which bit is site meta?In post 95, ReaperOfSouls wrote:That would constitute site meta which I don't have. I played a few games here late last year early this.In post 92, Elements wrote:The only player I can imagine hammering at this point is DEB and he's not in this game. If someone was to hammer and end the day now I think it would be all but a scum claim. So in that sense it would be very good to end the day so quickly. I'm guessing is 2v7 so that would instantly give us half the scum team day 2.In post 90, ReaperOfSouls wrote:It makes me wonder if you are just looking for quick end to the day phase so that the full use of the time isn't maximized.
It is, but he's not in this game so it doesn't matter.In post 97, ReaperOfSouls wrote:Naming of the player.