Mafiascum.net

In post 74, Raya36 wrote:I highly doubt scum placed all 3 members in group 1

That's exactly what they should do though.

In post 73, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Scum would just put all 3 in group 1 knowing that nobody will self-lynch, and then sweep the game from there.

This is the type of game where it could be beneficial to self-lynch so idk if that's fully true? I'd be more than happy to lynch my group if I think 2+ scum is in it.

Yeah, voting yourself shouldn't really be much of a problem here, no?

In post 51, dsjstr wrote:Group 1 has a majority of votes so they basically decide which group will get lynched

Everyone's votes are worth the same

In post 51, dsjstr wrote:They get a shot at winning even if there is no member in group 1, if they were hoping that we would lynch group 1 why would they hang one of their men?

If the scum chose 1/1/1 with the intent of lynching group 1 for the win today, I think putting one scum in group 1 to "sandbag" that group and make that group seem scummier would be the best way to do it.

Scumvibes from dsjstasefsfr's entrance, primarily from 49 though I'm having a hard time formulating it into words

In post 62, enomis wrote:

In post 59, Mohab500 wrote:VOTE: group 3

You are voting your own group?

What's wrong with that?

> We shouldn't lynch group 1. Too risky.
> That's why scum would just put all 3 in group 1; we should lynch it.
> What if they knew we would think that and we just lose by lynching it??
> It's fine. If there's 2 or 3 scum in there, it's a positive result.
> It's not even that good if there's 2 scum in here. We enter MyLo the next day.
> They're counting on our paranoi, see? We should definitely lynch it.
> What if it's a 1/1/1 split though? We insta-lose then!
> A 1/1/1 split makes no sense for EV purposes, it's either 0, 2, or 3 in group 1. Therefore, we lynch it.
> But the fact you think that is exactly why they do a 1/1/1 split and then we lose by lynching group 1.
> They anticipated you would be afraid and used the airpeed velocity of an unladen swallow...

(Continued Ad Infinitum)

In post 77, Mohab500 wrote:Yeah, voting yourself shouldn't really be much of a problem here, no?

Do you not want to play the game beyond day 1?

In post 79, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:

In post 62, enomis wrote:

In post 59, Mohab500 wrote:VOTE: group 3

You are voting your own group?

What's wrong with that?

I want to be here on day 2.

Shouldn't you be more concerned with lynching scum than being alive on day 2

Everyone in group 3 has been sus so far. It's pretty impressive.

In post 62, enomis wrote:

In post 59, Mohab500 wrote:VOTE: group 3

You are voting your own group?

I was also thinking of voting for group 3 tbh

Group 1 is too risky and if there is 1 member in group 2 then even without reads it would be a 50/50 we get them the next day.

I don't get it, Doro. If there's 1 member in group 2 and we lynch it, there'll be 2 alive tomorrow.

@enomis and @mohab: Do you have the tendency to be lynchbait in other games? Be honest.

I actually lean town on Mohab. What are you seeing there?

In post 84, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Shouldn't you be more concerned with lynching scum than being alive on day 2

I have no other play. I can't lynch group 1. I don't want to lynch myself. So I can only find from group 2. Quite demotivated tbh. This isn't what i expected when i came into this game.

You absolutely can lynch group 1 if you find enough people from there acting scummy. Why are you ruling the play out completely?

In post 88, Hoctac wrote:@enomis and @mohab: Do you have the tendency to be lynchbait in other games? Be honest.

This is addressed to me? How am I being lynchbait this game?

In post 91, Hoctac wrote:You absolutely can lynch group 1 if you find enough people from there acting scummy. Why are you ruling the play out completely?

based on what people have posted.

In post 90, enomis wrote:

In post 84, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:Shouldn't you be more concerned with lynching scum than being alive on day 2

I have no other play. I can't lynch group 1. I don't want to lynch myself. So I can only find from group 2. Quite demotivated tbh. This isn't what i expected when i came into this game.

If you thought Mohab or dsjstr were scummy, would you want to lynch your group then? I don't get your insistence on not wanting to lynch yourself.

Mohab entered saying we shouldn't talk about partitions because what's the point, but then discusses them anyway and emphasises how there can definitely be 3 scum in group 1.

He says it's too "risky" to lynch in group 1 and talks about how we shouldn't do it just because, unless we find "at least 1 scum in there worth lynching" - which is a very easy thing to do in 8 players. He's setting himself up later to vote group 1 while being reasonable and fair about it early.

Also, the self-vote is weird.

In post 92, enomis wrote:

In post 88, Hoctac wrote:@enomis and @mohab: Do you have the tendency to be lynchbait in other games? Be honest.

This is addressed to me? How am I being lynchbait this game?

I'm not saying you are. I'm just wondering if you are in other games. There's incentive for scum to dump 3 lynchbaits into the same group.

In post 87, Hoctac wrote:I don't get it, Doro. If there's 1 member in group 2 and we lynch it, there'll be 2 alive tomorrow.

If they went 1-1-1 which would just be a mistake for the mafia then there would be 2 members alive D2 no matter which group we choose. Since there are only two members in group 2 that leaves two suspects to choose from. The fact that no one else

sees going 1-1-1 as a bad move makes me think the mafia would have gone for it.

Fair point, but see 81, Doro.

You find anyone scummy so far? I'm pretty sure clidd and Ame are conspiring in the other corner.

In post 95, Hoctac wrote:Mohab entered saying we shouldn't talk about partitions because what's the point, but then discusses them anyway and emphasises how there can definitely be 3 scum in group 1.

True but there wasn't a whole lot else going on in thread tbf

He says it's too "risky" to lynch in group 1 and talks about how we shouldn't do it just because, unless we find "at least 1 scum in there worth lynching" - which is a very easy thing to do in 8 players. He's setting himself up later to vote group 1 while being reasonable and fair about it early.

Also, the self-vote is weird.

I see. I liked how he was thinking about how to play the setup, which seemed natural. and he did end up saying to not lynch group 1 today