Mafiascum.net

In post 802, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 800, Ankamius wrote:pagetop

You are in this game?

In post 803, Liger_Zero wrote:Ohhh backup moderator.

This might be a bit of a stretch but I think this is likely a towntell assuming the scum team would have had some interaction with both mods.

In post 824, Moongrass wrote:

In post 337, Shiro wrote:

Vote:Liger

This is scum. That back and forth with flavor and the way he backed away with (tell me to ignore you bs) was beyond awful

In post 709, Shiro wrote:

In post 706, Liger_Zero wrote:More votes on this ^

Nah you are the scum here tryin got go for the easy target

Something about these really bothers me but I'm unfamiliar with this player so if it's known they come off scummy I'm ok jumping on the next decent wagon.

Why? They are correct, though.

In post 779, chennisden wrote:I feel like scum is controlling the lynch right now and I hate it.

In post 792, Moongrass wrote:

In post 782, RCEnigma wrote:VOTE: Chenn sorry PPG I'm not feeling the Volxen lynch and Chenn is begging for it.

In post 786, RCEnigma wrote:We can all help VOTE: Cerb

What was this vote on Chen?

Seemed like a statement that scum makes. Doesn't have much behind it, doesn't follow a logical progression. Doesn't have to argue one way or the other since it isn't day 1 provable.

I would assume Volxen is the scum controlled lynch with only 4 votes being myself and PPG with like urap and someone else tagging onto the tail end. Don't think you could really argue a team of myself and PPG pushing a mislynch onto Volxen much less a case for individual scum behavior outside of me sheeping ppg on the vote.

But if Cerb doesn't want to play that's fine too, simplest way to resolve him with the least resource allocation.

In post 827, Flavor Leaf wrote:Why? They are correct, though.

No

FL, it seems a little off in terms of tone considering the whole ISO. Like trying to look like someone contributing because it looks good rather than because it's something they believe or have worked their way into believing. I find your hard defense of them based on 2+ year old meta...interesting.

RCE, you sound good but you're not walking the walk. You had great points and great reason to vote chen but literally jumped off before your vote could have had any effect. I appreciate the desire to sort Cerb, though he seems like the type of player who will be easier to sort further down the track. Pressure voting cerb is unlikely to have any effect. So I'm a little lost on your intent behind those votes.

Guys and gals, an announcement! We have created a fourth Powerpuff Girl; we called her Bunny! Other players can call her by her secret name, Moongrass, but we will call her Bunny from now on!

Welcome to the best institution you will ever be part of, Bunny!

In post 831, Pink Ball wrote:Guys and gals, an announcement! We have created a fourth Powerpuff Girl; we called her Bunny! Other players can call her by her secret name, Moongrass, but we will call her Bunny from now on!

Welcome to the best institution you will ever be part of, Bunny!

Ignore the cute dog, it's me, Blossom!

- Blossom

Pint, you make a great PPG.

In post 833, Moongrass wrote:Pint, you make a great PPG.

- Blossom

Attention all Shiro-wagoners

Is there an actual case on him, or is it a policy lynch?

In post 830, Moongrass wrote:FL, it seems a little off in terms of tone considering the whole ISO. Like trying to look like someone contributing because it looks good rather than because it's something they believe or have worked their way into believing. I find your hard defense of them based on 2+ year old meta...interesting.

RCE, you sound good but you're not walking the walk. You had great points and great reason to vote chen but literally jumped off before your vote could have had any effect. I appreciate the desire to sort Cerb, though he seems like the type of player who will be easier to sort further down the track. Pressure voting cerb is unlikely to have any effect. So I'm a little lost on your intent behind those votes.

Cerberus was correct that I’m definitely far back in terms of where we’re at in this game.

I moved into a new place the other day, so mix in work and unpacking, I’m in a place right now, so yeah.

The 2+ year old meta is something I remember, but it’s more than that. I also have a strong gut feel, and Shiro’s pushing the same exact stuff I was pushing, so I legit see it.

I’m still a little off and about, but I’m trying to get more invested because I saw what was going on and didn’t like it.

In post 836, Flavor Leaf wrote:The 2+ year old meta is something I remember, but it’s more than that. I also have a strong gut feel, and Shiro’s pushing the same exact stuff I was pushing, so I legit see it.

I like this. Can you talk a bit more about your Liger read? Does my comment on the town tell sway you at all?

In post 838, Moongrass wrote:

In post 836, Flavor Leaf wrote:The 2+ year old meta is something I remember, but it’s more than that. I also have a strong gut feel, and Shiro’s pushing the same exact stuff I was pushing, so I legit see it.

I like this. Can you talk a bit more about your Liger read? Does my comment on the town tell sway you at all?

Liger’s been attacking momentum gained by me since the beginning of the game. To be fair, the middle chunk I was away, but Day 1, I don’t necessarily put too much stock into town tells. They’re easy to fake.

I feel like Liger’s playing in a way where he’s okay with me seeing he’s scum because it gives him someone to fight against to make it look like he’s doing something so we come across as TvT.

You aren't worth fighting buddy.

In post 835, Iconeum wrote:Attention all Shiro-wagoners

Is there an actual case on him, or is it a policy lynch?

I legit made a case, and the posts since then haven't really been convincing any other way.

In post 825, Moongrass wrote:This might be a bit of a stretch but I think this is likely a towntell assuming the scum team would have had some interaction with both mods.

I don't think the mod contacts scum players to let them know who replaces in, I haven't heard that ever being done in games

In post 841, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 835, Iconeum wrote:Attention all Shiro-wagoners

Is there an actual case on him, or is it a policy lynch?

I legit made a case, and the posts since then haven't really been convincing any other way.

A case that is based on a single post. 1. post.

Seeing Shiro's ISO I can kinda understand you want him lynched on policy, but it's less scummy then for instance Shadow disappearing after his claim.

What about the other Shiro voters?

In post 337, Shiro wrote:

Vote:Liger

This is scum. That back and forth with flavor and the way he backed away with (tell me to ignore you bs) was beyond awful

I made reasons why I think this is posted more by scum but to recap:
> Phrasing used seems unnatural (certainty used, given the reasoning after how did you get that certainty? you looked like you skimmed)
> Framing used to describe what happened
> even if you take the framing the conclusion reached wasn't followed. You could label that as bad posting or w/e but most of the way it presents itself as self evident and even the way its framed it isn't that way.

In post 705, Shiro wrote:prod taken

Will post something tommorow most liekly

Come on Shiro. I want more posts. Prove me wrong.

In post 709, Shiro wrote:

In post 706, Liger_Zero wrote:More votes on this ^

Nah you are the scum here tryin got go for the easy target

Why call scum scum? Why not say "you are just trying to discredit me and go for an easy target" This is such an obvious reframe of the push.

In post 780, Shiro wrote:

In post 719, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 709, Shiro wrote:

In post 706, Liger_Zero wrote:More votes on this ^

Nah you are the scum here tryin got go for the easy target

You are not helping yourself by self labeling yourself as an easy target.

In post 718, u r a person 2 wrote:I also am scum reading alchemist.

Anyone else scum reading alchemist?

No, not really.

I mean, I am lurking to the maximum degree. Can't deny the truth

Using their lurking as a defense to a push. Its framing that I am going for easy push and that they are target only for that. When literally nothing else says they are town.

In post 843, Iconeum wrote:

In post 841, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 835, Iconeum wrote:Attention all Shiro-wagoners

Is there an actual case on him, or is it a policy lynch?

I legit made a case, and the posts since then haven't really been convincing any other way.

A case that is based on a single post. 1. post.

Seeing Shiro's ISO I can kinda understand you want him lynched on policy, but it's less scummy then for instance Shadow disappearing after his claim.

I don't want Shiro policy lynched. I have no idea where you get that idea. What policy am I lynching them for exactly?

I wonder if you'd feel the same way if he voted anyone else instead of you

fp'd: Oh i'm not really looking at you when I say policy lynch. I know ur the only one who is making effort in actually casing him.
All the other votes on him however… worries me

In post 847, Iconeum wrote:I wonder if you'd feel the same way if he voted anyone else instead of you

Leafy voted me and I am calling him town. So........not sure what else to say to this.

What are your thoughts on the other Shiro voters?