Mafiascum.net

In post 823, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 820, Almost50 wrote:if the main team were both eliminated then the Traitors inherits the factional kill

I sincerely hope this is not the case. It's one of the reason why Stack the Deck sucks, and it's not standard at all.

I think this should be clarified since this is an open setup

In post 824, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 822, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 806, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Dunnstral I will give you 5 minutes to bus your scumbuddy implo

I don't think I will be voting there today, I am not scumreading him. I would prefer to get minimega today, especially after Implo pointed out that they did give reads in another game.

I think picking no prs is a strong move for scum.

this is an exceptionally poor take, given the quality of discussion which has transpired. I'll consider Dunnstral back on the table for today as a fallback option.

Right, you'll vote for me because I disagree with you

In post 766, Battle Mage wrote:And I think you're wrong on the traitor. We don't need to elim the traitor to win -

And I think YOU are wrong. Check me previous post about the Traitor inheriting eth Factional Kill if they become the last Scum alive. This is not a NORMAL game. It's an OPEN-SETUP.

a50 i figured out i was wrong about traitor mechanics earlier.

I'm of the opinion that the traitor does inherit the factional kill

I'm of the opinion that the traitor does inherit the factional kill

In post 809, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are you voting implo then?

I should vote implo

VOTE: implosion

let's get this done

Like, make up your mind, boss.

In post 828, implosion wrote:a50 i figured out i was wrong about traitor mechanics earlier.

yeah, I noticed. I just can't shake the habit of responding while reading in sequence though. If I try to do I end up saying absolutely nothing and probably become totally disengaged too. Sorry.

In post 826, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 824, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 822, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 806, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Dunnstral I will give you 5 minutes to bus your scumbuddy implo

I don't think I will be voting there today, I am not scumreading him. I would prefer to get minimega today, especially after Implo pointed out that they did give reads in another game.

I think picking no prs is a strong move for scum.

this is an exceptionally poor take, given the quality of discussion which has transpired. I'll consider Dunnstral back on the table for today as a fallback option.

Right, you'll vote for me because I disagree with you

not even close! I'll consider you potentially elimmable because you conspicuously ignored many of the key things which had been discussed, to base your position on something less important, without justification.

In post 827, Almost50 wrote:

In post 766, Battle Mage wrote:And I think you're wrong on the traitor. We don't need to elim the traitor to win -

And I think YOU are wrong. Check me previous post about the Traitor inheriting eth Factional Kill if they become the last Scum alive. This is not a NORMAL game. It's an OPEN-SETUP.

let me know when you're finally caught up...

In post 832, Almost50 wrote:

In post 828, implosion wrote:a50 i figured out i was wrong about traitor mechanics earlier.

yeah, I noticed. I just can't shake the habit of responding while reading in sequence though. If I try to do I end up saying absolutely nothing and probably become totally disengaged too. Sorry.

the downside of your approach from my perspective, is that I can't now clearly discern what you currently think about anything - only what you may have thought about something that happened a while ago.

what is your current view of the setup, traitor mechanics etc?

and why did you make a big deal of sheeping Pooky, only to then...not sheep him?

In post 825, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 823, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 820, Almost50 wrote:if the main team were both eliminated then the Traitors inherits the factional kill

I sincerely hope this is not the case. It's one of the reason why Stack the Deck sucks, and it's not standard at all.

I think this should be clarified since this is an open setup

@mod

it would be sensible to clarify this.

In post 835, Battle Mage wrote:what is your current view of the setup, traitor mechanics etc?

Did the mod respond to Dunn's question about the Traitor mechanics??

Where I stand:

- Traitor does get the Factional Kill if both Goons are eliminated
- Scum likely do not pick any modifications to keep the Town PRs to a minimum
- As it stands, we have "2 scums" (A Goon and a Traitor) who share NO PT at this time

In post 837, Almost50 wrote:

In post 835, Battle Mage wrote:what is your current view of the setup, traitor mechanics etc?

Did the mod respond to Dunn's question about the Traitor mechanics??

no

In post 838, Almost50 wrote:Where I stand:

- Traitor does get the Factional Kill if both Goons are eliminated
- Scum likely do not pick any modifications to keep the Town PRs to a minimum
- As it stands, we have "2 scums" (A Goon and a Traitor) who share NO PT at this time

if that is the case I'm slightly more willing to look at Mini, although it still feels like the game would benefit from good players casting the net a bit wider.

We don't need to cast the net wider

We lost a pr and a mafia. There probably aren't many town prs left. MinimegaByte is a fine vote today

I’ve skimmed the last few pages and see I have questions thrown my way. I am at work right now and will catch up and answer everything when I get home

Alright home now so will catch up and answer everything as promised

In post 656, Dunnstral wrote:there is no reason for me to think you two are town.

Is there any reason to think one or both of us are scum?

In post 656, Dunnstral wrote:Both off wagon and looking

What about Something SMart and Implosion? They are both off wagon too so not a valid point

In post 663, Scipio1 wrote:@Mini who is the scummiest to you rn?

At this point I would have to say Dunnstral

In post 664, Save The Dragons wrote:in hindsight, i think it's likely that penguin hid behind n_m after crumbing it

I cant seem to see that crumb am I blind or is it relatively hard to spot?

In post 649, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:we are definitely going off-wagon for the elim today.

Pooky wants to look off wagon seems fine

In post 656, Dunnstral wrote:Both off wagon

Putting this in a way that says you want to look off wagon too... not long after Pooky too seems a little strange

In post 664, Save The Dragons wrote:i'd like to go off wagon today

And the third person to say to look off wagon...

Soemthing isn't making me feel good here something definitely ain't right

In post 692, Battle Mage wrote:could be Mini-scum. but wouldn't Mini power up the partner?

You are definitely right there as I would not be able to handle that. As scum I am majority of the time eliminated early