Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:49 am
OK, but even if you flip town I'm using my own basis to decide investigations, which will be between me and the mod. I was soliciting advice on whom to lynch and why.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
And yet you are voting for Town? I find your vote to be intellectually equivalent to the nonsense that syndrome just espoused.↑ Acosmist wrote:I know precisely one role. This provides me prima facie evidence that good dudes = town. It's only one role, so for me to get locked into the belief of a perfect correspondence among other roles would be a hasty generalization, but surely THAT is a more plausible belief than what syndrome said.
↑ Yates wrote:And yet you are voting for Town? I find your vote to be intellectually equivalent to the nonsense that syndrome just espoused.↑ Acosmist wrote:I know precisely one role. This provides me prima facie evidence that good dudes = town. It's only one role, so for me to get locked into the belief of a perfect correspondence among other roles would be a hasty generalization, but surely THAT is a more plausible belief than what syndrome said.
PE: Fair enough. I would expect nothing less. I'm voting for Ben and posted why so there's your answer.
He did. It's called POST 880, chump.↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:
@BK - WHY ARE YOU NOT VOTING YATES? YOU SAID THE ONLY REASON YOU WERE NOT IS HE CLAIMED COP. HE DIDN'T CLAIM COP?
Is that clear enough for you BK? Answer the damn question ...
Thor wrote:Yes. You'll note that the issue that bugged me happened there, and it was an exceedingly odd interaction. Plus, andyou have to recognize this, we do want a decent counter even if we're going to lynch Yates no matter what.Stop whining, this stuff will be gold if he flips scum or town.
Thor wrote:Reading your guys debates of roles, I have to say my feeling is Yates is holding even. I think his point about the Peter/Gozer thing even strengthens his call. The biggest win you have is the John Connor/Sarah Chronicles thing (and I don't know enough about that show to even begin to comment intelligently on who is right) but all of the other ones he brought up I feel hold solid to his perceptions as stated here. Do you really see it as totally hash?
Thor wrote:He can be scum, but I don't think he's scum for his attitude towards the role claim - is that the whole basis of why you think he's scum? Or are we just lynching him because he's the more suspect VT?
Thor wrote:Also, what do you think about my call on his replies to Benmage where he said he'd claimed VT even when he hadn't - you see that as an intentional setup trick performed by scum? Or just a VT who thought he had claimed and forgot he hadn't full claimed?
Yates wrote:Dopey, Lazy and Sneezy. What do you care? According to you I'm scum, right?