Mafiascum.net

@Fe: Alright, give me a second. In the meantime: Why voting me, other than "for Deras"?

Also let me repeat that if you want to vote me, keep a lid on and state intent first.

OH
@Fe again: What did you find scummy about 800 and806?

In post 869, goodmorning wrote:@Deras: None of those attempt in any way to deflect attention from Carey. I use several points (meta, speed of read buildup) to ascertain that I believe his slot to be Town. One person saying "I think this guy is Town" =/= one person saying "we should ignore this guy".

But it you kept saying, don't vote him he's not worth it.

In post 873, Eye Urn wrote:Point me explicitly to an argument I have made, and I will reconsider it and return with a more thorough exposition of it, or an acquiescence that I was wrong.

I'd like to see these as well please.

In post 874, goodmorning wrote:That is L-1, I think. If anyone intends to hammer, keep a vote off until you've stated intent and let me respond.

This, please don't hammer GM yet.

In post 869, goodmorning wrote:IC PART OF THE POST TIME: EVERYONE STOP PAIRHUNTING BEFORE FLIPS THAT IS SO EFFING COUNTERPRODUCTIVE

IC question: Why is it counterproductive?

GAIZ, DONT TYPE SO FAST GAIZ

Also GM, I just realized your avatar is a cat as well, however, my cat is superior

GM:

1) I think you've way overblown the Fropome thing, looking for something to grab onto and continuing to do so for no good reason.
2) The fact that you explicitly asked me only for my read of you still weighs heavily on my mind as something that you would have done as scum in that situation and not as town.
3) The part of 170 that Deras pointed out in 216 and your reaction to that in 316. You were caught and tried to twist it, and it only got in deeper.
4) Continually not even reading and understanding what's posted, like when you asked what I find scummy about posts that I made (800 and 806). You clearly didn't even read them, you just assumed that I was being unspecific and wanted more details.

There's plenty of other instances of (4) all over the thread too, I can find them if needed.

Jesus Christ this game.

Reiterating for emphasis: 877 is a scum slip. She clearly didn't even read the linked posts before making the comment because she's assuming I didn't make them (which I did). If she really wanted to know what I found scummy about certain posts, one would assume she had read them.

That's twice AA has jumped onto an L-2 wagon today unless I am misremembering.

And I'm not totally sold on her being scum for it, for the same reason I wasn't sold on Carey being scum. I just think she still feels pressure to lynch ANYONE ELSE, and that comes from self-preservation as town as well as scum. It's not very good game play, but we can't all be the best.

In post 882, fferyllt wrote:Jesus Christ this game.

i know this would come....

In post 884, fferyllt wrote:That's twice AA has jumped onto an L-2 wagon today unless I am misremembering.

so, whats your point? i know you're reading the game..so is others.
Isn't the GM and Z7 both are my strong scum reads?

(Not implying I am, this is my 3rd game of Forum Mafia ever. I found the previous 2 still on the internet if people want to see them.)

@Fe: Second paragraph in 666 is an example of a misrep from you and I don't see explanation though I could easily be missing it.

@Deras: I was saying "this is why I am not voting him." I was not saying "don't vote him," but even if I were that still =/= "ignore him."

IC answer: It's counterproductive because you can start building cases based solely on associative tells, letting actual tells from others go unnoticed even, and then if you lynch one and they flip Town it's back to the drawing board AND it can falsely make the other one look Town to you as well even if they aren't.
Basically it's just that you don't know. Now, if you say "I think X is Scum. I think Y is Scum. I also think they happen to make sense as a team." that's a bit different. But I'm seeing both blended together and honestly it's better to just wait for a flip, any flip, before pair speculation.

PEDIT @Fe:
1) That slot is Scum. I am about 95% likely to quit Newbie games altogether if I'm wrong about him.
2) Yeah, well, that's you.
3) Sorry I'm not that good at reaction tests? A more complete metaing of me might clear that up for you.
4) Yes, because you have been incredibly unspecific this game by using lots of words. Let me rephrase: Why use 800 as a justification for voting when sever people pointed out to you how utterly shit it was?

NOT CLICKING YOUR STUPID GODDAMNED LINKS IS NOT A SCUMSLIP IN ANY UNIVERSE

WHAT THE FUCK GAME ARE YOU PLAYING BECAUSE IT'S SURELY NOT THIS ONE

I'm basically concerned about the same thing re AA. Like I said, putting someone at L-1 TWICE today.

Can someone unvote GM and can we chill out a little until VE has a chance to read the full thread? Whatever his alignment he was a sport for replacing into a 30 page thread with such a short fuse to nightfall.

SEVER SHOULD BE SEVERAL

SEVER IS MORE APPROPRIATE TO MY MOOD

FF I LOVE YOU AND I'M SORRY I EVER DOUBTED YOU

fine. I love hammering GM anyways....

In post 890, goodmorning wrote:SEVER SHOULD BE SEVERAL

SEVER IS MORE APPROPRIATE TO MY MOOD

FF I LOVE YOU AND I'M SORRY I EVER DOUBTED YOU

Buddying up?

Nope. Just a reaffirmation of my Townread on her. She's been moving up the townranks for the past 10 or so pages.

In post 886, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 882, fferyllt wrote:Jesus Christ this game.

i know this would come....

In post 884, fferyllt wrote:That's twice AA has jumped onto an L-2 wagon today unless I am misremembering.

so, whats your point? i know you're reading the game..so is others.
Isn't the GM and Z7 both are my strong scum reads?

What is your hurry? Afraid town will take off in another direction?

Re: 800/808: The fact that you did not even bother to try to figure out yourself what was scummy about the posts when you took the time to make links for them makes me almost certain that you really don't care about what I think is scummy or not.

In post 894, fferyllt wrote:

In post 886, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 882, fferyllt wrote:Jesus Christ this game.

i know this would come....

In post 884, fferyllt wrote:That's twice AA has jumped onto an L-2 wagon today unless I am misremembering.

so, whats your point? i know you're reading the game..so is others.
Isn't the GM and Z7 both are my strong scum reads?

What is your hurry? Afraid town will take off in another direction?

I am Town, And any direction that town moves and i ll move along.
And i am afraid of getting lynched. I am very well aware that not all town team will survive to the end, i know that some of us will have to be either mislynched or night killed by mafia, i just didn't want to go down without a fight.

What confusing me about you is that since morning that you were neither interested nor shown uninterested in any of the wagons today.
that is not good.

In post 888, goodmorning wrote:@Fe: Second paragraph in 666 is an example of a misrep from you and I don't see explanation though I could easily be missing it.

It's looking like GM is trying to pry apart people who recognize each others' thought processes by claiming that we're just agreeing, when that's far from the truth. She might even push it off as part of her IC behavior and to some extent what she's saying is correct, but the problem is that she's mischaracterizing our arguments and the lines of our reads saying that we just happen to agree. I'd serious consider voting for her again in the future, but for now we just need to get Carey's replacement to talk a bit about the game before we lynch ArcAngel.

That's me making a claim about a player behavior. If it's a misrep, then it's a misrep. But only you know if it is or not, so it's totally unfair to call it a false argument from me. From my perspective, that's what I'm seeing out of you. Several players have seemingly read my mind, I find them Town for it, and you're just telling me to ignore that because I shouldn't assume people who agree with me are Town when it's not the fact that they agree with me leading me to think they're Town.

I assumed when you said I made a false argument it would be something verifiably so, not something that you claim as false where you're the only one who could know if it's false.

In post 896, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 894, fferyllt wrote:

In post 886, ArcAngel9 wrote:

In post 882, fferyllt wrote:Jesus Christ this game.

i know this would come....

In post 884, fferyllt wrote:That's twice AA has jumped onto an L-2 wagon today unless I am misremembering.

so, whats your point? i know you're reading the game..so is others.
Isn't the GM and Z7 both are my strong scum reads?

What is your hurry? Afraid town will take off in another direction?

I am Town, And any direction that town moves and i ll move along.
And i am afraid of getting lynched. I am very well aware that not all town team will survive to the end, i know that some of us will have to be either mislynched or night killed by mafia, i just didn't want to go down without a fight.

What confusing me about you is that since morning that

you were neither interested nor shown uninterested in any of the wagons today

.
that is not good.

That's patently false. My only question is whether it's intentionally false or you really could read this day's posts and come away with that impression.

In post 888, goodmorning wrote: 3) Sorry I'm not that good at reaction tests? A more complete metaing of me might clear that up for you.

I'm sorry, I don't get how reacting to reaction tests has the slightest thing to do with 170/216/316. Are you saying you're not very good at employing reaction tests on other people? That doesn't exactly clear you, because then you're the only one claiming that you meant it as a reaction test. It's much more likely that it's as Deras implied.

The vote on VE was to get him to read the thread; I agree that he's not particularly scummy for making those arguments, but he very clearly had not read the thread, and that's a cardinal sin as far as I'm concerned. I succeeded in getting him to do so, and he succeeded in making me rethink the case on AA9. Winners all around, sorta.