Page 36 of 91

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:26 am
by TheGoldenParadox
Vote Count 2.9With 11 votes in play, it takes 6 to eliminate.

superbowl9
(4): Flavor Leaf, hessian, NoPowerOverMe, Battle Mage
NoPowerOverMe
(2): OutWorldER, Alchemist21
Battle Mage
(2): Titus, Mathblade
OutWorldER
(1): superbowl9
Flavor Leaf
(1): JohnnyFarrar

Not Voting
(1): Rannygazoo

Deadline:
(expired on 2020-12-08 11:55:42).


Mod notes:
I am using Thesp's automated votecounter - please notify me if there are any errors.
Non lmh has been replaced by Mathblade. wiyvern has been replaced by JohnnyFarrar.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:26 am
by MathBlade
In post 310, TheGoldenParadox wrote:You are a 2-Shot Neighborizer, and aligned with the Town. You may post in the thread and vote as you see fit.
Abilities:
~ Twice during the game, at Night, you may neighborize a player by sending a PM to the moderator. If your action succeeds, regardless of whether you live or die, that player will be added to your Neighborhood at the start of the next Day.
Hood existed people get added.

I expect BM with Andres’s last reads.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:26 am
by Titus
In post 872, MathBlade wrote:
In post 870, Titus wrote:
In post 869, MathBlade wrote:
In post 644, Battle Mage wrote:lol I mean, we have a dead neighbouriser. I can confirm, he targetted me last night. It doesn't confirm my alignment one way or the other. But I can say, via the PT, Andres (like Ben) thought I was the towniest player. :D
Aha but it isn’t an unfair question.

Andres divulged reads to BM with his own words.

So asking for said reads is not an unfair question.

With those why BM should be apparent.

BM is being a smartass there.

There's no possible way Andres divulged anything. Andres would be dead before any PT with BM opened.
Nope. Hood existed based on TGP’s flip post and says add to.

And why are you defending your scumread? If I am wrong and BM is joking can’t he say so?
Mafia is a search for truth. Period. If you were talking tone or some shit, I wouldn't interject at all.

I'll recheck the flip post.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:29 am
by MathBlade
Quoted relevant parts for you.

Now since BM said Andres left a read, odds are he left more than one.

That post didn’t read like a joke and there’s zero risk to outing a dead townies reads.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:33 am
by Titus
In post 876, MathBlade wrote:
In post 310, TheGoldenParadox wrote:You are a 2-Shot Neighborizer, and aligned with the Town. You may post in the thread and vote as you see fit.
Abilities:
~ Twice during the game, at Night, you may neighborize a player by sending a PM to the moderator. If your action succeeds, regardless of whether you live or die, that player will be added to your Neighborhood at the start of the next Day.
Hood existed people get added.

I expect BM with Andres’s last reads.
I'll let this play out. I have my own opinions but it's not worth getting in the way here since I misunderstood partially. I still think you're going off an assumption and should look for more persuasive methods.

Even if you're assumption is wrong, BM claiming to be the target is just noise without data.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:35 am
by MathBlade
In post 879, Titus wrote:
In post 876, MathBlade wrote:
In post 310, TheGoldenParadox wrote:You are a 2-Shot Neighborizer, and aligned with the Town. You may post in the thread and vote as you see fit.
Abilities:
~ Twice during the game, at Night, you may neighborize a player by sending a PM to the moderator. If your action succeeds, regardless of whether you live or die, that player will be added to your Neighborhood at the start of the next Day.
Hood existed people get added.

I expect BM with Andres’s last reads.
I'll let this play out. I have my own opinions but it's not worth getting in the way here since I misunderstood partially. I still think you're going off an assumption and should look for more persuasive methods.

Even if you're assumption is wrong, BM claiming to be the target is just noise without data.
What assumption am I going off of?

BM claimed something, I am verifying the claim. What “assumption” is there since no one counter claimed? If someone did BM would be lock scum.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:39 am
by Battle Mage
Math is here

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:41 am
by Titus
In post 880, MathBlade wrote:
In post 879, Titus wrote:
In post 876, MathBlade wrote:
In post 310, TheGoldenParadox wrote:You are a 2-Shot Neighborizer, and aligned with the Town. You may post in the thread and vote as you see fit.
Abilities:
~ Twice during the game, at Night, you may neighborize a player by sending a PM to the moderator. If your action succeeds, regardless of whether you live or die, that player will be added to your Neighborhood at the start of the next Day.
Hood existed people get added.

I expect BM with Andres’s last reads.
I'll let this play out. I have my own opinions but it's not worth getting in the way here since I misunderstood partially. I still think you're going off an assumption and should look for more persuasive methods.

Even if you're assumption is wrong, BM claiming to be the target is just noise without data.
What assumption am I going off of?

BM claimed something, I am verifying the claim. What “assumption” is there since no one counter claimed? If someone did BM would be lock scum.
To answer that assumption would defend BM and give him an out.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:46 am
by Battle Mage
In post 880, MathBlade wrote:
In post 879, Titus wrote:
In post 876, MathBlade wrote:
In post 310, TheGoldenParadox wrote:You are a 2-Shot Neighborizer, and aligned with the Town. You may post in the thread and vote as you see fit.
Abilities:
~ Twice during the game, at Night, you may neighborize a player by sending a PM to the moderator. If your action succeeds, regardless of whether you live or die, that player will be added to your Neighborhood at the start of the next Day.
Hood existed people get added.

I expect BM with Andres’s last reads.
I'll let this play out. I have my own opinions but it's not worth getting in the way here since I misunderstood partially. I still think you're going off an assumption and should look for more persuasive methods.

Even if you're assumption is wrong, BM claiming to be the target is just noise without data.
What assumption am I going off of?

BM claimed something, I am verifying the claim. What “assumption” is there since no one counter claimed? If someone did BM would be lock scum.
you're both better than this. and we have already bled this topic dry, but to briefly summarise:

I was neighbourised last night, and claimed today.
It has no bearing whatsoever on my alignment.
The hypothetical benefit for scum-BM fakeclaiming it, would I guess be being able to claim a dead townie's reads (in this economy, not worth much, more to the pity)
The hypothetical risk for scum-BM fakeclaiming it, is being counter-claimed and looking like a tart.

So to be clear, I'd have to be a moron to fakeclaim neighbour here, because it wouldn't benefit me in the least. Therefore if someone did counterclaim, I clearly wouldn't be "lock-scum". I guess it's then a question of who is the dumbass who wants a 1v1.

i genuinely wish i hadnt bothered claiming honestly, because it's just wasted so much energy.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:47 am
by MathBlade
That’s a lot of words for I am not sharing Andres’s reads.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:48 am
by Titus
Neither of us believed you fake claimed being the neighborhood target.

Mathblade's wanting to know the dead giy's reads.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:48 am
by Battle Mage
In post 877, Titus wrote:
In post 872, MathBlade wrote:
In post 870, Titus wrote:
In post 869, MathBlade wrote:
In post 644, Battle Mage wrote:lol I mean, we have a dead neighbouriser. I can confirm, he targetted me last night. It doesn't confirm my alignment one way or the other. But I can say, via the PT, Andres (like Ben) thought I was the towniest player. :D
Aha but it isn’t an unfair question.

Andres divulged reads to BM with his own words.

So asking for said reads is not an unfair question.

With those why BM should be apparent.

BM is being a smartass there.

There's no possible way Andres divulged anything. Andres would be dead before any PT with BM opened.
Nope. Hood existed based on TGP’s flip post and says add to.

And why are you defending your scumread? If I am wrong and BM is joking can’t he say so?
Mafia is a search for truth. Period. If you were talking tone or some shit, I wouldn't interject at all.

I'll recheck the flip post.
not only is Titus wrong here, but i'm not sure why she didn't make this claim when we discussed it earlier. I was quite clear about how the neighbourhood gimmick worked, and Titus never questionned it, and then randomly asserts later that I had 'lied'.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:49 am
by Battle Mage
In post 884, MathBlade wrote:That’s a lot of words for I am not sharing Andres’s reads.
???

i already did, what are you talking about?

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:49 am
by Battle Mage
In post 885, Titus wrote:Neither of us believed you fake claimed being the neighborhood target.

Mathblade's wanting to know the dead giy's reads.
i have pages to catch up, sorry but Math can read the thread.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:50 am
by MathBlade
In post 887, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 884, MathBlade wrote:That’s a lot of words for I am not sharing Andres’s reads.
???

i already did, what are you talking about?
Link them then. I skimmed could have missed it.

Where is Andres says
X is town Y is scum go vote Y.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:52 am
by Titus
Very reluctantly town leaning Math here.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:53 am
by Battle Mage
In post 863, MathBlade wrote:
In post 642, Rannygazoo wrote:I don’t know the neighbor mechanic. Can’t scum be a neighbor?
They can. It all depends on who the original person targets.

The BM choice is odd and maybe being able to see all of Andres’s thoughts not just selected ones can piece it together.

VOTE: Battle Mage

I will tunnel you to death if you don’t explain.
he targetted me cause i was the towniest player apparently. i'd rather you actually helped, rather than tunnelling me. this game is painful enough as it is being tunnelled by Titus. I could do with you Mathblading this.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:54 am
by superbowl9
LMAO THE SIBBLINGS ARE BACK

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:54 am
by MathBlade
Yup.

What do you make of BM Super Bowl?

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:55 am
by Battle Mage
In post 889, MathBlade wrote:
In post 887, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 884, MathBlade wrote:That’s a lot of words for I am not sharing Andres’s reads.
???

i already did, what are you talking about?
Link them then. I skimmed could have missed it.

Where is Andres says
X is town Y is scum go vote Y.
*sigh* from recollection, his hero-solve was Superbowl-Hessian-Flavor Leaf. he was wary of Titus too but not as far as a full scumread.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:55 am
by Titus
The possible assumption has just been deemed impossible. Namely that Andres could not have posted in the hood because it was created after his death, but it was still made because of the text of the role. Thus negating any reads BM would be able to share.

Here, BM has admitted Andres got at least one post off.

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:55 am
by superbowl9
Also are we gonna hammer me or not because im kinda done with the E-1 edging

pedit: havent tried reading alignment but hes been useful

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:56 am
by MathBlade
In post 896, superbowl9 wrote:Also are we gonna hammer me or not because im kinda done with the E-1 edging

pedit: havent tried reading alignment but hes been useful
I’m still getting my feet wet. Why are you so eager to die?

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:57 am
by Battle Mage
In post 895, Titus wrote:The possible assumption has just been deemed impossible. Namely that Andres could not have posted in the hood because it was created after his death, but it was still made because of the text of the role. Thus negating any reads BM would be able to share.

Here, BM has admitted Andres got at least one post off.
"admitted"? ffs Titus, I claimed that he has posted several things, like 10 pages ago. :facepalm:

this is hopelessly dull

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:57 am
by MathBlade
In post 895, Titus wrote:The possible assumption has just been deemed impossible. Namely that Andres could not have posted in the hood because it was created after his death, but it was still made because of the text of the role. Thus negating any reads BM would be able to share.

Here, BM has admitted Andres got at least one post off.
He did that before.

And man I wish I could see that hood because that seems like a load of malarkey.