Page 36 of 94
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:47 pm
by Save The Dragons
I can respect your play and still not be scared
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:48 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
In post 869, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Really???
Let’s put this another way: you say you expect Nancy should re-eval you if she is town. But you also stated you think your wacky playstyle is getting you SR. Why not try and change it up and see what happens? The reason she’s not re-eval you is that you’re not doing anything to change her perception of you.
That’s why it’s so blatantly obvious he’s scared of me, because otherwise he could re-evaluate and look at least townier than last night but he needs me gone, so he can’t.
He knows I caught 2 scum right out of the gate in Pokemon, so it’s understandable he’s scared of me.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:50 pm
by Save The Dragons
You dont know me very well do you
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:50 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 871, Save The Dragons wrote: In post 869, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Really???
Let’s put this another way: you say you expect Nancy should re-eval you if she is town. But you also stated you think your wacky playstyle is getting you SR. Why not try and change it up and see what happens? The reason she’s not re-eval you is that you’re not doing anything to change her perception of you.
Why should I change for other people esp when I can get correctly tr by being myself
How often has that worked out for you?
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:51 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
I didn’t yet obvtown yesterday but I have now and I don’t believe town!you isn’t seeing it.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:51 pm
by Save The Dragons
I thought I said meta was bad 100 times this game and you are still are pretending I care?
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:52 pm
by Save The Dragons
In post 878, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 871, Save The Dragons wrote: In post 869, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Really???
Let’s put this another way: you say you expect Nancy should re-eval you if she is town. But you also stated you think your wacky playstyle is getting you SR. Why not try and change it up and see what happens? The reason she’s not re-eval you is that you’re not doing anything to change her perception of you.
Why should I change for other people esp when I can get correctly tr by being myself
How often has that worked out for you?
Well enough when scum doesn't try to sandbag me
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:52 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
I don’t believe your sr on me is genuine.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:53 pm
by Save The Dragons
Hence you don't know me
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:54 pm
by Save The Dragons
You have not obvtowned
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:55 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 881, Save The Dragons wrote: In post 878, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 871, Save The Dragons wrote: In post 869, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Really???
Let’s put this another way: you say you expect Nancy should re-eval you if she is town. But you also stated you think your wacky playstyle is getting you SR. Why not try and change it up and see what happens? The reason she’s not re-eval you is that you’re not doing anything to change her perception of you.
Why should I change for other people esp when I can get correctly tr by being myself
How often has that worked out for you?
Well enough when scum doesn't try to sandbag me
I think you sandbag yourself more often
Situation Room, LN 235, Pokémon LT
That’s just stuff of the top of my head where either I wrongly SR you or a substantial amount of other people wrongly SR you
I think it’s pretty clear you’re not as obvtown as you think a majority of the time
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:55 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:56 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
In post 725, Save The Dragons wrote:woe is me cannot come from town i guess
the flaw in nancy's meta read is that she's comparing two games where i was playing to day 6 and was greatly invested in being alive and not mislimmed. i also had a special role in FF that i didn't want to get mislimmed with. the fact she's not taking that into account is a little yucky
and that's not to say that i'm just a different person than the person who was playing those games
so that's why meta sucks
You were constantly re-evaluting me in that pt, so I don’t even understand this argument?
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:57 pm
by Save The Dragons
I don't recall being scumread in situation room? Fine whatever you're just right I'm wrong I guess based on my experience of my own games
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:58 pm
by Save The Dragons
In post 887, Nancy Sinatra wrote: In post 725, Save The Dragons wrote:woe is me cannot come from town i guess
the flaw in nancy's meta read is that she's comparing two games where i was playing to day 6 and was greatly invested in being alive and not mislimmed. i also had a special role in FF that i didn't want to get mislimmed with. the fact she's not taking that into account is a little yucky
and that's not to say that i'm just a different person than the person who was playing those games
so that's why meta sucks
You were constantly re-evaluting me in that pt, so I don’t even understand this argument?
I dunno how what I said has to do with re evaluating you
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 8:59 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
Do you think it’s possible @Gamma that this isn’t total bs?
I really feel he has no interest in solving me.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:00 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
In post 888, Save The Dragons wrote:I don't recall being scumread in situation room? Fine whatever you're just right I'm wrong I guess based on my experience of my own games
???
I wasn’t in that game.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:00 pm
by Gamma Emerald
This just feels icky
While I do think some valid points have been made about KT’s play potentially evolving, to try and turn things against Nancy like this using this assessment of KT’s play, when it’s not really an indictment of his play at all and just an observation, is rather nasty.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:00 pm
by Save The Dragons
That was to gamma
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:02 pm
by Save The Dragons
Just lim me already so i can get out of this terrible game
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:02 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 890, Nancy Sinatra wrote:
Do you think it’s possible @Gamma that this isn’t total bs?
I really feel he has no interest in solving me.
I think he’s sunk into the same bad scumplay I would get involved with a lot where I’d dig my heels into a certain stance because dropping it felt like losing ground. It would be 100% simpler to actually take anything that’s been said on board but he hasn’t because he views it as damaging to his agenda.
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:03 pm
by Save The Dragons
I don't fucking know which scum is on me but it's pretty clear a scum is on me if you have eyes
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:03 pm
by Save The Dragons
I've responded to Nancy?????? Like wtf do you think I'm doing
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:05 pm
by Save The Dragons
I'm trying to figure her out but she keeps making narratives and everyone is like "I guess making stuff up is cool"
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2022 9:06 pm
by Nancy Sinatra
In post 892, Gamma Emerald wrote:
This just feels icky
While I do think some valid points have been made about KT’s play potentially evolving, to try and turn things against Nancy like this using this assessment of KT’s play, when it’s not really an indictment of his play at all and just an observation, is rather nasty.
Yes, that is possibly what makes him look worse than Dwelee because he just keeps coming up with new bs reasons to sr me instead of just one. Also, his just totally dismissing my pocket question like was also ugh. That’s why I changed my mind back about him and Dwlee not possibly being buddies, so not extremely confident on that but weird he doesn’t even consider it a possibility.