Page 38 of 47
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:27 pm
by Frogsterking
In post 527, Fredrick A Campbell wrote: In post 525, shellyc wrote: In post 520, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Anyone have any last contributions? 12 hours and some change left, a hammer vote is coming sooner or later at this point, and one of us won't be here for Day 2. Get your last impulses and reads and ideas out, tell us Day 2 plans, etc.
IMO this Italiano / Magik interaction for calling Italiano out seems off to me. (This is just a gut feeling)
I also have an opinion on the interaction.
In post 531, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Actually, I think it should be fine for me to state it. I think the interaction is unlikely to be scum acting. Should it be true that it wasn't scum acting, at least one of them is town.
In post 920, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Right now, I think the scumteam is either Casey and LavarManos or ItalianoVD and LavarManos. I am considering executing LavarManos today.
Because of this????
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:32 pm
by LavarManos
I am somewhat experienced, but quite busy recently.
Forgive me for my lackluster play. I do not see much changing irl, so *shrug*
Also, I do think it would be best if you voted first.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:33 pm
by Frogsterking
You're play has not been lackluster as much as lurky.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:33 pm
by Frogsterking
Your*
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:34 pm
by LavarManos
That's what I meant.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:34 pm
by Frogsterking
Can you give me any insight into how you approach the game as scum???
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:34 pm
by Frogsterking
Off the cuff. Please, it will help.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:36 pm
by LavarManos
I think I would just try to active lurk and throw in the occasional thought or two. Nothing much.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:37 pm
by Frogsterking
In post 932, LavarManos wrote:I think I would just try to active lurk and throw in the occasional thought or two. Nothing much.
Okay great, and have you ever bussed a scum buddy before??
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:37 pm
by LavarManos
Not yet
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:40 pm
by Frogsterking
Lavar can you please answer one more question?
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:41 pm
by LavarManos
I just did
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:42 pm
by Frogsterking
Can you give me an example of a bad scumplay, like something your partner would do and instantly you would be so angry that they did that, like they ruined the game for you??
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:44 pm
by LavarManos
i am not sure how to answer that? I think I would be ok with anything for the most part.
I guess I would be mad if they claimed to be scum and got themselves hanged. But that is gamethrowing and you don't really see that much.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:47 pm
by Frogsterking
Okay. You seem pretty easy-going.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:48 pm
by Frogsterking
Thank you for answering my questions.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:59 pm
by Fredrick A Campbell
In post 925, Frogsterking wrote: In post 527, Fredrick A Campbell wrote: In post 525, shellyc wrote: In post 520, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Anyone have any last contributions? 12 hours and some change left, a hammer vote is coming sooner or later at this point, and one of us won't be here for Day 2. Get your last impulses and reads and ideas out, tell us Day 2 plans, etc.
IMO this Italiano / Magik interaction for calling Italiano out seems off to me. (This is just a gut feeling)
I also have an opinion on the interaction.
In post 531, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
Actually, I think it should be fine for me to state it. I think the interaction is unlikely to be scum acting. Should it be true that it wasn't scum acting, at least one of them is town.
In post 920, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Right now, I think the scumteam is either Casey and LavarManos or ItalianoVD and LavarManos. I am considering executing LavarManos today.
Because of this????
Wow, apparently that was exactly how I came to the conclusion subconsciously.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:00 pm
by Fredrick A Campbell
But I also have a suspicion on LavarManos in addition to that.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 4:06 pm
by Frogsterking
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:04 pm
by Fredrick A Campbell
The initial reason I remember is for potentially lining up executions in
post 688. A more general trend that I have noticed is that they (LavarManos) just says the bare minimum.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:01 pm
by Casey
In post 888, Frogsterking wrote: In post 887, Fredrick A Campbell wrote: In post 884, Frogsterking wrote:Also in hindsight I noticed that I got pushed a lot for perspective slips on D2 and I wonder if it's due to how I write and whether it was exacerbated by my drinking.
I think it was just me who pushed you for that.
To be fair it was Casey who pointed them out and then allowed you to push them.
Just FYI, I pushed you also. Like you were my #2 scumread at the time.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:06 pm
by Casey
Gun to my head Lavar Italiano. Or Lavar Fred. Italiano Fred has the greatest interactions and I am super sleepy and don't recall but I think I marked them as likely to be genuine.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:08 pm
by Casey
In post 893, Frogsterking wrote:I have more experience with NKA, is anyone here amateur, pro or otherwise experienced in VCA?
None.
Passing out.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:08 pm
by Frogsterking
In post 946, Casey wrote:
Gun to my head Lavar Italiano. Or Lavar Fred. Italiano Fred has the greatest interactions and I am super sleepy and don't recall but I think I marked them as likely to be genuine.
Why "Lavar Italiano" in the first line and then "Italiano Fred" in the second line?
In post 945, Casey wrote: In post 888, Frogsterking wrote: In post 887, Fredrick A Campbell wrote: In post 884, Frogsterking wrote:Also in hindsight I noticed that I got pushed a lot for perspective slips on D2 and I wonder if it's due to how I write and whether it was exacerbated by my drinking.
I think it was just me who pushed you for that.
To be fair it was Casey who pointed them out and then allowed you to push them.
Just FYI, I pushed you also. Like you were my #2 scumread at the time.
Setting up the lynch.
You didn't answer my question here Casey.
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:16 pm
by Frogsterking
In post 944, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
The initial reason I remember is for potentially lining up executions in
post 688. A more general trend that I have noticed is that they (LavarManos) just says the bare minimum.
Ugh I totally did not see that post and it's so true he only says the bare minimum.