Mafiascum.net

Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Fred: "I think the scumteam is ItalianoVD and LavarManos."

Lavar: "I will reconsider my reads, but the scumteam might just be Casey and Fred?" "I think Casey has been townie, but it is LYLO. A member of the mafia could be townie, so that alone does not prevent my vote from going there."

Italiano: "My scumteam is Lavar and Casey, however, I’ve been wrong on both days so far (shelly / rocknil) so I’m not real confident about placing a vote down unplanned or without logic."

Casey: Currently feeling Fred/Italiano. It may be Lavar's lack of action that has me focused there. I'm giving Lavar a pass for being a newbie.

Also this exchange:

In post 930, Frogsterking wrote:Can you give me any insight into how you approach the game as scum???

In post 932, LavarManos wrote:I think I would just try to active lurk and throw in the occasional thought or two. Nothing much.

Would a newbie maf really say how they play as maf while doing the exact same thing they say they're doing?

In post 975, Casey wrote:Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Maybe you have to explain why you think so as I was not trying to do so when I made those posts. Instead, I just answered ItalianoVD's questions.

Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

In post 977, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 975, Casey wrote:Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Maybe you have to explain why you think so as I was not trying to do so when I made those posts. Instead, I just answered ItalianoVD's questions.

Yes but why is that you did? No follow-ups, no addressing, no questioning his actions.

In post 978, Casey wrote:Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

By quote above I mean #976.

In post 978, Casey wrote:Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

lol

I'm still holding off on the results of the VCA I did until A wild Charmeleon appears!

In post 979, Casey wrote:

In post 977, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 975, Casey wrote:Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Maybe you have to explain why you think so as I was not trying to do so when I made those posts. Instead, I just answered ItalianoVD's questions.

Yes but why is that

all

you did? No follow-ups, no addressing, no questioning his actions.

Because I did not see any necessity in doing so.

In post 978, Casey wrote:Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

He was potentially not coached when he posted that.

Sorry, I do not think I have any new ideas.
Frogster, feel free to post your VCA whenever. Time is running out.

In post 970, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:In post 951, ItalianoVD wrote the following:

"Frederick already stated his and I don’t blame him for thinking that even though it’s only halfway true."

How would you know if LavarManos was scum though?

I don’t know for sure, but it’s the same thing: given the scenario, that’s how I was responding; like it was from your point of view.

In post 973, Casey wrote:

In post 965, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 952, Casey wrote:Awake again!

In post 895, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 885, Casey wrote:Fred are you going to continue to question the unCC'd power role or are you going to do something useful?

Are you?

No. Is there some reason I should be?

Just pointing out how you are pushing Frederick to do something you are not doing yourself.

I am literally not doing that.

You asked him if he’s going to do something useful. I asked you if you going to do something useful. I wasn’t saying are you going to stop questioning the power role.

In post 974, Casey wrote:I just looked back at my ISO and yeah I have zero clue what you're talking about.

I wasn’t talking overall, I was only talking about today.

In post 975, Casey wrote:Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Yeah, I thought he was town and I didn’t see why he was being universally scumread, so I was really trying to understand what others were seeing because I didn’t see it. If I townread someone I will try to protect them as best I can.

In post 980, Casey wrote:

In post 978, Casey wrote:Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

By quote above I mean #976.

What are you asking? If Lavar was coached to say what he said? That doesn’t make sense.

In post 985, LavarManos wrote:Sorry, I do not think I have any new ideas.
Frogster, feel free to post your VCA whenever. Time is running out.

Yikes.

Italiano do you have any thoughts on Lavar's lurking? And playing exactly the way he said he would as scum?

In post 976, Casey wrote:Fred: "I think the scumteam is ItalianoVD and LavarManos."

Lavar: "I will reconsider my reads, but the scumteam might just be Casey and Fred?" "I think Casey has been townie, but it is LYLO. A member of the mafia could be townie, so that alone does not prevent my vote from going there."

Italiano: "My scumteam is Lavar and Casey, however, I’ve been wrong on both days so far (shelly / rocknil) so I’m not real confident about placing a vote down unplanned or without logic."

Casey: Currently feeling Fred/Italiano. It may be Lavar's lack of action that has me focused there. I'm giving Lavar a pass for being a newbie.

Also this exchange:

In post 930, Frogsterking wrote:Can you give me any insight into how you approach the game as scum???

In post 932, LavarManos wrote:I think I would just try to active lurk and throw in the occasional thought or two. Nothing much.

Would a newbie maf really say how they play as maf while doing the exact same thing they say they're doing?

I'm wondering about this last bit as well.

In post 983, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 979, Casey wrote:

In post 977, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 975, Casey wrote:Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Maybe you have to explain why you think so as I was not trying to do so when I made those posts. Instead, I just answered ItalianoVD's questions.

Yes but why is that

all

you did? No follow-ups, no addressing, no questioning his actions.

Because I did not see any necessity in doing so.

Not even now?

In post 984, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 978, Casey wrote:Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

He was potentially not coached when he posted that.

That was the worst non-answer I've heard all game.

In post 987, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 973, Casey wrote:

In post 965, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 952, Casey wrote:Awake again!

In post 895, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 885, Casey wrote:Fred are you going to continue to question the unCC'd power role or are you going to do something useful?

Are you?

No. Is there some reason I should be?

Just pointing out how you are pushing Frederick to do something you are not doing yourself.

I am literally not doing that.

You asked him if he’s going to do something useful. I asked you if you going to do something useful. I wasn’t saying are you going to stop questioning the power role.

In post 974, Casey wrote:I just looked back at my ISO and yeah I have zero clue what you're talking about.

I wasn’t talking overall, I was only talking about today.

Are you still under the opinion that I'm being "useless"?

In post 988, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 975, Casey wrote:Italiano can you explain your blatant defense of Fred in #864?

Fred can you explain why your posts to Italiano in #863 look like they're trying to push Italiano off your back?

Lavar can you do something please? We have 3 days left and we really need you to focus.

Yeah, I thought he was town and I didn’t see why he was being universally scumread, so I was really trying to understand what others were seeing because I didn’t see it. If I townread someone I will try to protect them as best I can.

You said he was a "light townread."

In post 989, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 980, Casey wrote:

In post 978, Casey wrote:Fred & Italiano how do you reconcile the quote above being from maf?? Coached by his partner to active lurk and say self-incriminating things??

By quote above I mean #976.

What are you asking? If Lavar was coached to say what he said? That doesn’t make sense.

Explain how that quote comes from a maf.

It's genuinely impressive that Lavar is my biggest townread, and he's

Some might even find it a little suspicious that you are townreading me so much . . .

So my real reports were that Fred visited no one N1 and Italiano visited Redados N2

I'll try to post the takeaways from the VCA though I'm fairly tipsy again

In post 996, Frogsterking wrote:Italiano visited Redados N2

I'll try to partner hunt, but considering my reasons for townreading Italiano were fallacious, I might not be the most reliable.
Between Fred and Casey huh