Greetings to the rest of you who I will get to know.
@Liam and Zang – Can we expect you to be more active than you were in Smalltown – Stardust?
@Empking – If you are scum can I count on you to hammer your teammates, especially to end the game? [/inside joke off]
Given this statement we should expect no attacks from you later on in the game based on the premise of inconsistency in reads I take it?Seraph wrote:A good player should keep his mind open to new possibilities.
Emphasis added. Why is being self-inconsistent in the RVS inherently worse than out of RVS, which is your implication.Seraph wrote:In other words, you accuse me of something and then proceed to do aforementioned thing in your next post. That's a double-standard, son,and in the RVS, it reeks.
I see you’ve adopted the Fate / Sprexy / xReckx playstyle of being scummy for survivalist reasons. Good to know as the game goes forward.RC wrote:No... that's actually fine, I would think I'm scum too.
Hi, look at me I’m pretending not to be paying attention to the below posted Mod rules. I’m all random and scummy. [/sarcasm off]RC wrote:But you're probably right, I probably am scum. I should probably read my role PM >.<
MOD, whose word is Law wrote:You may start posting once you have read your role PM and replied back with the phrase.
Look at me, I also am likely to be pretending not to pay attention.Karma wrote:Shoot, I thought this was twilight/confirmation phase based on TheLonging's post above me. -_-
1. Stop referencing active games.Young wrote:In the other game I just started with you, you changed your vote 4 times within the first half of the day (real time) and got very defensive about it. Something very suspicious about your play style.
2. Why is his playstyle suspicious? Have you met Fate / Sprexy / xReckx / Ythan?
Hmmm … attempt to buddy up to an experienced Town player by scum? Or just plain bad Appeal to Authority on your part?Young wrote:Shit, let's just play follow the Anon, he seems pro.
QFT. Meta is a crutch for the weak. At best it serves as minor support for well-founded and presented suspicions (this is IMO, btw).TheLonging wrote:I don't rely on meta cause I've played too many games where meta basically helped town lose.
Why are you concerned with someone being put at 4 votes away from lynch? It’s not like he’s at L-1 already.Digi wrote:L-4 on page two seems just a little excessive on page 2, doesn't it? I'll hold my vote until we hear from Tasky.
VOTE: ReaperCharlie. So far I very much don't like what I see.