The Return to Liten (Game Over)

[Bowser]

Oh boy.

FFFS?

~CSL

[Bowser]

Let's see how much more Dana flails with another vote. I love how the flailing started after one vote.

VOTE: dana for great justice



oh, and uh...MWAHAHA and such

[Bowser]

the flailing started in post #59, at which point dana had one vote, right?

[Bowser]

dana, that post was not mine, and I WISH he'd shown it to me BEFORE he posted it.

~CSL

[Bowser]

Hey guys,
CSL has been sick and I've been getting my ass kicked by school a lot more than usual this week. Contribution will be up. Sorry about that. I'll keep this post brief because we wanted to get one up tonight but we weren't able to collaborate much. We'll post more tomorrow. First of all

unvote dana

Bowser's still scum, but MoI is committing a pretty blatant chainsaw defense right now. Obvpartners.

he's attacking you because he thinks you are making scummy arguments, not because you are making arguments against me.

I'm cool with his jib too.

unvote

vote:Data

I haven't really played with Slaxx before, so I'm not sure if this is unusual behavior for him. His ISO consists mainly of bandwagon votes and one liners. Just wondering if anyone else noticed and found this weird.

I also forgot to ask this before replacing in, but I'd like to know who the hydras are and their heads. Please use full screen-names. While CSL sounds familiar, I can't recall what it stands for.

CSL is his username. Mine is Untrod Tripod.

<3,
UT

[Bowser]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bowser

srs vote.

Last to post in thread, despite definitely being around. Gut twinged at his vote post. It all just feels very 'safe'.

We don't understand this post very well. So you're making a "srs vote" on us for making a "safe" vote (is any vote ever really safe? We think FoS's could be safe, while votes by definition are not) that we said was for pressure? Are we reading that right? Or are you saying that the timing of our first posting in the thread is scummy? Is it some combination of the two? If you think that adding a pressure vote is a scumtell, that's fine (although we disagree) it's just a your mileage may vary thing. However, we simply cannot figure out a way that the time thing could ever be a tell of any sort. Please, enlighten us how when we first post in the thread could tell you our alignment.

________________________________________

Care to bother to explain why? Or are you just piggybacking of Spyrex’s logic?

I’d like you to clarify how your vote on Bowser here isn’t exactly the same thing – looking for a ‘safe’ vote on a popular wagon?

unvote; vote: MoI

Either you're scum not paying very close attention to the game, randomly skimming for posts to nitpick so you look like you're scumhunting, or there's a space-time distortion in this thread and you're reading the one in a parallel universe where Spyrex voted before me.

RTFT.

You had two options. Point out that MoI had misread in a civil way. Or this

Yeah, he misread the thread. Your vote on us is still crap.

__________________________________________________

The vitriol with which you respond to a simple question (which you didn’t answer, BTW, so lovely dodge) is noted.

The way I saw it, your question was a result of a mistaken read on the thread, so I viewed it as irrelevant. It wasn't question dodging, I just thought it would cease to be a question once you saw your perception of the game was incorrect.

"I figured the only reason that someone would find me scummy is if they were misreading the thread."

You fail to present in your quotes that only the SECOND quote was addressed to you. The first quote was addressed to Slaxx inquiring about his motiviation. The reasons for that question has NOTHING to do with you or when you voted in relation to Spyrex. So thanks for pointing out that you voted before Spyrex when it has nothing to do with the first quote.

I'm aware the first quote wasn't addressed to me. I linked it as well because it was further indication you weren't reading the thread properly.

I’d like you to clarify how your vote on Bowser here isn’t exactly the same thing – looking for a ‘safe’ vote on a popular wagon?

Again – why is your vote on Bowser not a ‘safe vote’ and explain how Bowser’s is safe.

1. Bowser was the last person to jump on dana and expressly said it was for pressure. Hardly what you would call a safe vote given the interest it generated.
2. CSL being part of Bowser make him a relatively easy target if he is Town for opportunistic voting. It’s something I keep an eye on when I am in a game with players who are regarded as weaker by the community.

1.) If you want to go that WIFOM-y route, I could easily say the same thing about my vote. Hardly a safe vote given the interest I'm generating.

No -- interest has nothing to do with whether or not the vote is 'safe'. IMO making the first vote on someone who hasn't been voted is decidedly less 'safe' than hopping onto a popular bandwagon with parroted reasoning. The fact that it became popular after I voted is irrelevant -- I don't have control over whether other players agree with me or not, but it's interesting to see you wording the question like the fact that others agreed with me should be a point against me.

The fact that others agreed with you isn't what makes it scummy. In fact I'm not really sure where you got that from his question. He's saying it clearly wasn't a "safe" vote because it made others vote for us. Because it gave other people a reason to vote for us it was, by definition, not a safe vote and you were incorrect in saying that it was. Nice attempt at a strawman, though.

Hey Data - Is Bowser scum?

Bowser's still scum, but MoI is committing a pretty blatant chainsaw defense right now. Obvpartners.

Like we said in our last post, it's not a chainsaw. He's attacking you for scummy actions, not because of who you're attacking. We're not "obvpartners".

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

We like Furry's point about how you were content to vote for MoI when your case on him assumes that we're scum. Because of that and the other content in this post, we will VOTE: Data

[Bowser]

I think this latest opportunistic vote on Data says all you need to know about Bowser.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk

Opportunism is not adding to a case on someone by doing a PBPA of all of their relevant posts. If we were being opportunistic, we would have just written "we agree with all the things said about data. vote data". Sounds familiar...kind of like exactly what Slaxx has been doing. Tell us, why are you calling us opportunistic when you're not saying jack about Slaxx? Then again, this isn't the first time someone has called you out on calling one person scummy for something other people have been doing too...

[Bowser]

No. I do not think we (me and Tripod) even have the time to play this game anymore. So instead of you all accusing us of lurking, and wanting us replaced, we are hereby

requesting replacement