Zachtown in the mountains (Game over TOWN WINS!)
Forum rules
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I dunno, you seem to be overreacting slightly to your wagon. This drew my eye in particular:I Am Innocent Post 47 wrote:
Cause it's page 2. I don't over react to poor play early in the game. More often than not these players turn up townie. But I'll watch him...Sotty7 wrote:IAM, if Benmage's plan was scummy, why aren't you voting him?
It looked like you were trying to dirty benmage for what he said in pregame and if you legitimately thought what he did was scummy you should have voted. Instead you threw out a random vote, it feels disingenuous.I Am Innocent Post 43 wrote:Any other scummy plans you think we should incorporate?
The question felt a little spiteful and this explanation doesn't cut it.
= = = = = =I Am Innocent Post 47 wrote:Cause it's page 2. I don't over react to poor play early in the game. More often than not these players turn up townie. But I'll watch him...
Percy wrote:Sotty7 wrote:IAM, if Benmage's plan was scummy, why aren't you voting him?Vote: Sotty7
I don't do traps, they're silly.Percy Post 67 wrote:Sotty's question struck me as deliberately aggrevating. It boiled down to "You said all thisseriousstuff about Benmage, why didn't youseriousvote?". Seems like a trap for IAI - like either he's disingenuous or he's timid.
I thought IAI responded strongly, whilst Benmage took the bait to go all attack dog "the RVS is officially OVER, BITCHES, I am THROWING DOWN".
Also, what wasstrongabout IAM's response?
= = = = =
BUZZ. Try again Red.RedCoyote Post 55 wrote:I agree with Percy's vote here. I'm thinking we have a similar problem with Sotty's comment. I don't recall IAI ever saying pointedly that Benmage's plan is scummy, yet she presumes that and gives him a question from that presumption.
Vote: Sotty7
= = = = =I Am Innocent Post 43 wrote:
Information Instead of Analysis? I analyzed the one thing worth analyzing so far. Your initial scummy plan. Yeah you nixed it, after you were called on it. I just took the call on it and completely blew it up in your face.Benmage wrote:I already nix'd that plan. But thanks for the IIoA....looks like the 7 year old was right.
Any other scummy plans you think we should incorporate?
What made you come to that conclusion based on that quoted statement? I would think scum have day talk.Nikanor Post 56 wrote:
Apparently Zach is taking away mafia's night talk to make up for that.Zach wrote:(Keep in mind that I may establish rules pertaining to the scum's ability to night talk privately with the scum team. The town will not be informed as to these requirements.)
= = = = =
! Oso. I already like you. Beat me to the punch. I might follow you onto Red, but I'm quite liking my IAM vote atm.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
And? What juiciness did you discover?I Am Innocent Post 72 wrote:I asked that question to primarily gauge his reaction
Don't believe the hype.I Am Innocent Post 72 wrote:Sotty, you're smart,
My logic works pretty well actually, go back and re-read the exchange between you, me and benamge and then get back to me on this.I Am Innocent Post 72 wrote: why would I try to dirty benmage and then say he is townie? Your logic doesn't add up girl. Try again.
= = = = = =
Feel free to follow your own advice. Who are the scums?jasonT1981 Post 75 wrote:you know, this stat talk is really getting away from the actual objective of finding and lynching scum. I would suspect scum would be happy to drag discussion away from scum hunting in anyway possible maybe even perhaps lead the discussion away.....
Also I wouldn't say set up talk has flooded out the good stuff. In fact I have pretty much ignored the numbers. You should too.
= = = = = =
The Red thing is probably null... But isOso Post 76 wrote:@Sotty, I may join you back on that wagon as RC's mistake may have simply been a reading phail. He(IaI) already seems to be flailing in his defense quite a bit and flood posting, and it's barely 4 pages into the game and slightly over 1 day since the game started. Have to take that 7 year old out for an ice cream.isRed so I dunno. I'm kinda waiting to see what he does next before deciding.
Yeah, IAI does seem a tad frazzled. I think I like it.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I mean that Red is a very capable player so him making a mistake that was so obvious was out of character. The more I think about it, the more it is probably null. Nobody is perfect after all. But I'm not discounting the possibility of scum Red screwing with my mind.jasonT1981 Post 77 wrote:Sotty, can you expalin your last bit of your post please for those of us not in the know of Red?
you Italic seems to suggest you are familar with his playstyle.. I have never played with him so am curious to know what you mean.Sotty7 wrote: The Red thing is probably null... But isisRed so I dunno. I'm kinda waiting to see what he does next before deciding.
Ah so yeah, I agree with Elmo (post 78).- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Unvote
IAM, when I said I wanted you frazzled I didn't mean melting down completely. Unvote yourself, your overreaction to the wagon on you is a little silly. Scum IAM would probably play it cool and brush it off so I'm going to make a leap of faith by taking my vote off for now. What you need to do when you come back into the thread is re-read the opening exchange between me, you and benmage. If you still can't see why my vote was on you I will talk you though it. If you are town you can be benefit so get in here and start doing that. At this point I really doubt any of the people you listed are scum. In other words, take a deep breath and start again, it looks like this is the first time you have been run up in this manner. Learn from it.
Lets try something different.
Vote: Nikanor- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
lol! I didn't realize that... You have brainwashed me clearlyPercy Post 108 wrote:Right out of my mouth, hilarious.
Eeeeh no. I don't believe I set anything up, it would have happened with or with my question I think. Also as easy as you can write a scum narrative for the question I can write a townie one. Wanting to know why IAM was using snide statements to make benamge look scummy while keeping his random vote. That doesn't sound like a town thought process on IAMs part does it?Percy Post 108 wrote:The trap is that you set up a fight, and the one that backs down first is mislynch potential. Their interaction with their victorious opponent is then more than enough content for you to spin into something scummy. It's a great way for scum to start the day!
I also took a very clear stance on the “fight” so it wasn't like I was fanning the flames or sitting on the fence.
Why wait to place a serious vote? Why wait to place a semi serious vote? Acutally, as I type this I am having flash backs of Mini 775 where you spend a big portion of day one arguing about the need for an RVS. Do you still hold these beliefs?Percy Post 108 wrote:@Sotty7: IAI was sensible in his response. He said that he didn't want to serious vote right away, but that Benmage was worth watching. What's wrong with that?
= = = = = =
What arguments of his were bad to you? I don't like that I have to ask you this when you essentially ask mongoose the same kinda thing in the same post.Mina Post 110 wrote:I'm a bit annoyed. Because IaI made so many bad arguments before that self-vote, and on principle, throwing an antitown hissy fit shouldn't manipulate people off his wagon...but it feels genuine. Call me a sucker, but I'm buying it. So I'll direct my attention elsewhere.
Mina Post 110 wrote:Why exactly do you think I am Innocent's suspicions were decent? Which ones in particular were decent?
Scummy?Mina Post 110 wrote:This feels like sucking up.
I'm not voting for Nik for lurking, what makes you think this is a lurker wagon? I will elaborate on my vote in a bit here though. I'm trying to not to wall it up too much so will probably come in a separate post.Mina Post 110 wrote:Question to all those voting Nikanor or saying you support his wagon after Locke cast the first vote for him: what in particular makes you suspect Nikanor over another lurker? Is it just that he's already a viable bandwagon?
= = = = = =
If I was one of three scum in this set up I'd want some day talk. The amount of mislynches needed would make me cry, double day or not.Nikanor Post 117 wrote:Where are you getting day talk from?
= = = = = =
This. From what I have seen IAI is very composed scum, he manipulated me very well in newbie 960 which is why I did nominate him for best new player like he said. I don't have any IAI's town play to compare with, but the magnitude of the meltdown just doesn't make sense for IAI scum. I am annoyed that he isn't addressing my point against him, but I will get to that in another post.Locke Lamora Post 127 wrote:I've played with IAI as scum, and he seemed quite calm and collected. He was much more antagonistic here than I expected before his meltdown and I don't really see where the impetus for it came from, given that there were all of three votes on him at the time, which really isn't that much pressure. I'm treating it as a null tell and I think he needs some time to cool down.
I thought it was a RVS vote. He is now repping it as serious without any real transition. Not liking that move too much considering he hasn't asked Jason any questions at this point. He is just piling on with Elmo's reasoning and not even Elmo is voting for Jason. (I notice this changes as I work though the thread a little more, but at the time this was my thoughts)Locke Lamora Post 127 wrote:Sotty: what do you think of Nik's Jason vote?
= = = = =
I won't go into “omg read the 1st post” but you seemed to believe this claim. Why didn't you vote for Jason?imkingdavid Post 128 wrote:
And what is your goal behind claiming this early, when you're not even at L-1?Nik wrote:No, I'm a day cop. jasonT is mafia.
= = = = =
How? Other players have demonstrated a lack of knowledge to the set up (furc, IKD) are they scummy too? I see your follow up to Jason in post 169 but you should know that being defensive isn't a scum tell.... So what?RedCoyote Post 158 wrote:Elmo 141 wrote:
Shouldn't you already know he was lying? What did you see?jasonT1981 wrote:ok,i see above he is lying.... Im happy with my vote. A claim like that could have outted a real cop.Unvote;vote:jasonT1981
And how could a real Cop be outed in a mountainous game?
This is quite telling if you ask me.
= = = = =
Bad backdoor wagon vote right here.Dry-fit Post 159 wrote:However, that does look like a slip by jason.
Unvote. Vote: jasonT1981
Elaborate in your next post how Jason slipped and how that is scummy.
= = = = =
“I really doubt” isn't me beingI Am Innocent Post 175 wrote:Usually the mafia distance themselves, so I thought one, maybe two would be on my early wagon to "see where it went". The first underlined caught my eye though. How could townie sotty be so sure that of the 5 or so players that were coming after me, that none of them were scum. It made more sense that scum was on the wagon, maybe multiple scum.sure. At this point of the game I don't find the players you rattled off to be scummy. I also think you are reaching in this whole post with my whole “lets try something different” but whatever.
= = = = =
Okay I'm caught up. More coming.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
IAI I asked you on two seperate occasions to reevaluate this bad attack on me. Why did you ignore this?I Am Innocent Post 72 wrote: why would I try to dirty benmage and then say he is townie? Your logic doesn't add up girl. Try again.
The fact you threw in a dig on a player who you later state is probably a townie doesn't make you look good. I stated that I felt your direct question to benmage was more than a little bitter sounding
Explain to me why I wouldn't, upon seeing that post, think that you saw benmage as scum? It isn't until I directly question you that you say he is town. These two actions don't add up and I don't see how I wasn't justified in pushing you on this.I Am Innocent Post 43 wrote:Any other scummy plans you think we should incorporate?
Your self righteousness is sticking on me (but you nommed me for a scummy how could you possibly vote for me?!!) I don't like your reactions during being run up, and your posts since have been tainted with OMGUS. I hate to say it, but until you pull your head out of your ass and take an objective look at your wagon I can't take you seriously. You can't just paint those who dare ran you up as scum without any real solid logic.
I'd also like to know why you think Nikanor is town.
= = = = = =
I decided to switch to Nikanor because basically of what Locke pointed out. His first post ignores legit discussion that is going on completely. He makes a set up speculation statement as far as the night talk goes that I'm not really sure had any real point.
His next post represents his vote on Jason as serious all along. Building a case but not actually asking Jason any questions. Doesn't look like real scum hunting, more taking advantage of a players scummish play style. He makes no elaboration on why Jason is “obv scum” and like I commented earlier, seemed to be piggy backing on Elmo's pressure.
He does get a little better as the game progresses but I quite like my vote right now. Dry-fit would be a good second choice.
Other players I am looking at:
Red is a little off. The vote on Jason is terribad as I detialed in my last post. Looking for more of an explanation from him ASAP.
IKD seems tentative. His questioning Nik on his claim looks weird without a vote.
Mina. I have a love hate relationship with her right now. Some of her stuff is great, some sets my gut twitching. Probably need to see more before I can decide.
Locke and KaleiÐoscøpe are my biggest town reads at this point.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Hrmm.
Still don't like IAI.
Don't agree with Percy and his harsh judgment on me. I think it has a lot to do with him and his love for RVS so I am willing to let it pass. The rest of his posting is good though.
I could move over to Red. Going to wait to see how he responds first though.
It's not. That's the problem.Mina Post 188 wrote:Can people tell me if this is normal with RedCoyote?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Don't worry Nik I'm not ignoring you I'm just not believing your explanations. Your vote on Jason is easy and pretty weak considering the situation and I don't feel inclined to move my vote off you because of it.Nikanor Post 215 wrote:Sotty, stop ignoring me. I posted right before you did, so don't tell me you didn't see it.
What would you expect him to do then for it to seem real?RedCoyote Post 217 wrote:
Let me put it this way. jason was being voted by just Nikanor at that point if I remember correctly. That would mean he was at, what, L-7? The game just started. Even if he didn't think the setup was Mountainous, why did he feel compelled to immediately vote him in response? Why did he skip my post? Why the "you are lying!", then, "oh, I see now you are lying". It doesn't sound right. There's too much going on here to sound real.Sotty 179 wrote:I see your follow up to Jason in post 169 but you should know that being defensive isn't a scum tell.... So what?
Either I wasn't very clear or your misreading. I was talking to IAI about benmage.RedCoyote Post 217 wrote:
Wait, IAI said you were townie? Do you have this post? I don't remember this.Sotty 180 wrote:The fact you threw in a dig on a player who you later state is probably a townie doesn't make you look good. I stated that I felt your direct question to benmage was more than a little bitter sounding
IAI said benmage made scummy plans
I said “why don't you vote him then”
IAI calls ben a townie.
In that order.
What happened to the Nikanor wagon?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I'm not interested in lynching either furc or Jason today.
Benmage, what are you exactly trying to say with post 227?
It's easy and weak in my eyes because I have played a bunch of games with Jason. This is how he fails as a townie, he acts before he thinks. As scum he is much more calm and controlled. I don't agree anything he has done today is obv scum at all.Nikanor Post 232 wrote:My vote on jason has never been easy or weak. I've been pushing this bloody wagon uphill all the way. I've been pointing out everything that points to jasonscum since his first serious post of the day. My vote is not weak.
If we are going to unitize both lynches today we probably want to start moving towards that first lynch sooner rather than later. I'm thinking about what to do with my vote, but it is likely to move over to Red depending on the vote count.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Mina, I have a town read on Locke because I have agreed with everything he has posted so far. Simple really.
My read on KaleiÐoscøpe is from this post. I just think scum in that position wouldn't have pointed that out or at least they would have let the case boil over some more before then did. Of course this is more reliant on my JasonTown read than anything else.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
IAI you realize that Nikanor brought that subject up right? I just believed that scum would have day talk in a double lynch game, but I'm not much of a set up person. Benmage brings up a good point, also I don't think town have won a mountainous game on these boards. I have recently been though a stretch where I had been scum a lot and I wasn't enjoying it as much as I used to, hence the "cry" part. But 3 scum v 13 townies doesn't sound like a fun time to me. I also told Zach that if he made me scum he better give me day talk or I would punch him. Of course he didn't say what he was going to do, but I'm not scum but I don't have to worry about it.
You realize that this still doesn't answer the question right?Dry-fit Post 225 wrote:Sotty7 wrote:Why don't you buy the perfectly plausible explanation?
This is not an intuitive thought process at all.jasonT1981 wrote:and post so I see he is lying. meaning he just admitted to lying.
Whyisn't it an intuitive thought process?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Umm... I don't think so. Red was commenting that IAI isn't a wasted slot/town NOOB like you said. I think your twisting here.Benmage Post 253 wrote:
It looks like RC specifically says he doesn't think IAI is town. However he than goes to right off mine and IAI's exchange as town v town.Sotty7 wrote:Benmage, what are you exactly trying to say with post 227?
I'm also not following your case on Percy. Like at all.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
How is this crap logic?Nikanor Post 261 wrote:
My vote is easy and weak because the meta you have after playing with jason offsite for years points to jason being town. Craplogick more.Sotty wrote:It's easy and weak in my eyes because I have played a bunch of games with Jason. This is how he fails as a townie, he acts before he thinks. As scum he is much more calm and controlled. I don't agree anything he has done today is obv scum at all.
You have done absolutely nothing to convince me or anyone Jason is scum. Your initial case is weak:
You don't explain why those two posts are bad or why they make him obv scum. You spend more effort addressing others than you do trying to be convincing about this “case”. It's tacked on and bad. Feel free to redeem yourself a little though by explainingNikanor Post 117 wrote:
It says night talk, and the only modifier to the usual unlimited night talk that I can think of is limited night talk. Where are you getting day talk from?Sotty wrote:What made you come to that conclusion based on that quoted statement? I would think scum have day talk.
I guess I should have double-checked the numbers myself, but I could have sworn I told Zach exactly how many people to use.IAI wrote:On the Double Day page, Cell F16, it shows 39.04% winning pct. That is the exact number I got if we use all our lynches (39/61). Nik this is far from 50/50...
"You would" means you think he has something to hide. You stated earlier that you thought Benmage was town. This is scummy.IAI wrote:Very anti-town behavior here. If you have nothing to hide, you would supply this information willingly.
Locke and I *used to* have a perfect win record when we were on the same team (which I believe has happened every game so far). Basically, I asked him his alignment.Mina wrote:This is random. Nikanor, why are you only asking Locke this? And what do you expect to learn about his alignment from his answer?
The jasonwagonofone needs more love. This is just terrible, and this combined with jason's attacks on IAI makes jason obvscum. More votes over here please.
One last question. Elmo, would you consider yourself a gut player?whythis is scummy.
You then claim day cop. Is this supposed to convince people to join? Calls for more people to join, but no effort to build your case beyond post 117. It's like you want a wagon but don't even believe in it yourself.
Finally a little expansion, but none of these points are compelling. You are hanging onto Jason and I don't see the reasons why.Nikanor Post 157 wrote:
What.jason wrote:You really aint made much of a case though, you have mentioned me really mostly in passing
So Elmo is scummy because you think he called Benmage and IAI obviously town, but now that he has corrected his meaning, you don't find that scummy any more. So really, you're only voting Elmo for buddying up to IAI, another person who you find scummy.jason wrote:The way Elmo said it.. it sounded like he already knew allignment with the pretty obiviously mistaken if they think they are scum comment.
The point I was trying to make is that you're attacking Elmo for buddying someone who you've stated is scummy. That doesn't make any sense from a town perspective, because not only is buddying a weak tell, but it shouldn't take precedence over the things you've said about IAI.jason wrote:I stand by my post in 98.. I feel they are valid points.
my 'attacks' on IAI as you say I feel are valid, he spent more time leading direction away from sdcum hunting and towards facts and figures etc. I feel that is anti-town as taking away from scum hunting only helps scum.
Elmo, do you think that jason is scummy?
We should probably try to lynch somebody within the next six days if we're to leave ourselves enough time to fully discuss our second lynch. That's not a lot of time. I'd really like a jason lynch, so hop to it.
Two things.Nikanor Post 262 wrote:I still think that jason is scum, but Sotty's defense of jason is making me uneasy.I find Sotty scummy for her crappy reasoning for her vote on me and the fact that she hasn't moved her vote to a bigger wagon yet, despite saying that she wants a lynch within the next couple of days.
1: Why am I scummy for defending Jason when you seemed to like Elmo defenses of IAI earlier in the thread?
2: Why is the bold scummy to you when you have done essentially the same thing? This is your second attempt to move my vote off you. I don't get the desperation.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I get that we probably won't be lynching Nikanor today (grr) so expect my vote to move towards one of Dry fit or Red by the end of the weekend at the latest. I'll be honest, it's a toss up between those two for me. Both have horrible votes on Jason, both have been non committal (probably more Dry Fit than Red here). I'm leaning towards Red right now though. I will look though both ISOs before I leap.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
IAI:What is so troublesome about my Jason defense?
Not really. Your case was awful, it pushed you up my list by leaps and bounds.Benmage Post 298 wrote:OMGUS by Percy looks all too appropriate, wouldn't you say.
Okay, all but one thing. To be explicit I agree with:RedCoyote Post 299 wrote:...but he said he didn't understand the wagon on me. Explain, please.
-His Nikanor vote
-His evaluation of IAI
-His statement that Jason's slip was blown up
-Jason looking lost
-His top three suspects (Dry-Fit, Nikanor and Benmage)
And on that note,
Unvote, vote: Dry-Fit
Red's last post is more the Red I remember so I am willing to look another way for now. Dry fit's back door wagon vote on Jason is still grating on me. I also don't like his refusal to explain more indepth why he didn't like Jason's reaction.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
It's damn hard to make any sense out of it, but I gather it is because Percy gave you grief for forgetting something and didn't comment on other people who forgot? I looked though your ISO for the start but I couldn't see it. Break it down for me because what I see right now isn't very good at all.Benmage Post 336 wrote:I dare you to attempt to identify my case. Go ahead, bullet it for me.
= = = = = =
What would have been a reasonable number for this wagon in RVS then?Baby Spice Post 343 wrote:That's a hell of a wagon for RVS, and everyone following such a stupid reason to vote. (Ok, a reasonable RVS reason but not to 5 votes) (6 if you count Furcolow) Definately something hinky here and I dare say, There's scum on that there wagon
I explained this in post 258Baby Spice Post 343 wrote:?? Open setup, mod only refers to night talk. Why would you think that the scum have daytalk?
lolBaby Spice Post 343 wrote:Nikanor's comment is hinky but so is yours.
Though since it's mentioned, requirements makes it sound like the scum team have to do somerthing re night talk.
So... It's scummy that we both talked about it. But you will comment on it anyway?
Really?
= = = = =
Can we get a prod on Nikanor please?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I agree with IAI's 371 100%. Moot now that furc put his vote back though.
There is a night. It's a double lynch mechanic not a no night one.Percy Post 391 wrote:@Furc, this is a smallish game with no night phase.
I'm not convinced about a furc lynch at this point. I would say his swaying on Dry Fit is the scummiest thing he has done, but the rest of it does look like townfurc to me. I will have to check out a scum game of his to compare. I think he is a distraction.
Hi Fitz....- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I have a headache so brief posting will be brief. I'll be back later with actual substance... I hope.
Anyway I kinda want to revote Nikanor again, he is still scummy. However Percy and Red both look awful in light of the Dry fit flip. I'm going to have to look back and see where I stand on all that.
But yeah I'll be back later with actual content.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I remember Jason, but I'd like to think Mafiascum has a higher level of play than on our old board. Otherwise we could just lynch Nikanor then Babyspice and it would be game over.
What's your opinion on Percy and Red at this point?
I'm going to do some reading and get a vote out there by the end of the weekend.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Slap fight? This sounds like you are playing down the opening exchange I had with IAI in an effort to make it look scummy. Just come out and break down what you find scummy about it, these kind of subtle jabs don't look good.RedCoyote Post 426 wrote:Sotty and IAI are particularly interesting, because they both practiced a in a bit of a slap fight throughout the game.
I explained both my town reads on KScope and Locke, do you have an actual issue with what I stated? Kinda sounds like you do but you never challenged me apart from pointing out Locke not getting your wagon. I don't see anything you list here as scummy and unless you break it down it is looking a lot like mud slinging.RedCoyote Post 426 wrote:Sotty comes up not too long after, and interestingly she mentions that Dry-fit is her second biggest suspect and that Locke and Kscope are her best town reads. This is almost too coincidental. She was alone on the Nikanor wagon. She was backing up the Dry-fit wagon, and she thought the two most recent proponents of the wagon were her biggest town reads. I think I took issue with this at the time, but I never followed up on it. Locke and Kscope had given very few posts and opinions up to this point. Kscope in particular had been tight-lipped. For Sotty to claim them both as her biggest town reads is suspect just due to the fact that they weren't very active (nevermind that they both happened to be right in their Dry-fit suspicions).
You need to go into detailwhythis is scummy. It's all very vague and by default, weak and scummy.
I'll say now Jason and Locke are now my two biggest town reads. Wanna fight them too?
= = = = = =
Wishy washy language is wishy washy.Baby Spice Post 427 wrote:Think I said hinky not scummy btw.
(That means I find it scummy btw)
Your vote is on benmage who was a big force behind the Dry-Fit lynch, what is your case on him? Why was Jason's reason to hammer so poor? Why no comment on Nik's vote on you?
= = = = =
This is a great post. The only way it would be any better was if IAI's vote was on Nikanor instead of Percy but I will deal.
I agree that IKD's reaction to Nikanor's claim is suspect. That pushes Lrdwhyt higher up my scum list, but I would really like to see more from him. Red, Nikanor, Baby Spice are my other scum reads at this point. Percy's plea post happening soon after Red's trips an alarm in my mind, but I still have a more of gut town read on him. I understand his suspicions on me for example, while Red's are awful. I do need to look closer at the whole scum list issue that has been put out there. But my initial reaction was 100 posts happened between those two Percy posts, not sure if it is as damning as people want to say.
I'm happy enough to keep my vote on Red, but I need to review some more.
EDIT BY WAY OF PREVIEW: I see Fitz has made a post, I'll give it a read in a mo.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I'll admit my vote on Red in this phase was more of a gut reaction as I mentioned in early posts. Combine that with just not liking the Percy wagon and you get my Red vote. My top scum read is Nikanor and his lurking just cements that. Baby Spice is looking bad as well as I mention abovehavingfitz Post 473 wrote:I think my main suspect att is Sotty (Hi Sotty! ). Main reason as I finished my read was due to gut. I don’t know her suspicions towards Nik and her willingness to come off IAI’s wagon after he freaked out. Her comments regarding scum being able to talk during the day seemed off to me coupled with saying she had discussed day talk with the mod. I don’t guess that is a scum tell but it just doesn’t sit right with me. In 281 she laments that she will probably be moving her vote off Nik to DF or RC. She says,
Also...not sure why she is voting RC atm. She never voted RC in phase 1 and in fact made a decent case on his behalf when deciding to join the DF wagon vs the RC wagon. That said...if Sotty was scum (and Percy wasn’t) if would be easy for her to add to the momentum that is the Percy wagon.I'll be honest, it's a toss up between those two for me. Both have horrible votes on Jason, both have been non committal (probably more Dry Fit than Red here). I'm leaning towards Red right now though. I will look though both ISOs before I leap.
Red is my comprise scum read. In that my gut says he is scum and he is one of the leading wagons so that's where my vote is going. Deadline votes are bad and I think we can both agree on that. I don't understand why Red flipping town would implicate me at all, you are going to have to elaborate there.
I'd also like to know why me unvoting IAI is scummy to you.
You should probably know I am married to the mod, that might explain that post a little better. As to why I would be talking to the mod pregame anyway. I'm going to agree I probably shouldn't have brought it up, but when Nikanor mentioned it my scumdar twinged so I engaged him about it.
What do you think of my case on Nikanor?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I could do a BabySpice wagon. Nikanor is my number one with a freaking bullet but BabySpice isn't a bad alternative. They are both higher than Red.Percy Post 478 wrote:Hey Sotty, fancy joining me on the Baby Spice wagon? Is your read on Baby Spice less of a "compromise" than Red?
END OF POST EDIT: I had moved my vote right away to Babyspice, but after seeing Red's post on me I have decided to keep my vote there.
I think he is independently scummy at this point. I have recently burnt my book of associative tells having seen scum and been scum that exploits that way too easily. True there is little interaction between Nik and Dry-Fit but the same could be said of Mina, Kscope and Lrdwhyt.Percy Post 485 wrote:@Sotty: Do you think Nikanor is more or less likely to be scum, given Dry-fit's flip? Or is he independently scummy?
= = = = = =
Come on, I have been talking about Nik nearly all game. Babyspice was also off wagon, not interested in her?Elmo Post 480 wrote:I think we should be lynching someone off the wagon, but I'm not sure precisely how we narrowed it down to these two. Like, no-one has brought up Mina or Nikanor yet, and I don't know why. But right now, I'm not really motivated to find out when no-one's looking to change my mind, either.
= = = = =
It does a little. But I'm not about to follow my town reads off a cliff just because they do either.Red Post 488 wrote:Fair enough, but given that it's loaded with most of your "biggest town reads", shouldn't that console you?
Fair enough. I have been watching IAI and his suspicions of me do seemed to have lessened as the game has gone on. Feels natural to me, but I could be suffering from some bias here too.Red Post 488 wrote:I am still curious as to why IAI has seemingly dropped you from his radar, but all in all I don't really think there's anything sinister between you and him anymore.
You might want to check that again before you accuse me of being dishonestRed Post 488 wrote:I did as you asked. I went back and read over your posts. I found that you talked with Locke about IAI and realized that y'all both have similar opinions toward him. You also answered a question he asked about Nikanor, and... that's it. No mention of Kscope whatsoever. I think you're being dishonest here, Sotty. Either you're being dishonest in saying that you actually had explained why Kscope and Locke were your town reads, or you're being dishonest on account of the original accusation I made.
The Kscope read had a lot to do with timing. Momentum was building towards Jason, he was kinda melting down and would have been a perfect scum myslynch candidate. KScope coming out at that time with that post really screamed town to me. I'll agree he needs to post more, and is part of the reason he has slipped down my town list, but that one post is really townie to me and he hasn't done anything to make me question that read.
See, this makes no sense to me. How does calling out my two biggest town reads hurt the Dry-Fit wagon? I also voted Dry Fit in the end which is more than you did, so your stance that it makes me look worse is pretty ridiculous.Red Post 488 wrote:You ask why this is scummy. The original premise of my post was to put myself in the shoes of a teammate of Dry-fit, remember? I propose that a teammate would've wanted to attempt at destroying the Dry-fit wagon before it got started. Despite how bad this makes me look, I think that you, Percy, and, to an extent, Fur, all look worse. What better way to destroy the Dry-fit wagon and keep yourself clean than to say that Locke and Kscope are your biggest townies reads (despite saying very little about one player andnothing about the other at that point), and claiming that Dry-fit is your second biggest scum read (but without going into depth about why and instead favoring to push Nikanor). Worse still, I don't think Nikanor is even a very great suspect.
Feel free to explain why Nikanor isn't a good suspect, on top of my case he is lurking right now. There is little to nothing positive about his play. I find him very scummy.
In essence, you are reaching here. Your reasons for suspecting me are bogus and certainly don't feel well intentioned.
= = = = = = =
I questioned IKD in this post about it but he replaced outMina Post 489 wrote:Okay, what do you mean by "suspect"? What exactly about IKD's reaction makes you think he's scum?
My thinking is this: If IKD didn't know this was a mountainous game AND believed the Nikanor claim like his post suggested then he should have straight voted Jason or at least given an opinion on the possibility of Jason being scum. Instead he just questions the claim, it doesn't feel like a townie thought process at all.
This has nothing to do withmytown read on Jason, but IKD's read on the situation.
= = = = = =
Mostly because I felt there was more Red support than BabySpice at that time. Also Nikanor is on the Bayspice wagon. I don't know if it is a horrid bus or what, but he's there and I don't know why.Fitz Post 494 wrote:1. So despite giving RC props earlier in the game and voicing no real suspicions that I can see earlier in the game, you drop a vote on RC because you don’t like the Percy wagon. The problem I have with this is that you voice suspicions on Baby Spice who at the time you put a vote on RC....had the same size wagon. So why would you put a vote on someone you gave credit to when you could have put the same exact vote down on someone you suspect?
Ugh... this doesn't answer my question. I don't understand the premise you have formed based on “it's you or Red” From what I have seen of your case on me, it looks like we are both independently scummy of the other. So this hardline stance just looks poor and is a possibility of you lining up lynches.Fitz Post 494 wrote:2. See 1. As for why RC flipping town would implicate you...I think you stand a good chance at being scum, but based on my RC ISO I do not think both of you are. So if RC was town it would not eliminate my read on you whereas if he flipped scum, IMO it would clear you.
I detailed my reasons why I found IAI to be likely town, if you disagree there is little I can do about that. Being too hard and stubborn in my reads has lead to bad things, I am trying to be more flexible and fluid these days. Yeah it has bitten me in the ass (as you have witnessed), but I still think being able to change your mind on a dime is much more useful for hunting scum because it disrupts the flow of the game for them.Fitz Post 494 wrote:3. You had reasons for voting IAI (ie it was not a RV) and after he does something which IMO is very suspect you unvote him (post 97) and drop a vote on Nikanor without any rationale. Then you keep your vote on Nik...while not giving any reasoning up thru at least post 180 where you continue to grill IAI (who you just unvoted after his ridiculous self vote). Then right before providing your rationale for your Nik vote you prompt IAI for his reasons for thinking Nik is town. And oh BTW...IAI (who you have unvoted) is also suspicious of jason....which seems to be the bulk of your case against nik (that is his suspicions towards jason).
As to your point four I suppose that's fair enough. If enough people feel this way I can replace out. I don't play the game to cheat but I am not willing to comprise the game just by being here. For the record I felt Nikanor bringing that up in the first place as scummy. There was no need to talk about that but he went out of his way to do so. I think it was an attempt to gain some town cred to suggest he had no idea about the scum day talking. He is more than smart enough to lay that kind of ground work.
It's great because he brings up something I was going to post. Why didn't Babyspice vote for Dry-Fit? This is an important question.Fitz Post 494 wrote:How is post 437 a great post? Because he lists Nik as one of his top two? Is that the only reason? I don’t really see anything great about it. Was it the part where he expresses suspicions towards Baby spice (who you refrained from putting a vote on in favor of RC)?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Red, so after this back and forth I finally get to the real reasoning of your case on me. You think I was bussing, I don't know why you didn't just say that in the first place. I'm not going to sit here and say what I would and wouldn't do as scum in that situation because it is just all WIFOM and I do have a heavy bussing past as scum.
I will say that you built your suspicion on me in a very round about way. First the IAI exchange was scummy, then it wasn't. Then my town reads were scummy and now they aren't. You rolled out a big explanation for why you think I am scummy over several posts when you could have just cut the fat and been much more direct. Your insistence that you read my ISO but missed posts and having to back away from points later just stinks of you padding your case on me.
Accusing me of “underhandedly sabotaging” Dry Fit's wagon is just ridiculous because nothing you have brought up as shown anythingcloseto what you are suggesting. Your rhetoric is getting tiresome.
The longer this goes on, the scummier I find it.
= = = = = =
Okay, I'll play your game.Baby Spice Post 516 wrote:Wishy washy language comment is just so much ffttt! if it's scummy I call it scummy. If it's hinky I call it hinky. Hinky =/= scummy. (But it may be)
I wonder how you can make that wishy washy language comment if you have been reading what I've been saying.
To me it looks like hinky/scummy can be interchanged, especially with the way you used it. Basically a way for you to call something scummy and then being able to back away from it while holding your hands up all innocent like.
But I'm dropping this because it's just semantics. So meh.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Errr...
I clicked in the game and saw Thor replaced in and said hello because Thor is great.
I then went back to my last post and read what I had missed since I was last here. Like I do every day.
I then processed said information into a postable format for your reading pleasure, or displeasure. Whatever floats your boat.
This was followed by me clicking on submit and said post being sent though the internet tubes to the thread.
The end.
TL:DR?
I couldn't contain my excitement over Thor's sudden appearance into the game, that I spammed the thread a little.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Jason is my BFF but still should probably take a step back now and then. That was at least the second time he said something before I could respond. I'm assuming it is because he thinks I am really townie looking.
And Fitz, agree to disagree I suppose. I don't find you scummy but I can at least understand where you are coming from with your vote on me. But the deadline is coming up, are you willing to comprise to get a lynch?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
If you really think that we're getting a no lynch today then you may as well keep your vote where it is. Throwing your toys outta your pram isn't helping anyone and is preventing a last minute surge like you say.
Unofficial count at this point
Percy - 5 (RedCoyote, I Am Innocent, Locke Lamora, JasonT1981, KaleiÐoscøpe)
RedCoyote - 4 (Furcolow, Elmo, Sotty7, Fitz)
Baby Spice - 3 (Nikanor, Percy, Mina)
Anyone not voting for one of these three needs to do so now.Lrdwhytthat includes you. Deadline is.today- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Can you elaborate on this? Also your vote on Lrdwhyt as the day was dying looks really bad considering there was absolutely no chance of shifting the wagon that way. Why did you avoid taking a stance on one of the three top wagons with your vote?Mina Post 578 wrote:If Red flips town, I'll look more closely at Kaleidoscope and Sotty (I like a lot of what she's doing, but a few of her stances don't feel perfectly organic, as if she's hedging her bets a bit).
I want to see Thor's thoughts on the pages he hasn't read as soon as possible.
I will probably re-read day one before I place my vote. Red's flip kinda screwed most of my reads up.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
So I decided to do some ISOs on my top scum suspects (Thor665, Mina, Lrdwhyt and Baby Spice) to get my head straight.
Minais all over the place to me. She seems to be behind during most of the game which could be coloring my read of her. Her posts are wordy but sometimes I get the impression she is just writing words to have them there. Wall posts aren't always needed to make your point. This is probably just how she plays.
There is little interaction with Dry Fit which can be explained by the lurking I suppose. She votes Red initially for mostly gut and she follows this trend with the unvote. Things Red have said look “townie” to her. What things, I have no idea. She hops onto Babyspice which isn't a bad vote, but the lack of any real push is worrisome. It's like she is running in place.
I have already commented on how her Lrd looks bad to me. I don't know why so close to the deadline she would try and push a brand spanking new wagon. Her lack of real explanation around her Red read feels like she is just taking the backdoor out and away from that wagon. I would have thought he would be a perfect deadline vote from her.
There are moments of scum hunting in her posts, but they get drowned out by her second guessing and chasing of her own tail. I thought I might find something scummier here, but I'm just left slightly confused. I have her neutral leaning scummy now. I'd really like to see her actively playing the game today rather than always trying to catch up. I think that should help my read on her. A big positive for her in my eyes is that she does vote Baby and Lrd at differing points, both players I find scummy.
Also Mina, you said you would wait to comment on the Percy-Sotty debate before weighing in. it gave me the impression that you have something to say about it that you never shared. I'm interested in your thoughts.
= = = = = =
Lrdwhytstarts as IKD who does little really. His RVS unvote is normal for him, town or scum. The only real thing of note is his apparent belief of Nikanor's role cop claim. What I didn't realize until now is that Lrd only placed one vote. Red's hammer. He had plenty of time to put a vote out, especially since he claimed to have read the thread in his second post.
Also in the above linked post is a case on Jason that has Lrd end with this conclusion:
Really? If he isn't that scummy why spend all the post questioning him when you could have been doing something more productive? Also the tacked on Dry-Fit after thought looks like a scum buddy validating his wagon without a vote. Nice.Lrdwhyt Post 339 wrote:After that, nothing of his struck me as particularly scummy. There are better votes than him.
I'm considering voting Dry, but I want to see him post some more first...
The rest of his posts aren't that bad really, but it is mostly him defending himself. There is a lack of any real scum hunting here. Leaning scum.
= = = = = =
Babyspicestarts off as mongoose and after a slowish start he looks townie to me with how he takes the time to explain his reads. Not hot over his Benmage vote, but otherwise good.
Baby's opening post is just all kinds of ick. The comments on IAI's random wagon are just strange to me (good RVS reasoning but too many votes WTF?) The ragging on me and Nikanor for talking about daytalk.... only for her to go on and talk about daytalk. The pushing of the “Jason” slip. Lists Dry-Fit in her scum list but ends up voting for Benmage. More likely scum buddy distancing here.
Wishy washy language is scummy and I don't buy the later explanation. I'm also not understanding the continued push on benmage after Dry's lynch. Does scumDry completely clear benmage, no not 100%, but he is looking pretty damn townie right now. The case makes no sense.
She basically comes in and destroys my town read of mongose. Likely scum
= = = = = =
I'm waiting for Thor to be caught up with the rest of us. I want to agree with IAI that his Red vote was opportunistic but we were looking for a lynch that day so... Eh.
After doing some reading I have down graded my early day read of Mina leaving me with Lrd + Babyspice/Thor for the scum team.
Vote: Lrd
I'm going to read the posts since my last one, but on first skim the Percy benmage back and forth looks... Uninviting. To put it politely.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I might be able to swallow this narrative if you can sell me on the Percy case. You just lumped your vote back on him today with no elaboration. Change that?I Am Innocent Post 613 wrote:So let's recap. Nikanor's vote is stuck, he replaces out, Thor comes in, and does what any good scum should do around a deadline. Play the wait and see card...
Wagon leaves his teammate, takes off on the townie. Gives the ol' UNVOTE Whoever I'm voting, hahaha, and vote RC, despite only reading 9 pages. My vote can be bought tho, cause I like the attention, hahahaha. (not funny by the way).
Okay there wasn't too much that I skimmed. Neither Percy nor benmage are very moving. They just look like a couple of squabbling kids and the tone of their posts makes me not want to bother read them in all honestly.
Percy stop calling benmage Hannity . I get the lol factor, but it is pretty disrespectful when you do it constantly. I mean Hannity is a big freaking prick, it's like you are constantly calling him the *C* word. Also VI is being over used in this thread, the shear repitition just decreases the actual weight of the "insult" after time. It's getting more than a little ridiculous.
But enough of my rants, benmage, if you case on Percy is so epic why aren't you trying to sell everyone on it? Calling people idiots isn't going to make them abandon what they are doing and follow you. Lay out your points on Percy and lets get some scum hunting going eh?
I need to review Percy myself, but I will do that later. Percy v benmage puts me off from that. I also want to review Elmo and possibly KScope but I am feeling happy with my vote.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I have played with plenty of verbose players before, if this your meta I will deal. I also think my impression was influenced by you being seemingly always behind. You didn't look very proactive.Mina Post 643 wrote:Anyone who's ever played a single game with me as either alignment can corroborate that verboseness is a null tell from me. I just overthink and overexplain everything. But I'll try to tone it down if it's making my posts unpleasant to read.
See this is another thing that eats at me. Your case on Red was on gut as well right? I don't think I have ever seen such a wordy gut based player before. Normally the people who post walls (which I can be guilty of sometimes) are more logical players. I dunno, it's strange to me.Mina Post 643 wrote:But that said, might as well explain my thought process yesterday, even though this is essentially just trying to articulate gut vibes.
Expression of willingness to join Oso in voting RedMina Post 643 wrote:My first instinct was that your behaviour wrt Red fit with what I'd expect from scum subtly supporting a mislynch: not very aggressive, not much conviction in his guilt, but still unwilling to give him the benefit of the doubt. IIRC, you didn't find him suspicious until others did. Your heart didn't really seem into the Red Coyote case even as you consistently joined his wagon, and you suspected Nikanor and Baby Spice more
More wondering about Red with Oso
Wanting to cut Red some slack but not really sure if I should.
Questioning Red on him trying to sell defensiveness as a scum tell
And so on...
You recall wrongly. I was right there with you at the start saying that Red wasn't the normal Red I have played with before. My gut was tweaked on him, I just believed I had stronger case on Nikanor at this point. Plus he did improve slightly as the game went on but that didn't completely negate the vote on me, which was proved false, the awkward push on Jason for being over defensive. Red then went on to backtrack/lie with his case on me. He misrepped the exchange with IAI as a slap fight which he recanted once I pushed him. He also tried to claim I never explained my town reads when I had.
It all built up to a point where I was sure he would flip scum. Simply because, in my mind he had lied so many times. The town flip was such a surprise it made me backtrack and rethink. On review I still think I was right and he was wrong, but that doesn't really help us at all. I'm sure up in townie heaven Red still thinks he was right. I am more than willing to give people the benefit of the doubt when the situation arises, I have done so with IAI and Percy already in this game as an example. But when someone constantly fabricates things to make their case look better... I don't see how or why I should have given that the benefit. It was cumulative.
I believe I have already answered this questionMina Post 643 wrote:I also agree with the late Red Coyote that the timing of your Dry-Fit suspicions/vote would fit as bussing, and that Nikanor was an easy target. Speaking of which, why did you vote Red Coyote a week before the deadline, rather than push Baby Spice or Nikanor? Also, you mention being tempted by a BS wagon if it took off, IIRC. Why didn't you move to Baby Spice, particularly when there were three votes on her?
In a nutshell, I felt there was more support for a Red wagon at the time of my vote. I went with my gut and once Baby truly became viable, Red had already lied several times about his case on me. He rose above Babyspice.
Fair enough. He kept bringing me up so I kept defending myself/engaging him. Just because I unvoted him doesn't mean I'm gonna ignore him.Mina Post 643 wrote:But I got the "hedging your bets" vibe again after that. You unvoted after IAI's fit, but then you kept on engaging with him and bickering with him--which doesn't make much sense for someone you think is town. I got the impression you were trying to make him look scummy even while you paid lip service to his being town.
Checking your ISO, I see that you were defending yourself from his case on you, so that impression probably wasn't fair.
At the time of my first post of today I had forgotten about your Babyspice vote. I do think, if you had as strong a gut reaction to Red's early play you would have wanted to hammer him over start a fresh wagon. I'd think you'd want to know his alignment. Your unvote of him didn't seem very detailed to me. It was like a weak hop off the wagon.Mina Post 643 wrote:Sotty, did you notice that my vote had been on Baby Spice, and that I'd expressed a willingness to hammer RC, when you said that it "looks bad"? In that case, are you saying that the townish move would have been to have left my vote on Baby Spice or to have hammered Red prematurely, just to show that I'm an uber-decisive stance-taker?
Your explanation is plausible however and does make me feel better about you.
It wasn't that all my reads where dependent on him, it just that I think I was locked on there, tunneling a bit. If that was the case there is a chance I was ignoring other things I should have been considering. It was more I needed a fresh take on things with the knowledge Red was town and work from there.Mina Post 643 wrote:What reads of yours were dependent on Red being scum?- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
No.Baby Spice Post 649 wrote:Benmage is still arrogant scum, nothing changed there. Seriously 'confirmed' in this game means you're dead and flipped. Claiming otherwise is scum trying to make themselves into a white knight and lead the town to a loss.
This paragraph and vote do not match with each other. I can't speak with Mina but I like to engage my suspects to figure out better if they are town or scum. Ftr, right now I am starting to lean towards Mina town which is an almost 180 from my position at the start of the day.Baby Spice Post 649 wrote:Sotty, Mina. You both seem to be having a go at each other, but are both voting the same player. It makes me think that one of you is faking the discussion/arguement, which is scummy, whilst buddying up to them, which is also scummy. Or that one of you is bussing hard and trying to use the other as cover.
Vote Lrdwhyt
Your reasoning is bizarre and what makes it even worse is that youjointhe wagon myself and Mina are on. WTF?
Unvote, Vote: Babyspice
= = = = = =
Yeah, I didn't say that.Benmage Post 650 wrote:Locke and Sotty are accurate in that Percy is the most logical lynch choice for today.
I do support your call for a first lynch deadline though
= = = = =
I get where you are coming from and I think we could probably talk about this a lot more, but it isn't really game relevant any more, for me anyway. I'll just say, I'm glad you are playing a more current game today and leave it at that.Mina Post 653 wrote:Off-topic Mafia theory ramble that everyone can feel free to skip:
In my mind, slap fight means a fake or staged fight that shows no real desired aggression from either side. Basically two people weakly failing to make it look like a fight. It would be something scum could say to subtly discredit a legit argument/discussion. When I called Red on this he backed away right away agreeing with my assessment that it wasn't a slap fight.Mina Post 653 wrote:Does "slap fight" have a negative connotation on this site that I'm missing? I just read it as a colourful synonym for "back-and-forth" or "kerfuffle" or or "clash"--which, um, was pretty much what your [BLANK] with IAI was. It seemed weird to me that you assumed he was mischaracterizing you.
You should totally come join me on Babyspice now.Mina Post 653 wrote:EBWOPreview: And hilariously, I may have given more fodder to Baby Spice's theory that Sotty and I are...um, I dunno. Are we distancing? Is one of us trying to appease the other by voting for her suspect so as to say, "See? See? Don't pressure me because I like your suspect!" And yet...because one of us must be scum, that absolutely makes Lrdwhyt even more likely to be scum because...because...I dunno, everyone knows scum are more likely to vote for their buddies over another viable wagon even when they can't afford to bus?
Okay, I should be happy that you're voting Lrdwhyt, but obvious badly-justified opportunistic wagon hop is obvious.
I'm deadly serious.
= = = = =
I guess I just REALLY hate Hannity But thanks, I appreciate you not doing it anymore.Percy Post 657 wrote:@Sotty7: I think Benmage's rhetoric is indistinguishable from that employed by Hannity. However, I had no idea that calling someone Hannity is as bad as calling them a c*nt, so I'll ease off
Time to follow this up with a Babyspice vote I think.Percy Post 657 wrote:Sotty's case against Lrd is similar to mine. I agree with each point (especially the hesitance over voting DF), but I still think Baby Spice is worse.
= = = = = =
Okay so as I was reading I see the Lrd wagon got beefed up. I'm still happy with my switch to Baby at this point, her comments + vote were just... Wow.. Tipped her over the edge for me anyway.
I will happily lynch both Lrd and Babyspice today. Lrd's next post needs to contain some scum hunting and Baby needs to explain her Lrd vote. If people would rather Lrd goes first, I will move my vote back.
I still need to read Percy v ben in greater detail, but I'm too hungry to do that now. So hopefully I'll get to that later today.
Hooray for being caught up in all my games again!- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
I read it and found it ridiculous. Am I scummy for voting you or what? You post only talked about me staying on the wagon.Baby Spice Post 705 wrote:Hey Sotty. try reading the rest of my post that you quoted from where I answer your question.
Then answer this question. Why did you jump off of a wagon you started when it hit L-1?
I didn't know the Lrd wagon was at lynch-1 as the vote count was wrong. I also said the Lrd wagon got beefed up but there was no knowledge of lynch-1 vote.
= = = = = =
It's possible, I'm not willing to rule anything out at this point. Bussing tends to be over used as a tell from what I have seen. My new approach is not to be too quick to write someone off just for being on a scum wagon. If a player is scummy but voted for a scum lynch I won't give them too much credit for it.Elmo Post 707 wrote:Another thing that's bothering me is that open, all-vanilla setups are, by a long way, the best kind to bus in. I don't want to start the conspiracy theories too early, but I would actually like to hear from everyone what they think about the possibility of Dry being bussed by at least one buddy.
= = = = = =
On first read Mina's case+vote on Elmo does look pretty good. I'm interested to see a response.
IAI's attack on Thor is yummy to me, I really like the pressure. IAI, what shady players have voted for Babyspice?
And yeah, I know I have been slightly slacking in this game. I'm on a bit of a mafia downswing these days. I'm trying to power though it.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
You realize this is a week away right? Who is stalling?I Am Innocent Post 729 wrote:Benmage is right, this stalling is wasting time for Phase 2 of Day 2.
Those aren't the only questions she is ignoring. She votes me while ignoring the questions both myself and Mina asked her. It's ridiculous and scummy.jasonT1981 Post 735 wrote:What is this super town tell though BS... you keep decalring town town town, but ignore questions asking what your town read is- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
You obviously don't know me very well. If I decide to buss my partner, I stick to it. I won't lie, as scum I bus often and bus HARD. Just check out my wiki, Gonzo mafia and Tubby's open game at Warren state hospital are two very big examples.Baby Spice Post 764 wrote:Sotty, what questions? I believe the only one was did I find your vote scummy, and I think me calling you my top scumspect kind of answered that. But le me make this clear.
Sotty7's unvote of Lrdwhyt and vote of me was scummy, scummy, scummy! It reaked of sotty panic jumping off of a bus she had started.
Nothing here that I've said is new, except for repeating scummy a few times, so when Sotty asked her question I had already answered it. Again.
IF Lrd was my buddy and I was on the wagon ON THE GROUND FLOOR, there is no way... No way I would unvote.
“Oh but Sotty, you jumped off your so called buddy because if you lynched him you'd be all alone. You panicked!”
Let me once again reference Gonzo mafia. I lost both my buddies on back to back days (one and two) while in the middle of it having no night. To to push some bullshit that I panicked in this situation is stupid. I've been there, done that and won a game pulling that move before. To compare the two situations scum are in a better position in this game than I was at the end of day two in Gonzo.
Baby you ignored what I wrote, just because you vote me doesn't answer all my questions. You replied to my vote with situations that only involved me staying on the Lrd wagon. You never even addressed my vote on you accept to OMGUS it.
Your case on me is “your Lrd's buddy” if that is the case you should be lynching him first NOT me. Unless you want to make a case?
As for the unvoting while he was at lynch -1 I repeat again the vote count was wrong, I had no clue he was at lynch -1. You do seem desperate for me to put my vote back on Lrd even though you won't vote him yourself. I'm not sure I understand why that is seeing as, according to you, the only way I can be scum is if he is.
= = = = = = =
No, I'm voting Babyspice for pushing scummy logic. Jason's slip wasn't a slip and thereforeElmo Post 757 wrote:I think Baby Spice's behaviour looks quite like jason's in certain respect. If you look at how she's arguing with Benmage, I think that's a least a significant contributor to what she's saying; she certianly seems the type to wear her emotions on her sleeve in a way similar to what Sotty described. I would have thought that, seeing what happened with jason, she might be slower to attack someone who displayed similar behaviour. In the quoted post, she appears to be voting BS largely for bad logic, which I believe is probably null.wasn'tscummy.
There is no parallel. Try again.
Also extremely unimpressed that you are also pairing me with Lrd like your BFF Baby. But at least your voting the right way round unlike Babyspice.
= = = = =
Lrd's vote on Elmo is awful it does not count as scum hunting. Benmage's push on him is good in that respect.
My love for Locke is strong in this game.
Jason is getting lurky. He should fix that by coming back and voting for Babyspice.- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
- Sotty7
-
Sotty7 That Damn Good
- Sotty7
- That Damn Good
- That Damn Good
- Posts: 6744
- Joined: October 7, 2005
- Location: Minnesota
Last man standing?Benmage Post 810 wrote:
Damnit Sotty…that’s what I get for posting from my phone. Why have we never played together?Sotty7 wrote:
False. Hi.Benmage Post 786 wrote:Percy and I are the two most experienced people here, true or false?
Also, hammer time.
I don't blame you for not remembering, I was killed night one before I could shoot anyone in the face My biggest mafia regret to this day.
= = = = =
Yo Baby! Percy unvoted you when you were at lynch -1, using your logic that makes him your buddy right? Oh wait, it's not scummy at all? You don't even mention it once?
Hrmm...
= = = = =
Mina, after reading post 812 I was ready to fall in mafia love with you. But you ruin a good thing with post 813. Broke my heart...
Okay, fair enough if you're “not feeling” Baby as scum but reading this little block of text I see no reason for you to be fighting the Baby wagon like you are. You are actively derailing a wagon on a player who you admittedly have at least a slight scum read on. Why exactly?Mina Post 813 wrote:@Sotty: My reason was that Baby Spice put the third vote on LrdWhyt IsupposeI could concoct a conspiracy theory in which she was bussing LrdWhyt and preemptively setting one of us up as his buddy, but it just looked really weird and convoluted for a scum gambit. I wouldn't die of shock if she flipped guilty, and I kind of see Locke's point that setting contingencies based on the lynch is scummy (it's so much fun as scum to link your partner to every group suspect in existence). But meh. I guess I'm not really feeling it. She doesn't seem to be opportunistically tailoring her opinions to suit the masses.
I understand the Benmage thing.
I understand the furc thing.
I understand the IAI thing.
But in a mountainous game like this, where we get two lynches a day, you shouldn't be fighting a lynch as hard as you are unless you are convinced that player is town. Clearly you aren't convinced about Baby. It's like you want it all ways possible.
Baby looks scummy
People on her wagon are scummy
People off her wagon are scummy.
Seriously? Pick a side. Unless you have a legit case as to why weshouldn'tlynch Baby today then you shouldn't be trying to derail this as hard as you are.
1] Me too. But experience has taught me that sometimes you just have to take a deep breath and jump over that cliff already. Considering the set up of this game with the double lynch, I think the town can afford to play a little lose here.Mina Post 813 wrote:Why am I panicking?
1) Force of habit. I always second-guess myself at crunch time.
2) People should not be using lack of time and desire to get making compromise votes on Baby Spice instead of pushing a player they suspect more when we have time to reach a consensus. I mean...seriously, you have no problem whatsoever with Benmage's, IAI, and Furcolow's votes?
3) Furc's recent posts have looked so opportunistic and conscious of popular opinion that I'd rather that Furcolow and Lrdwhyt were the lynches. So I'd prefer we lynch LW right now, and then we move onto the next phase, in which I push Furc over Baby Spice.
2] I don't have any issue with furc's vote. It's how he is.
Benmage and IAI's votes do look suspect on face value. Both are voting for someone they believe is town out of spite. However, I still have a strong town read on IAI because I have seen scumIAI and this is totally different. He does earn a couple of scum points for the reasoning to his vote but not enough for me to abandon this read.
Benmage is town right now mostly because of Dry-Fit. How likely do you think that was a bus?
I resevere the right to change my mind, but this is where my head is at right now. Their votes a terribad, but Baby is probscum. I'll take it anyway I can get it.
3] I thought you had experience playing with furc before? I wouldn't exactly be against a policy lynch of furc, but lets not pretend that it is scum hunting.
First off I never classed anything Babyspice did asMina Post 813 wrote:Sotty, question. Why do you find Baby Spice's cognitive dissonance scummy and not Furcolow's? Also, do you think that Furcolow's play is similar to his town or scum meta?“cognitive dissonance”. I don't like the fact you have, in essence, paired my case against Baby up with furc now. Clearly Baby and furc are not guilty of the same exact things, otherwise I would be pushing on furc too.
I'm old school. I don't use phrases like cognitive dissonance or cognitive bias or whatever. I scum hunt mostly on gut. If I see something off, I question it, I try and figure out posts motivations and develop a reasoning. I'm logical to a point, but I try not to over think. My scum hunting abilities are a result of all the games I have personally played in and experienced. I don't need to justify it anymore beyond that.
All furc has done is be himself. In that he changes his mind in a blink of an eye. Make a case on him and maybe I'll listen. Right now I don't have an issue with him. Would I want him in LYLO... Probably not. Although I do hear he has a good lylo record (unless I remembering someone else)
Now this I can give you. In my opinion, it is your only legit point you have for stalling the Babyspice lynch.Mina Post 813 wrote:4) I'd rather everyone took a stand before the lynch.
I have already said why.Mina Post 813 wrote:Your turn. What's the rush for someone to hammer right away, Sotty? Why don't you want more discussion?
But I have no issue waiting for everyone to weigh in. After that, I will be calling for the lynch again.
= = = = =
I pretty much agree with this.Thor665 Post 814 wrote:
I'll preface this by saying that a lot of Mina's last post to Benmage resonated with me.Benmage wrote:^^^^^Wow scummiest post of this century. This is Lynch 1. Even if it goes through quickly, why/how would it affect your read on Lrd?? You’ve been pushing BS for 2 days. You should be jumping up and down and ecstatic about your 2 day lead suspect being lynched for whatever reason that have convinced others.
That said...I actually think Benmage has a decent point here. Earlier in the same post Percy was talking about how long and solid he has been on BS and now that the wagon is finally getting some good steam under it he wants to unvote to re-read LrdWhyt? Something is a little odd with this.
= = = = =
Do you find me scummy for unvoting Lrd when he was at lynch-1?jasonT1981 Post 828 wrote:slowly getting back on my feet.. got diagnosed with food poisioning and a burst blood vessel. Not as serious as I thought but still groggy on it...
Seriously shocked at Percys attempts at derealing the BS wagon at -1... I know he says its a 24hour thing but it seems more like scum getting cold feet on lynching his partner. I don't buy his reasons for it one bit. If anything it indicates more Percy is likely to be scum with a BS lynch. I would go as far as saying on the seere likelyhood BS flips scum Percy is an automatic policy lynch. We need to lynch him by the end of this day phase. - Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7
- Sotty7