--
VOTE: Whispersilk
Worst lurker and non-performer in the game. And that's saying a ton when we have Snake on the playerlist.
Thor wrote:I dunno - I'm just sucking up to MoI, frankly. I presume she flaked/hyper-lurked at some point.
Pops wrote:Legit strat. Then shoot him night one. His spirit will watch over you and guide you to victory.
Stranger wrote:If I see anything's that's the problem, I interpret it as Thor665 supporting a policy lynch, which I'm against in most cases.
Farside wrote:Why suck up to MoI?
↑ StrangerCoug wrote:I do dislike and vote people who suggest policy lynching as it tends to be anti-information; however, I've been accused of policy lynching policy lynchers (in a game where I was scum, if I remember correctly), so I have to be careful with my accusation of this. Thor665's post looks closer to a random bandwagoning stage post, and even though I'm against the RBS as well, fighting the stage is unproductive.The RVS stage is pretty much over in my eyes, so I will UNVOTE: ; however, nobody stands out as scummy and it's a little late for me to think right now.
jerobbo wrote: Colour me interested, cause I don't see it.
Thor wrote:All I've really got is the one, being specifically mindful of being lynched and moving to avoid it despite personal opinions of what is best for the game.
Secondary is...I guess the no direction after RVS thing ends, though if that's it I disagree with the tell.
Pops wrote:Serious image management when he metas himself, survivor-scum tell.
His position on the RVS stage seems like a wave that appears like a particle if you observe it. It's unproductive, yet he participates in it, thus encouraging it.
I'm either 0/2 or 1/2.
RBT wrote:On your only post in the game, you are intending to hammer on page four?
UNVOTE; VOTE:Nacho
enomis wrote:A hammer on page four? No way. UNVOTE: Strangercoug, do you think the advantage of hammering now really outweighs the disadvantage of hammering now. Really?
Snake wrote:OK Nacho his vote is back down to L-2 so you still willing to put a vote on him if you are convinced enough to hammer? Enomis, I know what I'm doing. You play your way and will mine.
Iceguy wrote:And there we have our opportunistic lurkerscum. This is your first post out of RVS and all you're doing is voting the prevalent wagon with a non-sequitur.
Iceguy wrote:I didn't vote enomis just because he was lurking. I voted him because he laid low until there was a major wagon and than voted this wagon with a non-sequitur justification that looked like the vote came first and the thought second.
Nice try to spin my argument.
Stranger wrote: That was pretty much it, admittedly.
Farside wrote:Scum ^
Whisper wrote:So thumbs up on your policy lynch MoI. Pretty scummy if you ask me.
Nacho wrote:Yes. I agree that he seems pretty scummy and I'm not really worried about soliciting a claim first simply because I'm going to lynch him regardless of what he claims. Why shouldn't I hamnmer?
farside wrote:I answered that here
In addition I don't like BW votes with no reasoning. The fact that emonis didn't disappear after being called out gives me pause on my initial reaction to his post.
I don't like Snakes vote or reasoning for his vote on SC. Weak reasoning there.......more later.
Snake wrote:MoI I assume you meant StrangerCoug in your post and not IS, as Ive just realised this could become confusing. As Im sure you meant Coug, but initially thought you meant IS was at L-3. At the time of voting I was the 6th vote thus L-1?
Mod of Cool Insrcutablity wrote:StrangerCoug (4) - MagnaofIllusion, Thor665, enomis, farside22
Snake wrote:Don't over complicate things. Oh and it should be pointed out I was town in the Doctor WHo game and I was specifically right in what I did. Whether you like it or not.
Iceguy wrote:I voted enomis because she didn't post for a day (which would be fine by itself), AND THEN put the third vote on the active wagon with a short justification that didn't make any sense in context.
While that's not a particularly strong tell, it's an useful indicator at least for newbscum. Probably not enough to justify a Day 4 lynch, but enough to justify a Day 1 vote.
Iceguy wrote: Oh look, it's a typical MoI misrep clad into a question!
I was willing to vote him because he was going the safe route by sheeping you and redefined "policy lynch" as "scum lynch" to distract from an argument.
Iceguy wrote:All of this post is the first post of the thread. If you're going to throw mud at me at least get your links right.
Nacho wrote: This is correct.
Nacho wrote: My opinion of his alignment hasn't changed since my first post.
Iceguy wrote: Let me just remind you this "crap" caught scum-MoI redhanded.
Iceguy wrote:MISREPCEPTION!
A misrep of what I call a misrep!
Iceguy wrote:He followed you onto SC, as well.
Iceguy wrote:I already explained it approximately seven hundred times.
Thor wrote:The MoI and Icy walls are going to become a problem soon, aren't they? Stay on target guys - I don't care about the other game stuff because it doesn't seem to be going anywhere.
Iceguy wrote:I'm using misrep in the common MS sense. You're misrepping me, saying I'm using misrep in another sense. That's misrepception.
Nacho wrote:Voting him would be a detriment to lynching him. No other player in this game at this time would be willing to put down the hammer vote.
Pops wrote:It's page four, I don't have m/any reads yet. When I get some, you'll know about them
Pops wrote:To be perfectly honest, there's some players I feel I can read leaps and bounds better by LyLo than I can with a day or two posts. I try to reorder lynch decisions (inb4lininguplynches) so that I'm lynching people that my opinion is unlikely to change about with more material before people that are much easier to read with a large amount of material. I guess you could say it's the opposite of lynching killa 7 d1 - it's lynching a player who has an abundance of info on Dlast last, rather than lynching someone who will have 0 info on Dlast first. (killa 7 might have been before your time, guy basically never posted anything that remotely resembled content.)
Snake wrote:Oh and for the record MoI just because you have that best newbie badge by your name doesn't make your opinion automatically right and I would rather that you and Thor dont patronise me either.
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:Why is that?I'm clearly taking a position.