The Wire, Season 1 - Final Credits!
Forum rules
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Sottyrulez eh? I take it Zach/Sotty hydra as opposed to just Sotty which is listed?
Go read the playerlist in the OP again.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Vote: jason
This is good shit right here. Mofo gets real tight and scared and shit, tellin' ya he's hiding wires.
Jason is town. Try again.
Unvore, Vote: TheGreatestAmericanHero
I'm seeing a lot of busy body questions while they still have the random vote in play. Looks fake.
With this hydra you'll get Zach mostly posting in the day and me mostly during the night, simply because I work all day with no interwebs. Zach never signs his posts, I try to remember as much as possible.
~Sotty.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:Unvote, vote: Shadoweh
How to Win At Mafia, Empire-style:
1) Read Shadoweh's #79 and #86
2) Realize that they are both full of shallow, fake scumhunting complete with a shitty attack on Benmage and a question to Arthur that reads like she's more interested in swaying his vote than actually interested in his thoughts.
3) Vote Shadoweh for mafia 2013
4) Townread Empire (optional, but recommended)
79 isn't scummy. 86 is a little I guess, but meh. Thoughts on our vote?
Mass claiminganythingis not happening on day one.
~Sotty- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ SafetyDance wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Sottyrulez eh? I take it Zach/Sotty hydra as opposed to just Sotty which is listed?
Go read the playerlist in the OP again.
He did:
If you read even only to page 2 in his direct response to us, you'll see that my response was not incorrect. Is there a purpose to bringing this up again? If there is I can't see one.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
This.
I find post 125 pretty scummy. Just the support of both of the underwhelming Nostredeus and Shadow wagons is all kinds of blegh.
I could also be swayed into safety dance, who is currently pinging as our second scum read.
~Sotty.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:
@Sotty:
Where is Zach and why hasn't he been posting that much?
(Yes, this deserved a giant bold header.)
~~
I have some weaker townreads I'm not ready to talk about yet because I get the impression that a lot of people are struggling getting reads this game and I don't want to ease people into the game. I think our scumreads at this point are pretty well stated and both of us agree on the Jason vote. SafetyDance is not a bad vote either though. I'm kind of eh on McStab, I think his attack on Nostredeus is pretty shitty and applies too high of a standard for him regarding his level of competence. Not sure if it's scum motivated, though, need to see more from him.
Zach's car broke down on Tuesday, and Zach has been preoccupied with all the scrambling that entails getting another one.
On that notewe are going to be V/LA through the weekend.
Jason is town btw. He's being ridiculously silly in his actions this game. That is town Jason to a T. (Sotty and I are both confident in stating this so I'm confident in the read.)- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
Okay so I am caught up. Liking the SafetyDance vote mostly because of his posturing and dismissive tone when it comes to a lot of the pressure. Also he brings up winning the recent vig4all? I don't really like that at all. I know Zach played in that game so when he wakes up I'll ask him about it, but right now, blegh.
CDB feels town to me. I remember him not enjoying scum and his posts here have been mostly good. benmage is feeling kinda town too, I like his push on Peta and might be down for a vote there if it wasn't for Post 378 which is an excellent point about Safety.
Jason is still town. I have known the guy for 8 years just about, played mafia with him on and off the last three or four years? I forget. But Zach and myself are pretty great when it comes to reading the Jason slot and we both feel Jason Town right now. He does dumb things like tunnel on the wrong people (vifam) all the time as town. There are only two people I am happy in just straight up reading and that's Zach and Jason. So yeah, that's where I'm at with that. If any of you Jason voters want to show me something in his meta to provoe me wrong then go ahead. Right now I'm just not seeing it.
Ironic or not, I don't really like any of the other hydras. TGAH I have already gone into and they are a strong scum read of mine. But the other two Plessiezarus and Cerulean both feel fake when I read their posts. It's more of a gut feeling too right now, I will have to recheck ISOs but something is bubbling there. I'm pretty sure I read Cerulean defending Plees from Camn too which makes me urk. But I will look back again later.
~Sotty- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Shadoweh wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:
Ironic or not, I don't really like any of the other hydras. TGAH I have already gone into and they are a strong scum read of mine. But the other two Plessiezarus and Cerulean both feel fake when I read their posts. It's more of a gut feeling too right now, I will have to recheck ISOs but something is bubbling there. I'm pretty sure I read Cerulean defending Plees from Camn too which makes me urk. But I will look back again later.
~Sotty
So you have a scum read on Cerulean because they might have defended Plessie, who you have a scum read on because
I remember that Zach has a meta of phoning it in on scum games because he hates them. Incidentally, Cerulean asked where Zach was and now you think they are fake for poor reasons. You cited irl as why he's not posting but in my experience IRL excuses doubly come into play when you're scum and really just don't want to post. Do you think TGAH is scummier then SafetyDance and do you really think that a derp thing like 'i won ebanowoof' is something scum would say and expect to get away with?
(this is highly hypocritical right now seeing as irl is keeping me from posting alot but I'm trying to get this out there)
You're free to think what you want of course, but I just got done with probably one of the worst weeks of my life in a long time, and a mafia game wasn't exactly something I had high on the list of things I cared about.
Cerulean pushing on it feels more townish to me actually.
Sotty can explain her rationale on suspicions, while I'll just say that as of page 13ish or so that I'm most suspicious of SafetyDance's play. (I haven't gotten to the safetydance on ebanowoof or whatever it is you're mentioning here, but I'll get back to it once I catch up.)- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Baby Spice wrote:
At least there is balance.
Poked my head into some Vifam games, and this looks like scumfam. TownFam posts content and not do many crappy one liners.
Can you show your work here? (Preferably citing a source.)- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:
↑ sottyrulez wrote:Jason is still town. I have known the guy for 8 years just about, played mafia with him on and off the last three or four years? I forget. But Zach and myself are pretty great when it comes to reading the Jason slot and we both feel Jason Town right now. He does dumb things like tunnel on the wrong people (vifam) all the time as town. There are only two people I am happy in just straight up reading and that's Zach and Jason. So yeah, that's where I'm at with that. If any of you Jason voters want to show me something in his meta to provoe me wrong then go ahead. Right now I'm just not seeing it.
Him attacking "the wrong people" is not even remotely the issue we have with him. It's the fact that he's attacking Arthur and Vifam for their playstyles rather than anything alignment indicative and there's just an overall lack of substance coming from him (#122 still being the most egregious example). A lot of his posts read like they just exist to make him seem like he's contributing when he's really not. Also, just telling us to trust you isn't going to do much when you're not doing much to highlight the difference between his town play and his scum play. What's the difference between the two and how exactly is he playing like his town self? (For what it's worth, Tammy told me she feels like he's playing more like in TM 2012 Closed Normal where they were scum buddies than in Harry Potter. Tammy can probably elaborate on this better when she comes back, though.)
Yeah, your complaints about his play pretty much hit all the markers that indicate he's town. He's notoriously bad with reads and arguments as town. It's actually when he's scum that he will come across more level headed and seem to be making more reasonable arguments. It's precisely because when he's scum he's more interested in trying to fit in vs when he's town and actually interested in finding scum that he tries so hard that he tries to make square pegs fit into circular holes.
↑ TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:
I don’t know. It could be a small scum team, Jason could be a scum PR, or a few other reasons that I can’t think of right now. That doesn’t negate the point that they –are- defending Jason. Nor are they touching the main issue of why Jason is scum. Instead they are labeling Jason as town due to his gambit and tunneling on Vifam.
Sotty, would you respond to 304 and give your thoughts on that and how it affects your read on Jason? Would you also address Jason’s scumread on Dayne?
I’m going to catch up with everything, hopefully, before I head out to work today. If there is anything that people would specifically like me to address please let me know.
Unless you're going to make an argument that SafteyDance necessarily has a similar meta to Jason, I don't see how 304 should affect my read on Jason at all. (Jason has a pretty distinctive town playstyle consisting of things I would find scummy out of almost any other player.)
What do you want me to say about his scumread on Dayne? I don't agree with it.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
Camn
↑ camn wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:I'm pretty sure I read Cerulean defending Plees from Camn too which makes me urk. But I will look back again later.
I missed this- I would love to see it, if you can point it out.
I'm talking about this right here. Seems out of left field to me. The whole post is awkward.
Gonna check (skim?) some of the hydra ISOs to see if my gut rumbles amount to anything or if it something to ignore for now. While I do that, I'm still a days posting behind.
~Sotty.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Konowa wrote:Short post short till I get off this afternoon.
Waiting on rofl to get back to me, if no response by then our vote will be moving to Jason. sotty can go next. Their 452 doesn't address the main issue for us of why Jason is likely scum (Jason pushing this crap that Dayne is scum because his RPing is "scum trying hard to fit in".
Sorry dude, Jason is town, you're not. Sucks, I know but dems the breaks.
It's gut so no. I already detailed it a little with the tunneling, Jason is over eager as town. He gets on his high horse and casts down suspicions as if posting was black and white. With players he doesn't know he tries to make them fit into his box of right and wrong (see: Vifam). Other things are there too, posting tone a big one. But like I said it is pretty much all gut and experience. I can't translate to you if you don't have the same experience I do. I do know an easy wagon when I see one though, that's what Jason is made of.
*Shrug* Never said it was, I was explaining why he is town. I do appreciate you actually showing your work though, a lot more than most. Just completely disagree.
↑ TheGreatestAmericanHero wrote:unvote;
Vote: Jason
I'll address stuff tomorrow. Work/Daughter's birthday this week/etc.
lol
I understand the issue, but my site posting AKA pulling out of the UK scum meet should be clear that this is something real that happened. I guess judge us now that it's starting to be resolved, as in we should be picking up the new car by the end of the week. Last week was just a shit week, I'm glad we managed any posting if I'm honest.
What the flipping fuck?
↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:scott/zach, can you please EXPLAIN the townread on Jason? Like,attemptto convince others instead of just saying "take my word for it".
That's pretty much the extent of it I'm afraid. He is a terrible day one lynch and I will scream that to the rooftops. I don't have anything better than "because". I am surprised that one has actually bothered to ask Jason of our defense of him though. That's kinda weird now I think of it. But yeah, if you don't like our arguments for JasonTown, it doesn't get any better.
After I get done posting this Jason does actually comment. Timing.
Looked though the hydra posts and I am happy to ignore that for now. The defending was strange, but eh. Putting a pin in it. There are much scummier people around. Like Safety and TGAH. Lets lynch one of these two.
~Sotty.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:Unvote: Vote: TheGreatestAmericanHero
No way rolfcopter is the passive head in a hydra as town. I just did a search on him and he's also active in site. The alarm bells are ringing.
What do you think of Konowa's cotent irrespective of rofl's activity?
Scumolious. Check our ISO for details, then think about joining us here.
↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
Not particularly? (I mean I don't remember the last time Zar played a westerosi game, and I don't remember ever seeing Pless as scum on westeros, so meh - I don't remember ever really getting a strong read on them in ADWD either).
And I find their lack of engagement/interaction and seemingly interest to be appalling. Both of them look like they're forcing themselves to post, esp from Zar who looks like he's being dragged to come and post. I actually find Pless' annoyance at Zar not really posting or conversing with him privately rather genuine - but I can very clearly see it as Pless being annoyed at Zar in a scum slot.
I quoted this because it needs to be read again. This is echoing my gut read on this slot right now and put into better words than I could.
Never mind about the link Tammy, Zach linked me to it.
~Sotty.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Baby Spice wrote:#492, Zach I looked it up using my limited computer time then tried to write it later on the phone when I shouldn't have, and screwed it up. Three days on two different anti-biotics so far seems to be working though.
Would like to see it when you get the time to do so. It's relatively important to me to see that you've actually genuinely done the research.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
Cerulean, let's try a different tact.
Assuming we're town, how likely do you think it is that we're wrong about Jason and that he's actually scum?
Assuming we're not town, how likely do you think it is that Jason is scum vs us going out of our way to white knight him?
Consider the answer to either scenario there while you're working out in your mind whether Jason is still worth pursuing at this point in the game.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:Cerulean, let's try a different tact.
Assuming we're town, how likely do you think it is that we're wrong about Jason and that he's actually scum?
Assuming we're not town, how likely do you think it is that Jason is scum vs us going out of our way to white knight him?
Consider the answer to either scenario there while you're working out in your mind whether Jason is still worth pursuing at this point in the game.
How hard is it to see that I'm trying to read all of you?
I've gone through each of the scenarios you've proposed. I know Jason's not getting lynched today. He knows it, you know it, the entire town knows it. But, it happens to be important to me that I have my reads as right as I can get them, and if that means me going over what is bothering me I'm going to do it. I don't care if it seems like I'm reaching or if it's silly, you can point out to me why it is. I'm not interested in stubbornly holding onto a read that will end up being a detriment to town, I'm interested in having accurate scum reads.
Fair enough.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:↑ Cerulean wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:Unvote: Vote: TheGreatestAmericanHero
No way rolfcopter is the passive head in a hydra as town. I just did a search on him and he's also active in site. The alarm bells are ringing.
What do you think of Konowa's cotent irrespective of rofl's activity?
Scumolious. Check our ISO for details, then think about joining us here.
The only real issue I have with any of their posting is rofl's Post 153 and rofl's lack of activity. This activity level is pretty typical for what I experienced with konowa recently though. And as I've just played a game with konowa, I looked through his scum meta and when scum he tends to be really passive and not asking direct questions of people all that much. If I were just judging konowa, I'd think they were townish. But, I hate the post I just linked by rofl. Empire says it sounds like town rofl and thinks konowa sounds like town too, and roll does make these sorts of posts as town, but this sounds like trying to stretch something really far to make something sound like scum, which is what I remember rofl being like when we were scum together. I think empire thinks I'm just being paranoid or something because he changed the subject last time we talked.
I can link the scum games I looked through later if youre interested, but I'm heading out to work right now.
I believe I've only played with Konowa town, so I can't say I know much about his scum meta. I do know that rolf hates being scum about as much as I do, so it's bothering me a lot that Konowa is more present in this game/the more dominant head, and that he's apparently convincing rolf of reads rather than the other way around. (Rolf's town game really shines so I'd expect him to be extremely proactive, and he's not showing that here.)- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
I also looked through Mcstab's iso and it's scummy. A lot of what was in my head to cover was covered in Benmage's 557 which I largely agreed with in points regarding Mcstab of all things. (I usually don't find myself agreeing with Benmage about much of anything.)
Mcstab/Zdenek would be my 2nd choice for a lynch.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Zdenek wrote:
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Personally I just think you are trying to deflect attention back to me over the gambit etc so as to take away from people looking at you.
By suggesting that you could be scum in a post where I talk about a bunch of people and while I'm not even voting you - that suggestion is LOLZY.
This reaction to me when you've said before that you think that my slot is 100% going to flip town is ridiculous.
Unvote
Vote: Jason
Not only was that assertion written round about 200 posts ago, that wasn't even what he said. He said he was nearly 100% that Mcstab would flip town. That's notquitethe same thing as saying 100%
You get some scum points for that misrep. (And for using the statement in an attempt to prevent Jason from voicing any future suspicion on your slot.)- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Yes, I have said I thought McStab would prob flip town... Nowhere have I said ZDenek would flip scum.... I was
1) Pointing out that I felt his comments on me where more to drag attention away from his growing wagon
2) Showing how he was wrong.
Here we are arguing over a read that didn't even change in the first place.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Zdenek wrote:↑ Plessiezarus wrote:We didn't do this. Zar misreading one post is obviously not the bulk of our "case" against McStab.
I did not say that the whole case was a misrep, but if Sottyrulez thinks that it's scummy for me to say 100% rather than nearly 100%, but doesn't care about that, then something is wrong.
On a side note, the reason why I checked that point was that it was one of the few things in your case that I thought was objectively scummy.
↑ sottyrulez wrote:Where's the misrep?
↑ Plessiezarus wrote:basically because I don't understand why McStab found Nostredeus' vote of Shadoweh suspicious, since he had been voting Shadoweh himself.
↑ Plessiezarus wrote:Hmm. Looks like Zar is misreading things a bit here. McStab votes Shadoweh in 93, and later, in 164 attacks Nost for being talked out of his idea by Shadoweh, his scum-read. But McStab doesn't actually say the Shadoweh vote is suspicious in itself - looks like Zar missed the point a bit
*Grabs chest* You got me. I'll go ahead and slightly adjust my read of Pless from null to null leaning scum and my read your slot scummy, to leaning scummier.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:↑ Plessiezarus wrote:Friendly Neighbour != Neighbourizer
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... _Neighbour
It's a necessarily town-aligned role.
its not a town role, but its also not a scum role...It can be used as scum or town and has no real indication as to the allignment of the person at all.
Wiki says it's pretty much town if it's confirmed. The problem is believing the claim because...
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:The problem with it being used as a fake claim though, he can be 'verified' by one of his lower suspected scum buddies. Who can say yes, I was neighborized.
Yes, this is valid.
I'm more inclined to believe actiondan's claim over zdenek's. That isn't to say it necessarily has to be a one or another deal. I'm not sure how likely it is that both roles exist in the game though...
I still prefer lynching TGAH and figuring the rest of this out later.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Zdenek wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:I'm not sure how likely it is that both roles exist in the game though...
Scum posting - trying to cast doubt on the possibility without taking a stance.
If you think it's unlikely, say why.
So ummm, do you believe Dan's claim?- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Zdenek wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:↑ Zdenek wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:I'm not sure how likely it is that both roles exist in the game though...
Scum posting - trying to cast doubt on the possibility without taking a stance.
If you think it's unlikely, say why.
So ummm, do you believe Dan's claim?
I believe that he's a neighborizer, but I don't think that it's relevant to his alignment.
Now, do you think that it's unlikely that both roles are in the game?
As town yes.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Zdenek wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:
If I had a particularly compelling reason that didn't require having more information, I'd be on one of your wagons today.
It's just a feeling, that I'm doubting I can substantiate with any fact.
I can't tell what this is supposed to mean. If you had a compelling reason, you'd be on one of our wagons today. Okay, but isn't that always true of basically any player?
Sure, but I happen to be suspicious of you.
You mean "confirmable" and I emphasize the quotation part in the scenario that you're lying scum and claim to have targeted a buddy who backs up your claim.
Just because you claimed a "confirmable" role doesn't mean I have to be inclined to believe it.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
Oh wow, got prodded. With how much has been posted since our last post, I didn't think it had actually been that long.
We have doubts, we've made those doubts clear. I don't think it's surprising to have doubts. It doesn't matter at this point anyway. It will matter later when there's more information and a clearer picture than there is now.
Anyway, ====[] Let's go TGAH lynch!- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
What are you going to say?- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:↑ sottyrulez wrote:What are you going to say?
Well, you spent the entire D1 adamantly defending Jason as town so uhh what the fuck
It's a new day, and what would be the fun without completely 180ing on a stance?- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Cerulean wrote:↑ Plessiezarus wrote:This list matches up fairly well with our current town-reads (not in this order, obviously, but then this list isn't meant to be ordered, right?).
We'd add you and sottyrulez as town-reads (despite sotty's odd reversal re:Jason today), and wouldn't have TML (who's definitely still null for us) or DV (whowasnull, but has dropped down to weak-scum recently), but otherwise that's it. Can you explain what we're missing in TML's play?
No, it's not meant to be ordered. I'd like to see some more from Zach, especially regarding Jason. And I'm not at all confident in DV.
We'll have more whenever Jason decides to post and acknowledge our vote.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:2 cops down, thats a great start.
Not too sure what to make of Sottys vote TBH it is kinda weird they want me to respond to their vote before explaining it. Honestly, not too bothered. I've played with both Sotty and Zach many times, used to them changing stances on me. Though I have never known this tacit from either.
You're not at all interested in what changed our opinion of you?
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:Usually if they have something on someone they come out pushing it relentlessly and will howl it from the roof tops. It's unusual for them to do it this way. Meh, whatever. It is odd... but its been a while since I played with them both so they may have changed things up a bit.
Would you characterize the TGAH push we made that way? What do you think makes today's vote different?- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
So basically you care as much about what changed our position on you as you seemingly have about the game since about the halfway point of day 1?
See, your early play hit what we know of your town meta to a T, but your play since has basically been coasting, and you've actually spent a large part of the game completely disinterested in our reads, which is another trait that is unlike town Jason and more like scum Jason.
So yes, our read on you has waivered for that reason. It's also waivered because despite TGAH ruthless attacks on you, you never seemed all that interested in lynching them. So that's the other mystery for us. What lead you to town read that slot? (And if you weren't townreading them, why the hell weren't you voting them?)
I mean you can rebut that we're depending too much on the tendency of your town play in regards to following our suspicion, but the lack of vote on TGAH from your position doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense to me, even more so because I can't find anything in your iso where you ever give a clear indication of what you thought of their play.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ jasonT1981 wrote:@SottyRulez - who was more behind the TGAH scum push on your side at the start, Zach or Sotty? or were you both in agreement from the start he was scum, or did one have to persuade the other?
At the start of the day, Sotty was heavily suspicious of TGAH, and I was more interested in Safetydance. Later on I came on board because of Rolf's lack of presence in the game because he has a scum meta that is very similar to my own so I became convinced later on in the day that TGAH was scum. From that point on, we both wanted him dead.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ The Mini-Librarian wrote:
sottyrulez wrote:If you think we're scum with TGAH after the way day 1 played out, I really don't know what to tell you.
Um...Traitor? (jus sayin)
Go read his final post after being lynched. He went out of his way to mention us being a possible SK. That would just be an odd thing to say about someone you would theoretically know is on your scumteam.
(I think he posted that because he wanted the town to consider us a serial killer suspect to salvage any value in our lynchability, but of course I have the benefit of knowing my alignment.)- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Nostredeus wrote:↑ Cerulean wrote:Kuribo - what's your read on Cdb?
Kise - same question.
Not a fan at all of nostredeus' vote on Sotty. Didn't like kuribo's vote on Sotty either but he removed it so that's all good, but nostredeus' vote was awful on all kinds of levels. Nost. I'd like you to explain what you think Sotty!scum has to gain by spending day one hard defending Jason only to turn around and push him today. How was their interaction forced?
I'll make a real post tomorrow or Wednesday as will other head but now *sleep*
I dunno what to tell you here but frankly scotty comes in with
"Vote jason"
and demands a response to that vote, jason responds with
"Not too sure what to make of Sottys vote TBH it is kinda weird they want me to respond to their vote before explaining it. "
to which scotty responds with
"You're not at all interested in what changed our opinion of you?"
Wow, that quote has been tragically snipped.
↑ sottyrulez wrote:↑ jasonT1981 wrote:2 cops down, thats a great start.
Not too sure what to make of Sottys vote TBH it is kinda weird they want me to respond to their vote before explaining it.Honestly, not too bothered. I've played with both Sotty and Zach many times, used to them changing stances on me. Though I have never known this tacit from either.
You're not at all interested in what changed our opinion of you?
Bold emphasis mine. He actually said he wasn't too bothered. This can't be anything but you changing the context of what actually happened.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:then pushes hard with
"Please don't make me wait an entire weekend worth of time for a response this time."
as if Jason hadn't clearly pointed out he'd be V/LA over the weekend in question. Jason responds with
"I replied... I'm not wasting time by chasing after you asking why oh why did you change your mind... if you have a solid reason, you would have posted it by now."
which given that scotty hadn't posted a reason seems reasonable to me, scotty then does two weird things:
1) "So basically you care as much about what changed our position on you as you seemingly have about the game since about the halfway point of day 1?"
Which is clearly not what Jason is saying, maybe we're all speaking different languages but it looks to me like Jason is asking multiple times for the reasoning behind the vote.
Let's establish a couple of things here. Yes, Jason does declare V/LA. He tends to do this over weekends. I tend to devalue it because I know what he tends to do on those weekends, I know he has internet access, I know he's on the internet on the weekends, so I know he can post here if he really wants to.
Part of the purpose of the vote was to see how much he'd care about it. That was certainly accomplished one way or another, but you defending Jason by saying that I'm misrepping him when he directly said he wasn't too bothered is trying to rewrite events a little more than I'm comfortable with.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:2) "See, your early play hit what we know of your town meta to a T, but your play since has basically been coasting, and you've actually spent a large part of the game completely disinterested in our reads, which is another trait that is unlike town Jason and more like scum Jason."
Which strikes me as backwards; Scotty voted BEFORE Jason "seemed"(I'm using quotes given 1) disinterested in scotty's read, this can't be a reason for the vote and if it is it should at least be presented with an example from before the vote.
I wasn't talking about just our read on him. I was talking about general disinterest in any of our reads. (This argument is meta based in nature, so I wouldn't expect you to actually understand the full context of the point I'm trying to make here, but you did change reads to read here.)
↑ Nostredeus wrote:If Scotty didn't just force that then I honestly don't know what your definition of forced is but for me that's a pretty damn good example of it. I'm happy to say I think at least one of them are scum, I've already given reasons why I don't think it's Jason and now I've given reasons why I think it's scotty; my vote stands.
What leads you to believe this is a scum/town interaction? I'm not even convinced of that at this point because I'm not actually sure Jason is scum. I'm actually trying to figure that out.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
On iso of Nostredeus:
↑ Nostredeus wrote:↑ Plessiezarus wrote:↑ Nostredeus wrote:So TML has had 0 heat all game which makes me sad, I suppose that can wait until Day 2; I might look at this once TML has more content to consider.
Do you think peopleshouldbe looking at TML? If so, why?
(Looking at your iso, you seem to suggest that TML's 390 is scummy, but you say nothing as to why. Can't see any other mention of him at all.)
I'm unsure at the moment as to TML's alignment, I am worried about the lack of heat though(I find that players who coast through Day 1 worry me); I don't think there's anything especially bad which is why I'm waiting for more content there before deciding either way. As for #390 my problem is TML saying he/she buys #351 but not voting Jason, personally when I said I liked #351 I gave analysis as to why it didn't convince me (namely that I don't see how it shows scum motivation but rather explains why the gambit was bad) given that TML didn't give that sort of analysis I can only assume TML likes #351 in the entirety which is then at odds with his/her vote on absta. *Shrugs*
Bold emphasis mine. One of my points is that Jason was coasting through toward the end of day one. I find it strange that you wouldn't acknowledge that point in attacking me while defending Jason.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:I'm looking for the case on TGAH but can't find it, I'll keep at it to see if I agree but until then I'd only be sheeping and that won't help you guys establish reads and what not.
I'm open to being convinced though.
I missed this gem before. I know the traitor thing can be counterargued. Regardless it can also be argued as distancing from what was believed to be a mislynch as well because he says "he's open to being convinced" which means that someone else's points would ultimately be responsible for the lynch..
↑ Nostredeus wrote:↑ Benmage wrote:↑ Nostredeus wrote:That feels really town; my real concern is that TGAH had the opportunity to respond to the case pless made in #633 and didn't, that's what I was personally looking for.
Not a fan of this nor DV's wishy-washiness... but this one more so.
The claim read like capitulation, scum caught... not town with fire that its a mislynch... No even "F"-off, just total blah.
Really? That's interesting, I supported a TGAH lynch based on #633 reasoning and said I'd hold off the hammer until deadline so that TGAH would have chance to answer; it seems like that's exactly what I'm doing, is there something wrong with that plan? If not then I'm not sure why me saying "that felt really town" is any different to DV saying it felt town, can you paint the distinction for me since you think one is worse than the other?
Oh man. Way too much justifying of a stance based on someone else's reasoning.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:Interested to see some heat on SAD, who it's coming from worries me of course. #1016 is weak sauce and seems to be refuted in the quote SAD quotes but maybe that's just me reading it wrong? #1079 is half a wall of "zdenek is looking bad" with the final sentence of the first paragraph being "but nvm all of that because the claim will sort that out" it just makes the first paragraph largely worthless...
When were you ever suspicious of SAD? Looking through your iso you seem to write him off as town on day 1. This comes out of nowhere and feels like it's just fanning the flames for a wagon.
Unvote: Vote: Nostredeus
Why do you seem to want TML pursued while making no serious effort to go after him? What is your read of him now? I mean I'm not really seeing anything that looks like any kind of process in trying to read him, just you filing off an "uneasiness about his play" and then filing it away.
Also if you're interested in the heat on SAD now, what's flipped your position on him? (The explanations you give aren't exactly strong because you back away from some of the attacks as soon as you make them.) You were less interested in him on day one so this would be changing your position. I mean, that in itself isn't a problem, except that you seem to have found a pretty juicy line of attack on me for doing the same thing.
I'm filing Jason off as lazy town for now. I'm a lot less confident in that read now though.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=4714367#p4714367]post 1264[/url], Zachrulez wrote:↑ BT wrote:Don't like Sotty's Nost vote at a glance (haven't read their other posts for background but the post as a post is no) mostly because it's on Nost and their reasons are kind of nitpicky. Would you consider this your strongest choice for a vote right now? What do you think of people universally reading his D1 as town?
People can be wrong? If he was universally read as town, I'm not seeing why.
~Duplicate post on Zachrulez deletedLast edited by The Baltimore Sun on Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:14 am, edited 1 time in total.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
Grrr
↑ BT wrote:Don't like Sotty's Nost vote at a glance (haven't read their other posts for background but the post as a post is no) mostly because it's on Nost and their reasons are kind of nitpicky. Would you consider this your strongest choice for a vote right now? What do you think of people universally reading his D1 as town?
People can be wrong? If he was universally read as town, I'm not seeing why.- sottyrulez
-
sottyrulez Mafia Scum
- sottyrulez
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1032
- Joined: August 17, 2009
↑ Nostredeus wrote:Oh you're voting me, I'm shocked, truly I am...
I suppose if you ignore all of the words around Jason saying "I'm not bothered" then I you can probably pretend that Jason only responded with "I'm not bothered", if however you go ahead and read all of Jason's stuff you'll see things like the line I quoted:
"I replied... I'm not wasting time by chasing after you asking why oh why did you change your mind... if you have a solid reason, you would have posted it by now."
Or directly from the same post you quoted:
"Not too sure what to make of Sottys vote TBH it is kinda weird they want me to respond to their vote before explaining it."
I dunno how that can be read other than Jason wanting an explanation before responding.
It can be read by interpreting him saying he's not too bothered meaning that he's actually not too bothered. Are you actually being serious here? Really?
It's not insignificant that you omitted him saying that either.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:With regards to V/LA, like, V/LA is V/LA I dunno why Jason can't post over the weekends but honestly I don't care as long as it is consistent both when Jason is town/scum; which, you know, it is...
Given that ^ there's probably a difference between someone coasting over a weekend when it's clearly not a scum-tell and someone coasting in the sense that they didn't have to respond to any heat on them for an entire in-game day; sure we've used the same words but frankly we have different meanings when we say "coasting" and yours is crap.
It wasn't just about that V/LA. (It is part of it, but it's noteverythingin regards to the coasting.) That post was my annoyance with him going on V/LA and delaying any progress in a read on him over the weekend.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:This stuff about how I've brought a read on SAD out of no where is really odd, given that you've just dragged a read out of no where on Jason after calling him town D1 I'm not sure who you think that's gunna be convincing? The difference between us is I gave reasons and allowed others to provide input on those reasons, you voted then gave reasons a number of posts later based on stuff that happened AFTER the vote.
You flipped, made a weak attempt to explain your change in position, and didn't even put a vote behind it. What's the crux of what is scummy about my play if your similar play there was not? The fact that I didn't immediately explain the vote? The fact that I actually voted based on my changed read? (A play that generally accomplishes more than not voting.)
Not to not immediately explaining, part of purpose of the play was to get reactionsbeforeexplaining the vote. If I say I intend to explain the vote and eventually do, what does it matter if it's not immediately when cast? It just seems like you're opportunistically attacking me for breaking some concept of expected play meta.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:The stuff on TML is a general worry/observation that no one has made any effort towards looking into TML, that's all I'm saying there, if I say something more you can read into that all you want but I recommend you wait for me to say something more first.
See you're putting the fact that no one is interested in looking into TML on the town. You have a vote. You have the ability to question and pressure to try to get a better read. You're not doing that in regards to TML. The result of your action is an attempt to cast a dark cloud (and somewhat vaguely.) over TML while putting the onus on the town to actually pursue him. It shouldn't be hard to see why I find it hard to see that coming from a pro-town mindset.
↑ Nostredeus wrote:I'll vote based on other people's reasoning all I want, and change stance based on other people's reasoning too; see me changing stance on the mass name claim early D1, shockingly other people can have convincing thoughts too.
tl;dr: herp derp bro?
I'm not saying other people can't have convincing thoughts. I'm saying that it's concerning that your positions follow (and seem to depend on.) other people's convincing thoughts. This is a great way to avoid responsibility for lynches, and also a great way to put that responsibility on others. It's a great position for scum to be in. - sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez
- sottyrulez