VOTE: Cephrir cause his last few posts feel funny in my tummy.
Also, the correct response to the hydra thing is to
lolnopeIn post 221, Alfred Borden wrote:Quadz is making votes he believes we'll believe he believes instead of votes he believes though.
By non-sequiturs, could you possibly be referring to meIn post 285, Shadoweh wrote:##Vote: Quadz
Way too many non-sequitors not enough lynching mafias. Also don't like the unvote, you were convinced way too easily to drop something you thought was a slip.
see aboveIn post 292, StupendousMan wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Quadz
Lots of fluff posting without much content. His vote/unvote of elle seemed really awkward. However, at this point it's mostly a gut read. I still have some reading to do, so this may change.
-> This is dumb as shit, and there's not much more to it. I said "it looks like a scumslip" as opposed to "it is a scumslip"In post 295, Alfred Borden wrote: I remember not too long after #194, Llamarble pointed it out to me and we both had the same kneejerk "WOW LOOK AT THE OBVSCUM" reaction. I'll do my best to sum up our AIM convo about quadz but it basically ended up resulting in this:
-> Llamarble found the post scummy because something either is a slip or it isn't; he found the "this looks like a slip" comment to be scummy because scum want to go after things that :look like: slips in order to bolster the credibility of their votes and make them appear more believable.
-> I hate to use the "o" word here, but personally, I found his vote opportunistic given the above "slip" logic. Scum tend to care a lot more about making sure their actions appear justified in the eyes of everyone at large so I feel like he shoved the slip logic in there for that reason.
-> Shadoweh already pointed it out, but I really dislike his unvote in #213. Seems more like a backpedal after he began drawing some heat for it rather than it being a genuine "my bad". #227 doesn't make sense either since there's plenty of scum motivation in unvoting once something like 4 people react to the vote negatively.
I disagree with everything you just said. Including the fact that wagon jumping is scummy. (And yes, this is yelling town-kanye.)In post 443, PeaceBringer wrote: there is not a thing scummy in any of that behavior. Not a thing. It could go either way.
compare that to KKB's behavior which demonstrates wagon jumping... now if people tell me that is his normal town play, fine, and when I have time it may be concerning enough to meta check...
-Reads by themselves are not content.In post 445, ooba wrote: - My reads are my content
says he "still" reads elle as townafter not mentioning outside of 331
- elle is the first read on my "initial readslist"
"then a couple of scumreads after Thor explicitly asked him to point out some scum for him"
- This is a misrep that makes it sound like I never mentioned scumreads before this - kanye and Shadow were also mentioned in the "initial readslist" (although Cephrir and Garruk reduced on the scummy meter in the few pages in between)
- AlfredBow has not mentioned me anywhere except for the vote - so wanted to know why he thought I was scummy
Off to work see you guys this evening!In post 452, Nautilius wrote:Why did this matter again?In post 218, quadz08 wrote:I mean, I guess that Faraday could just flavor the scumteam as wights, but it doesn't seem like Faraday, especially when there are definitely a couple of explicitly undead characters that could get picked.
Because of my headspace when calling out Elle for the "scumslip." That post absolutely matters in context.I sorta liked this.In post 267, quadz08 wrote:I don't put a ton of stock in my meta of players, but I just remember you being confident to the point of obnoxiousness. It stuck out in my head so felt it was worth mentioning. Plus, wanted to see what your response to being called out on it was.
kIn what kind of way? In a "they are both town" or "they are both scum" or "one is scum" kind of way?In post 298, quadz08 wrote:interesting.
None of the above. In a "this is something to keep in mind depending on future events" kind of way.Seems like a pretty scary thought to me too.In post 298, quadz08 wrote:I am extremely concerned that Andy is scum faking a Post Restriction, but that's :tinfoil: and has nothing substantiating it.
not sure if srs, but my point here was that Town haveno reasonto fake a post restriction.Why?
And why didn't you vote either?
Gut feelings while reading the entire thread. And I didn't feel strongly enough about either to warrant a vote.
That said, upon re-reading Amrun's ISO, I think what pinged my scumdar is actually her scumread on P&J. Dunno why, but it is. Upon re-reading Zdenek, I don't like his votes on either Kanye OR Thor. Kanye is clearly town-kanye here, and he voted Thor due to the particulars of his claim, which is just off-the-wall ridiculous to me at this stage in the game when we know nothing about the setup. It feels like scum latching onto something that looks sketchy, even thought it's not actually scummy.
In post 437, quadz08 wrote:ooba, on the other hand, is someone who keeps making me go AHHH every time he posts and then I promptly forget about him in the sea of Not Shitty Posts that surround his play
ooba is town but feel free to bring words into this to prove me wrong
k
Being as sure as I am about it, whyIn post 488, Nautilius wrote:You're that sure about this read AND you expect town-Zdenek to pick up in it? Why?
I do not actually know what you're attempting to say here. Try again please?In post 543, Shadoweh wrote:Quadz, #487 is painful to read, quote strips in bolded quote strips why. The best defense is a good offense, but I'm not sure if I agree with it. I think reads are the only content that matter. That and thought patterns. The counter that's been brought up is ooba's thought patterns are reasonable to follow.
ok? what's your point?In post 557, Nautilius wrote:People normally don't all agree on a townread, ever, and certainly not so early, and certainly not so easily. But the few times everyone actually agrees on a townread because someone is just THAT town, even newscum can pick up on it.
...... what does this post even meanIn post 559, Alfred Borden wrote:Premature townreads from scum who figure so and so will be obvtown eventually are a thing.
Ooba your step Ks have been about right for scum.
The sleep of a thousand waking princesses awaits. My primary bed is now a real bed for the first time in years >_>
Wat. There are 2 reads in there that could be construed as waffling (unless you count his "probably"s as waffling, which is completely ridiculous and you shoud stop doing that). Misreps are not cool.In post 632, Amrun wrote:Why bother posting a reads list if it's going to be stack of waffles?
In post 821, Tierce wrote:Also if SafetyDance flips scum I am immediately calling for blood and lynching the Nautilius slot for the elleheathen/ellebereth/Ellibereth slip. In fact I am awfully tempted to go there immediately because how the heck do you do that unless Elli is present on your mind due to QT posts. I don't see the first post causing such an impression.
Nacho. You went and drew scum on us?
In post 824, Tierce wrote:Yeah I am okay with this.
VOTE: SafetyDance
I hope to wake up and see GOOD THINGS from you, Nacho.
Care to inform me when the reason for your vote on him changed, Tierce? Cause it seems to me like someone came up with a better reason than you, and you decided to hop on and pretend it was your reason all along.In post 909, Tierce wrote:Holy fucking shit no it's not good. He has ten scumreads after reading the game for the first time? No, quadz. (Bonus factor is that it shows Nacho-scum if he flips scum, but I won't care about Nacho for like three Days). See stuff like this:
In post 831, SafetyDance wrote:I'm confused. What slip? If I'm the one who scumslipped why I am left in the dark over it?
Color me stupid. >_< nevermind, then. My post to you can be scratched more-or-less completely.In post 917, Tierce wrote:quadz, post before that:In post 820, Tierce wrote:Nah, they went and eloped on us. A scandal, really, but what thrills.In post 818, SafetyDance wrote:Oh, was 721 game-related at all?
Can you explain how on earth you happen to have ten scumreads?
It's not good as in "this is full of insight and analysis and brilliant play." It's good as in "this is a town POV."In post 918, Cephrir wrote:How is "I'm confused" good? Hadn't someone just explained the possible-slip? Even if they hadn't, "good" is quite a stretch.In post 915, quadz08 wrote:
And for the record, this is a pretty good response to the reasoning for your vote (the only vote on him at the time besides Syryana, and the singular vote with any reasons attached):In post 831, SafetyDance wrote:I'm confused. What slip? If I'm the one who scumslipped why I am left in the dark over it?
See I was gonna hop on here to see what happened and then you moved your vote off of it too fast. Jerk.In post 1043, macmollie wrote:so if I tried to push a goat lynch through would you still support it even tho we both would cry cos cdb and av are the coolest dudes?In post 1042, quadz08 wrote:I still don't like Zdenek. Amrun has moved into nullish territory, though that may be due to her being less of a presence in-thread.
I'm also growing more paranoid of Goat; I think I may be unintentionally giving them a pass because CDB is the Coolest Dude.
can you help me try?
lets see what comes of it
VOTE: goat people
These are all "bad/new at mafia" tells rather than scumtells.In post 1096, Syryana wrote:*sigh*
Problem #1: 3000 fucking scumreads. Scummy by itself? No. Scummy when considered of the context that he's done jack fuck to narrow the list? Hell fuck yes.
Problem #2: Reaction to scumslip. As town, when somebody else goes up to me and says "LOL YOU SCUMSLIPT LOL", the immediate town reaction (in my humble 13er opinion) is some variant of "lolthefuckyousmokintierce".
What did we get? "What? I scumslipped? Where?" *looks for scumslip for 20 minutes* "Oh, you mean that?" *proceeds to overexplain scumslip*
Hmm...
Problem #3: Best reasoning for anybody being in his scumlist is "X is most likely to flip scum." No reason X is scum. No indication of thought process. No indication of scumhunting. Hell, corollary to that, there's no reason anybody in his list is any alignment. The moral of the story: THERE'S NO INDICATION OF THOUGHT PROCESS OR ANY KIND OF ALIGNMENT HUNTING IN HIS READS LIST OR ISO.
Questions?
Pedit: Tierce, I was attempting to troll the fuck out of mollie, and you are all up in me shit. Besides, I don'tneedgallantry, because I got bitcheslining upto be all in me shit. Just ask Tammy and Shadoweh.
Chrissakes, Ceph, read the fucking game.In post 1107, quadz08 wrote:Ok, so for some reason I was conflating stupendousman and safetydance in my head when I made that post. I can appreciate the case on him a little bit better now. >_<
tbf, "not differentiating" between scum and null reads is stupid at the very best.In post 1120, macmollie wrote:@ syrlacious
you iso him in this:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=29629
and then tell me that it is even remotely the same.
you have 8 freaking null reads and you are bitching about his scum reads while ignoring that he doesn't really differentiate between null and scum? [redacted] you
your case is downrightterribleand reeks of opportunism in picking on low hanging fruit (which only makes sense if you are scum) and elitism (which I am surprised at you).
silly me. I had this retarded incredibly stupid idea that we were supposed to lynch scum not go for the easy lynch "just because" but mebbe that is cos it is my wc to do that. jesus fucking christ I subbed into a game that was about as confscum as you can get without a view and he was mislynched over me. your push on him looks scummy as fuck I don't care what anybody says.
In post 1222, ooba wrote:@Quadz
- My top scum read jumped on to my wagon because 'oobas flaking' and im trying to figure out if that's it and why he isn't pushing other stronger scum reads? But sure - call it filler
- i never defended Amrun and Zednek. At least read my posts before posting "cases" on me
Point 1 is fair.In post 1222, ooba wrote:@Quadz
- My top scum read jumped on to my wagon because 'oobas flaking' and im trying to figure out if that's it and why he isn't pushing other stronger scum reads? But sure - call it filler
- i never defended Amrun and Zednek. At least read my posts before posting "cases" on me
Also, Thor should answer M&M's question.In post 1177, ooba wrote:Vibe + Your major pushes in the game have been on Amrun and SafetyDance - both of whom I'm leaning town on and looked like very easy pushes at that time.
this is a really shitty reason for a vote at this stage in the game when Goat has been around preeeetty regularly. "oh noez they have not posted in this thread for like 24 whole hours" is anIn post 1308, macmollie wrote:cos I am pretty sure that they have been around but are ignoring the game for some reason.
So you're telling me that "you're trying to be antagonistic" is a stronger scumread than "you can die?"In post 778, Zdenek wrote:Mainly for their interaction with Benmage which seemed like they were just trying to be antagonistic.
ohIn post 1356, macmollie wrote:WAAAAAAIT A MINUTE!!!
thor since when have you ever thought any of my logic was valid? name 1 other time in a game that you ever thought that something I said was valid or had anything to do with logic much less have any merit to it? in fact that is the whole reason as to why you always want to pl me and why we fight it is cos you say you can never understand a single thing I say. you're scum aren't you? oh god that is why you have been so civil isn't it?In post 1305, Thor665 wrote:I see that as valid logic why Tierce looks scummy.
VOTE: thor
no wonder the game is feeling so off there is a rotten apple trying to worm their way into town's core.
you're kidding, right? that's all you've got after 50-odd pages?In post 1380, displaced wrote:OK read up now, sorry it took so long but that was a lotalot of words to read
VOTE: goat
for voting a townread because 'flips are needed' when a null read of his also has a viable wagon