[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 6128687 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Mini 1603 - Air Combat Mafia - Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Your vote was opportunistic because you tried to back it up with (poor) reasoning. His vote seemed random, blatantly without justification. It's scum motivation vs. WIFOM, I pick the former as more likely to be scum. My question could gain insight into the wagon to better understand his post (if it was to be answered), so I can therefore see if I'm missing something about it that makes it scummier.
Huh? I thought by second-vote-on-wagon vote you meant Flubber's vote on Csareo. I wasn't sure how serious the Flubber wagon was so if MattP was scum it would be easier to blend in in that case. It's the second page so I wouldn't call it a confident read but at the moment, I do think MattP is scum.
↑Anatole Kuragin wrote:Ki-Gi, do you think it's likely that scum would drop a second-vote-on-wagon vote without explanation like that?
↑Ki-Gi wrote:I don't think it's likely, no. Which is why I especially don't like Flubber's wagon.
You said you don't think it's likely that scum would drop the second vote on a wagon without explanation, which is what Matt did.
I just explained the distinction though. With Matt, being the second vote on the wagon against Flubber wouldn't be a towntell because as far as I know that was a completely random wagon. With Flubber's second vote on a wagon on the other hand, it's WIFOM, as I said before. I misspoke in saying that I would agree that scum would drop the second vote on a wagon without explanation in all cases. Some cases yes, but not all cases.
p-edit: So you're seriously trying to justify a vote off of me saying "bruh"?
↑MattP wrote:I just don't see how you could extrapolate so much more meaning from my vote on csarea than from farsides vote on flubber (besides the "taking advantage of a noob" card which wasn't even true considering I didn't even push csarea when he responded to my vote) and use that to be so confident I must be scum. It seems ridiculous
But I'm not confident you're scum, and said as much. We're three pages in. I don't understand the wagon on Flubber so I can't extrapolate anything from that. Your vote on Csarea seemed opportunistic. Not pushing, which helps, but opportunistic all the same.
You remember your original vote for me had no comments from you right? We had to get those comments out of you. You responded to 53 just now to elaborate when you had a response before that after 53 was posted, so you're starting to realize how weak your argument is yet you're trying to make it look like you're still confident in it.
Which alignment does that? I don't think you're town bruh
So your vote was intentionally vague, and then more explained, and then more explained still. And this was your intention, to get reactions. I see. I'm inclined to believe you but damn that is some weak logic.
↑farside22 wrote:Oh and for a shit and giggle reference I did vote for messiah in Bel's game for no reason and he was scum.
What is the point of this. What. Why. Because it seems like an underhanded way to justify your random vote while still making it clear that you don't actually mean anything by it.
↑Anatole Kuragin wrote:I saw his post about Matt earlier, and asked if he thought the way Matt (who he was and is voting) would be likely to vote in such a bold way (no other text, or explanation) as the second vote on a wagon if he was scum. I asked this because I think that reduces the chances of it being a scum vote. Ki-Gi even said himself he didn't think it would be likely when addressing the question in a more general manner.
That has nothing to do with what you're arguing.
You realize your question did not refer to Matt right?
He also stated it wasn't a big scum tell, also not sure why your up in arms over my vote with explanation while questioning ki for his vote with the rational of being a second vote without a reason.
What is the difference between the first vote for no reason push?
Your vote still has no explanation at all.
And yes, I was asking a question to Ki-Gi in reference to Matt originally. I think I would know better than you. Ki-gi seemed to understand the question fine when I asked it - you are the only one who did not.
That's not true, I thought you were referring to Flubber when you were referring to Matt, which made me answer yes as opposed to no.
I can see that earlier on this page anyway. And it's not even a quote thing. 103 and 104 do not need to be two posts. And if you butcher quoting than just use @s. Anything but this.
In 91 and 92 you take the same quote and make two responses to it in two different posts. That's not okay. I do not need Mr. Schizoid Man filling up every page of this game until your inevitable death. I'm glad you see my point. Maybe try being offline more and then relying more on catch-up posts? Whatever, I'm guilty of it to an extent myself.
I didn't say policy lynch, I said DOUBLE policy lynch. And you thought I was serious. And you thought that was my first post of the game, even though I posted earlier on this page.
Town does not need scumhunting this bad clogging up the game.
↑farside22 wrote:My vote on ki is simple. He isn't scum hunting. His post are stabs at people on things they say and keeps himself out of conversations completely.
Aka: playing the sideline scum game.
Your "conversations" with AK is nothing but running in circles and never concluding anything decent, so really I care enough about the town
to avoid
getting involved with them. My stabs at people actually reveal shit that help me with my reads. You just confuse people with questions that couldn't possibly reveal alignment and then continue to bother them when they call you out for it. I would OMGUS you but I just think you're weak town. If your scum and just want me to think that, then good job.