Mini 2004 - Birth of the Necromancer - [DERP! - MOD LOSES]
Forum rules
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
What post(s) are you scumreading Zito for?In post 273, Wisdom wrote:
249/250 feel pretty fakeIn post 269, Ankamius wrote:What post(s) are you scumreading Tywin for?-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
mm
I know Zito (kind of... well enough to have a basic idea of how he thinks) outside the game to believe that snarkiness is probably NAI. The hiding-reasons thing doesn't ping for me either since I operate similarly. Is there another link I'm missing regarding him, and what do you think about him pointing out the same posts from Tywin?-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
I'm assuming there isn't a whole lot more in the game so far to base things off of for right now. If there's anything else in particular that's worth looking at then I'll go look, but I think this is enough to determine that reading through day 1 isn't going to be too insightful.
I'll be back tomorrow to give more thoughts.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Probably?In post 302, Wisdom wrote:Tywin's overreactions about the hammer are probably consistent with this incoherent thought dump - its just all a playstyle i dont like i guess-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
This sentence right here.In post 321, brassherald wrote:
I'm just asking for some analysis.In post 320, ActionDan wrote:It's rare his brand of intransigence after earning the stink eye from almost everyone in thread (ignoring correlations) comes from scum.
unrelated, @brass, if you can't understand a even a single of those reads my desire to explain any to all of them dissipates completely.I can understand and agree with some, but I'm looking for thought processes.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
It is a scum mindset. Town has an agenda when looking to get more information from people because they need them to get reads. Scum (especially weaker scum) don't have to care, their reads are all fake unless they're hunting another team or a serial killer anyways.In post 389, Tywin Lannister wrote:
Im not ashamed to admit this went over my head. Can you ELI5?In post 385, Ankamius wrote:
This sentence right here.In post 321, brassherald wrote:
I'm just asking for some analysis.In post 320, ActionDan wrote:It's rare his brand of intransigence after earning the stink eye from almost everyone in thread (ignoring correlations) comes from scum.
unrelated, @brass, if you can't understand a even a single of those reads my desire to explain any to all of them dissipates completely.I can understand and agree with some, but I'm looking for thought processes.
Brass isn't looking to further his own reads from AD, he's scraping his mind for something to attack or attach on to.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
The key difference its the how and the why.In post 395, Wisdom wrote:i dont get it
brass asked AD to elaborate because his reads did not include his thought process-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Brass asked him to post the reasoning behind any of his reads, even though he apparently already agreed with some of them? What read(s) is he looking for info on and why?
Its like I said before, town has an agenda behind questions. Brass doesn't.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
In post 278, Ankamius wrote:mm
I know Zito (kind of... well enough to have a basic idea of how he thinks) outside the game to believe that snarkiness is probably NAI. The hiding-reasons thing doesn't ping for me either since I operate similarly. Is there another link I'm missing regarding him, and what do you think about him pointing out the same posts from Tywin?-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
ooooooh
You're scandalous-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
It's playstyle if anything, I'm not engaged in the game at this point, especially since we are stuck with a stalled wagon on somebody I don't believe is scum and a lot of people aren't doing much outside of that.In post 443, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Just read his ISO, again not seeing it. Your reasons for voting for Brass and Eddie didn’t really make any sense to me either. YOUR ISO is pinging me however. Any idea why that may be?In post 441, Ankamius wrote:Well, first of all, you're probably not going to like any of my pushes in any game I'd you don't like vagueness.
Second of all, it's not from any specific post. It's his entire ISO that feels off.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Can you post what all your points on him are in one post?
The reason I find him really town is partially because I get a very genuine vibe from his posting and partially because the distant memory I have of being scumpartners with him, I remember he was nowhere near as open in his thoughts and the ones he did give were more rigid.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
It doesn't, that was more a result of being exhausted and not caring at the moment than anything.In post 448, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Your vote on Eddie was a sheep though and you gave no reason for it, other than that. How does sheeping help you to form better reads?In post 444, Ankamius wrote:Ehhhhhh
That's a reasonable deduction, but it only looks that way because I don't explain my thoughts around each vote. I haven't formed enough reads to be confident in any of them, so I'm mostly looking to get those reads.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
This isn't unusual for Dan as either alignment. He's a low-information player and I've seen this type of behavior from him in just about every game I've ever seen from him. This game is actually the highest information game I think I've seen him play so far.In post 407, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:I wiil respond more to both this post and your other post later. I’ve already stated that I find Dan’s lurking but not posting wayy scummier than Zito voting for Kokichi who was the first one to mention that bizarre Eevee post, I believe. I disagree with him on that, because that is one of my strongest reasons for tr Kockichi.
I am still not happy about him not answering mine or anyone else’s questions nor the inexplicable calling Kockichi and me partners.
I am not tr him but ironically, I do think his prior vote on Kockichi is AGL, despite IMO, him being wrong about sr them.
snip
I totally disagree with your Dan comparison because he was LURKING but did nothing. You say that Zito did nothing as well but he actually voted - a vote I completely disagree with but nevertheless - not an entirely illogical if wrongheaded one.
What about it is scummy? I got the sense he picked up on something in Eddie's play and was mostly using his vote for pressure.Dan still left his vote on me and now is pushing Eddie out of the blue. Between the two of them, I hands down view Dan’s behaviour as scummier.
I didn't see anything come out as 'reactionary' for a reason from Dan's ISO. Where did that come from?Eventhough I obv find all pushes on me wrongheaded ngl; I can distinguish between a likely townie but wrongheaded one: yours and to me, a highly sus one. Dan’s basic reason for still sr me, is that he is calling my votes “reactionary” which really makes 0 sense because no one has ben pushing on me harder in both d1 and d2, than you; yet when a brief wagon formed on you, what is both you and Dan’s explanation for my NOT jumping on that? Shouldn’t I be really be voting you and not Dan, based on this logic?-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
I'm saying his approach felt off, in that it doesn't seem like he's trying to approach the game the same way recently that he did in day one.In post 453, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
What about his “playstyle” and how is saying this any different than your previous post, saying that something was off about his ISO?In post 445, Ankamius wrote:[quote="In post 443,
It's playstyle if anything, I'm not engaged in the game at this point, especially since we are stuck with a stalled wagon on somebody I don't believe is scum and a lot of people aren't doing much outside of that.
It's almost like he's floating along and using his activity to hide it today.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
In post 278, Ankamius wrote:mm
I know Zito (kind of... well enough to have a basic idea of how he thinks) outside the game to believe that snarkiness is probably NAI. The hiding-reasons thing doesn't ping for me either since I operate similarly. Is there another link I'm missing regarding him, and what do you think about him pointing out the same posts from Tywin?
Your first line doesn't address the issue; the base of your logic depends on ActionDan having called your votes reactionary, which I didn't see anywhere in his ISO. Where does he say that?In post 462, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
LOL, reread my post again. What I was saying is if MY vote not Dan’s or anyone else’s was “reactionary”, I should be voting for Ty.In post 454, Ankamius wrote:
This isn't unusual for Dan as either alignment. He's a low-information player and I've seen this type of behavior from him in just about every game I've ever seen from him. This game is actually the highest information game I think I've seen him play so far.In post 407, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:I wiil respond more to both this post and your other post later. I’ve already stated that I find Dan’s lurking but not posting wayy scummier than Zito voting for Kokichi who was the first one to mention that bizarre Eevee post, I believe. I disagree with him on that, because that is one of my strongest reasons for tr Kockichi.
I am still not happy about him not answering mine or anyone else’s questions nor the inexplicable calling Kockichi and me partners.
I am not tr him but ironically, I do think his prior vote on Kockichi is AGL, despite IMO, him being wrong about sr them.
snip
I totally disagree with your Dan comparison because he was LURKING but did nothing. You say that Zito did nothing as well but he actually voted - a vote I completely disagree with but nevertheless - not an entirely illogical if wrongheaded one.
What about it is scummy? I got the sense he picked up on something in Eddie's play and was mostly using his vote for pressure.Dan still left his vote on me and now is pushing Eddie out of the blue. Between the two of them, I hands down view Dan’s behaviour as scummier.
I didn't see anything come out as 'reactionary' for a reason from Dan's ISO. Where did that come from?Eventhough I obv find all pushes on me wrongheaded ngl; I can distinguish between a likely townie but wrongheaded one: yours and to me, a highly sus one. Dan’s basic reason for still sr me, is that he is calling my votes “reactionary” which really makes 0 sense because no one has ben pushing on me harder in both d1 and d2, than you; yet when a brief wagon formed on you, what is both you and Dan’s explanation for my NOT jumping on that? Shouldn’t I be really be voting you and not Dan, based on this logic?
I’ve already regurgited this to TY ad nauseum and tbh, it reads as if you’re far more interested in question my reads than coming up with any of your own and coming up with a valid reason for them.
The only person. that you have appeared to give a credible read to, is Dan. You haven’t even given your reasons for opposing the Zito wagon yet.
What seems ironic to me, is that you appear to be pretty much doing the same thing you accused Brass of earlier: giving reads without an agenda.
I'm townreading both you and Dan, what exactly is the issue with me trying to get you to townread Dan too? Especially since Dan is coming around on you.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
I actually did read through Zito's ISO of day one.In post 464, Tywin Lannister wrote:If Zito was town, 100% he wouldve been quicklynched already for his anti-town play, but the fact that there's so much pushback says a lot imo. The kind of pushback going on for Zito definitely wasn't there for Evee. Is it that difficult to see why? Does anyone honestly think scum would block a town mislynch, especially when it's on such an anti-town player?
All pushback in his defense has either been unexplained 'feeling' reads (bad and lazy play imo), or just general deflections/diversions like Srceen telling everyone to make a new wagon for no reason at all. The rest haven't even tried to explain why they TR Zito, or at least stopped SRing him. Others just ignore his slot entirely. Ankarius just said they didn't 'feel anything,' but thats obviously not legitimate reasoning, especially when they already admitted to having not read D1 at all. Its straight to lazy play at best, and a common scum copout at worst. I know where I stand with it though. Actually, the only person that even has even tried is ND, and although I think their logic is faulty, its at least an attempt. That speaks a lot more to me than what others have(nt) done.
I'm still where I was at from the start: Zito, Srceen, Ankarius. I'll add in my discomfort with The Worst sheeping everyone in sight.
Srceen isnt getting lynched, and Zito doesn't look to be either. Only other place ill move is on Ankarius.
The case on Zito looks like a playstyle clash, not an actual case. I'm not impressed with it.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Why? I already outright stated it.In post 470, Kokichi Oma wrote:Ank, answer me. Please dont pull a zito on me-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
You understand that I'm one of the bigger sources of the pushback and I replaced in on night one, right?In post 464, Tywin Lannister wrote:If Zito was town, 100% he wouldve been quicklynched already for his anti-town play, but the fact that there's so much pushback says a lot imo. The kind of pushback going on for Zito definitely wasn't there for Evee. Is it that difficult to see why? Does anyone honestly think scum would block a town mislynch, especially when it's on such an anti-town player?-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Oh dear.In post 476, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
I’m down with that. I was just on the verge of switching my vote. Most of her posts are all about how she is “exhausted”, “lacks energy” or isn’t “engaged” for whatever reason. Add to this, all of her votes seem like throwaways and lack any genuine basis. Even her read on Dan - the only one, that doesn’t sound like total bs., seemed to be inserted there to sound like an actual read, rather than questioning me.In post 464, Tywin Lannister wrote:If Zito was town, 100% he wouldve been quicklynched already for his anti-town play, but the fact that there's so much pushback says a lot imo. The kind of pushback going on for Zito definitely wasn't there for Evee. Is it that difficult to see why? Does anyone honestly think scum would block a town mislynch, especially when it's on such an anti-town player?
All pushback in his defense has either been unexplained 'feeling' reads (bad and lazy play imo), or just general deflections/diversions like Srceen telling everyone to make a new wagon for no reason at all. The rest haven't even tried to explain why they TR Zito, or at least stopped SRing him. Others just ignore his slot entirely. Ankarius just said they didn't 'feel anything,' but thats obviously not legitimate reasoning, especially when they already admitted to having not read D1 at all. Its straight to lazy play at best, and a common scum copout at worst. I know where I stand with it though. Actually, the only person that even has even tried is ND, and although I think their logic is faulty, its at least an attempt. That speaks a lot more to me than what others have(nt) done.
I'm still where I was at from the start: Zito, Srceen, Ankarius. I'll add in my discomfort with The Worst sheeping everyone in sight.
Srceen isnt getting lynched, and Zito doesn't look to be either.Only other place ill move is on Ankarius.
You were right, Dan.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
In post 475, Kokichi Oma wrote:
I missed it in your wall posts. Can you quote it for me?In post 472, Ankamius wrote:
Why? I already outright stated it.In post 470, Kokichi Oma wrote:Ank, answer me. Please dont pull a zito on meIn post 455, Ankamius wrote:
I'm saying his approach felt off, in that it doesn't seem like he's trying to approach the game the same way recently that he did in day one.In post 453, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
What about his “playstyle” and how is saying this any different than your previous post, saying that something was off about his ISO?In post 445, Ankamius wrote:[quote="In post 443,
It's playstyle if anything, I'm not engaged in the game at this point, especially since we are stuck with a stalled wagon on somebody I don't believe is scum and a lot of people aren't doing much outside of that.
It's almost like he's floating along and using his activity to hide it today.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
In post 461, Wisdom wrote:im guessing he hasnt played with you before
I've been wondering where you were; do you have any thoughts about the last few pages?In post 467, Wisdom wrote:zito is the lynch, no worries-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
See, this is what I'm talking about.In post 483, Kokichi Oma wrote:What??????
You're saying you have nothing wrong with Zito's day 1 to day 2 transition. But, mine is off? Even though I've continued trying to pressure Zito from day 1?
VOTE: ankmius
This is scum.
Reads changing over night =/= overall approach towards the game changing. You're pushing your critics that already have support for them, but there's no intensity behind any of your posting outside of it. It's like you don't care, despite already making your way into a lot of people's townreads and being a significant force behind the day one lynch.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Dan is town. You and Tywin, while both having biased views of the gamestate, are both town.In post 484, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
What are your reads on the rest of the players, other than Brass, Kokichi and Dan? Not including Eddie, because you voted him without one.In post 479, Ankamius wrote:In post 475, Kokichi Oma wrote:
I missed it in your wall posts. Can you quote it for me?In post 472, Ankamius wrote:
Why? I already outright stated it.In post 470, Kokichi Oma wrote:Ank, answer me. Please dont pull a zito on meIn post 455, Ankamius wrote:
I'm saying his approach felt off, in that it doesn't seem like he's trying to approach the game the same way recently that he did in day one.In post 453, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
What about his “playstyle” and how is saying this any different than your previous post, saying that something was off about his ISO?In post 445, Ankamius wrote:[quote="In post 443,
It's playstyle if anything, I'm not engaged in the game at this point, especially since we are stuck with a stalled wagon on somebody I don't believe is scum and a lot of people aren't doing much outside of that.
It's almost like he's floating along and using his activity to hide it today.
Eddie is null.
Papa Zito is lightly leaning town, although that's mostly because this wagon on him is lazy.
Wisdom and the worst are both lightly leaning scum; nothing either of them has said so far showed town and they're the back end of the Zito wagon. If there was scum there, this would be a likely spot for them.
The brass read is shelved right now. There was enough blowback from the vote that I really couldn't test his response like I wanted to.
Srceenplay and Sugar Cain, I don't even remember anything either of them have done outside of the Eevee lynch vote.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Um, Nancy?
This is just now starting to change. Of course I'm not going to have a lot of fleshed out reads.In post 445, Ankamius wrote:
It's playstyle if anything,In post 443, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Just read his ISO, again not seeing it. Your reasons for voting for Brass and Eddie didn’t really make any sense to me either. YOUR ISO is pinging me however. Any idea why that may be?In post 441, Ankamius wrote:Well, first of all, you're probably not going to like any of my pushes in any game I'd you don't like vagueness.
Second of all, it's not from any specific post. It's his entire ISO that feels off.I'm not engaged in the game at this point, especially since we are stuck with a stalled wagon on somebody I don't believe is scum and a lot of people aren't doing much outside of that.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Your original case on me was pretty blatantly town, Tywin is town because he's falling into the same trap I see his type of playstyle fall into all the time; it's the type of trap that's easy to read and he's falling squarely on the town end of it.In post 491, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:The Worst is one of my stronger town reads. He seems pretty genuine to me.
Why are Ty and me town though? Not that I disagree but what are you basing this on? What about Wisdom and the worst, do you find particularly scummy?
Saying that they haven’t “showed town”, is meaningless,
Why is Eddie “null”?
Why is Zito townleaning?
Like I’ve already said, the only somewhat credible read you’ve given so far is on Dan, because his is the only one that sounds like you’ve put some actual thought into to.
Eddie's actions just... don't feel like scum or town. He's probably a player I'll have to get reads on indirectly.
Wisdom/the worst/Zito reads are where they are for the reasons I stated; there's a reason I stated alongside them that they aren't strong reads.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
I will have very little time for the next 24 hours, but I'm going to do a deep analysis afterwards if the game doesn't pick up by then to see if it can get jumpstarted again. This sudden lull in activity is disturbing, especially now that the Zito wagon has effectively stalled out and the wagon on me isn't any better. Initial thoughts about this is that Zito is town being parked on by scum, but I'll look into that more when I get around to analyzing things.
Papa Zito and Sugar Cain need to come in and give thoughts on the past several pages ASAP, especially Zito since the focus of a big chunk of it was not directly on him. Sugar Cain, I'd take just about anything because that slot has been completely useless.
I'm still waiting on the worst's non-Zito reads.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Really?In post 518, Srceenplay wrote:
I feel like in this post you are saying you know Zito is town. Town reading Zito. Throwing shade at Zito and posturing.In post 515, Ankamius wrote:I will have very little time for the next 24 hours, but I'm going to do a deep analysis afterwards if the game doesn't pick up by then to see if it can get jumpstarted again. This sudden lull in activity is disturbing, especially now that the Zito wagon has effectively stalled out and the wagon on me isn't any better. Initial thoughts about this is that Zito is town being parked on by scum, but I'll look into that more when I get around to analyzing things.
Papa Zito and Sugar Cain need to come in and give thoughts on the past several pages ASAP, especially Zito since the focus of a big chunk of it was not directly on him. Sugar Cain, I'd take just about anything because that slot has been completely useless.
I'm still waiting on the worst's non-Zito reads.
Anyone else see that?
Plus wisdom with the follow up vote like “ sure thing buddy. ”.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
Although really, everything in that post is consistent with my earlier thoughts, the biggest reason I want Zito and Sugar to post now is because they've been absent for longer than everyone else.
Plus, Zito has been under a lot of fire until now. I want to see what he has for us now that he is under less lynch pressure.-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
-
-
Ankamius Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21802
- Joined: May 9, 2011
- Location: Target Locked. Initiating Combat.
He is saying that he found three townreads very early on into the game, and I have the same townreads after very little time of being engaged into the game. We are clearly on the same page, just off different material, so I have high hopes that Nero and I will be able to work well together this game.
Srceen making up an excuse to attack that when my wording doesn't imply what he said at all is reeking of scum trying to keep town disorganized and lazy.
Kokichi's backing of it is not quiiiite as bad since it can also be bias too, but it's not a town marker by a long shot.