Long time no see, dear warrior! I look forward to fighting alongside all my allies and exterminating our enemies. To battle!
VOTE: wagonomics
No room for logic on the battlefield!
Long time no see, dear warrior! I look forward to fighting alongside all my allies and exterminating our enemies. To battle!
I would speculate he is rather inventive but Death Miller seems a bit outside his realm of possibility. Can someone who played TBD mafia 1 or 2 confirm or deny the honor of our mod?In post 12, CheekyTeeky wrote:A rather controversial twist is the Death Miller, whose alignment is shown as "Mafia" by the Moderator upon death. This has been argued and discussed in Ethics Threads as a source of distrust in the Moderator, which most people feel should not be tolerated. Thus, the Death Miller is an particularly scarcely-used role even in bastard mod games. - Wiki
Hmm how ethical is the mod?
I believe the best way to proceed in the early stages is to play quickly and effectively. That way we do not drag out the fighting for a lot of pages.In post 18, Varsoon wrote:Woah woah guys these votes
We have no deadlines
What's the rush?
Also, I'm in a PT with Party Boat, Xtoxm, and Nancy Drew 39.
This PT began before gamestart.
We've currently got about 15 posts in there.
It's fairly chill.
That's all I wanted to say.
I dislike this logic. Just because you infiltrated a community in the past does not mean someone is automatically infiltrating that community.In post 30, profii wrote:I was in a mafia month game and I was the scum in the neighbourhood.In post 18, Varsoon wrote:Woah woah guys these votes
We have no deadlines
What's the rush?
Also, I'm in a PT with Party Boat, Xtoxm, and Nancy Drew 39.
This PT began before gamestart.
We've currently got about 15 posts in there.
It's fairly chill.
That's all I wanted to say.
VOTE: Party Boat
What the fuck are you sad about speed-wiseIn post 67, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm sad about the speed of this game. So far townleaning vonflare, Profii and Varsoon.
Thought you might have wanted more pages. Apologies, milady. I should not let my temper get the best of me so.In post 70, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm struggling to keep up!In post 69, Gamma Emerald wrote:What the fuck are you sad about speed-wiseIn post 67, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm sad about the speed of this game. So far townleaning vonflare, Profii and Varsoon.
Why are you so grumpy?
Everyone makes that mistake smhIn post 106, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Oh, I was wondering.In post 104, Wisdom wrote:Hes gammagooey, not gamma emerald
Better yet, make even those memesIn post 107, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Someone should mod a game, where everything save the votes, flips and role PMs, are done in memes.In post 105, profii wrote:No no, lynch all the serious people
Make MafiaScum funny again!
We could probably put that on a baseball cap
I wish I was, sounds like a ballIn post 111, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:I thought you were in our hood until now.In post 108, Gamma Emerald wrote:Everyone makes that mistake smhIn post 106, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Oh, I was wondering.In post 104, Wisdom wrote:Hes gammagooey, not gamma emerald
I might have to play on another account for games with gooey to avoid confusion
BTW this hood discussion is very interesting especially when it comes to VarsoonIn post 121, CheekyTeeky wrote:I kind of agree after a closer look. I interpreted this as:In post 115, Kokichi Oma wrote:Bad postIn post 49, Varsoon wrote:I'm liable to believe that at least one of the four people in my PT is scum, which is why I decided to out the PT in the first place.
That said, it's a fallacy to assume that the same ratio of town to scum in the main thread applies to any PT, so I'd prefer we didn't hunt out of that PT group.
VOTE: Profii
"I think there's scum in my neighborhood so I outted"
"It's dumb to think there's scum in my hood"
*votes Profii for thinking scum is in the hood"
Eh? Doesn't that fall apart after one dies?In post 125, Xtoxm wrote:Plot twist, there's no hood at all and our scum team is pretending there is for townread after a couple of us die
no that came laterIn post 148, Varsoon wrote:He's talking about a game I ran.
Are you talking about when they did the PARLIAMENT AT DAKKAR PT, Gamma?
'cus that was MOD CONFIRMED to contain at least 1 scum
but scum had a hidden mechanic where they could put as many of themselves in it as they wanted.
What a clever mechanic
Man I love my games
oh wow this is a thingGamma Emerald wrote:Actaully I think something Varsoon said implies it is a redirect of the scum kill. And I claimed in Zeon because I had to share somewhere, the main thread was not a good idea, neither was parliament, and I didn't consider this because it was in disuse. I knew it couldn't be blocked but I wanted scum to not know what I had planned.
actually wait who told you I was vigging scum? I might be able to worm out a lie about factions with this. Don't worry about it if it's within (PH, RR, Titus)
YEEET
watIn post 232, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Oh good, it looks like Cheeky may have been right on Porkens.
Liking Cheeky, sheep and Brie so far I think.
Cheeky being right on porkensIn post 305, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Which part?In post 287, Gamma Emerald wrote:watIn post 232, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Oh good, it looks like Cheeky may have been right on Porkens.
Liking Cheeky, sheep and Brie so far I think.
So higher value equals scummy got itIn post 329, Wagonomics wrote:The goal is to be on a wagon that has the HIGHEST VALUE at the end of the day
I mean I think their stances will easier to analyze?In post 352, sheepsaysmeep wrote:so the imminent truth is that i have to try to read wagonomics later which is going to be aids
That’s reasonable.In post 355, CheekyTeeky wrote:It seems more like it's the threads' overall stances rather than personal stances. I think my stock along with Drewva's crashed because our lynches look unlikely at this point. It'll be interesting to see how long he keeps it up for.In post 354, Gamma Emerald wrote:I mean I think their stances will easier to analyze?In post 352, sheepsaysmeep wrote:so the imminent truth is that i have to try to read wagonomics later which is going to be aids
Don’t feel like it’s a towny system though
This is yikes and Kokichi Oma probably knows why.In post 385, Leodanny wrote:So why are you calling me out for not doing things while Kokichi has actually said he hasn’t done anything?In post 345, Kokichi Oma wrote:wth i haven't even done anything so far this game. have i?In post 325, Wagonomics wrote:KokichiCoin has further depreciated in VALUE
VOTE: Kikochi Oma
That's NOT why.In post 387, Leodanny wrote:Damn, I spelled it wrong.
Still bad for the same reason but I was about to post more calling you out for being generally wrong about me not doing anything which your response nullifiesIn post 392, Leodanny wrote:I meant wisdom. And yeah, I knew spelling wasn’t why.
I want Kokichi to confirm he sees what I see firstIn post 399, Leodanny wrote:Hey Emerald, what is the reason for my Kokichi vote being bad?
Does that not resemble what Dunnstral did in Terror in the City?In post 406, Kokichi Oma wrote:???????? what. this post literally makes 0 sense. LOLIn post 385, Leodanny wrote:So why are you calling me out for not doing things while Kokichi has actually said he hasn’t done anything?In post 345, Kokichi Oma wrote:wth i haven't even done anything so far this game. have i?In post 325, Wagonomics wrote:KokichiCoin has further depreciated in VALUE
VOTE: Kikochi Oma
Nice post that adds nothing but appeals the the target.In post 415, Leodanny wrote:My hero! Thanks for pointing that out, Ermeralds iso was big so I didn’t read it yet.
The prompt response is much appreciated however I would like to know why despite LeoCoin gathering several investors you are predicting it will depreciate. Do you believe it is a bubble wagon? Do you think investing in a bubble wagon is a bad idea? I personally feel diversifying through the day could be good, in which case investing early into a bubble wagon doesn’t seem like a bother to me.In post 419, Wagonomics wrote:[As the representative of WagonCoin, I am always available for Conference Calls with our Valuable Investors.In post 360, Gamma Emerald wrote:@Wagonomics, in future reports, and I know this might sound unprofessional, could you add some personal speculation on what you think of different currencies?
That being said, I am unlikely to provide multiple conference calls per week and my number of conference calls may decline over the holiday season.
You’re just agreeing with above poster, no new content. And I meant appeals TO the target, which means you were trying to flatter Ausuka.In post 443, Leodanny wrote:How so? And what does “appeals the the target” mean?In post 438, Gamma Emerald wrote:Nice post that adds nothing but appeals the the target.In post 415, Leodanny wrote:My hero! Thanks for pointing that out, Ermeralds iso was big so I didn’t read it yet.
@Ausuka I’ll address your post later but I feel like we’re gonna have a problem.
Also stop being a ninja all of you please
So their value is their odds of a scumflip and not the odds of their lynch going through? If so I’ve misunderstood the system and need to handle my accounts pronto.In post 442, Wagonomics wrote:In post 431, Vaxkiller wrote:It's like really high tho... where is the ceiling? I should have invested earlier.In post 419, Wagonomics wrote:You are welcome to!The number of shares you buy is related to the price you buy in at, and while the actual value of a scumflip is not currently known, current estimates would put it in the ballpark of ~500.In post 435, Vaxkiller wrote:I'm probably taking this way to seriously (no not the game) but if I invest in Varsoon at 40 and he flips scum does the coin skyrocket at that time? Or is this not really thought out yet?
So if you INVEST at 40, and they flip a value of 500, then you are making SERIOUS PROFIT!
However, if you invest a 40, and they flip a 0, you are throwing your COINS away!
I continue to hold that what you want to invest in a property that will grow at a steady rate, rather than gambling your money on depreciating assets.
Because it has more scum motive than town motive.In post 456, Leodanny wrote:@Emerald, why is there a problem with flattering Ausuka?