no deadlines mafia [game over]
Forum rules
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
A rather controversial twist is the Death Miller, whose alignment is shown as "Mafia" by the Moderator upon death. This has been argued and discussed in Ethics Threads as a source of distrust in the Moderator, which most people feel should not be tolerated. Thus, the Death Miller is an particularly scarcely-used role even in bastard mod games. - Wiki
Hmm how ethical is the mod?- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I've never been in a neighborhood :'(In post 15, CheekyTeeky wrote: <--- this is my trust face.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Really? I took it as quite towny that he opens already intent on looking for decent avenues to push. You serm to be taking this too seriously.In post 34, Gamma Emerald wrote:I dislike this logic. Just because you infiltrated a community in the past does not mean someone is automatically infiltrating that community.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I'm struggling to keep up!In post 69, Gamma Emerald wrote:
What the fuck are you sad about speed-wiseIn post 67, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm sad about the speed of this game. So far townleaning vonflare, Profii and Varsoon.
Why are you so grumpy?- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Our wavelengths are on point.In post 74, Party Boat wrote:
noIn post 72, CheekyTeeky wrote:Porkens can be town too.
why would you think this- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
His vote on Brie. What do you think of her reaction?In post 89, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Based on?In post 75, CheekyTeeky wrote:
Our wavelengths are on point.In post 74, Party Boat wrote:
noIn post 72, CheekyTeeky wrote:Porkens can be town too.
why would you think this- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Ok let me put it this way.
I was pinged by Brie's entrance. I continued to observe people to see if anyone else felt the same and it looks like Porkens did.
What makes it towny coming from porkens is the simple naked vote - getting straight down to business and not trying to look overly towny.
Brie's reaction escalated quickly from "it could be a personality thing" to "maybe they're both scum." Under little pressure and with missing logic.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I kind of agree after a closer look. I interpreted this as:In post 115, Kokichi Oma wrote:
Bad postIn post 49, Varsoon wrote:I'm liable to believe that at least one of the four people in my PT is scum, which is why I decided to out the PT in the first place.
That said, it's a fallacy to assume that the same ratio of town to scum in the main thread applies to any PT, so I'd prefer we didn't hunt out of that PT group.
VOTE: Profii
"I think there's scum in my neighborhood so I outted"
"It's dumb to think there's scum in my hood"
*votes Profii for thinking scum is in the hood"- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
True. Do you think his vote on you is RVS?In post 122, profii wrote:I think it's just wifom at this stage - there may or may not be scum in the 'hood.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Lol I read it as "do not invest"In post 220, TheBrie wrote:donut invest means? Could you explain?
I'm trying to decide whether it's too weird to be real, or too weird to be made up.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Any guesses?In post 245, Wisdom wrote:definitely some scum on this wagon- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
In post 124, profii wrote:
nah I didn't think this was RVS at the time because I did something and Varsoon voted me for it - that's not random.In post 49, Varsoon wrote:I'm liable to believe that at least one of the four people in my PT is scum, which is why I decided to out the PT in the first place.
That said, it's a fallacy to assume that the same ratio of town to scum in the main thread applies to any PT, so I'd prefer we didn't hunt out of that PT group.
VOTE: Profii
It's arguably low-info voting stage, which is how I like to deal with RVS which is why I said we are "emerging" from truly random into "low info" where the cases are generally poop but the game gets going.
That being said, we have to start somewhere, so we have the quote above and the quote below
In post 58, Varsoon wrote:'cus it's a fallacy to assume the same ratios exist within a neighborhood.
If we're all town in there and I make the mistake of assuming one of us is scum, then I have a 100% chance of mislynching if I concentrate there, whereas the game thread ALWAYS has the assured setup ratio.
And I know if I mislynch in there I'll sunk cost it and keep lynching in there
and if they all flip town then I know I'm up shit creek for being the last one left.
Does that make sense?
we also have 15 where Varsoon basically says "there is a hood"
It was ME that suggested there could be scum in the hood in my haste when I thought we had deadlines to which, Varsoon made post 49...
he says
"I'm liable to believe that at least one of the four people in my PT is scum"
what does "I'm liable to believe" even mean? kinda feels a bit like he's saying "it'll be you lot that leads me into lynching within the hood, not me pushing it" almost a bit "not my fault we mislynched" so you could _conclude_ he is shifting blame for inevitable mislynches - how we he know if it's a mislynch? if he is scum in the hood
so I don't like that turn of phrase.
So then he goes a bit further into the logical fallacy of it all - which is true but, given the vibe I'm getting from above it again comes over as "yeah sure hunt in the hood if you want, but I aint leading that shit because I wont get stitched up for that mislynch, so I suggest hunting outside the hood, which puts me at a lot less risk"
again this phrase:
"And I know if I mislynch in there I'll sunk cost it and keep lynching in there"
he is right - if we restrict the lynch pool and commit to lynching in the hood, we _could_ end up doubling down
so yeah I don't like this at all
VOTE: VarsoonIn post 199, Kokichi Oma wrote:Because of the bad post I quoted last time I was on. I forgot to vote himIn post 217, sheepsaysmeep wrote:so im basically caught up
it was a quick skim with breaks in between so i prolly missed things but theres a depressingly low amount of exciting things actually happening and all of my thoughts on players are weaker than i'd like
stronger reads that i feel ok with rn are vonflare, cheeky as villagers and pretty uncomfortable with varsoon
VOTE: varsoon
have some iso's that i want to look at later once school is out
I think this is the whole wagon. The AVarsoons.In post 233, Jaylow7 wrote:So this has started...
I will in general be most active on the weekends until the end of the year. The holiday season is always super busy for me.
No real reads yet except one, not much of note has been said beyond the neighborhood claim and recent setup spec discussion, by the same person...
who is the one person I have a solid read on right now.
VOTE: Varsoon- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Why do you think there's "definitely" scum there?
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I don't know why but Kokichi's "I forgot to vote him" is pinging me as uncharacteristic. Not sure I like his reaction - accusing me of WK'ing is pretty funny. Even if it were logical to WK (White Knight @Brie) in multiball I don't see how that benefits my position as scum sticking my neck out that early.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I wonder if scum got the same wincon? Otherwise this seems town spewy.In post 185, Varsoon wrote:you win once no members of opposing factions are alive.
members of opposing factions
opposing factions
factions
s- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
No forgetting to vote is fine, explaining you forgot to vote seems unnecessary.In post 262, Kokichi Oma wrote:
Forgetting to vote is scummy now. Thanks. I'll add that to my checklist.In post 257, CheekyTeeky wrote:I don't know why but Kokichi's "I forgot to vote him" is pinging me as uncharacteristic. Not sure I like his reaction - accusing me of WK'ing is pretty funny. Even if it were logical to WK (White Knight @Brie) in multiball I don't see how that benefits my position as scum sticking my neck out that early.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I'd be surprised if a game this size didn't at least have 3 factions in it even if it's just Scum v Town v 3p.In post 265, sheepsaysmeep wrote:that doesnt actually confirm multiball in any way?
it's very technical but that could be translated as "members of any potentially existing opposing factions"- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Yay I accept my nomination for 1st NK. Thank you.In post 267, sheepsaysmeep wrote:going to make this disgusting read but cheeky is 95% angleshot town after that exchange
Pedit: Jfc lol..- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Well that's the point. You usually are iirc.In post 272, Kokichi Oma wrote:But someone asked..? Want me to just be mysterious instead- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
This reads awkward and hedgy.In post 346, Theta Alpine wrote:wow
that actually caused a lot more discussion then i thought it would
not yet sure about my reads after that though
a little bit tired at the moment so it is a bit hard to put two and two together
however i will say i am slightly town-reading emerald now
emerald appears to be doing some amount of player sorting which at this stage of the game is important
i would also state that party boat is probably town
i believe they are fishing for reactions with those votes- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
It seems more like it's the threads' overall stances rather than personal stances. I think my stock along with Drewva's crashed because our lynches look unlikely at this point. It'll be interesting to see how long he keeps it up for.In post 354, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I mean I think their stances will easier to analyze?In post 352, sheepsaysmeep wrote:so the imminent truth is that i have to try to read wagonomics later which is going to be aids
Don’t feel like it’s a towny system though- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Kind of? Like people I wouldn't lynch today and null/can die.In post 361, TheBrie wrote:Is that town above line, and null to scum below the line? I see you've got each section in alphabet order. Theta SK, because she mentioned they might exist?
Yeah the mention and I find some posts awkward so not town. It's still early game though so it's more a note for later. My main concern is not allowing scum above the line - Sheep is probably my biggest concern but I'm going to sheep Nancy's read until I see reason to believe otherwise.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I agree with this but we may as well wagon people who are here to respond atm.In post 369, hebichan wrote:
Honestly just realllly hated his varsoon vote.In post 367, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
youve literally never talked about themIn post 366, hebichan wrote:Why Leo over Jay? I could really lynch Jay.
at least try harder to sell me on a 1 poster
it's pretty hard to have read leo's iso and prefer a 1 poster as a lynch- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Oh beat me to it.In post 375, hebichan wrote:
We can push leo whenever we want though. It's no rush.In post 373, profii wrote:
Leo is now 23 posts deep - he has had a chance to mess around in RVS and start doing something... let's give the 1 poster/nothing ISOs a chance to shine or hang themselves a bit more... this is a no deadline game after all, I suppose we have to excuse the less hasty for a bitIn post 366, hebichan wrote:Why Leo over Jay? I could really lynch Jay.
p-edit: Suppose so. Best argument I've seen.
VOTE: Leo- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Looks like you 180'd on your sheep the Hebi plan.In post 379, Purrcocet wrote:
makes me think you're scum with leoIn post 366, hebichan wrote:Why Leo over Jay? I could really lynch Jay.
He didn't elaborate on his vote, so how did you get therehebichan wrote:
Honestly just realllly hated his varsoon vote.
Unless that's what you're scumreading him for it just looks like you're choosing to vote someone with 1 nai post over a slot that hasn't scumhunted and you're soft wking it
....
i stepped away from this post for like 6 minutes and you completely 180- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Leo why are you voting Koki here and not wagonomics?In post 385, Leodanny wrote:
So why are you calling me out for not doing things while Kokichi has actually said he hasn’t done anything?In post 345, Kokichi Oma wrote:
wth i haven't even done anything so far this game. have i?In post 325, Wagonomics wrote:KokichiCoin has further depreciated in VALUE
VOTE: Kikochi Oma- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
What do you know about Koki?In post 403, Leodanny wrote:Cause I don’t KNOW anything ABOUT wagonomics, he’s barely posted 5 times.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I feel like scum gamma would enter the game less weirdly if that makes sense. The amount of real content is NAI tbh.In post 414, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: gemerald is where i lean so far, i feel like his iso is like trying to produce content to the point where it's not immediately obvious that he isn't, and he definitely has a lot of posts, but most of them feel more like posts for the sake of posting than anything else- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Hebichan < Purrcocet.In post 439, Leodanny wrote:Hebichan; in the span of two or three posts, goes from suspecting a one poster to sheeping the person that said they would sheep her, nice one.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
Guys flip this rotten potato. A fast day is a good day.In post 461, Leodanny wrote:Hey I’m the most voted player now! V/LA over the weekend, bye!- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
It's a weird thought to have though. Their wagons consist of one player apart from them who are your townreads. Did you mean they are bad votes not bad wagons? Bad wagons implies the constituents are scummy to me.In post 476, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Yeah but I think there both town. They’re both reading town tonally to me.In post 471, CheekyTeeky wrote:
They're voting each other though?In post 470, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Sheep and Varsoon wagons are bad.- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
I guess you're right... but then she votes sheep? Her actions and words seem to be doing two different things.In post 542, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Didn’t she say, “no reason not to kill it then”?In post 541, CheekyTeeky wrote:530 was pretty scummy tbh. Why wouldn't town lynch scum just because they're newbscum?- CheekyTeeky
-
CheekyTeeky Survivor
- CheekyTeeky
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12090
- Joined: September 3, 2017
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky
- CheekyTeeky