Mini 2074: Madness at Port Arthur (Game Over)


Forum rules
Locked
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1239 (isolation #0) » Sat May 25, 2019 10:43 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1221, RCEnigma wrote:Got a couple pages to read, I was redirected to myself last night. Turns out I'm fabulous ;).
Pardon me, but who did you target?

Can I get a list of claims/important events?

I can tell Chara's definitely town and believe Irrelephant's town, but as they've been the only ones posting, I lack contextual reads on anyone else.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1242 (isolation #1) » Sat May 25, 2019 10:46 am

Post by Succinct »

VOTE: skitter
L-1

Can't read her, but sheeping Chara/Irrelephant until given better idea.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1246 (isolation #2) » Sat May 25, 2019 10:50 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1243, Chara wrote:you put someone at L-1 just for that?
As long as not hammering, I'd vote someone for it, yes. L-1's irrelevant. Were I two minutes faster to cast it (minutes I spent skimming skitter's iso), my vote would've been L-2.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1247 (isolation #3) » Sat May 25, 2019 10:51 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1239, Succinct wrote:
In post 1221, RCEnigma wrote:Got a couple pages to read, I was redirected to myself last night. Turns out I'm fabulous ;).
Pardon me, but who did you target?

Can I get a list of claims/important events?
Still could use this.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1252 (isolation #4) » Sat May 25, 2019 10:55 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1248, ClearlyClarity wrote:Why did you vote skitter over me?
Because skitter was where Chara/Irrelephant actually voted.
In post 1250, Irrelephant11 wrote:No claims aside from the one you quoted, fake claims from the dead, and Chara receiving fruit
Summary of events would help though.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1322 (isolation #5) » Sun May 26, 2019 8:43 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1257, tris wrote:Wow. I townread skitter, but I should go over her ISO to remind myself why.
VOTE: Succinct
You sure this was spewed town, Irrelephant?
In post 1272, skitter30 wrote:a) i was under the impression that you think you can read me
I said that when scum; I lied.
In post 1272, skitter30 wrote:b) just going to point out that the utter lack of resistance to an l-1 wagon at this stage of the game is kinda suspicious
Not given who's driving it.
In post 1273, skitter30 wrote:what did you see after skimming my iso
Lack of obvtownness, but as I'd expect obvtownness from you regardless of alignment, that helped little.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1323 (isolation #6) » Sun May 26, 2019 8:49 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1305, RCEnigma wrote:UNVOTE:
Who did you give your n0 fruit to Skitter?
In post 1247, Succinct wrote:
In post 1239, Succinct wrote:
In post 1221, RCEnigma wrote:Got a couple pages to read, I was redirected to myself last night. Turns out I'm fabulous ;).
Pardon me, but who did you target?

Can I get a list of claims/important events?
Still could use this.
It's actually important.
In post 1278, Chara wrote:
In post 1270, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1235, Chara wrote:i forgot to say, i received a delicious fruit last night. thanks!
oh this was me btw
why did you choose me?
It does seem like a scum action.
In post 1281, Irrelephant11 wrote:I buy most of what skitter is selling tbh
I don't.

I don't think skitter-ClearlyClarity's scum-scum, but also don't believe town/town.
Between the two, skitter's who I'd place higher scum odds on.

I find the way ClearlyClarity claimed to be suspect,
but
, believe this:
In post 1307, Irrelephant11 wrote:
In post 1288, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'm jailkeeper and the other JK is town. Jailed irrelephant last night :D
Maybe try to let me claim first next time, ye?
So how did I get a night result then..? :lol:
Actually indicates ClearlyClarity's truthful about their claim.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1336 (isolation #7) » Sun May 26, 2019 4:15 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1328, ceejayvinoya wrote:
In post 1323, Succinct wrote:I find the way ClearlyClarity claimed to be suspect,
but
, believe this:
In post 1307, Irrelephant11 wrote:
In post 1288, ClearlyClarity wrote:I'm jailkeeper and the other JK is town. Jailed irrelephant last night :D
Maybe try to let me claim first next time, ye?
So how did I get a night result then..? :lol:
Actually indicates ClearlyClarity's truthful about their claim.
Can you elaborate on this?
Sure.
ClearlyClarity's unlikely to claim a result as scum which Irrelephant's capable of contradicting. She loses the resulting 1v1 always.
Ergo, she believed she did block Irrelephant.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1337 (isolation #8) » Sun May 26, 2019 4:16 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1335, RCEnigma wrote:This games already been a rollercoaster for me.
In post 1323, Succinct wrote:
In post 1247, Succinct wrote:
In post 1239, Succinct wrote:
In post 1221, RCEnigma wrote:Got a couple pages to read, I was redirected to myself last night. Turns out I'm fabulous ;).
Pardon me, but who did you target?
Still could use this.
It's actually important.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1373 (isolation #9) » Mon May 27, 2019 10:56 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1338, RCEnigma wrote:You were the target.
Story checks out.
I'm not a Redirector, but I'm a redirector-
type
role. (It'd be anti-town to claim specifically which one.)
Can verify that you targeting me last night would redirect to yourself.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1504 (isolation #10) » Tue May 28, 2019 9:55 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1389, skitter30 wrote:a) i'm p. sure i got the vibe from those games that you actually knew what you were talking about wrt my meta, even if incidentally you were scum
And if I had to guess, you'd be scum here. I'm simply not
sure
.
In post 1389, skitter30 wrote:scum who know me don't think they can mislynch me easily *at all*
Which is why I insist the wagon on you's towndriven regardless of your alignment.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1505 (isolation #11) » Tue May 28, 2019 10:06 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1477, Irrelephant11 wrote:Succinct/CJ might have a town in it and if so that player needs to step it uppppppp by a lot
What if I told you I thought both of us're town?
In post 1493, Chara wrote:that's fine with me. i'm interested in Succinct's thoughts especially.
The one and only role combo which could cause skitter to have no motion N0 and not be lying is if someone used a N0 rolestop on Irrelephant.

Given that's obviously not true, skitter's caught scum. I'm already voting there.

If you want her scumbuddy, my guess is tris, but I'm uncertain. I can tell you players clearly town (you, Irrelephant, ClearlyClarity, RCEnigma); I can tell you players I suspect are town (ceejay, Persivul, insomnia), but not which player's scum definitively.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1506 (isolation #12) » Tue May 28, 2019 10:09 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1502, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1499, Irrelephant11 wrote:RCE what results did you get on yourself? Motion, because of your own detection?
I was told no other actions were taken on or by me.
Unfortunate you claimed this, as only one redirector role would allow for that result.
Confirming that's my role. Actions targeting me're reflected back onto their owner.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1507 (isolation #13) » Tue May 28, 2019 10:13 am

Post by Succinct »

In post 1505, Succinct wrote:
In post 1493, Chara wrote:that's fine with me. i'm interested in Succinct's thoughts especially.
The one and only role combo which could cause skitter to have no motion N0 and not be lying is if someone used a N0 rolestop on Irrelephant.
Worth noting: even this combo's only
possible
if the mod deems a player visiting someone rolestopped as being roleblocked; this is not the standard resolution of those roles.

Simply put, occam's razor: skitter's scum.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1520 (isolation #14) » Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:14 pm

Post by Succinct »

VOTE: Blake Belladonna
Safest vote to make on likely scum, while we sort out Fuscezu's claim compared to ClearlyClarity's.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1845 (isolation #15) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:03 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1571, Blake Belladonna wrote:Fuscezu is very likely town as well.
Beg your pardon, why?

Fuscezu was the person I'd planned on voting today.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1847 (isolation #16) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:07 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1644, Irrelephant11 wrote:Blake’s reaction to being “dayvigged” is pretty good so I’ll town BB slot again
Sorry, but standard play to a dayvig is assume it's fake until proven real. Reactions're thus nai.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1848 (isolation #17) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:09 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1664, Fuscezu wrote:We are a disloyal doctor.
VOTE: Fuscezu
I believe this to be a 100% truthful claim; I believe it to be a scum role.
Town has zero use of a disloyal doctor.
Loyal
doctor's vast utility, but not disloyal.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1849 (isolation #18) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:12 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1688, Irrelephant11 wrote:Just thinking, because Fus/RCE/Blake have the least-confirmed role claims so far I think (besides Persivul and I who have not claimed) and scum needs some power in a game with a cop and 2 jailkeepers.
Correction; I can half-confirm RCE's claim. He received a result consistent with targeting me with the role he claims, something he couldn't know prior to my claim was correct.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1851 (isolation #19) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:15 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1698, Blake Belladonna wrote:We could also not try to solve the entire setup today and rely on raw reads strength instead.
My reads were tris and Fuscezu as most likely scum aside from skitter.

Claims don't change this.
RCE's claim looks town; his result's not something he'd easily be able to fake and he genuinely believed skitter was caught scum in a way hard to fake as scum.
Irrelephant is cop cleared.
ClearlyClarity and ceejay cross-clear each other.
I am town.

That leaves {Persivul, Blake, Fuscezu}.

I lack a read on Persivul, I'll admit. But I scumread Blake/Fuscezu.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1852 (isolation #20) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:17 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1718, Irrelephant11 wrote:I guess it can just be Succinct/Blake
Sure. Help me bus Blake then. (Refer to my vote.)
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1854 (isolation #21) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:20 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1749, Fuscosco wrote:it heavily implies a second 3p
Or it implies you forgot to change your claim from Disloyal to Loyal.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1862 (isolation #22) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:27 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1813, Blake Belladonna wrote:Succinct needs to start talking.
Succinct is busy and as I'm speaking I'm multitasking. This game's not my priority right now.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1864 (isolation #23) » Fri Jun 07, 2019 12:36 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1850, Blake Belladonna wrote:
In post 1848, Succinct wrote:
In post 1664, Fuscezu wrote:We are a disloyal doctor.
VOTE: Fuscezu
I believe this to be a 100% truthful claim; I believe it to be a scum role.
Town has zero use of a disloyal doctor.
Loyal
doctor's vast utility, but not disloyal.
I believe it's third party.
I don't buy we have two 3ps in this game; I don't buy Fuscezu's a counter to an already-nerfed sk.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1964 (isolation #24) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:51 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1901, insomnia wrote:Debating on an Ank / Succint team tbh. What’s the point of accusing the one that’s not even focused on you. Seems like poor distancing after he saw he’s being set up for a hammer.
Perhaps you should iso me and search for my stance on tris.
In post 1904, insomnia wrote:Succint’s read on Fuscezu is mechanics based as well, not even a real read. Zero effort. Level 1 read.
Wrong. Again, iso me. You'll find I scumread Fuscezu
prior
to Fuscezu's claim. Fuscezu was always a suspect. The disloyal doctor claim was the final nail in the coffin of the existing suspicion.

Fuscezu's play is lackluster and is POE'd; most slots're obviously town, and Fuscezu's not among them.
In post 1908, insomnia wrote:Succint abandons his only scum read that he has no progression on to vote someone based on mechanics that has been acting town all game. Adds up.
Perhaps you'd fare better with this stance if you researched mine.
In post 1505, Succinct wrote:Given that's obviously not true, skitter's caught scum. I'm already voting there.
If you want her scumbuddy, my guess is tris, but I'm uncertain. I can tell you players clearly town (you, Irrelephant, ClearlyClarity, RCEnigma); I can tell you players I suspect are town (ceejay, Persivul, insomnia), but not which player's scum definitively.
Absent from the list of players named town's Fuscezu. I.e., Fuscezu wasn't a townread; Fuscezu was a suspect scum.
In post 1845, Succinct wrote:
In post 1571, Blake Belladonna wrote:Fuscezu is very likely town as well.
Beg your pardon, why?

Fuscezu was the person I'd planned on voting today.
The only reason I didn't vote Fuscezu is at the time I thought Fuscezu might be claiming to be the second jailkeeper (which would've made Fuscezu town). When ceejay claimed, that made my only reason for not voting Fuscezu go away.
In post 1930, Blake Belladonna wrote:That said, I still would like Succinct to go more into why they hold the reads they do.
Especially on my slot, because even with them having a fairly poor read record of me, I'd still expect them to have come around to a townread of me by this point. I have a suspicion for what the reason is, but I need to be sure before outing it.
I scumread tris. I found your claim suspect. When you said you were out of your scumrange, you weren't at the time actually out of it. Now I feel it's doubtful you're scum, but I'm not completely convinced you're town.

Irrelephant's cop cleared and obvtown on play even without it.
ceejay's conftown from role.
RCEnigma truly believed he had a guilty on skitter; I don't think he pushes skitter that hard as scum. His handling of his result on me also indicated town, and I've liked his approach this game.
insomnia's largely a sheep of Chara/Irrelephant, but has looked town enough on his own.

Persivul was someone I didn't think was scum with skitter and at the time was sheeping Irrelephant. Once skitter flipped 3p, this changed my read on him. Furthering this: people have pointed out that "scum need a super strong role". They've accused my mirror of being it; I'd say a self-governing governor fits far better.
Fuscezu's always been a scumread because nothing Fuscezu's posted's been town and quite a lot has been suspect.

I'm not voting outside those two today.
VOTE: Persivul
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1965 (isolation #25) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:54 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1964, Succinct wrote:When you said you were out of your scumrange, you weren't at the time actually out of it. Now I feel it's doubtful you're scum, but I'm not completely convinced you're town.
To clarify: At the time you said you were out of your scumrange, you weren't. However, now I feel you are. I'm not
certain
, but I think this is beyond your scumrange. Thus, doubtfully scum, but not absolutely convinced town.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1966 (isolation #26) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:57 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1962, ceejayvinoya wrote:Hi. I jailed Blake.
With this plus RCE jail, you have confirmation neither of those two did the kill.

As a consequence, the killers could only be {insomnia, Persivul, Fuscezu}. One of those three did the kill; it should be transparent who the obvious two are.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1971 (isolation #27) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:37 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1967, insomnia wrote:The reason that I keep defending Persivul’s cuz I’m a bus driver and I switched Irrel with Percy on night one when Chara checked Irrelephant.
Night ONE, you say?

Small problem with you Persivul defense, then:
Chara checked Irrelephant N0, not N1.

So unless you meant to say you busdrove Irrelephant and Persivul N1...the cop inno on Irrelephant, and lack of one on Persivul, holds.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1972 (isolation #28) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 8:42 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1537, Irrelephant11 wrote:
In post 131, Chara wrote:
In post 117, Irrelephant11 wrote:So sorry for the misgender tris!
Chara why do you townread me
you're a good player and i have some knowledge of your scumgame. innocent until proven guilty is good for me.
same sort of situation as skitter.
In post 132, Chara wrote:i could go into it further, but i don't see a reason to start talking about how i think you should be read as scum when i don't need to.
In post 151, Chara wrote:elephant after my own heart. except for Clearly.
In post 1203, Chara wrote:it's not "might", it's, "i think skitter is scum and you're asking me to vote someone who's never scum if she is."
why the hell would i, elephant?
In post 1361, Chara wrote:
In post 1332, Irrelephant11 wrote:Hm
I lied about getting a night result
Just wanted to see reactions but I don’t necessarily want to start a massclaim train just to solve this puzzle
Ignoring the past couple pages I still want to lynch Clarity
But she did past my reaction test kinda

Clarity why did you vote Smile last gameday?
i was so excited about your night result. i thought you had a Clarity guilty and that's why you were annoyed with me earlier.

i didn't like her whole claim thing and thinking she was hammered, but now i'm not sure how to proceed.
I’m thinking one of me/Clarity was Chara’s N0 inno
Skitter seems to be the N1 guilty
For reference.
The inno existed on N0.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1991 (isolation #29) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 9:58 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1973, insomnia wrote:N1 - Percy
with RCEnigma
In post 1502, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1499, Irrelephant11 wrote:RCE what results did you get on yourself? Motion, because of your own detection?
I was told no other actions were taken on or by me.
Folks, we have a 1v1 here; these claims are mutually exclusive.

VOTE: insomnia
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #1993 (isolation #30) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:02 pm

Post by Succinct »

In post 1991, Succinct wrote:
In post 1973, insomnia wrote:N1 - Percy
with RCEnigma
In post 1502, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1499, Irrelephant11 wrote:RCE what results did you get on yourself? Motion, because of your own detection?
I was told no other actions were taken on or by me.
Folks, we have a 1v1 here; these claims are mutually exclusive.

VOTE: insomnia
To explain:
RCEnigma targeted me N1.
Via my mirror, he self-targeted.
Via insomnia's busdrive, he either got a result on himself or a result on Persivul.
RCEnigma claimed nobody visited his target except for himself.
Regardless of whether he targeted himself or targeted Persivul, he should've seen insomnia's visit.

Ergo, the claims don't add up. I trust RCEnigma's more than I trust insomnia's.
User avatar
Succinct
Succinct
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Succinct
Goon
Goon
Posts: 215
Joined: January 2, 2019

Post Post #2073 (isolation #31) » Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:43 am

Post by Succinct »

Obviously I couldn't do anything.
I'm going to guess who ceejay blocked:
VOTE: Persivul
Locked