Newbie 1906 | Fractals | Over

[Plotinus]

Official Vote Count 1.02

Zoom 16; Center: -0.7677697-0.1248997i

---

Lynching

With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

Nikk

(2): YellowSnow, Alonzo

Alonzo

(2): Formerfish, Micc

Formerfish

(1): Nikk

Child

(1): Emperor flippyNips

Micc

(1): Child

Emperor flippyNips

(1): GrandWazoo

Not Voting

(1): Poisonchan

Deadline:

(expired on 2018-12-25 09:15:00).

Mod notes:

Good luck everyone!

Poisonchan have another (expired on 2018-12-17 09:15:00) to confirm before they will be replaced.

[Nikk]

Also, did you read the rest of my posts where I expand on that a bit and still not understand, or did you get to the first thing that hurt your head and stop there?

Allowing people to vote without reason opens the door for scum to skate by without having to at least put in the effort of a fake push or reasoning. It gives little benefit to a town player and a bunch to a scum player.

Town start at a information disadvantage. It seems real scummy to not only not want more information out there but to present such info as helpful advice. Unless you think there is a trap vote on page 2?

Also this insulting response is quite unbecoming of a town player as well.

tl;dr you presented advice that is bad at best and scum at worst and have offered no good reason for it.

[Child]

Also, did you read the rest of my posts where I expand on that a bit and still not understand, or did you get to the first thing that hurt your head and stop there?

Allowing people to vote without reason opens the door for scum to skate by without having to at least put in the effort of a fake push or reasoning. It gives little benefit to a town player and a bunch to a scum player.

Town start at a information disadvantage. It seems real scummy to not only not want more information out there but to present such info as helpful advice. Unless you think there is a trap vote on page 2?

Also this insulting response is quite unbecoming of a town player as well.

tl;dr you presented advice that is bad at best and scum at worst and have offered no good reason for it.

It is the very start of the game, i am not sure what are you getting yourself scared over. No one is going to hammer anyone without a proper case either way, and pushing people only helps town to get reads easier.
Looks like a very LAMIST post.
VOTE: nikk

[Child]

Could be you were trying to distract me and still are. Or maybe Alonzo's trying to get me to vote someone on his own wagon. Perhaps both are true.

I'll keep my vote on flippy until he posts something useful.

Votes lose their power when you speak to their intentions.

And you can still hunt among active players while back burnering him until he gets back, there are 2 scumbags in this game...

I'm sorry what?

You aren't making much sense here.

Correct me if i am wrong, but i think Formerfish is trying to say that voting while explaining everything isnt necessary, as scum can react accordingly. If you make a joke vote and tell a player it is a joke vote, the player only reacts to it like a joke vote. If you don't, you can get a better idea on the player's allignment based on their reaction. Or something along these lines.

[Nikk]

Could be you were trying to distract me and still are. Or maybe Alonzo's trying to get me to vote someone on his own wagon. Perhaps both are true.

I'll keep my vote on flippy until he posts something useful.

Votes lose their power when you speak to their intentions.

And you can still hunt among active players while back burnering him until he gets back, there are 2 scumbags in this game...

I'm sorry what?

You aren't making much sense here.

Correct me if i am wrong, but i think Formerfish is trying to say that voting while explaining everything isnt necessary, as scum can react accordingly. If you make a joke vote and tell a player it is a joke vote, the player only reacts to it like a joke vote. If you don't, you can get a better idea on the player's allignment based on their reaction. Or something along these lines.

Do you believe this line of reasoning?

[Nikk]

Also, did you read the rest of my posts where I expand on that a bit and still not understand, or did you get to the first thing that hurt your head and stop there?

Allowing people to vote without reason opens the door for scum to skate by without having to at least put in the effort of a fake push or reasoning. It gives little benefit to a town player and a bunch to a scum player.

Town start at a information disadvantage. It seems real scummy to not only not want more information out there but to present such info as helpful advice. Unless you think there is a trap vote on page 2?

Also this insulting response is quite unbecoming of a town player as well.

tl;dr you presented advice that is bad at best and scum at worst and have offered no good reason for it.

It is the very start of the game, i am not sure what are you getting yourself scared over. No one is going to hammer anyone without a proper case either way, and pushing people only helps town to get reads easier.
Looks like a very LAMIST post.
VOTE: nikk

This is true, and it is early, but I'm confused on the context here. Was Fish pushing someone? I just saw some garbage advice being thrown. Am I misunderstanding this?

[Plotinus]

Poisonchan is being replaced. If they confirm before a replacement is found, they can stay.

[GrandWazoo]

Also, did you read the rest of my posts where I expand on that a bit and still not understand, or did you get to the first thing that hurt your head and stop there?

Allowing people to vote without reason opens the door for scum to skate by without having to at least put in the effort of a fake push or reasoning. It gives little benefit to a town player and a bunch to a scum player.

Town start at a information disadvantage. It seems real scummy to not only not want more information out there but to present such info as helpful advice. Unless you think there is a trap vote on page 2?

Also this insulting response is quite unbecoming of a town player as well.

tl;dr you presented advice that is bad at best and scum at worst and have offered no good reason for it.

It is the very start of the game, i am not sure what are you getting yourself scared over. No one is going to hammer anyone without a proper case either way, and pushing people only helps town to get reads easier.
Looks like a very LAMIST post.
VOTE: nikk

This is true, and it is early, but I'm confused on the context here. Was Fish pushing someone? I just saw some garbage advice being thrown. Am I misunderstanding this?

Most likely Nikk was triggered by Fish's playstyle. Could be scum distancing.

[Formerfish]

Could be you were trying to distract me and still are. Or maybe Alonzo's trying to get me to vote someone on his own wagon. Perhaps both are true.

I'll keep my vote on flippy until he posts something useful.

Votes lose their power when you speak to their intentions.

And you can still hunt among active players while back burnering him until he gets back, there are 2 scumbags in this game...

I'm sorry what?

You aren't making much sense here.

Correct me if i am wrong, but i think Formerfish is trying to say that voting while explaining everything isnt necessary, as scum can react accordingly. If you make a joke vote and tell a player it is a joke vote, the player only reacts to it like a joke vote. If you don't, you can get a better idea on the player's allignment based on their reaction. Or something along these lines.

Ding ding ding!

If I tell someone a vote on them is a pressure vote to get them to post more then all they have to do is post and that vote should come off no issue. If the player voting is doing a reaction test then they would have to with hold the intent of the vote to get a reaction from the player being voted.

This is a simple thing to see and understand. If you feel like I'm being pedantic I can treat you with kids gloves. The you in that sentence is in reference to Nikk.

[Nikk]

Could be you were trying to distract me and still are. Or maybe Alonzo's trying to get me to vote someone on his own wagon. Perhaps both are true.

I'll keep my vote on flippy until he posts something useful.

Votes lose their power when you speak to their intentions.

And you can still hunt among active players while back burnering him until he gets back, there are 2 scumbags in this game...

I'm sorry what?

You aren't making much sense here.

Correct me if i am wrong, but i think Formerfish is trying to say that voting while explaining everything isnt necessary, as scum can react accordingly. If you make a joke vote and tell a player it is a joke vote, the player only reacts to it like a joke vote. If you don't, you can get a better idea on the player's allignment based on their reaction. Or something along these lines.

Ding ding ding!

If I tell someone a vote on them is a pressure vote to get them to post more then all they have to do is post and that vote should come off no issue. If the player voting is doing a reaction test then they would have to with hold the intent of the vote to get a reaction from the player being voted.

This is a simple thing to see and understand. If you feel like I'm being pedantic I can treat you with kids gloves. The you in that sentence is in reference to Nikk.

I don't think you are being pedantic just bad at the game.

[Formerfish]

My record would say otherwise. Also, most people I play with.

[Plotinus]

TTTT replaces Poisonchan! Please welcome them!

[TTTT]

you heard Plot
welcome me!

[YellowSnow]

Your previous record only gets you so far.

This isn't poker. Town should be more transparent. Scum are expected not to be.

[Alonzo]

Welcome TTTT that is a freaky avatar you have there...

[YellowSnow]

Stop insulting my kid.

[TTTT]

Thanks dad

[Alonzo]

Lol

[TTTT]

VOTE: Nikk

This is L-1
that means Nikk is one vote away from being lynched and you better not drop that last vote
until you've first declared your intent and giving everyone time to discuss the lynch

[TTTT]

ok now it's time to read the game

[TTTT]

@Alonzo - was this sarcastic or for-realsies?

Principles.

+1 towncred for GW

[TTTT]

The correct answer is anything you do in the game may require explanation.

I'm afraid you and I may not become BFFs

[TTTT]

@Micc - are you thinking that some of this unnecessary bickering this early on day1 is manufactured?
yeah, me too

[Alonzo]

@Alonzo - was this sarcastic or for-realsies?

Principles.

+1 towncred for GW

For realsies, I would not have been so Impressed had they abandoned their principles on page 2.

[Alonzo]

unnecessary bickering

which posts?