In post 1556, chennisden wrote: In post 1550, Lil Uzi Vert wrote: In post 1457, chennisden wrote:VOTE: skitter
You've been deliberately dragging me out.
My "reason" is because I'm macho. So that's why I initially believe the claim.
Also I believe it's likely there's an rb for scum
I want to buy this and I think I do but we now have the same problem I have with PK and that’s going to bug me to no end. There was no reason to claim here and I think you have a good understanding of why you shouldn’t have unless it was absolutely needed.
The roleblocker theory is interesting but I think the NRG regardless of the setup are opposed to giving scum that role and won’t until sufficient data is shown that towns have improved. Skitter mentioned not finding a single normal of BNL’s. Do you have reviewer meta? I don’t think Performer for ongoing game reasons gives scum a roleblocker.
What do you think of the odds of a jailkeeper?
Given that pisskop voted me and skitter was dragging out my crumbs it really only served mafia
Yeah but I don’t see that though. Skitter began to start considering you due to the way you’ve been insistent on the possibility of Cinn being scum. The coached comment was very head scratching as not enough time has passed to make that conclusion.
I think if she wanted to get you to claim she would’ve attempted to defend Cinnamon and case you in
1376. She instead voted you and shortly after stated that she thinks you’re purposefully playing this way to dictate the pace and control the narrative. She’s doing the latter while she’s talking to Exilon. This is important as I can’t see how you feel she was dragging you out if she wasn’t interacting with you. The only interaction before the claim is the call-out and that isn’t dragging either.
I also don’t think Skitter is dumb enough to try to get you to claim here.