In post 3071, Hopkirk wrote:To repost the list of my townreads:
Hectic- I've played over 600 hours of mafia with him, hydraded with him involving long irl talks, and read him right on every forum game we've played (~4). We can read each other. You're attacking him for inactivity which I can vouch for irl. Your scumread here is shitty as hell.
My issue with Hectic has nothing to do with activity, and it isn't even a scumread per se. I detest all the non-game-relevant wiki shit regardless of who it's coming from. It makes me doubt everything he says. Is your background with him offsite? Would you expect town to just trust meta from somewhere else, not knowing the alignment of the meta source?
Carcalilly- Mason
Bob- I covered some stuff d1. You don't seem to disagree with this.
Garmr- He claimed. I townread him before then which I covered D1.
Yes, I townread Carcalilly without the facepalm Mason stuff.
Bob is kinda in between. I'm nowhere certain on him.
Garmr - My issue with Garmr is very in the open.
JJD- you say you townread him. I explain my townread day 1.
If town, good town. This is a player who can post what he's posting as scum. Therefore not a solid read.
Cliff - I covered d1 after a fairly long interaction.
Rick- you say you townread him. I think I covered my read d1, but it's largely from other people's meta on him.
I don't actually trust either of these. They could be town for reasons that are best left unsaid, but if those reasons aren't true then they're prime candidates for deepscum.
Billy- claim based townread at the moment.
Umm, is this the VT claim? I don't remember. I don't have a strong read either way.
What's so 'shit' about this list which you mostly agree with, and that I mostly covered beforehand?
The scumreads and lack of explanation regarding them.
I can see things have been posted while writing this. I'm gonna go ahead and submit and then read stuff.