Thats not how this works. You say pagetop on the actual pagetop not the post afterIn post 1251, Datisi wrote:Oooooh pagetop
That was sudden
Thats not how this works. You say pagetop on the actual pagetop not the post afterIn post 1251, Datisi wrote:Oooooh pagetop
That was sudden
not necesarilly right nowIn post 1273, Alduskkel wrote:How would it avoid fake claims or pressure scum into mistakes? Also Day 1 is pretty early for setup building.
In post 1265, Alduskkel wrote:nah
you realize it's anti-town to stall a claim, right?In post 1278, Alduskkel wrote:I don't actually feel that pressured tho
provide other reads plz
decisions decisions
In post 813, Menalque wrote:Yeah but it’s kind of conditional on stuffIn post 809, Datisi wrote:You, I was asking because of thisIn post 805, Menalque wrote:I’m not sure if I’m tunnelling or not that’s the problem
Did you read the rest of the thread? Opinion on other slots?
Atm I’d say my lynchpool is (wimpy!slot, al-thingy #1, al-thingy #2, wicked) but depending on flips within that I would probably reevaluate my townreads
In post 973, Menalque wrote:Tbh I’m just really ashamed of how I treated wimpy (rightfully so, I know) and I’m struggling to get back into this game based on that
If wimpy is town then scum is in (wicked, aldu, almi) I think
But if wicked is town then that may need to be re-evaluated
In post 982, Menalque wrote:In post 620, Luca Blight wrote:The whole 'I've done nothing to warrant a scumread on me' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.
You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.
You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.In post 622, Luca Blight wrote:The thread is becoming so clogged full of spam I'm losing track of what the exact arguments are.In post 619, Wimpy wrote:Why are you not voting the player who lied and has clogged the game up pushing that lie?
What was the lie that Menalque has been pushing?In post 628, Luca Blight wrote:I disagree.In post 626, Wimpy wrote:So you have an illogical reason to scum read me because I have literally not done anything to warrant a scum read.In post 620, Luca Blight wrote:The whole 'I've done nothing to warrant a scumread on me' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.
You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.
You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.
Can you point out where Menalque lied, please?In post 645, Luca Blight wrote:Ok, I don't really agree with the argument of either side here - they are both a little on the pedantic side, but what I think is more important it the result of these arguments.
Menalque has been relentlessly pushing his scumread in a way which he might not have had the cause to do so early on as scum, and has done so in a way which reads as genuinely frustrated and believing in his read.
Wimpy on the other hand reads like caught scum who are desperately trying to wriggle free, and then get so far entrenched that they feel they have to commit to their counter-vote. I don't believe Wimpy's confidence in his scumread/s as much as I believe Menalque's.
Thought all of this was town in how he was approaching wimpy!slot and in his reasons for SRing the wimpy defence
I didn’t lie and I liked him trying to get wimpy to clarify that too
Finally although there’s mild equity with scum!wimpy and it very mildly pings me that he said more than once that wimpy he thought had good chances of being scum, he didn’t vote him, I think scum is somewhat more likely to get on there if it’s a buddy
If wimpy is town I think it’s much more likely that scum was avoiding things and letting town eat itself which brings things back to some combination of (wicked, aldu, almi)
In post 990, Menalque wrote:I think pops will probably make it relatively clear if wimpy!slot is town after all and honestly I’m starting to feel that way even if I don’t have good reasons to
I need to reread it but again I’m not really ready to do that yet
If pops is town, then the PoE is good I think
Guess you’ll find out in 14 minutesIn post 1288, Alduskkel wrote:In other words, Menalque won't hammer me, therefore I have no reason to claim.
who is who in that gif?
while i don't appreciate you holding this game hostage, i do enjoy this anticipationIn post 1296, Alduskkel wrote:I don't get the point of threatening to hammer someone who clearly doesn't believe you will carry out the threat. And why don't you at least interact with Ico, Menalque?