Please tell me again why you're voting Invisibility in
171.
203: Do you think rb could be Scum and is tunneling Dolly? I agree with the first half of
208, but I'd like you to guess as to why I don't agree with your second half of it. On
218 I think we should talk more about you thinking Dolly should be Townread regarding rb's behavior. I like that you also caught that in
257; want to join me in pressuring this? Not sure I like your
331... Also, why did you join on Jake's wagon in
341? I too would like to see Invisibility expand on
380.
You seem eager to find a reason in
254 to join the Invisibility wagon. I like
402 because I agree with all of it.
443: It can be whatever; don't let people tell you how to play the game. Could you please briefly explain your gut-vote in
455?
491: Regarding Dolly, Invisibility, and Jake, who would you vote if you had to, and why? I think the better reason to vote Dolly would be
442, Billy, if she doesn't explain herself.
Not particularly liking your
151. For the record meta-wise, I never do Mason claims. Although I am still curious why you would target me for that claim.
184: In no way does that make me ObvTown, and I don't think it's reasonable for Town-You to really have that notion this early in the game. I agree with
199. You know, for someone being Scumread for a fake Mason claim, you appear eager to vote Invisibility for a perceived Scumslip (
228).
231: I don't like this.
414: What? I REALLY don't like
442, and I could hammer you right now for it but I want an explanation from you on this. Please explain
514.
515: Noted. Somehow I'm not convinced by
523. I don't like the "reasoning" behind
556. I need you to thoroughly respond to
558 please.
I don't like your vote in
96 because to me it feels opportunistic. Do you currently support Jake's lynch? Regarding
421, how are you reading him currently? On
433 I don't think he's had a completed Scum-game yet, so we don't know alimdia's Scum-meta.
434: Alimdia should not be above scrutiny, and Uzi has done barely anything this game.
Not liking your
122. Sarcasm rarely translates well on text. I agree with
277; a joke Mason claim does not a Scum make. Please tell me more your reasoning behind
379. I like
440.
454: A good question, and not a fair thing to really ask, especially during Day 1.
Please tell me again how Invisibility was quicklynching you in
95. I do however like your response to eth0s in
98. Only Scum self-votes to help themselves, so as Town you should never do that in
102.
111: Are you new to Mafia? I agree with
244. I also agree with
269. I can't agree with
405. I agree there hasn't been much from that slot wrt
411. I agree with
533, in that Dolly does appear to be doing a lot of shade-throwing.
Please elaborate on
224.
225: That presumes you assume he is Town, which is knowledge you should not be having if you are Town. You should make it not a secret regarding
509, Joey.
OK, I do not like
264, because you are way too quick to join the wagon: I want to know why
you
are voting Dolly. I can agree with
450.
I need to hear more from you, Uzi.
I'm not that convinced it was a slip, rb (
142). I wouldn't mind seeing Rex pressured more. So confident you seem in
147. I'm liking the latter half of
156. Unsure the reason for the Dolly vote in
161 but I'm assuming it was a reaction test. I find your overconfidence in
180 disturbing: you know Town is not informed, so if you're uninformed confidence is not something you should have (especially during the early part of Day 1).
181: Obviously if they were to flip Scum you would deal with the consequences. I don't recall getting a reaction from you regarding my
185.
196 seems completely unnecessary. In regards to
213, alimdia shouldn't be Townreading Dolly for that.
221: I'm still not convince Invisibility Scum-slipped, although I've been wrong before. I like that you picked up on that in
272. Regarding
289 I still think pressuring Rex is a good idea.
How well do you fare under pressure as Scum? Your vote on Dolly regarding the fakeclaim is, to me, opportunistic. In
179 you meant fake-claim, not counter-claim, correct...? OK, you corrected yourself. I need you to be very specific regarding why you switched your vote from Dolly to Invisibility in
347. I agree with
382.
503: Good question. Not sure how to read
564.
I agree with
315. I don't agree at all with
349, however. Are you saying in
351 it does or doesn't? I think we should hear more from eth0s in general wrt
381. I can't agree with you on
383: sometimes it's way too difficult to sort players, especially early on.
394 I do agree with.
