Could you elaborate?
Same question.Kanna wrote: If GBJ is scum I think Map is partner
Could you elaborate?
Same question.Kanna wrote: If GBJ is scum I think Map is partner
I sort of disagree because I think scum could easily give reasons for their actions as appeasement. I think we should looking at actions themselves and if they have scum motivationIn post 399, Ph0enix wrote:All of the above is justified if there's a reason for it. So the former.In post 397, Kanna wrote:Do you find him just not providing reasoning scummy and not the actual actions?In post 375, Ph0enix wrote:Providing no reasoning for basically anything he's said so far:In post 373, Kanna wrote:Actually, can I ask why people individually find GBJ scummy?
- the opening vote on Norway
- saying Norway is PR/scum
- Readslist #1
- the vote on Naerys
- Readslist #2
I like Naerys' last post. Keep them coming. Currently scumreading Salad, GBJ and Non. Guys, that's 3 people on D1, doesn't anyone want to address my concerns so that I can narrow it down :/
Wolf's pressure vote on Jackson earlier I still don't like, but at least he has contributed with his other posts; Non's vote to put Jackson at L-1, in combination with the lack of reasoning behind his posts, I particularly don't like.
Norway is obvtown, Datisi is doing townie things plus has more than double posts than me.
So you are okay with GBJ's actions so far?In post 401, Kanna wrote:I sort of disagree because I think scum could easily give reasons for their actions as appeasement. I think we should looking at actions themselves and if they have scum motivationIn post 399, Ph0enix wrote:All of the above is justified if there's a reason for it. So the former.In post 397, Kanna wrote:Do you find him just not providing reasoning scummy and not the actual actions?In post 375, Ph0enix wrote:Providing no reasoning for basically anything he's said so far:In post 373, Kanna wrote:Actually, can I ask why people individually find GBJ scummy?
- the opening vote on Norway
- saying Norway is PR/scum
- Readslist #1
- the vote on Naerys
- Readslist #2
I like Naerys' last post. Keep them coming. Currently scumreading Salad, GBJ and Non. Guys, that's 3 people on D1, doesn't anyone want to address my concerns so that I can narrow it down :/
Wolf's pressure vote on Jackson earlier I still don't like, but at least he has contributed with his other posts; Non's vote to put Jackson at L-1, in combination with the lack of reasoning behind his posts, I particularly don't like.
Fair enough. Define "busser", though, I'm not familiar with that term.In post 402, Kanna wrote:Also about Map;
>defended GBJ + from previous game, I have reason to believe he’s not a busser
> early on, I felt he was more aggressive but his tone has changed
> generally been coasting
Fair as well.Saladman27 wrote: Norway is obvtown, Datisi is doing townie things plus has more than double posts than me.
You are doing great examinations, (especially of me)
GBJ is the Lynch today. Non I already explained.
Rest is null cause I'm too lazy to read them since it was supposed to be a shotgun read list.
Could you explain further about Non? Also, are Salad and Naerys scumreads or?Kanna wrote:Readlist goes;
<Norway>
<Phoenix, Non, Datisi>
<Salad, Naerys>
<GBJ, Map Wolf>
Mostly with emphasis on Norway; I think he’s quite obvtown. Will explain any placements if anyone asks.
No? I just disagree with you saying “GBJ is just scummy because he doesn’t give reasons.” I think GBJ’s actions/motivation is scummyIn post 405, Ph0enix wrote:So you are okay with GBJ's actions so far?In post 401, Kanna wrote:I sort of disagree because I think scum could easily give reasons for their actions as appeasement. I think we should looking at actions themselves and if they have scum motivationIn post 399, Ph0enix wrote:All of the above is justified if there's a reason for it. So the former.In post 397, Kanna wrote:Do you find him just not providing reasoning scummy and not the actual actions?In post 375, Ph0enix wrote:Providing no reasoning for basically anything he's said so far:In post 373, Kanna wrote:Actually, can I ask why people individually find GBJ scummy?
- the opening vote on Norway
- saying Norway is PR/scum
- Readslist #1
- the vote on Naerys
- Readslist #2
I like Naerys' last post. Keep them coming. Currently scumreading Salad, GBJ and Non. Guys, that's 3 people on D1, doesn't anyone want to address my concerns so that I can narrow it down :/
Wolf's pressure vote on Jackson earlier I still don't like, but at least he has contributed with his other posts; Non's vote to put Jackson at L-1, in combination with the lack of reasoning behind his posts, I particularly don't like.
I see. I mean, his lack of posts obviously concerns me as well, but this is what stood out the most.In post 407, Kanna wrote:No? I just disagree with you saying “GBJ is just scummy because he doesn’t give reasons.” I think GBJ’s actions/motivation is scummyIn post 405, Ph0enix wrote:So you are okay with GBJ's actions so far?In post 401, Kanna wrote:I sort of disagree because I think scum could easily give reasons for their actions as appeasement. I think we should looking at actions themselves and if they have scum motivationIn post 399, Ph0enix wrote:All of the above is justified if there's a reason for it. So the former.In post 397, Kanna wrote:Do you find him just not providing reasoning scummy and not the actual actions?In post 375, Ph0enix wrote:Providing no reasoning for basically anything he's said so far:In post 373, Kanna wrote:Actually, can I ask why people individually find GBJ scummy?
- the opening vote on Norway
- saying Norway is PR/scum
- Readslist #1
- the vote on Naerys
- Readslist #2
I like Naerys' last post. Keep them coming. Currently scumreading Salad, GBJ and Non. Guys, that's 3 people on D1, doesn't anyone want to address my concerns so that I can narrow it down :/
Wolf's pressure vote on Jackson earlier I still don't like, but at least he has contributed with his other posts; Non's vote to put Jackson at L-1, in combination with the lack of reasoning behind his posts, I particularly don't like.
(omg I got asked a theory question) Bussing is when scum partners distance from each other by shading/SRing/voting so it looks better when one of them flip scum. It’s kind of dangerous though because you’re pushing against your winconIn post 406, Ph0enix wrote:Fair enough. Define "busser", though, I'm not familiar with that term.In post 402, Kanna wrote:Also about Map;
>defended GBJ + from previous game, I have reason to believe he’s not a busser
> early on, I felt he was more aggressive but his tone has changed
> generally been coastingFair as well.Saladman27 wrote: Norway is obvtown, Datisi is doing townie things plus has more than double posts than me.
You are doing great examinations, (especially of me)
GBJ is the Lynch today. Non I already explained.
Rest is null cause I'm too lazy to read them since it was supposed to be a shotgun read list.Could you explain further about Non? Also, are Salad and Naerys scumreads or?Kanna wrote:Readlist goes;
<Norway>
<Phoenix, Non, Datisi>
<Salad, Naerys>
<GBJ, Map Wolf>
Mostly with emphasis on Norway; I think he’s quite obvtown. Will explain any placements if anyone asks.
It's a interesting pet theory, but i'm pretty sure Non Imh is a more likely GBJ partner.In post 410, Kanna wrote:And I did sort of explain before about Non but his play here is very similar to a lot of his games + the last game I
played with him. I don’t see any differences that make me really think he’s scum. Also they’re low TRs. I mostly SR GBJ/Map
err... we're not? why do you say that?In post 414, Non lmh wrote:Assuming GBJ flips green, we're all in agreement that Datisi is scum, yeh? or am I being paranoid and reading subtext wrong again..
I'm genuinely asking btw
No. How about you actually explain why you think this.In post 414, Non lmh wrote:Assuming GBJ flips green, we're all in agreement that Datisi is scum, yeh?