In post 5373, Sherlock and Watson wrote:I don't wanna shut you down TSE but I just don't see how that exchange is even slightly scum indicative for chemist?
If you wanna case chemist off meta/play you can keep doing that but I think he's hard to read and the things I see make me lean town personally
-S
Have you seen the link of that Mafia 451 game I sent you?
It legit is the same thing Chemist is doing here.
Also notice how
@Chemist
Refuses to mention that game.
Because he knows I’m right.
we are entering stupid territory because there is no restriction on what alisae wants to do for all we know e could have 3 traitors or 4 joats and guessing that is kinda
it is what MORIARTY designs after Alisae makes basic rules
And MORIARTY loves lots of duplicate roles in a game
Which suggests A) that there is more than one ascetic, B) that given the small number of ascetic claims there is likely an unclaimed ascetic and that therefore C) the unclaimed ascetic is scum
That, + flipped scum one-shot alien (VERY powerful), suggests that failed night action results can be plausibly scum indicative or at least worth talking about
QED, Pine is maybe more valuable to us alive?
if nothing else, I'd need a rebuttal to simply sacrifice Pine to the Negative Utility gods when I actually think his role might be pro-town in this gamestate?
In post 5387, Espeonage wrote:So you are saying my failed action last night is scum indicative. Because I'm worried about claiming on a false positive.
Pine never survives till Lylo with his role claim which makes him town which simultaneously means we don't want to lynch him which might make him survive to Lylo which we don't want so he should be lynched now but then he's town so why not let him live but then we're keeping negative utility around so he should be lynched but he's then he's town because of claim
In post 5383, Sherlock and Watson wrote:That, + flipped scum one-shot alien (VERY powerful), suggests that failed night action results can be plausibly scum indicative or at least worth talking about
QED, Pine is maybe more valuable to us alive?
if nothing else, I'd need a rebuttal to simply sacrifice Pine to the Negative Utility gods when I actually think his role might be pro-town in this gamestate?
-S
Run that by me again? I am especially dumb tonight. Pine is like super probtown from my pov, so articulating some way that his NU is actually...not, is very helpful.
One shot alien, alright, that means that yes, said alien could be used on someone who did not claim ascetic, therefore making it a frame vs any night action. I don't see how Pine keeping people as ascetics is a positive effect because of that factor?
-Cerb
In post 5394, Reasonably Rational wrote:One shot alien, alright, that means that yes, said alien could be used on someone who did not claim ascetic, therefore making it a frame vs any night action. I don't see how Pine keeping people as ascetics is a positive effect because of that factor?
it relies on the assumptions that:
a) there is an unclaimed ascetic and that
b) the unclaimed ascetic is scum
which means literally any failed action could be plausibly equivalent to a soft cop guilty