And all townies are reasonable, and scum never are?In post 1221, Drixx wrote:Sure you do. Other people that KM isn't scum reading have weighed in and said that it's reasonable to ask for brief reasoning.
KM's reaction to being asked to share brief explanation of the reads displays no town motivation. That bad reaction continues through gaps of no posts and into consecutive days. KM's reaction is inconsistent with the reasons a town player shares reads in the first place.In post 1220, Something_Smart wrote:- get inside your head so I can understand and hopefully read you betterIn post 1215, Drixx wrote:So can you tell me what you're trying to accomplish here S_S? You're engaging with me pretty heavily in an attempt to defend KM here ... but I've managed basically no traction there while one of the other things I pointed out today is a viable wagon. Like ... I would like to understand what you're trying to accomplish here.
- understand exactly why you think KM is scum so I can either join your push or try to convince you to weaken your read, depending on whether I agree with your reasoning (and it seems pretty shaky right now).
See above. Lack of plausible town motivation.In post 1225, Something_Smart wrote:And all townies are reasonable, and scum never are?In post 1221, Drixx wrote:Sure you do. Other people that KM isn't scum reading have weighed in and said that it's reasonable to ask for brief reasoning.
Look, if you're trying to convince me that KM's being unreasonable, you don't need to, I already came to that conclusion on my own. But if you're trying to convince me she's scum, you need to show a link between unreasonableness and a red role PM, and I'm not sure one exists.
I haven’t read any of their posts yet. I basically started playing on like page 40. >.> sorryIn post 1223, Titus wrote:@Amrun, Thoughts on Black Ranger and tictac?
I hope that this game goes exactly like Wake's Rolemadness did day 1 (minus the gunsmith). Got wagoned D1, got like 6 straight guilties.
Told y’allIn post 1207, Titus wrote:Ok yup tictac is scum. Willing to vote there too.
Easy pocket
Do what you want. I try to be laissez-faire d1.In post 1236, insomnia wrote:Easy pocket
I’m gonna treat you as tree stump as well this game titus
Can I screech at Amrun?
You should check my iso i went after tictac kindaaaaa hard
Nope! I'm commenting on a conversation that's going on between a couple of other players. Nowhere does that discourage people from having reads. If anything it encourages explanations.In post 1149, Kirari Momobami wrote:Yes I doIn post 1147, davesaz wrote:I'm not the one claiming to have a high number of reads.And you don't get to reverse the question like that.
It's midnight:30 for me and past time to sleep. Maybe tomorrow.
You're making a bad faith argument and discouraging people from giving reads
Maybe you have. I had difficulty finding the explanations you're referring to and didn't remember coming across any during normal reading, but as I said it was after midnight.I have given explanations for every read asked of me in good faith
You posted this after I said I was going to sleep. Thanks for paying attention to RL limitations.So now I want your reads with explanations since you decided to take a lazy pot shot at me
Okay, after rereading, I see not wanting to waste time doing something you don't see as useful at that stage of the game to be a plausible town motivation? Not everyone has unlimited time to play the game.In post 1226, Drixx wrote:KM's reaction to being asked to share brief explanation of the reads displays no town motivation.
I mean honestly, I feel like that claim is just self-resolving since he's most likely gonna die early. If he's still alive on like D5 then I'll be concerned. I have no interest in lynching TSE today.In post 934, Almost50 wrote:Mate, stop being surface level (that's me trying to get FL's attention, as I somehow feel he IS ion this game under an alt).In post 854, AaronFrost wrote:Why does scum claim loud bodyguard, a claim which will easily be disproven if he's still alive tomorrow and no one gets the loud message?
Theoretically, he could be Loud ANYTHING (Loud Role Cop for instance). Tomorrow someone IS going to announce they were visited by TSE (or maybe the mod will. I dunno which version of Loud Wake is using). The target will be a Town read slot by most (which will justify why they was "protected"), but the fact is they were targeted by a SCUM ROLE COP and their role is now known to them.
How is that?
Now I'm not saying this must be the case. I am not voting TSE myself. But it bugs me when people go down that route, and YOU OF ALL should know better, having just been SCUM WHO FAKED A ROLE recently yourself.
Probably a combination of joke and real. Definitely not like Dolly Parton's list. I'm in catchup mode so not looking too closely.In post 1165, Hectic wrote:Reads list:
To be fair, I think Kirari is saying she wants to discuss individual reads instead of blanket statements.In post 1177, Drixx wrote:No you haven't. I asked in good faith.In post 1149, Kirari Momobami wrote:Yes I doIn post 1147, davesaz wrote:I'm not the one claiming to have a high number of reads.
It's midnight:30 for me and past time to sleep. Maybe tomorrow.
You're making a bad faith argument and discouraging people from giving reads
I have given explanations for every read asked of me in good faith
So now I want your reads with explanations since you decided to take a lazy pot shot at me
VOTE: dave
pop ins to complain about impressions and reads = you can get voted
PEOPLE NEED TO REMEMBER THIS WHENEVER I FLIP.
What did you like in fonz's posting btw?In post 1154, insomnia wrote:Haven’t read any of their posts except for fonz and he good
lol I've explained every read I've been asked in good faithIn post 1173, Drixx wrote:KM has just refused to give any thinking and reasoning whatsoever,
I haven't felt like you've been snarky at all, I've felt like most of your posts feel like someone annoyed that they are forcing themselves to play the game. I also felt like you more or less fabricated your reasons for pushing me given you didn't wait for me to give explanations for reads before tunneling me for a day while I was asleep and at workIn post 1176, Drixx wrote:You keep referring to my posts as "angry" but I haven't had any strong emotion when reading/posting this game. I've definitely been snarky,
You did not. Town asking in good faith engages on specific reads; you never even made it clear if you disagreed with any part of the list. If I don't even have reads on 33 people in the game why do you think I want to take time to explain my initial gut takes on the 17 people I do have reads on when those reads are constantly shifting?In post 1177, Drixx wrote:No you haven't. I asked in good faith.
I would not have believed this with TSE, but I do believe it for youIn post 1183, Titus wrote:I checked the ISO on this. Loud Bodyguard is pretty self resolving.
OK but I want to see some reads from you, with explanationsIn post 1239, davesaz wrote:Nope! I'm commenting on a conversation that's going on between a couple of other players. Nowhere does that discourage people from having reads. If anything it encourages explanations.
sell me on profii being better than aaron or elsa?In post 1243, Nero Cain wrote:can we lynch profil now?
You could expand on this a little.In post 1178, gobbledygook wrote:Because it’s Pisskop.In post 1167, Hectic wrote:Why is the sole Miller claim in-thread confirmed scum?In post 1166, gobbledygook wrote:What is fake about me calling Pisskop’s Miller claim scum?
———
VOTE: Dolly Parton
Not sure how this other game stuff helps this game.In post 1196, Titus wrote:@Drixx, I probably would have shot you. I would have shot the most likely scum candidate fmpov. In order to have you live to lylo, all of my other suspects would have to be lynched. I play to win and play friendly but I don't directly decide who wins based on friendship (unless a cognitive bias does that). So TDLR, it depends but likely you.