nahIn post 427, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think some three of the most non active people voting baltar shows that he is town
Game is just over 24 hours old
nahIn post 427, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think some three of the most non active people voting baltar shows that he is town
In post 449, NoPowerOverMe wrote:What does sodding mean?
Your defense of his play is noted.In post 450, ready2rock wrote:nahIn post 427, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I think some three of the most non active people voting baltar shows that he is town
Game is just over 24 hours old
How about no because you can both be Scum here.In post 454, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So join me then.
I'm never Scum with anyone except VP and possibly R2R?In post 456, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So could you but I doubt it.
you should be scum with meIn post 457, Quick wrote:I'm never Scum with anyone except VP and possibly R2R?In post 456, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So could you but I doubt it.
LOL, no. I'm not.In post 458, votato wrote:you should be scum with meIn post 457, Quick wrote:I'm never Scum with anyone except VP and possibly R2R?In post 456, NoPowerOverMe wrote:So could you but I doubt it.
Okay, I don't buy this. She could be very well faking that. Time will tell I guess.In post 257, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Where she queestions her read of Blair.In post 256, VP Baltar wrote:Any particular posts or moments where you feel that way?
If I cock my head ever so slightly, I can read this as SvS.In post 122, NoPowerOverMe wrote:You shouldn't "ask yourself to spew town", you should just do things that are pro town rather than go around looking for people that think you are town.In post 118, Blair wrote:So I should have asked myself to spew town as well?
I'm not really following. (Also, THAT definitely would be asking for town cred)
This is a pretty damn good response tbqh.In post 153, votato wrote:@atarashi: no, i don't buy the wagon positioning argument. its kinda silly pre-flip. i just think that your defense of it is even worse, and does not do anything to defend your actions because your defense said "i didnt do x" when the argument was "you thought you did x." You either need to say "i didnt think i did x" or "x isnt bad". you said neither.In post 135, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Where do you get off calling your posts being higher quality than mine?In post 131, votato wrote:first, if you want me to respond to posts other than the one you are currently making, be a lamb and use [post] tags.In post 128, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:Then can you answer my 117 and 119? Like, this whole wagon positioning argument is really weird.In post 127, votato wrote:as someone else said, the important thing is that you thought you did.
second, neither of those posts are addressed to me. you want me to answer them?
NPOM's posts werent memorable at all. partly its probably the lack of avatar (a condition that will result in a scum-read if it persists), but it also suggests a lack of content or quality shitposting.
@NPOM: i said nothing about the quality of my posts. and i didnt say yours were particularly bad either. i just said i didnt remember. if you add an avatar youll be more memorable.
@quick: are you really gonna start deathtunneling me already? its a bit early for that, no? i hope you're gonna bring a different playstyle here.
In post 268, Quick wrote:How do you group those two together?In post 253, NoPowerOverMe wrote:NoPowerOverMe
CantLynchAPuppy
Quick
Nauci
VP Baltar
votato
Atarashi
Blair
not enough content: iDannyboy, Gammagooey, ready2rock, mavsfan, PeterPan
Don't mind me, just dredging up some questions asked to NoPowerOverMe which were never responded to or even commented on by anybody else ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗIn post 337, mavsfan41 wrote:@Quick: most of my reasoning was how you plucked out a post from the past when justifying a vote vs voting at the time of the post. And now you just plucked my post haha.
@Puppy: you have a series of posts 229-231 that was the inception of the Votato interaction (231). Your 229 had a question posed to NPOM. I think the votato read only started cause votato responded first and that’s naturally where the conversation went. Since the 229 post, NPOM has gone quiet and hasn’t actually responded. Wouldn’t this be more suspicious and possibly be seen as NPOM letting another read develop while staying away? Basically what I’m saying is that I think town!votato is more likely to respond where scum would stay back and let something pass.
@NPOM: your Nauci read has developed quite a bit. It goes from RVS with a double down in 92. And still (what I believe is throwing shade) Nauci in 185 to having her as top town read in 253. In those 70 posts, what strikes you as town?
Stop tunneling votato because you are not the type to tunnel? Or are you just having fun in the game at this point?In post 168, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:Also @votato, respond to 157 already
Why are votato and VP both blue?In post 468, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I already said what strikes Nauci as town to me.
There are more parts to that post which you neglectedIn post 468, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I already said what strikes Nauci as town to me.
enlighten me.In post 473, Nauci wrote:There are more parts to that post which you neglectedIn post 468, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I already said what strikes Nauci as town to me.