In post 722, Formerfish wrote:Who were you before?
Yeah, maybe you shouldnt answer questions to other people when clearly you dont understand the question being asked.In post 723, osuka wrote:literally scroll up three messages
In post 722, Formerfish wrote:Who were you before?
Yeah, maybe you shouldnt answer questions to other people when clearly you dont understand the question being asked.In post 723, osuka wrote:literally scroll up three messages
Name seems familiar, but i dont think weve crossed paths prior to this.In post 724, wavesarc wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/memberlist. ... le&u=28557In post 722, Formerfish wrote:Who were you before?
Was this based on statistics or reads?In post 429, CopyKat wrote:I think at least one scum is an SE.
I don't think I understand what this post is saying.In post 460, iamironcat wrote:Personally, I'm not interested in drama regardless of alignment. Mafia is a drama game, but this shit isn't up my alley. I'm blunt and to the point.
Apart from my personal interested, mafia shouldn't be able to talk to each other until at night. So it's not like they can read each other minds and agree beforehand that they should stage a fight.
So again, those claims don't work in this context.
At some point in some conversation with somebody over 2 years ago when I was last active someone told me that formerfish games are wild and I had seen his post counts so I was kind of excited to play with them based on thatIn post 716, osuka wrote:elaborate?In post 698, Nauci wrote:I don't think so; the reaction was by reputationIn post 689, Formerfish wrote:Have we played together before?In post 677, Nauci wrote:Oh boy oh gee a Formerfish game! I swear that wasn't sarcastic I am legit twice as excited now
ah i'm a fucking idiotIn post 725, Formerfish wrote:In post 722, Formerfish wrote:Who were you before?Yeah, maybe you shouldnt answer questions to other people when clearly you dont understand the question being asked.In post 723, osuka wrote:literally scroll up three messages
In post 714, osuka wrote:disclaimer: the following posts are not going to involve a lot of thought so bear with me for a second
I see how you only chastize me for my post which was in response to being called an asshole multiple times in a post.In post 727, Nauci wrote:Okay now that's a level of rudeness which is both totally unwarranted and completely inappropriate for thew Newbie Games section. Inb4 the entire game derails over this kind of thing or we get 4 replacements. The irony of someone saying J"flooding the thread with your vitriol" or "Why the fuck do i want to talk to you if this is how you react to a miscommunication." after accusing them of cunting up a thread is
Rut Roh Shaggy, it's one of those gamesIn post 473, Formerfish wrote:Has anyone ever heard of a Slayer's Gambit?
wouldn't you say cunts and dicks go together more than assholes and cunts? Or is that just false?In post 731, Formerfish wrote:I see how you only chastize me for my post which was in response to being called an asshole multiple times in a post.In post 727, Nauci wrote:Okay now that's a level of rudeness which is both totally unwarranted and completely inappropriate for thew Newbie Games section. Inb4 the entire game derails over this kind of thing or we get 4 replacements. The irony of someone saying J"flooding the thread with your vitriol" or "Why the fuck do i want to talk to you if this is how you react to a miscommunication." after accusing them of cunting up a thread is
Is it ok in your book to call people assholes but not cunts? I felt like since she was the first to call me names that it was fair game, and since cunts and assholes go together, it seemed to fit.
Notice how we also came to blows and we figured out why we were fighting and that it was just a misunderstanding that we squashed. So don't be coming in here tyring to stir shit up that we already buried.
Your reaction was objectively more aggressive and inappropriate, especially for the Newbie queue where that kind of thing would often warrant a warning, and it has the extremely anti-town effect of discouraging people from interacting either with you or with the entire game to the point of considering replacing out. I agree with her assessment that your previous post was also being a jerk but describing a post as assholery is not at all the same thing as the level of vitriol you then escalated with. If you think that's unfair then we should agree to disagree.In post 731, Formerfish wrote:I see how you only chastize me for my post which was in response to being called an asshole multiple times in a post.In post 727, Nauci wrote:Okay now that's a level of rudeness which is both totally unwarranted and completely inappropriate for thew Newbie Games section. Inb4 the entire game derails over this kind of thing or we get 4 replacements. The irony of someone saying J"flooding the thread with your vitriol" or "Why the fuck do i want to talk to you if this is how you react to a miscommunication." after accusing them of cunting up a thread is
Is it ok in your book to call people assholes but not cunts? I felt like since she was the first to call me names that it was fair game, and since cunts and assholes go together, it seemed to fit.
Notice how we also came to blows and we figured out why we were fighting and that it was just a misunderstanding that we squashed. So don't be coming in here tyring to stir shit up that we already buried.
I concur. Since they are written high, they are best enjoyed that way as well.In post 727, Nauci wrote:oh boy the edible was a lot more powerful than I expected and it just kicked in maybe this is the best way to read Formerfish posts
In post 734, Nauci wrote:agree to disagree.
Right, I still want to know what you were trying to accomplish with that.In post 720, Formerfish wrote:Last time you checked was gladiating a thing that could be done in newbie games?In post 719, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Hey, was this a serious attempt at a Thunderdome?
When you find the answer to that question, take it an apply it to your own and you will have your answer.
I was poking a scum read and trying to inject a little levity to my posts because multiple people were reading my words as super fucking serious ones and had been placing me in a certain box because of how they were misreading my words, so that was supposed to be more of a joke, which people still took serious.In post 737, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Right, I still want to know what you were trying to accomplish with that.In post 720, Formerfish wrote:Last time you checked was gladiating a thing that could be done in newbie games?In post 719, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Hey, was this a serious attempt at a Thunderdome?
When you find the answer to that question, take it an apply it to your own and you will have your answer.
Fair enough. There does seem to be a playstyle barrier between you and other players. Is there anything you've seen as scum latching on this game? Sorry if it's been addressed already.In post 738, Formerfish wrote:I was poking a scum read and trying to inject a little levity to my posts because multiple people were reading my words as super fucking serious ones and had been placing me in a certain box because of how they were misreading my words, so that was supposed to be more of a joke, which people still took serious.In post 737, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Right, I still want to know what you were trying to accomplish with that.In post 720, Formerfish wrote:Last time you checked was gladiating a thing that could be done in newbie games?In post 719, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Hey, was this a serious attempt at a Thunderdome?
When you find the answer to that question, take it an apply it to your own and you will have your answer.
Its a way for me to judge how people take me as well. I think scum would latch on to that more than town.
I'm fine with barriers, because when you actually talk to me and try to figure the game out with me then you have a different side of me playing.In post 741, Tuxedo Mask wrote:Fair enough. There does seem to be a playstyle barrier between you and other players. Is there anything you've seen as scum latching on this game? Sorry if it's been addressed already.
Are you asking me why I am still holding on to RVS behavior from Gibus?In post 706, Nauci wrote:So when you first said that, I thought it was good that you were trying to push town out of RVSIn post 345, Freddiethelady wrote:Gibus is sus to me because of all the vote switching and random accusations.
But it's really weird to me that by this point, you're still clutching to RVS behavior from Gibus and even using it to justify a scummy read
IDK, how long did you hold that past post 345?In post 744, Freddiethelady wrote:Are you asking me why I am still holding on to RVS behavior from Gibus?In post 706, Nauci wrote:So when you first said that, I thought it was good that you were trying to push town out of RVSIn post 345, Freddiethelady wrote:Gibus is sus to me because of all the vote switching and random accusations.
But it's really weird to me that by this point, you're still clutching to RVS behavior from Gibus and even using it to justify a scummy read
So... you can't possibly be scum because scum wouldn't possibly be scummy?In post 484, Formerfish wrote:If i were scum, why would I act this way knowing its going to bring heat down on me?
There's at least 1 town between Brass and FFIn post 484, Formerfish wrote:And i agree that stating what im doing does take a little of the bite out of it, but notice i didnt care right away and let everyone in on the plan. I had thought that Brass would have been able to back me up, but again I mistook him for someone else. If he had been who i thought he was then he would have been able to let you guys know you were barking up the wrong tree and could kinda leave me alone to do my thing.
OK but did you quote the strat to explain scummy behavior?In post 484, Formerfish wrote:No, i didnt make this up as a "strat" to explain scummy behavior.