Open 785: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Game over!]


Forum rules
User avatar
northsidegal
northsidegal
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
northsidegal
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11481
Joined: August 23, 2017

Post Post #625 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:10 pm

Post by northsidegal »

Votecount 1.19
Snowblaze
...........
(4):
HoldenGolden (), Menalque (), Ydrasse (), Almost50 ()
Mohab500
............
(3):
Umlaut (), Fredrick A Campbell (), Eevee ()
RCEnigma
............
(2):
Snowblaze (), Mohab500 ()
HoldenGolden
........
(1):
Raya36 ()

Not Voting
..........
(3):
Something_Smart, Chemist1422, RCEnigma ()

With 13 alive, it’s 7 to lynch. The Day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2020-07-14 12:17:59).
Last edited by northsidegal on Mon Jul 13, 2020 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
wiki | modded | Newbie NewD3 Stats | scripts

things fall apart
User avatar
Eevee
Eevee
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Eevee
Goon
Goon
Posts: 349
Joined: May 20, 2020

Post Post #626 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:10 pm

Post by Eevee »

In post 9, Mohab500 wrote:So, I am just wondering some stuff regarding the setup. From what I've read, does scum auto-win once they reach day 5? and why would them getting lynched Day 1 and Day 2 instantly end the game if there are supposed to be 3 players?
In post 51, Mohab500 wrote:meaningless wagon as all wagons are early on. UNVOTE:
In post 124, Mohab500 wrote:I am gonna ask a really dumb question but, can there be power roles in this game?
In post 347, Mohab500 wrote:Can I get some idea of the current wagon? skimmed the last few pages but everything seems so disconnected to me, I am not sure what's going on anymore.
In post 420, Mohab500 wrote:Honestly unsure of what to do at the moment. can someone provide a summary of what the fuck happened in the last few pages? I don't understand what's going on anymore.

From what I understand: push on holden initially makes sense, but seeing as they're apparently V/LA, shouldn't be a cause for a push anymore.
In post 421, Mohab500 wrote:Also really disappointed in the constant replace outs, I know I would've done the same if I had something that made me busy (in fact, I am still considering replacing out atm), but it's hard for me to form any reads properly when the player changes midway.
In post 502, Mohab500 wrote:I would give a speech about not rushing but since we only have three days, I need you guys to speak up. For me, the RCE wagon still seems OK to me. This is fairly hypocritical of me but the low presence or inactive players as well as the replace-outs probably have the bulk of scum in them. I'll evaluate later in more detail and give more precise reads. VOTE: RCEngima for now.
In post 594, Mohab500 wrote:what's even going on anymore lol
all of these posts are scummy imo - confused/lost to excuse lack of content complaining about replace outs and a healthy dose of LAMIST sprinkled in - this doesn't match what town!her is like

this is much more likely to flip scum than Snow i feel - let's vote here please

~Eve
User avatar
Eevee
Eevee
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Eevee
Goon
Goon
Posts: 349
Joined: May 20, 2020

Post Post #627 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:12 pm

Post by Eevee »

In post 624, Something_Smart wrote:I don't know exactly how confident. More than I am in anyone else by far, and enough to vote probably anyone else to keep him from being killed today.

The reason is that draws suspicion onto him in return for having a perfect alibi for being on the wagon. By unvoting, he's not revoking the suspicion-- it still looks like a potentially opportunistic vote-- but he is relinquishing the position on the wagon that was presumably very important to his survival as scum. To get back on the wagon he'd have to pretend to be unimpressed by Snowblaze's content and generate a new excuse, which will draw suspicion.

Also, like, he doesn't want to let up on Snowblaze as scum since he's likely on the chopping block if Snowblaze talks herself down. The unvote shows that he's actually invested in letting her give her defense, so either he's doing it as a play to look good, or he's just town. And being not the most charismatic player I would not expect him to try a reverse psychology play like that when he could go the more direct route of just remaining on and trying to get her hammered, which wouldn't have even made him look bad.
alright cool

~Eve
User avatar
Eevee
Eevee
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Eevee
Goon
Goon
Posts: 349
Joined: May 20, 2020

Post Post #628 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:14 pm

Post by Eevee »

Menalque would be a possible partner for Mohab if she is scum with the way he called her obvlious town when i just don't get that feel really

~Eve
User avatar
Eevee
Eevee
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Eevee
Goon
Goon
Posts: 349
Joined: May 20, 2020

Post Post #629 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:17 pm

Post by Eevee »

here's Mohab's ISO in partition: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go

it's night and day

vote Mohab if you'd like to perform in the play!!!

~Eve
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #630 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:05 pm

Post by Raya36 »

Sorry about the short catch up. Hurt my hand, sucks to type.
In post 516, Menalque wrote:
In post 515, Raya36 wrote:
In post 496, Menalque wrote:
In post 319, Raya36 wrote:I think Fredrick is ok. No slip there. Unless he backpedaled hard and successfully
In post 443, Raya36 wrote:Sorry guys, was really not engaged with this game yet and discouraged when I came in and couldn't find anything to comment on.

VOTE: Fredrick
Going to start off again with this
What was going on here, raya?
Me trying to re-engage myself
Okay but like why did you vote fredrick to do so?
Thought it might go somewhere. It did not.

In post 518, HoldenGolden wrote:
In post 515, Raya36 wrote:
In post 496, Menalque wrote:
In post 319, Raya36 wrote:I think Fredrick is ok. No slip there. Unless he backpedaled hard and successfully
In post 443, Raya36 wrote:Sorry guys, was really not engaged with this game yet and discouraged when I came in and couldn't find anything to comment on.

VOTE: Fredrick
Going to start off again with this
What was going on here, raya?
Me trying to re-engage myself
What do you think of my snow vote.

Engage with me
I agree with your reasoning and I can definitely see that. On a reread of her iso I'm not getting a strong solvey feel.

That said I think this reasoning is true:
In post 530, Snowblaze wrote:
In post 522, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:VOTE: Snowblaze
Is this because of Holden’s post, or because I haven’t posted in a while?

@Holden, if you must try and get me killed, you could at least spell my name right. Anyway: my original vote on Fredrick was more a gut ping than anything else. It’s kind of hard to put it into words, especially a few days later, but I thought he was just opportunistically hopping on wagons.

I unvoted because I thought his remark on scum not having daytalk was a townslip after finding out that scum did have daytalk. Probably should have made that slightly clearer.

As for my post with the RCE vote, that’s probably because I didn’t really have any scumreads (still don’t, I guess). And it wasn’t “why everyone else can’t be scum” it was more “why I don’t want to vote for other people”.
Snow, why can't scum fake that townslip. I see that all the time or scum asking the mod if there's daytalk for example
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #631 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:26 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 606, Snowblaze wrote:Yeah. I’m trying. I was just going to point out that RCE’s vote on me is ringing all kinds of alarm bells.

“I vaguely remember not liking this wagon, and I think other people have done scummy stuff, but I’m fine with eliminating this anyway, we can worry about other stuff tomorrow”.

That just screams “scum trying to push a miselimination through while simultaneously distancing from it” to me.

Other than that, in general I feel like scum are on the latter half of my wagon rather than the early part. I’ll see if I can find what I particularly don’t like.
This is actually suspicious. "Who on your wagon is scum?" then she says the counterwagon lol
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #632 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:26 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 542, Almost50 wrote:
In post 535, Eevee wrote:Almo what do you think of my reasoning here and why does town!RCE make that post?
Because he didn't receive a red PM and didn't even read the rules thoroughly?? I mean, the rules explicitly state:
In post 1, northsidegal wrote:The Mafia win when all living members escape.
There is no mention of "majority" here, so RCE didn't read that (and I'm sure the win con in the role PM is identical because it would be a mod discrepancy if they gave us something in public and something else to scum in private).

Now let's discuss the possibilities: 2 Scum Eliminations on D1/D2 = Scum instant loss
1 Scum Elimination on D1/D2 and they canNOT have a "majority" escaping because NO ONE will escape by the end of D2.
No Scum Elimination on D1/D2 = still can't win by the "start" of D3 because only one scum would escape by the end of D2 and they need to make it through D3 for a second one to escape (and that's EVEN if we assume -somehow- "majority" which I already said was a misconception)

So, RCE was wrong. Plain and simple.

Now let me ask you this: What is the SCUM motive behind this post, given scum daychat is also announced in the rules. If RCE had doubts or was unclear about the rule (which -again- is not possible from my PoV given it's an explicit win con statement) why wouldn't he have asked in the scum PT?
This is a really good post.

UNVOTE: RCE
There isn't any scum motivation for that post unless they were doing it for us to think they're town for that reason. But if so it clearly backfired on them.

In post 547, Eevee wrote:no Almo you don't follow me

RCEngima tried to give the impression he didn't want scum to realise they could kill each other if they hadn't already, and asked a question privately to the mod
but if that's the case, he shouldn't be making that post in the first place since it could possibly alert scum that they can kill each other

the scuminess of that post has nothing to do with the act of misunderstanding the rules - it has everything to do with the intent of the post and the disconnect betweent the thought process behind it and the actual act of making and posting it
you ask for scum motivation? there doesn't need to be a
specific
motivation for that post - the scum motivation for any post like that is to give out content and get yourself not scumread
you and RCE aren't invited to perform for the play - you can still have tickets to view it though

VOTE: RCEnigma

~Eve
VOTE: Eeveee
Seems they're just trying to find a reason to push RCE now (says we need to look at the intent but the only intent that makes sense is town intent), and then they say A50 looks bad too for disagreeing.
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 22616
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He
Location: Rochester, New York

Post Post #633 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:27 pm

Post by Something_Smart »

In post 631, Raya36 wrote:This is actually suspicious. "Who on your wagon is scum?" then she says the counterwagon lol
But she has actual reasoning for it, so it's not a cop-out. And like I pointed out before, she's right that RCE's vote did look bad.
Shame on a martyr claiming friends
From either perspective of &
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #634 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:32 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 633, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 631, Raya36 wrote:This is actually suspicious. "Who on your wagon is scum?" then she says the counterwagon lol
But she has actual reasoning for it, so it's not a cop-out. And like I pointed out before, she's right that RCE's vote did look bad.
Yeah I saw that giant wallpost about RCE from her after. You're right that it's not a cop-out.
I don't want a snow lynch. I'd be ok with RCE since my only reason for townreading is that whole scum killing scum thing that I don't think scum would talk about in thread.
I'd like Eevee but I don't think that would be popular.
I'm not against Mohab.

VOTE: Mohab
I don't think Eevee is gonna happen and if Mohab does flip scum that would be very telling in that regard
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #635 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 2:32 pm

Post by Raya36 »

That's E-3 for Mohab and 15 hours until deadline
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #636 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:00 pm

Post by Menalque »

Why don’t you want a snow lynch Raya? Or more to the point, why do you think snow isn’t scum?
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #637 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:00 pm

Post by Menalque »

In post 635, Raya36 wrote:That's E-3 for Mohab and 15 hours until deadline
This is vaguely disingenuous given that Snow is also at G-3
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #638 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:18 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 636, Menalque wrote:Why don’t you want a snow lynch Raya? Or more to the point, why do you think snow isn’t scum?
I believe Snowblaze's post that I quoted and she stepped it up with that read list and the new burst of effort. I also believe that she will participate much more now based on the reads and the effort shown there and the lack of participation and solving was my main problem originally.
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #639 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:19 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 637, Menalque wrote:
In post 635, Raya36 wrote:That's E-3 for Mohab and 15 hours until deadline
This is vaguely disingenuous given that Snow is also at G-3
Snow is viable as well but I don't want her lynched because I think she is town
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #640 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:08 pm

Post by Menalque »

In post 639, Raya36 wrote:
In post 637, Menalque wrote:
In post 635, Raya36 wrote:That's E-3 for Mohab and 15 hours until deadline
This is vaguely disingenuous given that Snow is also at G-3
Snow is viable as well but I don't want her lynched because I think she is town
Yes but by presenting only mohab it makes her seem like she’s the only person viable to anyone coming into the thread late, when that’s not the situation. Despite your reads you should present the information honestly so that we can see what people chose to do between the two of them on later days with all the information in front of them

I really wish we weren’t deadline guillotining
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #641 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:11 pm

Post by Menalque »

In post 618, Snowblaze wrote:
RCEnigma


I still don't get the initial Porkens vote, but I'm not sure it's strongly AI either way.

The mechanics stuff... I don't really like making reads based on mechanical speculation, but again it seems weird from either alignment. I'm trying to think through this: scum!RCE would have presumably asked the question in the PT before making , otherwise he would have kept it secret in case the answer was yes. At the same time, town!RCE would have wanted to keep it a secret if he didn't already know the answer, since that post is encouraging scum to consider possibilities they might otherwise not have thought of... yeah, I don't think this is getting me any closer to a read, I'll just move on.

is okay, but the kind of solving that would be easy enough for scum to fake.

and - this is the sort of thing I'd be kind of expecting from scum in the gamestate at the time.

- I do get the logic here, but I'm not really sure the information denied to scum outweighs the information denied to town, plus I find it very hard to play without talking about townreads.

- that's actually a valid explanation; personally if I'd had a thought like that and the answer was yes I'd keep my mouth shut about it and hope scum don't have weird enough logic to figure it out, but I guess it makes sense.

- actually not as bad as I originally thought given the context of the post above.

- I appreciate this, and I do feel it's slightly town-AI.

...yup, my reads are a confused mess again. What fun. At least if I'm eliminated I don't have to worry about getting them straight!

I'm getting slight pings in both directions, and I can't really work out whether the town-AI things outweigh the scum-AI things. That being said, I'm keeping my vote firmly where it is in the most-likely-vain-hope of self-preservation.

(By the way, we have plurality elimination at deadline, so you don't need to hammer me (or anyone else) just to get an elimination.)
Oh, I missed this earlier, this is actually very useful to know
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #642 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:12 pm

Post by Menalque »

Fuck, I meant to just quote the last para about plurality
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Umlaut
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5241
Joined: August 3, 2016
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post Post #643 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:13 pm

Post by Umlaut »

Haven't caught up yet, but it looks like my vanity wagon has come a long way!
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
and the other kind,
’ and those who
don’t
say. Well, then there’s me.” — J.R. “Bob” Dobbs
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #644 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:14 pm

Post by Menalque »

I actually don’t love plurality setups because they allow a greater degree of passivity than I’d like and allow people to avoid compromise which I think is quite often useful in determining alignments when looked back at (who compromised and where) but the big plus is not needing to find 3 votes in 12 hours when the people I’d need to make those votes are all p inactive
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #645 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:18 pm

Post by Menalque »

In post 638, Raya36 wrote:
In post 636, Menalque wrote:Why don’t you want a snow lynch Raya? Or more to the point, why do you think snow isn’t scum?
I believe Snowblaze's post that I quoted and she stepped it up with that read list and the new burst of effort. I also believe that she will participate much more now based on the reads and the effort shown there and the lack of participation and solving was my main problem originally.
Which post, you quoted two?

And why does snow making an effort at threat of being lynched make her townie vs her lack of solving earlier?

Also why is effort townie? Snow made walls and tried in her scumgames on site and meta is basically the only reason to TR someone or SR someone for effort
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Snowblaze
Snowblaze
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Snowblaze
Goon
Goon
Posts: 583
Joined: April 15, 2020

Post Post #646 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:36 pm

Post by Snowblaze »

I’m... not dead?

Still tired, but I’ll make myself do those last two ISOs in a couple of hours. In the meantime, VOTE: Mohab500 for self-preservation.
User avatar
Menalque
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Menalque
he/him
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 22775
Joined: May 15, 2019
Pronoun: he/him
Location: Madrid, Spain

Post Post #647 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:42 pm

Post by Menalque »

S_S, chemist, RCE

I’d like it if some combination of you could vote snowblaze at this point to ensure she’s guillotined today
"we knew everything... And we knew nothing."
User avatar
Snowblaze
Snowblaze
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Snowblaze
Goon
Goon
Posts: 583
Joined: April 15, 2020

Post Post #648 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:51 pm

Post by Snowblaze »

In post 647, Menalque wrote:S_S, chemist, RCE

I’d like it if some combination of you could vote snowblaze at this point to ensure she’s guillotined today
I’d like it if you couldn’t :)

(If you think I’m most likely to flip scum, fair enough, I probably won’t be able to change your minds.)
User avatar
Umlaut
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5241
Joined: August 3, 2016
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post Post #649 (ISO) » Mon Jul 13, 2020 6:52 pm

Post by Umlaut »

Menalque, independently of Snowblaze, what is your actual read on Mohab?
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
and the other kind,
’ and those who
don’t
say. Well, then there’s me.” — J.R. “Bob” Dobbs
Locked