In post 1973, Infinity 324 wrote:Hopkirk, I get it, I voted you to try and get the game moving more than anything. I'd definitely hear you out on anything at this point, most of us are pretty lost.
yup
In post 1974, Gloria Cleary wrote:
Without suggesting a counterwagon, this isn’t helpful. Who do you think we should vote for?
It wasn't meant to be. honestly I'm lost at this point. I don't want to take out lurkers as it's LHF and they might get more viable late game, like we've both done previously. If I had to, it would be Jessie right now. simply as my weakest non-lurker read and I suspect that's just because we clash in our style of play and we don't quite vibe with each other. At this stage that's the poorest reason for a vote outside of a nekkid vote. If I'm voting inside the lurkers and nulls I have, I'm rolling a D3 (which I have btw
) or using some loose reasoning between Ydrasse, Gypyx and Dunn.
TGP towncased Gypyx pretty hard, which takes me down to Dunn and Ydrasse. Honestly, I'd call that a coin flip at this point. The vibe from Ydrasse feels good, and I like Dunns defence of himself against TGP.
In post 1978, Ydrasse wrote:erm....
i need to read their content but i'm worried that like, my impressions of them are based entirely on enthusiasm rather than content?
That's fair, let me know what you find. I will happily engage with you on anything you want to discuss {](^_^)[}
In post 1983, Dunnstral wrote:
So when you were pushing me for the first elim, did you have an actual case?
This whole interaction is weird... These two posts both sit weirdly with me.
In post 1985, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:cuz right now it sounds like you just r pissed off I pushed you with in your opinion "nothing" so you're trying to push me with "nothing" right back and that's kind of a bad look for you if you're actually green here cuz you're just straight game throwing.
In post 1986, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I know I'm green, I stated pretty clearly why I thought you are red, people said nah those reasons suck pooky and we ended up elimming someone else instead.
I might be an idiot and wrong but at least I'm trying to play the game to win.
I hate these arguments >.< Everyone here knows they're green because that's how to win. Calling someone out for game throwing because they don't agree is massive AtE and it scumpings me massively :/ I'm really going to have to do the pooky ISO dance aren't I -.-;
In post 1990, team rocket queen wrote:
it's like, hm, yeah there are a few things i've noted but also does this:
In post 1904, skitter30 wrote:did i miss anything other than us trying (and failing) to vote out the mod?
i think ti's time for us to start working on wagons. i am interested in neither dunn nor pooky atm
seem like the post scum!skitter would make in a situation where she could easily just take over the game?
See I like that, it's working with the town to try and get things rolling instead of taking command and being all in peoples faces and DO THIS NOW, VOTE HERE OR DIE!
In post 2003, skitter30 wrote:i'm townreading way too many people
[...]
i don't know how to resolve the too many townreads
[...]
pedit stop that isn't helpful
[...]
Mood.
In post 2004, skitter30 wrote: In post 1930, team rocket queen wrote:
the other is hopkirk. like the calling people scummy thing felt maybe relevant to me, the way pooky was pushing gypyx felt off, didn't like the way the game diversion happened, but all of that i have commented along the way so it feels strange to me that you're like, oh, why? when i voted when push to vote and that's all there, i guess
also, i quite like pooky. asking me that feels ... but eh
can we do hopkirk ?
*swats*
Eugh with this much on hoppy I suspose I'd better stop blind defending and actually look at him properly and confirm my townread instead of just rolling with the townread (˵¯͒〰¯͒˵)
In post 2015, team rocket queen wrote: In post 2013, skitter30 wrote:right i was like 92% sure i actually saw that but couldn't find it when you asked so wasn't sure. yeah that too, i agree
i guess i don't have enough of a mental sample to weigh the mediation stuff. like i know for the communication things if it was the other way, like infinity rewording something gloria had said in an attempt to understand that is more likely to come from town, but infinity rewording infinity idk and the i think this is t/t i think kinda not alignment indicative but i did appreciate infinity trying to explain things to me earlier just the probability stuff and the readslist feel so much like things i do as mafia to me
there's been a few times I've had to reword something, look at our interactions. I feel it's more NAI to reword yourself in most contexts to prevent misunderstandings and provide clarifications. I'm TRing infinity at the moment
---
I know the fluff can be bad, and I really should tone it down a bit but I feel it adds more of me to the game (´⌣`ʃƪ) as do the weird kaomojis
Like infinity I struggle with text so they add how I'm feeling about things and make it more readable apparently {](^_^)[}
Going to catch up on my other games, then I'll ISO someone.
TODO List wrote:
ISO Hopkirk ◔̯◔
ISO Pooky ୧ʕ ⇀ ⌂ ↼ ʔ୨