can you elaborate on where this read comes from?In post 1048, Titus wrote:I would be voting the worst.
or is it all in the mystical Titus VCA
can you elaborate on where this read comes from?In post 1048, Titus wrote:I would be voting the worst.
Lhf to meIn post 1044, JacksonVirgo wrote:Are you saying these are who you want to elim or those that are the general lhf?In post 1042, Dunnstral wrote:ABR, DGB, A50, JacksonVirgo, and recently Titus
hmmm what don't you like about it? im biased because I townread unwnd but I don't see why this kind of post doesn't come from townIn post 1019, AGar wrote:
On that track, would love it if someone would maybe help me out here:In post 840, AGar wrote:Can someone else read 763 and tell me if it feels bad? I cannot separate my thoughts from the fact that I feel I would in fact be a bad yeet because I'm town and I have given very little to work with post-flip up until these last two posts. I go back and forth on unwnd in general because the early push on IV felt contrived and very much trying to shut a town player down from doing something to get them townread, but later posting was fine and consistent. Binning them as null right now because I can't get a handle on the slot, even with a read, an ISO dive, and a re-read.
what don't you like about my Xtoxm read? i said it's a weaker townlean but i don't think any of the reasoning i gave was necessarily "lame"In post 1033, Dunnstral wrote:This is a pretty lame read
It's almost like I've said I'm trying to parse out a read on unwnd because I'm struggling there so I'm noting things.In post 1029, the worst wrote:and?In post 1019, AGar wrote:I am once again disagreeing vehemently with an unwnd post. (Source: 918)
Yep.In post 1036, OkaPoka wrote:gamestate/sanity check
for 42 pages, wagon movement has been awfully slow hasn't it?
I appreciate this.In post 1054, innocentvillager wrote:he's not explicitly suggesting the wagon should/can get quickhammered and I don't think people would do that so early in a more serious game like TM, he's just saying the wagon is good. if you think he's indirectly suggesting you "could" be flipped soon (or cementing that you should be the eventual flip today) and that would be fine then... maybe in isolation that's +scum agenda-y? i think i might see why you're apprehensive about it but to me it leans NAI for the most part.
I mean, I could give you a PBPA of why I'm unimpressed, but you kinda already laid that out. I don't see her making much of a real attempt at solving so far. I'm keenly aware though that I really don't understand Titus particularly well. She's not someone I'm super worried about deepwolfing though.In post 1019, AGar wrote:Mmk. So what do you make of her ISO is actively just avoiding addressing literally anything that has occurred outside of me. I feel like you can muster up more than "unimpressed".
I don't really vibe with the point about "look at me i'm town" for 2 reasons:In post 1059, Cephrir wrote:JV 1016- I see how you can interpret hercule's first couple posts as manipulative to the end of "look at me i'm town" but i think it gets a little confbiased after that because i can't find that same thing everywhere you're seeing it
I am already kinda thinking Winter might be scum, although this post gets so far into the weeds it gets hard for me to follow.
i am semi-consciously trying to find JV as town i think because there seems to be a fair amount of consensus on him for not that much reason. i think i still am just landing on null. i don't think the scum response to their first catchup not working well is to do another one of the same content, but that could just be them freezing up a bit and not knowing how to engage with the game. watch this space?
this is the type of excuse scum posts, i thinkIn post 1026, Winter Flakes wrote:And even if you're basing this entirely off PYP I don't think my play this game has been *that* far off how I played there. Sure, in that game I was a bit more analytical but that's also a given as I hadn't played Mafia for almost a year. As I'm quite a few games in now since coming back, the style is bound to change and I have been experimenting with being more aggressive/blunt.
can you help me see 506 as nai, i still think it's a scumpost. feel free to rebut 510 since i didn't find his rebuttal very convincingIn post 1034, Dunnstral wrote:I still think that everybody jumping on them was preemptive/based on what is nai for himIn post 889, Cephrir wrote:i prefer this to forgetting about it. i don't wanna be like, party's moving to the next house let's forget this ever happened, but that seems to be where the thread is headed.In post 880, the worst wrote:I'm on the fence about how much to say but my team are like assertively undecided on AGar but I don't think I really have an opportunity to advance my read on him atp
And we haven't moved on from that
They had a good post, the vote thing is nitpicking, saying his team could make that post is true but there's no evidence for it, and the original argument wasn't convincing to me
you did see that i put a smile on the warthog right? that's the towntell of the centuryIn post 1045, Dannflor wrote:hi can you expand on your back & forth on Ceph and/or your team mate's uber town read on him?In post 967, the worst wrote:so I'm back & forth on ceph but someone in my team super heavily townreads him. he's also posting a tonne better than he did in a marathon game I was in with him when he was scum - but I also have a fair bit of respect for his like gamestate comprehension & ability to post confidently so I'm biting my tongue a bit there.In post 964, OkaPoka wrote:idk if i have any hottake reads because i suspect most the playerlist might have at most 5 ish reads that aren't outside the bounds of null and there is nowhere near enough consensusIn post 961, the worst wrote:I'd contest that isn't a read but I kinda agree a lot of the more vocal disagreements don't feel particularly manipulative (agar/Titus feels like it has the strongest chance of red atm)
how about like actual player reads? townreads can be hot too
maybe something random like ceph could be scum
who are the 5 outside null reads as you see them? who should we be reconsidering or bumping up/down outside of there?
My personal feeling that's been shared by Jingle is that Ceph has posted enough content where I feel like I should have a decent handle on his alignment by now but I 'm really just coming up with a big cloud of nothing and I can't figure out if that's just a fault with my reading skills or it says something about Ceph's alignment
can you explain what you mean by abr's wagon placement - just that he is not on a relevant wagon? does that diverge from your expectations of his scum game? why would you be voting the worst?In post 1048, Titus wrote:I'll be reading up tomorrow but I have a solid TR on ABR based on his wagon placement here. If I wasn't voting Agar, I would be voting the worst.
to play devil's advocate, do you think that scum!agar's teammates would also tell him to back off?In post 1064, Cephrir wrote:i did really like agar backing off me ill admit. i was thinking of asking his teammates to look at the interaction if he was town because i was so sure they'd tell him he was overreacting and then it happened without my prompting
all of my comments are funny (to myself)In post 1067, Cephrir wrote:the one thing that keeps pinging me about hercule is him posting LMAO after comments that aren't funny
i know this is stupid, shut up
this is legitimately a funny thought to meIn post 1065, hercule wrote:you know, it's probably not a bad idea to take LAMIST as a scumtell for site meta health because we keep getting deepwolfed and our games are exhausting, we could just make everyone cut it out LOL
you guys are going to make me look up what lamist means again aren't youIn post 1065, hercule wrote:you know, it's probably not a bad idea to take LAMIST as a scumtell for site meta health because we keep getting deepwolfed and our games are exhausting, we could just make everyone cut it out LOL
yes, absolutely, which is why i'm hesitant to write the whole thing offIn post 1066, hercule wrote:to play devil's advocate, do you think that scum!agar's teammates would also tell him to back off?In post 1064, Cephrir wrote:i did really like agar backing off me ill admit. i was thinking of asking his teammates to look at the interaction if he was town because i was so sure they'd tell him he was overreacting and then it happened without my prompting
it's Look At Me I'm So Towny, which I'm pretty sure is either a mafiascum or mafiauniverse term, definitely not one I've ever used outside of here LOL (now u have me self-conscious about my LOLs)In post 1070, Cephrir wrote:you guys are going to make me look up what lamist means again aren't youIn post 1065, hercule wrote:you know, it's probably not a bad idea to take LAMIST as a scumtell for site meta health because we keep getting deepwolfed and our games are exhausting, we could just make everyone cut it out LOL
i have to every time it comes up and somehow i never remember
yes, absolutely, which is why i'm hesitant to write the whole thing offIn post 1066, hercule wrote:to play devil's advocate, do you think that scum!agar's teammates would also tell him to back off?In post 1064, Cephrir wrote:i did really like agar backing off me ill admit. i was thinking of asking his teammates to look at the interaction if he was town because i was so sure they'd tell him he was overreacting and then it happened without my prompting
if you'll allow me to pontificate (this is what happens to coffee!hercule), I genuinely wonder if it goes in and out of fashion as a response to site meta at the time. Like, for example, on EpicMafia we have never considered it to be a scumtell. That's just how everyone plays. But we really should start treating it less town-indicative because we have seen back-to-back-to-back deepwolves who utilized it to their advantage. But when it's not prevalent (aka scum doesn't need or have to do it or else they're scumread), then I presume it would go back to being a towntell. And I wonder if it just doesn't cycle like that with the current metaIn post 1072, Cephrir wrote:oh ye.
it seems to go in and out of fashion here which is why i still can't remember it despite my join date
Wagonomics. VCA requires flips.In post 1050, Dannflor wrote:can you elaborate on where this read comes from?In post 1048, Titus wrote:I would be voting the worst.
or is it all in the mystical Titus VCA