I'm going to largely ignore a bullshit solve from 2500 posts ago - but I note that you were suspicious of Oka throughout D1, and it tracks in your ISO.In post 3783, Almost50 wrote:Yes and no. Yes, I am using that now to make the connection between the two for WHEN Ythan flips red, and no because Oka was ALSO a supect of mine for the whole game. See my first proposed solve in 727, followed by ny first posted read list in 730, and -to make a long story short- just to my first post of D2 (3233).In post 3750, AGar wrote:@A50So the theory you're yeeting into the universe is that Oka is scum because Oka is expending energy to push away from a Ythan-buddy yeet, correct?
So, if your question is "Is this your case on Oka?" or "Is thisthereason you SR Oka?" the answer is no. If the question is "Do you think they're Scum together and are providing your reasoning for it?" the answer is yes.
You cite 3233, but in 3233, you have two solves - Ythan and Oka are in distinctly different solves. Now suddenly, even though Oka's behavior towards Ythan has been consistent from towards the end of D1, they're scum together. You're specifically pairing them at this point.
My big issue is you're seemingly tying Oka to an Ythan flip - regardless of your prior suspicions, your wording has changed and you're haranguing Oka and appealing with phrases like "When Ythan flips red." Your vote is on Ythan last I checked. And your continued aggression towards Oka suggests your read on him is becoming more and more hinged on an Ythan flip, that Oka is chainsawing Ythan. These are specific buddying accusations.
So:
1) Why are you not expending literally any energy trying to get a wagon on Ythan pushed further?
2) If your scumread on Oka is independent of Ythan, case it. And explain why you're abandoning your "solves" in 3233 so rapidly.
3) Hypothetically, if Ythan was an IC, how does that impact your opinion of Oka?
I will simply point out that I was one of the votes on the wagon - I know how it happened, and it wasn't seriously moving forward until LLD tried to rally up a wagon. I'm not "wrong again" - you're trying to manipulate what happened based on posts absent context and just pulling what works for you.In post 3796, Almost50 wrote:Wrong again: here's the full VC:In post 3758, AGar wrote:Aaaanyways, the rest of the Ythan wagon didn't kick up until LLD moved to get consolidation amongst those of us on some vanity wagons. Then it petered out around 8 votes, fell apart, and people shifted to Titus.
I mean, technically it did happen after LLD's call for consolidation, but the VC clearly shows it wasn't exactly a consolidation process. (Plua the Titus wagon took off AFTER this)In post 2442, implosion wrote:
3814 - I don't know how anyone could call it "dishonest" to attack mastina for suddenly being unsure of a scumread when asked to vote that scumread given... mastina.