In post 307, Lukewarm wrote: In post 301, Zyla wrote:This still doesn't read as a joke to me, it reads as Xlos breadcrumbing as mason. I think he wanted it to fly under the radar for a bit so that he could deny it if pressed, which he eventually did.
What would scum!Xlos gain from bread crumbing masons with Mix? Masons is a hard thing to fake claim if your supposed mason partner is not your scum partner, and they cannot both be scum at this point.
Honestly, I have no clue at the logic behind it, it's just what it felt like to me.
In post 308, Lukewarm wrote: In post 301, Zyla wrote:After all, he's very specific in saying that T3 isn't his mason partner, not that he isn't a Mason, not that he isn't partnered with T3.
If anything, Xlos leaving that possibility open is a pro-town move. If Xlos is not a PR, but leaves people to think that he might be one, then it can draw the NK with is a good thing.
It was more in context with the other bits that it looked suspicious to me
In post 309, Lukewarm wrote: In post 301, Zyla wrote:Maybe this is just bad math, but for it to be 50% chance of column C, you would have to know at least one of the roles is in the game that can't be in the third column, which only PRs and mafia know.
I am having a hard time finding a solid threw line for your thought processes. Because, you have repeatedly pointed out the possibility of someone being a PR as a reason we should be careful assuming they are scum, but then you don't think the same thing here. What makes this pr chance different then the others?
But it was bad math! ... On my part. My bad Xlos
In post 315, Lukewarm wrote:@Zyla, after I explained how to look at T3's games yourself, how many did you look over to decide that my meta case was not cherry picked?
I ended up looking at the same amount you posted, because I could only find the one scum!t3 game and a lot of t3's games seemed to be expiremental/non-standard
In post 316, Wayward Son wrote: In post 314, Xlos wrote:I would like to see what Wayward Son's and Mix's reads are at the present time. I may change my vote.
I really think it can't be anyone other than Zyla, with an off chance of Egix.
-snip-
@ Zyla If you're town, who do you think is framing you??? Personally I don't see anyone.
Ok, I'm confused, that's a complete 180 from the last read we heard from you
In post 317, Wayward Son wrote:@ Zyla I had multiple pages open and somehow missed
301 until I read it in your ISO. Sorry.
Do you actually think Xlos is trying to frame you? I'm convinced Xlos isn't a Mason.
I never said I was being framed? I don't think the night kill had anything to do with me
In post 318, Wayward Son wrote: In post 311, Xlos wrote:I'm not so sure about Zyla being it. It seems like Lukewarm and Bulge are suspecting her in part because they don't understand her logic, especially Bulge:
@ Zyla This doesn't sound like someone trying to frame you.
Why are you even mentioning framing?
In post 321, Wayward Son wrote:Last post tonight, I promise.
@ Zyla In
253 the first quote is attributed to Luke, but he didn't say that. Do you know how that happened?
I probably had multiple posts quoted and accidentally deleted the wrong opening tag
It's easy enough to change quotes or mess up the formatting tbh
Never in this thread, Zyla wrote:Would y'all believe me if I said that Mix and I are actually masons?
/joke