I applaud your tenacity. I still believe you’re scum and I just hope that SS and Marci also realize this.In post 1673, marcistar wrote:nah theres no quotes in thereIn post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:1. Did Imaginality provide any quotes or generalized reasoning for a partnership between me and Gamma? I'd like to address any that are resonating with you as he's no longer around to discuss with
d5 just seemed like u were trying to push whatevers easiest to convince people on mainly. it seemed like u were keeping ur options open, and not trying to limit those options down at all to find scum. thats what i dont like, and thats what convinced me on u.In post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:2. Can you go into what doesn't seem town about my D5 or any other parts of the game? Again I'd like to address concerns
we were talking about if gamma would be scumIn post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:3. Can you provide context to this? I'm not sure what it's referring to.
i said "he would vote alot quicker if he was town" something like that
he said that someone used that argument against him when the butterfly elim thing was going down
i mentioned how it was u who did that against him.
he didnt mention ur push on gamma at all tho..?In post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:ttention his slot deserves. Nobody else was keeping their options open enough to see he was scum. I've already posted some quotes but can post more in a dedicated post if you need, to showcase my pushing on Gamma and others' "passive" townreading of him.
at that point my thoughts were "brrrng i was wrong somewhere, i dont think kittys partner would lead an elim against them tho" so it went down to process of elimination which made u = scum, so if scum wanted a miselim on imaginality (like he thought it was gonna be)... ur who i think is scum, so u would try to miselim himIn post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:7. Why did you think I would try to get him miseliminated? I briefly flip-flopped end of D3 I think when CB was eliminated, I remember voting him so he would have to vote CB to self-preserve, and I SRed him on D1 some, but aside from those times, as I recall I thought he was actually trying to solve. I think he Cupcake and I have been the most active about solving in this game.
Mini Theme 2217 | Owner's market blitz | Over
Forum rules
- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
That quote you posted also is flipped town explaining why your result on me is, in all likelihood, an actual clear. Now we know more than she did though, as your result being a clear was predicated on scum!VFP's non-ninja partner performing a kill to dodge the jailkeep.In post 1669, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Not the specific quote I was looking for but it’ll do. This is also why SS is town. Gamma was more tr than he was, so it makes absolutely no sense for him to have guiltied Gamma.In post 1328, mastina wrote:Btw RE: the track:
Since scum, presumably, attempted to outbid me on the jailkeeper, but failed, they would know a town player got the jailkeeper.
If the jailkeeper was used to protect, they would assume that it was on Smoke & Mirrors, the more universal townread and loudest voice, which again is why a watch there is convenient.
If the jailkeeper was used offensively rather than defensively, though? Who would the scum think would be blocked? VFP, the person with the ninja and a universal scumread, or the other scum?
OBVIOUSLY, with the scum not having control of the jailkeeper, they would know that IF the jailkeeper were used offensively, that the jailkeeper would be roleblocking VFP, necessitating the non-ninja to perform the nightkill.
Which means that in all probability, the clear on SSBM is in fact a clear. While it's obviously possible scum, knowing that they didn't get the jailkeeper, chose to holster out of fear of the jailkeeper, them deliberately no-killing guarantees the jailkeeper agency; if the jailkeeper was used offensively on VFP, VFP's a guaranteed elimination; if the jailkeeper was used defensively on town, then the town player is cleared from the jailkeeper; this, regardless of an attempt to kill or not.
In other words: scumcouldhave holstered, but they had more reason to take a shot than to not. Meaning that the clear while not absolute, I still trust as being reasonably likely to be correct.
So at this point:
Smoke and Mirrors = marcistar = ssbm >> imaginality >>> Gamma Emerald>Something_Smart >>>>>>>> VFP to me.
We know VFP is town now.
Gamma/S_S: knowing there is a no watcher and there is a tracker, the player more TRed by the tracker would try to kill the JK and expect rhe JK to guard the tracker
Gamma/Kyouko: knowing there is a watcher, a tracker, and a Jailkeeper, either I should kill someone unlikely to be watched using strongman, or Gamma should try to kill the Jailkeeper because the tracker TRs him.
Gamma/S&M: knowing there is a Jailkeeper and a watcher, it doesnt matter who performs the kill as long as they aim for the JK so it cant be stopped. Gamma would attempt this kill in case he gets caught by watcher, because Gamma appears to follow S&M, and S&M is more TRed. So S&M has plausible deniability in this case.She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
D5 is the day S_S guiltied Gamma, so I was keeping options between them open, because we were in mlimlo. Did you mean D4, because I do remember flip flopping a lot on D4. But D4 is when I pushed Gamma. I quoted my push, S&M's reaction to it, and Imaginality's vote on Gamma which immediately follows my case, and put it into a spoiler. You should see soon I think.In post 1673, marcistar wrote:
nah theres no quotes in thereIn post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:1. Did Imaginality provide any quotes or generalized reasoning for a partnership between me and Gamma? I'd like to address any that are resonating with you as he's no longer around to discuss with
d5 just seemed like u were trying to push whatevers easiest to convince people on mainly. it seemed like u were keeping ur options open, and not trying to limit those options down at all to find scum. thats what i dont like, and thats what convinced me on u.In post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:2. Can you go into what doesn't seem town about my D5 or any other parts of the game? Again I'd like to address concerns
we were talking about if gamma would be scumIn post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:3. Can you provide context to this? I'm not sure what it's referring to.
i said "he would vote alot quicker if he was town" something like that
he said that someone used that argument against him when the butterfly elim thing was going down
i mentioned how it was u who did that against him.
he didnt mention ur push on gamma at all tho..?In post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:ttention his slot deserves. Nobody else was keeping their options open enough to see he was scum. I've already posted some quotes but can post more in a dedicated post if you need, to showcase my pushing on Gamma and others' "passive" townreading of him.
at that point my thoughts were "brrrng i was wrong somewhere, i dont think kittys partner would lead an elim against them tho" so it went down to process of elimination which made u = scum, so if scum wanted a miselim on imaginality (like he thought it was gonna be)... ur who i think is scum, so u would try to miselim himIn post 1642, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:7. Why did you think I would try to get him miseliminated? I briefly flip-flopped end of D3 I think when CB was eliminated, I remember voting him so he would have to vote CB to self-preserve, and I SRed him on D1 some, but aside from those times, as I recall I thought he was actually trying to solve. I think he Cupcake and I have been the most active about solving in this game.
Okay, context helps: I think yes that town votes a lot quicker there as the victim of a fake guilty. I used a different argument on Gamma when he voted me on d5 though, that voting me (not voting speed) is just wrong here as there is 100% scum in Gamma and S_S so town!Gamma should only vote S_S.
I did say something like that to Imaginality at the Cupcake deadline on D3, but it is not the same exact thing. Cupcake did not have a guilty on Imaginality. I thought, after seeing Imaginality do that VC that if he were town he should be voting Cupcake, as any unknown flip is better for a town player than their own flip. As it stood, in the VC Imaginality.was.going to die by tiebreak, but if he moved to CB, then CB would have hit the next vote count (I think 3 or 4) before Imaginality if anyone else voted Ima, so I forced him to.vote CB to self-preserve because I was considering CB and Imaginality as a team at that point close to deadline. I was trying to test Imaginality and it was manipulative, but it worked. I got confirmation they weren't teamed, and I came back around to TRing him on D4 when I was floating options and eventually landed on Gamma.
As mentioned, you'll see my D4 Gamma case and Imaginality voting Gamma right after I post it v soon.
Okay so you were wrong somewhere and I was poe scum because kitty's partner wouldn't lead a wagon on them, but as it turns out, kitty's partner did lead a wagon on them, so the poe that pointed to me was based on an assumption that turned out to be incorrect. It sounds like you're saying scum would want to mislim Imaginality, and because I'm scum by poe I would want to mislim him. But if I'm not scum by poe, then someone else could want to mislim him as well,.right? Look at Gamma's and S&M's scumreads: {VFP, Imaginality, Kyouko}. They also were pushing to mislim Imaginality.She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
This is not a lie. I have had 1-shot hitman since day 1, nice try at a dumbtell though lol. I explained how you could have bought the 2-shot hitman for 301, bit here it is again:In post 1661, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:Then you lie and try to give Imaginality the impression that we have hitman, so his roleblock can’t clear us. Then right before the day ends, you actually tell the truth and admit you not only have it but have actually had it since day freaking 1!
What possible town motivation could you have to lie about this? NONE
Gamma buys AD and Tracker and passes the results to you in the scum PT so you can claim them.
You buy Godfather and Hitman so that when Gamma is outed it appears that you can be cleared by a roleblock, which you know Imaginality has if you ADed him N2, because you can see the 500-90=410. It's the same argument as how S_S could have bought hitman, but it's more believable for S_S, because with Watcher, you will know if your partner was ADed before claiming.
It is possible for you to have hitman in your possession, right now. I have demonstrated it to be possible, so it is not, and never was, a lie.She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
You were more TRed than Gamma is why he guiltied Gamma and not you. You had Gamma perform the kill because of that.In post 1669, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:
Not the specific quote I was looking for but it’ll do. This is also why SS is town. Gamma was more tr than he was, so it makes absolutely no sense for him to have guiltied Gamma.In post 1328, mastina wrote:Btw RE: the track:
Since scum, presumably, attempted to outbid me on the jailkeeper, but failed, they would know a town player got the jailkeeper.
If the jailkeeper was used to protect, they would assume that it was on Smoke & Mirrors, the more universal townread and loudest voice, which again is why a watch there is convenient.
If the jailkeeper was used offensively rather than defensively, though? Who would the scum think would be blocked? VFP, the person with the ninja and a universal scumread, or the other scum?
OBVIOUSLY, with the scum not having control of the jailkeeper, they would know that IF the jailkeeper were used offensively, that the jailkeeper would be roleblocking VFP, necessitating the non-ninja to perform the nightkill.
Which means that in all probability, the clear on SSBM is in fact a clear. While it's obviously possible scum, knowing that they didn't get the jailkeeper, chose to holster out of fear of the jailkeeper, them deliberately no-killing guarantees the jailkeeper agency; if the jailkeeper was used offensively on VFP, VFP's a guaranteed elimination; if the jailkeeper was used defensively on town, then the town player is cleared from the jailkeeper; this, regardless of an attempt to kill or not.
In other words: scumcouldhave holstered, but they had more reason to take a shot than to not. Meaning that the clear while not absolute, I still trust as being reasonably likely to be correct.
So at this point:
Smoke and Mirrors = marcistar = ssbm >> imaginality >>> Gamma Emerald>Something_Smart >>>>>>>> VFP to me.
Consider that I'm the last scum: Does Gamma or I perform the kill on the obvious Tracker Mastina? I do, because Gamma is locktowned by S&M who is town in this scenario. Gamma is better positioned to endgame amongst S&M, S_S, Imaginality, and Marci than I am. So if my team was forced to kill tracker mastina, knowing she would not be involved in limlo situations, I would have done the kill so Gamma could endgame.
Consider that S&M is scum: why didn't scum target them on N3 when they had obviously won Tracker? Scum targeted the obvious Tracker on N4 when Mastina won the 2-shot. Why not on N3? Because scum!S&M won the tracker.She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
@MOD
Also yes I'd like extension for S_S's VLA, but it would be a long one. If you gave it:In post 1634, Gypyx wrote:
i'm fine with granting an extension, i'm bad at timezones, but it looks like 2 more days are required?
I think S_S gets back around 4:45 PM on Monday the 19th in Central US time.
Current deadline looks like 1:50 AM on the 18th, so a 2 day extension gives him about 9 hours to come in and post. Maybe a 3 day extension instead? If you cant do that or can only do 2 days, we can still no lim if he doesnt show up in time, as I doubt scum kills here. It's effectively the same as an extension imoShe/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
In post 1680, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:How did Gamma fool you if you were just partners with him?
Also what is your full bidding history @S&M
Pooky has been online and posting in multiple games for the last 2 and a half hours since I posted this question. Obviously Nancy is the main poster in this game, but this is just information I need - Pooky should be able, and has had plenty of time to answer. Nancy stopped posting a few minutes before I posted these, but she hides her login times, as does this hydraIn post 1681, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:And why did you bid 365 on Cop D1?She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- Gypyx
-
Gypyx She/HerVirtute Ex Machina
- Gypyx
She/Her- Virtute Ex Machina
- Virtute Ex Machina
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: March 25, 2020
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: Pain.
B visited CIn post 1653, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@mod can you confirm this night action resolution in thread since there seems to be some confusion?
A tracks B
B kills C
D jailkeeps C
What result does A receive?
-B didn't go anywhere
-No resultbottom text- Gypyx
-
Gypyx She/HerVirtute Ex Machina
- Gypyx
She/Her- Virtute Ex Machina
- Virtute Ex Machina
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: March 25, 2020
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: Pain.
- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
@Marcistar
@S_S
Please take a look. I know I've been posting a lot of walls and it's probably daunting to read it all, but if you read just one of my posts, this is the one that proves S&M is just scum here. A lot of my other posts are conjecture and what-ifs, this is evidence that S&M has been lying about results, which town should never be doing.
There are a lot of long quotes in here but you only need to read what is highlighted ingreenand then my commentary on it below to understand. I left full quotes for context and spoilered it for readability.
tl;dr:
-S&M has flip-floppedbetween claiming "No Result" and "Did not go anywhere" on me
-S&M has lied at least 4-5 times about their PMs with Gypyx, claiming that Gypyx told them that if I had visited Marci on the night Marci was jailkept, that S&M's result would have been useless.
-Gypyx has confirmed publiclythat if S&M tracked me on the night Marci was jailed AND I tried to kill Marci that night, that S&M would have seen me visiting Marci.
Spoiler: S&M's progression on their Tracker result
Spoiler: The mod quote that proves that S&M is lyingShe/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
In post 1688, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@Marcistar
@S_S
Please take a look. I know I've been posting a lot of walls and it's probably daunting to read it all, but if you read just one of my posts, this is the one that proves S&M is just scum here. A lot of my other posts are conjecture and what-ifs, this is evidence that S&M has been lying about results, which town should never be doing.
There are a lot of long quotes in here but you only need to read what is highlighted ingreenand then my commentary on it below to understand. I left full quotes for context and spoilered it for readability.
tl;dr:
-S&M has flip-floppedbetween claiming "No Result" and "Did not go anywhere" on me
-S&M has lied at least 4-5 times about their PMs with Gypyx, claiming that Gypyx told them that if I had visited Marci on the night Marci was jailkept, that S&M's result would have been useless.
-Gypyx has confirmed publiclythat if S&M tracked me on the night Marci was jailed AND I tried to kill Marci that night, that S&M would have seen me visiting Marci.
Spoiler: S&M's progression on their Tracker result
Spoiler: The mod quote that proves that S&M is lying@mod, can you please requote here EXACTLY what you said to me in that pm? I don’t want us to lose the game because Kyouku is misrepresenting what I was told. I asked you specifically what happened wrt to our track if Kyouku visited Marci, and you made it crystal clear our result was meaningless if that occurred. So I don’t know what kind of fuckery Kyouku is alledging but unless you’ve for some reason changed your mind on that, Our”inno” on Kyouku is non-existent.At any rate, @Kyouku, Gamma could have visited Marci, so it doesn’t change my read on you one iota.
I am waiting for either Marci or SS to post. I’m not going to read anymore of your bs posts attempting to frame me.- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
I will try to paraphrase what Gypyx told me:
He basically said, that the only way our result that Kyouku didn’t go anywhere is valid - if she visited Marci - is if you had a ninja ability. Is that correct @mod? And since we know that VFP got 2 shot ninja, it means, our result that Kyouku didn’t go anywhere was invalid.- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
- Gypyx
-
Gypyx She/HerVirtute Ex Machina
- Gypyx
She/Her- Virtute Ex Machina
- Virtute Ex Machina
- Posts: 4816
- Joined: March 25, 2020
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: Pain.
hmmm.... i'm not even sure what PM you're mentionning there, so could you like, simplify things?In post 1689, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:@mod, can you please requote here EXACTLY what you said to me in that pm? I don’t want us to lose the game because Kyouku is misrepresenting what I was told. I asked you specifically what happened wrt to our track if Kyouku visited Marci, and you made it crystal clear our result was meaningless if that occurred. So I don’t know what kind of fuckery Kyouku is alledging but unless you’ve for some reason changed your mind on that, Our”inno” on Kyouku is non-existentbottom text- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
This is saying the only way you could have gotten the result on me that you did get, if I visited Marci, is if I had visited Marci using the Ninja ability. Your result on me (did not go anywhere) is valid, because I did not go anywhere.In post 1690, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:I will try to paraphrase what Gypyx told me:
He basically said, that the only way our result that Kyouku didn’t go anywhere is valid - if she visited Marci - is if you had a ninja ability. Is that correct @mod? And since we know that VFP got 2 shot ninja, it means, our result that Kyouku didn’t go anywhere was invalid.She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- ssbm_Kyouko
-
ssbm_Kyouko Jack of All Trades
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5683
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Location: Middle Tennessee
Which means that if I am the last scum, that Gamma is the one that tried to kill Marci that night.
Ask yourselves, if I were scum, wouldn't I have just used my hitman ability to bypass the jailkeeper? Scum did not have hitman available to them the night the JK protected Marci or they would have used it, so I should be clear in that regard.She/They
"No ssbm is not grudging me. She's one of my favorites on the website, and i wanna say vice versa." - Transcend
The day senpai noticed me^- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
And why did Gamma push us so hard to vote you for MO?In post 1695, Smoke and Mirrors wrote:Gypyx is confusing me, he said we would have seen you visit jk’d Marci.
UNVOTE:
for now.
It’s definitely not us.
I don’t see why scum!SS guilties Gamma and why did Distance say that voting Marci was a scumclaim?
Like even if you didn’t visit Marci, everything still seems to point to you and you pushing us as his buddy really isn’t helping much either, if I’m wrong.
I’m really struggling with how it could possibly not be you.- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
Wait, didn’t you say you had it since D1?In post 1694, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Which means that if I am the last scum, that Gamma is the one that tried to kill Marci that night.
Ask yourselves, if I were scum, wouldn't I have just used my hitman ability to bypass the jailkeeper? Scum did not have hitman available to them the night the JK protected Marci or they would have used it, so I should be clear in that regard.- Smoke and Mirrors
-
Smoke and Mirrors Mafia Scum
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1735
- Joined: October 2, 2020
- marcistar
-
marcistar Mafia Scum
- marcistar
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3328
- Joined: December 18, 2020
- Location: Canada
am i really an obvious kill..? i wouldnt think soIn post 1694, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Ask yourselves, if I were scum, wouldn't I have just used my hitman ability to bypass the jailkeeper? Scum did not have hitman available to them the night the JK protected Marci or they would have used it, so I should be clear in that regard. - marcistar
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Smoke and Mirrors
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Gypyx
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Smoke and Mirrors
- Smoke and Mirrors
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Gypyx
- Gypyx
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Smoke and Mirrors
- ssbm_Kyouko
- Smoke and Mirrors